is tapestry 5 better than all of JSF put together(richfaces vs icefaces+adf+tomahawk+JSF RI etc..)

2008-11-17 Thread hari ks
Also - is appcelerator just a hype?

thanks  Regards,
Hari Sujathan.


  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: is tapestry 5 better than all of JSF put together(richfaces vs icefaces+adf+tomahawk+JSF RI etc..)

2008-11-17 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Yes. (*)

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:43 AM, hari ks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Also - is appcelerator just a hype?

 thanks  Regards,
 Hari Sujathan.




(*) What did you think I would say?

I'm actually not familiar with all of those technologies.  I do know
Icefaces is quite innovative and different.  I think JSF is
fundamentally crippled by being a very slow moving specification
rather than a single framework. However, Tapestry is not the perfect
solution for all cases ... I do think it heavily overlaps *most* of
the cases where people use JSF and I think in the overwhelming
majority of those, the Tapestry application is faster to get up and
running, easier to maintain, and will have better performance and
scalability. Can I back up that statement with numbers?  Sorry, no ...
just with anecdotes from the many, many people I've met who've tried
both JSF and Tapestry.


-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]