Re: maxHttpHeaderSize: InternalNioInputBuffer vs InternalNioOutputBuffer

2011-01-21 Thread Yuesong Wang
Just to confirm, it is a bug in the InputBuffer, not OutputBuffer?

Yuesong

On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:

 On 21/01/2011 00:53, Yuesong Wang wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is there a reason why InternalNioInputBuffer automatically grows its buffer, 
 effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, while 
 InternalNioOutputBuffer doesn't? I was playing around with the setting, and 
 set it to a rather small value. While large requests seem to go through 
 without an issue due to the automatic expansion of the buffer, the response 
 will choke if it's over the maxHttpHeaderSize limit and an 
 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException will be thrown. This lack of response size 
 check/proper error handling in InternalNioOutputBuffer also leads me to 
 believe that it may not be by design?
 
 Looks like a bug in InternalNioInputBuffer to me. Please create a
 bugzilla entry.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Mark
 
 
 This is tomcat 6.0.29 + NIO connector.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Yuesong
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: maxHttpHeaderSize: InternalNioInputBuffer vs InternalNioOutputBuffer

2011-01-21 Thread Yuesong Wang
So the bug is InternalNioInputBuffer not honoring maxHttpHeaderSize?

Yuesong

On Jan 21, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:

 On 21/01/2011 13:55, Yuesong Wang wrote:
 Just to confirm, it is a bug in the InputBuffer, not OutputBuffer?
 
 InputBuffer, yes.
 
 OutputBuffer not so sure. As a minimum, it should be consistent with the
 other connectors. I haven't checked how they behave.
 
 Mark
 
 
 Yuesong
 
 On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
 
 On 21/01/2011 00:53, Yuesong Wang wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is there a reason why InternalNioInputBuffer automatically grows its 
 buffer, effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, while 
 InternalNioOutputBuffer doesn't? I was playing around with the setting, 
 and set it to a rather small value. While large requests seem to go 
 through without an issue due to the automatic expansion of the buffer, the 
 response will choke if it's over the maxHttpHeaderSize limit and an 
 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException will be thrown. This lack of response size 
 check/proper error handling in InternalNioOutputBuffer also leads me to 
 believe that it may not be by design?
 
 Looks like a bug in InternalNioInputBuffer to me. Please create a
 bugzilla entry.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Mark
 
 
 This is tomcat 6.0.29 + NIO connector.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Yuesong
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 



Re: maxHttpHeaderSize: InternalNioInputBuffer vs InternalNioOutputBuffer

2011-01-21 Thread Yuesong Wang
Done:

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50631

Thanks,

Yuesong

On Jan 21, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:

 On 21/01/2011 13:55, Yuesong Wang wrote:
 Just to confirm, it is a bug in the InputBuffer, not OutputBuffer?
 
 InputBuffer, yes.
 
 OutputBuffer not so sure. As a minimum, it should be consistent with the
 other connectors. I haven't checked how they behave.
 
 Mark
 
 
 Yuesong
 
 On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
 
 On 21/01/2011 00:53, Yuesong Wang wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is there a reason why InternalNioInputBuffer automatically grows its 
 buffer, effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, while 
 InternalNioOutputBuffer doesn't? I was playing around with the setting, 
 and set it to a rather small value. While large requests seem to go 
 through without an issue due to the automatic expansion of the buffer, the 
 response will choke if it's over the maxHttpHeaderSize limit and an 
 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException will be thrown. This lack of response size 
 check/proper error handling in InternalNioOutputBuffer also leads me to 
 believe that it may not be by design?
 
 Looks like a bug in InternalNioInputBuffer to me. Please create a
 bugzilla entry.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Mark
 
 
 This is tomcat 6.0.29 + NIO connector.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Yuesong
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Request Line Truncated and Caused 501

2011-01-20 Thread Yuesong Wang
Thanks. I tried 6.0.30, but under heavy load in our production environment, its 
memory usage shot up in a matter of minutes and we had to bring it down. We did 
not see that in 6.0.29.

Yuesong

On Jan 19, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:

 On 19/01/2011 19:54, Yuesong Wang wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have tomcat 6.0.29 configured using the NIO connector running on linux. My 
 access log shows strange 501 errors like this:
 
 Known issue. Fixed in 6.0.30.
 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50072
 
 Mark
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: Request Line Truncated and Caused 501

2011-01-20 Thread Yuesong Wang
Thanks. I think Mark identified the memory problem in 6.0.30. So we will try 
again when a new release is available with the fix. For now we've reverted to 
6.0.20 which seems to be free of both defects.

Yuesong

On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: Yuesong Wang 
 Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:41
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Request Line Truncated and Caused 501
 
 Thanks. I tried 6.0.30, but under heavy load in our 
 production environment, its memory usage shot up in a matter 
 of minutes and we had to bring it down. We did not see that in 6.0.29.
 
 The patch should easily back port.
 
 On Jan 19, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
 
 snip/
 
 Known issue. Fixed in 6.0.30.
 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50072
 
 
 --
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 -   -
 - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
 - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
 - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
 -   -
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



maxHttpHeaderSize: InternalNioInputBuffer vs InternalNioOutputBuffer

2011-01-20 Thread Yuesong Wang
Hi,

Is there a reason why InternalNioInputBuffer automatically grows its buffer, 
effectively ignoring the maxHttpHeaderSize setting, while 
InternalNioOutputBuffer doesn't? I was playing around with the setting, and set 
it to a rather small value. While large requests seem to go through without an 
issue due to the automatic expansion of the buffer, the response will choke if 
it's over the maxHttpHeaderSize limit and an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException 
will be thrown. This lack of response size check/proper error handling in 
InternalNioOutputBuffer also leads me to believe that it may not be by design?

This is tomcat 6.0.29 + NIO connector.

Thanks,

Yuesong
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Request Line Truncated and Caused 501

2011-01-19 Thread Yuesong Wang
Hi,

I have tomcat 6.0.29 configured using the NIO connector running on linux. My 
access log shows strange 501 errors like this:

86.24.156.114 - - [19/Jan/2011:14:41:28 -0500] eferer: /static/r07/sh30.html  
501 1235 - -
41.203.64.251 - - [19/Jan/2011:14:39:18 -0500] ET actual url HTTP/1.1 501 
1220 actual referrer Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; 
WOW64; Trident/4.0; GTB6.6; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET 
CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; CPNTDF; .NET4.0C)

It seems something went wrong while reading the request, and a rather random 
chunk is treated as the request uri. I thought it had to do with the 
maxHttpHeaderSize being too small, and tried to reproduce it but couldn't. I 
suspect the http request itself is malformed, but can't be sure because I can't 
get to the raw request (RequestDumperValve happens after the raw request is 
parsed I think).

Any idea what the problem may be or how to go about investigating this?

Thanks,

Yuesong
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org