FOO / HTTP/1.1
Hi, If I send this to my Tomcat it responds with HTTP/1.1 200 OK and calls my servlet. :-) telnet localhost 8080 FOO / HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost What is this suppost to do? Ronald.
Re: FOO / HTTP/1.1
Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, If I send this to my Tomcat it responds with HTTP/1.1 200 OK and calls my servlet. :-) telnet localhost 8080 FOO / HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost What is this suppost to do? :-) I don't know what is the context, and how you determine that Tomcat is the target, nor how you know that your servlet is being called, but on the face if it, it does exactly what it is supposed to do. From the above, the conclusions that can be drawn are : - there is a webserver on localhost which answers to port 8080 - it has a valid document to return for the URL / - and it is not too picky about HTTP verbs, since it seems to consider FOO as an acceptable alias for GET If you want more information, I am afraid that you will have to supply more details about your configuration, and maybe explain exactly what the question is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: FOO / HTTP/1.1
The question is why Tomcat does not return a 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED error like Apache does? But I already found something. It does give a 501 when I call my servlet which only implements doGet, but when it goes to index.jsp the jsp stuff calls the service() method which doesn't check the http method. Probably this is ok. Ronald. Op maandag, 12 oktober 2009 12:01 schreef André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com: Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, If I send this to my Tomcat it responds with HTTP/1.1 200 OK and calls my servlet. :-) telnet localhost 8080 FOO / HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost What is this suppost to do? :-) I don't know what is the context, and how you determine that Tomcat is the target, nor how you know that your servlet is being called, but on the face if it, it does exactly what it is supposed to do. From the above, the conclusions that can be drawn are : - there is a webserver on localhost which answers to port 8080 - it has a valid document to return for the URL / - and it is not too picky about HTTP verbs, since it seems to consider FOO as an acceptable alias for GET If you want more information, I am afraid that you will have to supply more details about your configuration, and maybe explain exactly what the question is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: FOO / HTTP/1.1
For Servlets - as long as Servlet.service(ServletRequest,ServletResponse) is implemented - you wont see the 501. So thats why you see the 501 for your servlet. JSP's are funny since there is nothing in the spec which restricts the request method. So service(...) is overridden by all JSP's so it will handle GET/POST/HEAD/??? - which isn't necessarily a bad thing since you *could* implement PUT (Or any other valid but typically unused method) in a Servlet and forward to a JSP to render the results. -Tim Ronald Klop wrote: The question is why Tomcat does not return a 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED error like Apache does? But I already found something. It does give a 501 when I call my servlet which only implements doGet, but when it goes to index.jsp the jsp stuff calls the service() method which doesn't check the http method. Probably this is ok. Ronald. Op maandag, 12 oktober 2009 12:01 schreef André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com: Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, If I send this to my Tomcat it responds with HTTP/1.1 200 OK and calls my servlet. :-) telnet localhost 8080 FOO / HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost What is this suppost to do? :-) I don't know what is the context, and how you determine that Tomcat is the target, nor how you know that your servlet is being called, but on the face if it, it does exactly what it is supposed to do. From the above, the conclusions that can be drawn are : - there is a webserver on localhost which answers to port 8080 - it has a valid document to return for the URL / - and it is not too picky about HTTP verbs, since it seems to consider FOO as an acceptable alias for GET If you want more information, I am afraid that you will have to supply more details about your configuration, and maybe explain exactly what the question is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
