Re: urgent : unsubscribe please
I see that your sending addresse is not exactly the same as the one in your signature. Could it be the mailing list tool messed-up with the uppercase? (Yeah i know stupid suggestion, but let's be sure) En l'instant précis du 01/10/07 16:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] s'exprimait dans toute sa noblesse: > Hello, > > Just so you know and maybe the list owners know as well. I have tried to > unsub about 5 times sending to the correct email address and it fails. > Never get a response and I am still on the list. > > Great list, lots of help, just the volume is high and hard to keep up with > sometimes. > > -chrisl > > --- > Christopher M. Lee > Enterprise Server Engineering > Union Bank of California > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 323-720-2031 (phone) > 323-888-0824 (fax) > > > > > > > Mladen Turk > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Tomcat Users List > > s.com> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: urgent : > unsubscribe please > 01/09/2007 11:43 > > PM > > Please respond to > > "Tomcat Users > > List" > > > > > > > > Christian Mennequin wrote: > >> Cordialement, >> >> Christian Mennequin >> Barclays IRCB / DI >> 183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12 >> Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05 >> Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > Please don't behave like an idiot. > > Send an empty email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Mladen. > > - > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ** > This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or > confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, > and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should > delete this communication and/or shred the materials and any attachments and > are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this > communication, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly > prohibited. > > Thank you. > > > - > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: urgent : unsubscribe please
Hello, Just so you know and maybe the list owners know as well. I have tried to unsub about 5 times sending to the correct email address and it fails. Never get a response and I am still on the list. Great list, lots of help, just the volume is high and hard to keep up with sometimes. -chrisl --- Christopher M. Lee Enterprise Server Engineering Union Bank of California [EMAIL PROTECTED] 323-720-2031 (phone) 323-888-0824 (fax) Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Tomcat Users List s.com> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: urgent : unsubscribe please 01/09/2007 11:43 PM Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" Christian Mennequin wrote: > Cordialement, > > Christian Mennequin > Barclays IRCB / DI > 183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12 > Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05 > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please don't behave like an idiot. Send an empty email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mladen. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this communication and/or shred the materials and any attachments and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this communication, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Thank you. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: urgent : unsubscribe please
Christian, To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is included (near the end) in every message from the list. -Bob - Original Message From: Christian Mennequin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Tomcat Users List ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tomcat Users List ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 11:38:51 PM Subject: urgent : unsubscribe please Cordialement, Christian Mennequin Barclays IRCB / DI 183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12 Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org >>>>> To [EMAIL PROTECTED], e-mail: <<<<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: urgent : unsubscribe please
Christian Mennequin wrote: Cordialement, Christian Mennequin Barclays IRCB / DI 183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12 Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please don't behave like an idiot. Send an empty email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mladen. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
urgent : unsubscribe please
Cordialement, Christian Mennequin Barclays IRCB / DI 183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12 Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/01/2007 23:51 Veuillez répondre à "Tomcat Users List" A "Tomcat Users List" cc Objet Re: Best way to include common html Is there actually any real requirements for those html-code portions to be outside of the webapp? If no - move them into the webapp :-) If no - write a custom tag which caches the files via normal FileSystem read and dumps them out in the jsp buffer (of course its better to have a class that caches the binaries and the tags only gets the data from this class, but you haven't asked for details, right?) regards Leon On 1/9/07, Scott Cowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that I can't reference JSP includes from app code if the > included file is outside the app's root. > (At least with the default installation of Tomcat). > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 1:24 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Best way to include common html > > Possibly a framework for templating. Tiles, SiteMesh they are created > for exactly what you are looking for. Of course you can use JSP includes > ... but the frameworks do a better job IMOHO. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Cowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:14 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Best way to include common html > > > What is the best approach to get shared HTML files, (such as header and > footer files) located outside each appBase, > included into an application (.jsp) under Tomcat? > > SSI filter ? > Or some context resource setting ? > > Thanks for any help. > > - s.c., university of utah > > > > - > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ce courriel et ses éventuelles pièces attachées sont confidentiels et ne concernent que le destinataire. Si vous nêtes pas le destinataire ou si vous lavez reçu par erreur, informez en immédiatement lémetteur, effacez le de votre ordinateur et nen faites aucune copie ni diffusion. Ceci sapplique à tout ou partie du document ainsi quaux pièces attachées. La communication à travers le réseau Internet ne présente aucune garantie de sécurité ni de protection contre les virus. Le groupe Barclays nest pas responsable en cas de perte résultant de laction dun tiers par des accès non autorisés, par des interventions sur les moyens de communication ou par la transmission de virus. Barclays se réserve un droit de surveillance sur les réponses qui pourront être faites à ce message. Toute information ou opinion, contenue dans ce courriel ou dans ses pièces attachées, qui serait sans rapport avec lactivité commerciale du groupe Barclays doit être considérée comme personnelle à lémetteur et nengage en aucune façon le groupe Barclays.
urgent : unsubscribe please
Cordialement, Christian Mennequin Barclays IRCB / DI 183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12 Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/01/2007 22:09 Veuillez répondre à "Tomcat Users List" A Tomcat Users List cc Objet Re: Can APR use verisign certs ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert, robert lazarski wrote: > Can I please ask for more assitence ? I'm getting a date error on this > site in both IE6 and firefox 1.5 - 2.0 that I don't understand: > > https://dpt.alphatheory.com/ I receive no warnings or errors of any kind when visiting the above URL. Firefox (2.0.0.1 on winXP) reports a good cert issued and signed by VeriSign with validity dates from 2007-01-07 through 2008-01-09. The encryption being used is AES-256 in my case. MSIE (6.0.2900.2180 on winXP) reports the same information, and says that the "status" is "This certificate is OK" in the Certification Path tab of the Certificate dialog. Oddly enough, double-clicking on the "lock" icon in the status bar of MSIE (or clicking the "Certificates" button from the page properties dialog) /sometimes/ (but not always) results in a message that the cert has expired or is not yet valid. There were never any warnings that came up at any point in either browser. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpAR39CaO5/Lv0PARAtQQAJ9iPLbzFkONgpiinTk8hZrhvAcJ6wCgwYdI 2KDTXJO1K2skpPdCTLx7Krw= =i8lJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To [EMAIL PROTECTED], e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ce courriel et ses éventuelles pièces attachées sont confidentiels et ne concernent que le destinataire. Si vous nêtes pas le destinataire ou si vous lavez reçu par erreur, informez en immédiatement lémetteur, effacez le de votre ordinateur et nen faites aucune copie ni diffusion. Ceci sapplique à tout ou partie du document ainsi quaux pièces attachées. La communication à travers le réseau Internet ne présente aucune garantie de sécurité ni de protection contre les virus. Le groupe Barclays nest pas responsable en cas de perte résultant de laction dun tiers par des accès non autorisés, par des interventions sur les moyens de communication ou par la transmission de virus. Barclays se réserve un droit de surveillance sur les réponses qui pourront être faites à ce message. Toute information ou opinion, contenue dans ce courriel ou dans ses pièces attachées, qui serait sans rapport avec lactivité commerciale du groupe Barclays doit être considérée comme personnelle à lémetteur et nengage en aucune façon le groupe Barclays.
urgent : unsubscribe please
Cordialement, Christian Mennequin Barclays IRCB / DI 183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12 Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/01/2007 22:04 Veuillez répondre à "Tomcat Users List" A "Tomcat Users List" cc Objet Re: Securing Tomcat Article for Review On 1/9/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leon's message says flat out that adding Apache httpd reduces security, > and provides no basis for that statement. A more appropriate statement > might have been that Apache does not add any appreciable measure of > security as Tomcat provides the same kinds of protections against > unauthorized access, etc. Allow to explain this. As other posters already explained puting a httpd in front of tomcat doesn't increase security. The only way it could increase it, would be if it could handle known security issues and protects the tomcat from the usage of such exploits. Personally I don't know of any, and even I did, I would doubt that putting httpd in front would be the best solution, or that httpd can protect something better than a firewall, which is actually desinged to protect. Httpd is not. Can we agree that httpd doesn't increase security now? Now, moving on, if httpd doesn't increase security, it has a) zero impact or b) decreases it. As for option a) (despite I don't believe it) even if it would have zero effect, there is always a possibility for human factor (mistakenly released configs or something). So even with the option a) the solely presence of httpd wouldn't reduce security, it's presence would give more opportunity for the human to fail, and therefor reduce security indirectly. As for option b): httpd is a lot of code. Any contains bugs. So chances are good that httpd will add own bugs to the existing tomcat bugs without hiding some of them. So the overall bug count will increase therefor increasing the number of possbile security-relevant bugs. Therefore decreased security. q.e.d :-) However, puting a firewall in front of any webserver to protect it the host and the server from attacks he can't deal with, seems a very good idea to me :-) best regards Leon - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ce courriel et ses éventuelles pièces attachées sont confidentiels et ne concernent que le destinataire. Si vous nêtes pas le destinataire ou si vous lavez reçu par erreur, informez en immédiatement lémetteur, effacez le de votre ordinateur et nen faites aucune copie ni diffusion. Ceci sapplique à tout ou partie du document ainsi quaux pièces attachées. La communication à travers le réseau Internet ne présente aucune garantie de sécurité ni de protection contre les virus. Le groupe Barclays nest pas responsable en cas de perte résultant de laction dun tiers par des accès non autorisés, par des interventions sur les moyens de communication ou par la transmission de virus. Barclays se réserve un droit de surveillance sur les réponses qui pourront être faites à ce message. Toute information ou opinion, contenue dans ce courriel ou dans ses pièces attachées, qui serait sans rapport avec lactivité commerciale du groupe Barclays doit être considérée comme personnelle à lémetteur et nengage en aucune façon le groupe Barclays.
urgent : unsubscribe please
Cordialement,
Christian Mennequin
Barclays IRCB / DI
183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12
Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/01/2007 21:58
Veuillez répondre à
"Tomcat Users List"
A
Tomcat Users List
cc
Objet
Re: Help with Tomcat 5.5 mod_jk 1.2.20 loadbalancing sticky session issue
This one is easy: you've got a twist in the routing config:
mod_jk: jvm1=port 18007, jvm2=port 18009
Tomcat: jvm1=port 18009, jvm1=port 18007
Hope this helps, have fun with mod_jk :)
Rainer
Carlos Campos schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed one instance of apache 2.2.3 with mod_jk 1.2.20, two
> instances of tomcat 5.5, and Java 1.5.0
>
> I m trying to set up a loadbalancer that supports sticky sessions.
> However what I m getting when i access the test.jsp via
> (http://somedomain.com/carlos.jsp) round robin hits on the tomcats
> setup, with a new session id being created for each access.
>
> 1st hit: sessionId: 11EB9613AAE1BD6E1903CAFEAD9469C4.jvm1
>
> 2nd hit: sessionId: DAA0ECBF06B2A8C4543BEBF61C2C8787.jvm2
>
> 3rd hit: sessionId: 9CF6BCE52886C82E777E1F76917DDCB4.jvm1
>
> and so on
>
> Can anyone point out what I m doing wrong? I m trying to setup the
> system so that the client browser is always sent to the same tomcat
> instance.
> I have tried setting the directive
> "worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=True" as
> "worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1" but I still get the same
> result. I even tried adding: worker.jvm1.domain=jvm1 ,
> worker.jvm2.domain=jvm2. as suggested in some of the threads but that
> didn't help.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Carlos.
>
>
> TEST JSP
>
> <%
>
>HttpSession session22 = request.getSession(false);
>if ( session22 != null )
>{
>String id = session22.getId();
>out.println("sessionId: " + id);
>}
> %>
>
>
>
> JAVA VERSION
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]# java -version
> java version "1.5.0_10"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_10-b03)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_10-b03, mixed mode)
>
>
>
> SOME HTTP DETAILS
> =
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./httpd -V
> Server version: Apache/2.2.3
> Server built: Dec 18 2006 10:56:49
> Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:3
> Server loaded: APR 1.2.7, APR-Util 1.2.7
> Compiled using: APR 1.2.7, APR-Util 1.2.7
> Architecture: 32-bit
> Server MPM: Prefork
> threaded: no
>forked: yes (variable process count)
> Server compiled with
> -D APACHE_MPM_DIR="server/mpm/prefork"
> -D APR_HAS_SENDFILE
> -D APR_HAS_MMAP
> -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled)
> -D APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE
> -D APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
> -D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT
> -D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD
> -D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS
> -D DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=128
> -D HTTPD_ROOT="/usr/httpd"
> -D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/httpd/bin/suexec"
> -D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="logs/httpd.pid"
> -D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status"
> -D DEFAULT_LOCKFILE="logs/accept.lock"
> -D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log"
> -D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="conf/mime.types"
> -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="conf/httpd.conf"
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./httpd -l
> Compiled in modules:
> core.c
> mod_authn_file.c
> mod_authn_default.c
> mod_authz_host.c
> mod_authz_groupfile.c
> mod_authz_user.c
> mod_authz_default.c
> mod_auth_basic.c
> mod_include.c
> mod_filter.c
> mod_log_config.c
> mod_env.c
> mod_setenvif.c
> mod_ssl.c
> prefork.c
> http_core.c
> mod_mime.c
> mod_status.c
> mod_autoindex.c
> mod_asis.c
> mod_cgi.c
> mod_negotiation.c
> mod_dir.c
> mod_actions.c
> mod_userdir.c
> mod_alias.c
> mod_so.c
>
>
>
> HTTPD.CONF
> ==
>
>
> LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
>
>
>
> JkWorkersFile /usr/httpd/conf/extra/workers.properties
> JkLogFile /usr/httpd/logs/mod_jk.log
> JkLogLevel debug
> JkMount /*.jsp loadbalancer
> JkMount /servlet/* loadbalancer
> JkMount /*.xml loadbalancer
> JkMount /jkmanager/* jkstatus
> JkShmFile /usr/httpd/logs/jk.shm
> AddType text/xml .xml
>
>
>
> WORKERS.PROPERTIES
> ==
>
> worker.list=loadbalancer,jkstatus
> worker.maintain=60
>
> worker.jvm1.port=18007
> worker.jvm1.host=localhost
> worker.jvm1.type=ajp13
> worker.jvm1.lbfactor=1
> worker.jvm1.socket_timeout=1
> worker.jvm1.retries=1
> worker.jvm1.domain=jvm1 (I even tried this to see if it would help, but
> it didn't -- removed)
>
> worker.jvm2.port=18009
> worker.jvm2.host=localhost
> worker.jvm2.type=ajp13
> worker.jvm2.lbfactor=1
> worker.jvm2.socket_timeout=1
> worker.jvm2.retries=1
> worker.jvm2.domain=jvm2 (I even tried this to see if it would help, but
> it didn't -- removed)
>
> worker.jkstatus.type=status
> worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
> worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=jvm1,jvm2
> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=True
> worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session_force=False
>
URGENT: UNSUBSCRIBE PLEASE
Cordialement, Christian Mennequin Barclays IRCB / DI 183 avenue Daumesnil 75575 Paris Cedex 12 Phone : 0033 (0)1.55.78.43.05 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] "robert lazarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/01/2007 21:49 Veuillez répondre à "Tomcat Users List" A "Tomcat Users List" cc Objet Re: Can APR use verisign certs ? On 1/9/07, Peter Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: robert lazarski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://alpha-web01.alphatheory.com/atdev/ > > The cert's issued to dpt.alphatheory.com; you're testing connections to > alpha-web01.alphatheory.com. Any sensible browser will scream at that > difference. If they didn't, crackers would be able to get a cert for > www.somesillyname.com, install it on a spare server, poison the DNS for > www.amazon.com and the browsers wouldn't scream as they were redirected. > > You will get errors from every browser with that cert unless/until they > connect to https://dpt.alphatheory.com. > > - Peter > Can I please ask for more assitence ? I'm getting a date error on this site in both IE6 and firefox 1.5 - 2.0 that I don't understand: https://dpt.alphatheory.com/ - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ce courriel et ses éventuelles pièces attachées sont confidentiels et ne concernent que le destinataire. Si vous nêtes pas le destinataire ou si vous lavez reçu par erreur, informez en immédiatement lémetteur, effacez le de votre ordinateur et nen faites aucune copie ni diffusion. Ceci sapplique à tout ou partie du document ainsi quaux pièces attachées. La communication à travers le réseau Internet ne présente aucune garantie de sécurité ni de protection contre les virus. Le groupe Barclays nest pas responsable en cas de perte résultant de laction dun tiers par des accès non autorisés, par des interventions sur les moyens de communication ou par la transmission de virus. Barclays se réserve un droit de surveillance sur les réponses qui pourront être faites à ce message. Toute information ou opinion, contenue dans ce courriel ou dans ses pièces attachées, qui serait sans rapport avec lactivité commerciale du groupe Barclays doit être considérée comme personnelle à lémetteur et nengage en aucune façon le groupe Barclays.
Re: unsubscribe please
use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get more informations ahmed qaoud wrote: I sent many emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to unsubscribe me and i still receive emails from you . Please unsubscribe me or tell me how can i unsubscribe. color=#99>Assalam Alaykum color=#00> Kind Regards Ahmed AL-Qaoud - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unsubscribe please
hotmail is probably eating your unsubscribe request replies. this is a common issue. configure your hotmail account to accept all mail, or at least to not auto-delete the junkmail. you'll probably find the unsubscribe confirmation in your junkmail next time you try. ahmed qaoud wrote: > > I sent many emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to > unsubscribe me and i still receive emails from you . Please unsubscribe > me or tell me how can i unsubscribe. > > color=#99>Assalam Alaykum > color=#00> > Kind > Regards > Ahmed > AL-Qaoud > > > > - > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe please
I sent many emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to unsubscribe me and i still receive emails from you . Please unsubscribe me or tell me how can i unsubscribe. Assalam Alaykum color=#00> Kind Regards Ahmed AL-Qaoud - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
