Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Roberto, sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: Roberto, sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and probably another one for source code. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: Roberto, sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :) From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and probably another one for source code. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: Roberto, sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: Eclipse TomEE Serve modules without publishing
A simple workaround is to create a symlink from the deployed web project to the jsf module project: ln -s ~/workspace/m2m-ram/jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/resources/myjsfcomp ~/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp3/wtpwebapps/myportal/myjsfcomp Tomcat will not follow links by default but you can configure it in the server.xml (e.g. in workspace/Servers/tomee-plus-1.7.0-config/server.xml). Add to context allowLinking=true: Server ... ... Context path=/myportal allowLinking=true ... //Host ... /Server Now if you make changes to your myjsfcomp resources the changes are directly visible obviously without publishing, because the symlink ensures that the used resource files are directly from workspace folder. Technically speaking the changes in the myjsfcomp will take affect faster than the changes to resources from the myportal. :-) So now have fun with fast jsf module developing with TomEE, Eclipse and Maven. Am 01.12.2014 um 15:45 schrieb Alexander Wagner: Hello Comunity, I would like to know if someone use successfully TomEE in Eclipse with the configuration Serve modules without publishing. If it works, is there a special configuration needed? If I start my projects with this option no manged beans seems to be loaded, maybe CDI does not work. I would like to use this option, so that we can make changes to jsf modules without restarting TomEE. Environment: Eclipse Kepler/Luna. TomEE 1.7.0/1 What I found so far: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15575302/technical-details-of-serve-modules-without-publishing-in-eclipse-wtp-and-tomcat https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387733 Not sure at all if this issue relates to this bug entry.. Best regards Alexander Wagner smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Eclipse TomEE Serve modules without publishing
Thanks for the tip. Does it work for Java classes too? 2014-12-11 14:35 GMT-02:00 Alexander Wagner alexander.wag...@inside-m2m.de : A simple workaround is to create a symlink from the deployed web project to the jsf module project: ln -s ~/workspace/m2m-ram/jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/resources/myjsfcomp ~/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst. server.core/tmp3/wtpwebapps/myportal/myjsfcomp Tomcat will not follow links by default but you can configure it in the server.xml (e.g. in workspace/Servers/tomee-plus-1.7.0-config/server.xml). Add to context allowLinking=true: Server ... ... Context path=/myportal allowLinking=true ... //Host ... /Server Now if you make changes to your myjsfcomp resources the changes are directly visible obviously without publishing, because the symlink ensures that the used resource files are directly from workspace folder. Technically speaking the changes in the myjsfcomp will take affect faster than the changes to resources from the myportal. :-) So now have fun with fast jsf module developing with TomEE, Eclipse and Maven. Am 01.12.2014 um 15:45 schrieb Alexander Wagner: Hello Comunity, I would like to know if someone use successfully TomEE in Eclipse with the configuration Serve modules without publishing. If it works, is there a special configuration needed? If I start my projects with this option no manged beans seems to be loaded, maybe CDI does not work. I would like to use this option, so that we can make changes to jsf modules without restarting TomEE. Environment: Eclipse Kepler/Luna. TomEE 1.7.0/1 What I found so far: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15575302/technical- details-of-serve-modules-without-publishing-in-eclipse-wtp-and-tomcat https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387733 Not sure at all if this issue relates to this bug entry.. Best regards Alexander Wagner
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :) From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and probably another one for source code. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: Roberto, sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: Eclipse TomEE Serve modules without publishing
For Java classes fakereplace works but issue is deployment lifecycle is no more respected so not sure it is a good solution Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 17:42 GMT+01:00 Felipe Jaekel fkjae...@gmail.com: Thanks for the tip. Does it work for Java classes too? 2014-12-11 14:35 GMT-02:00 Alexander Wagner alexander.wag...@inside-m2m.de : A simple workaround is to create a symlink from the deployed web project to the jsf module project: ln -s ~/workspace/m2m-ram/jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/resources/myjsfcomp ~/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst. server.core/tmp3/wtpwebapps/myportal/myjsfcomp Tomcat will not follow links by default but you can configure it in the server.xml (e.g. in workspace/Servers/tomee-plus-1.7.0-config/server.xml). Add to context allowLinking=true: Server ... ... Context path=/myportal allowLinking=true ... //Host ... /Server Now if you make changes to your myjsfcomp resources the changes are directly visible obviously without publishing, because the symlink ensures that the used resource files are directly from workspace folder. Technically speaking the changes in the myjsfcomp will take affect faster than the changes to resources from the myportal. :-) So now have fun with fast jsf module developing with TomEE, Eclipse and Maven. Am 01.12.2014 um 15:45 schrieb Alexander Wagner: Hello Comunity, I would like to know if someone use successfully TomEE in Eclipse with the configuration Serve modules without publishing. If it works, is there a special configuration needed? If I start my projects with this option no manged beans seems to be loaded, maybe CDI does not work. I would like to use this option, so that we can make changes to jsf modules without restarting TomEE. Environment: Eclipse Kepler/Luna. TomEE 1.7.0/1 What I found so far: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15575302/technical- details-of-serve-modules-without-publishing-in-eclipse-wtp-and-tomcat https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387733 Not sure at all if this issue relates to this bug entry.. Best regards Alexander Wagner
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
I try. But, it doesn't like me. :( On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :) From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and probably another one for source code. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: Roberto, sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: I try. But, it doesn't like me. :( On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :) From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and probably another one for source code. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: Roberto, sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Thank you Romain. :) On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: I try. But, it doesn't like me. :( On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid : You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :) From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and probably another one for source code. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: Roberto, sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Wow! That was fast! Thank you :) Building now... From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 should be ok now Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : Hi Roberto. you are right, will fix it quickly Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : This one is fixed :) I was looking into some other errors, namely: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation: OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533 Is this correct? Cheers,Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah we need to do something about it :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 hehe love this error: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}] but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}] Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com : It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_ GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha --