Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Roberto.

you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
écrit :

 This one is fixed :)
 I was looking into some other errors, namely:
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink

 And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
 what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
 OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
 org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
 Is this correct?
 Cheers,Roberto
   From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
  To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 Yeah we need to do something about it :)
   From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com


  To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 hehe love this error:

 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console

 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
 but
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
  It does yes
 
  Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
 
  There is only one failing bug with transactions in
  CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
  Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
  now
  with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
 
 
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
  Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.






Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
should be ok now


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
 Hi Roberto.

 you are right, will fix it quickly

 Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
 écrit :

 This one is fixed :)
 I was looking into some other errors, namely:
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink

 And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
 what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
 OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
 org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
 Is this correct?
 Cheers,Roberto
   From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
  To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 Yeah we need to do something about it :)
   From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com


  To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 hehe love this error:

 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console

 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
 but
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
  It does yes
 
  Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
 
  There is only one failing bug with transactions in
  CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
  Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
  now
  with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
 
 
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
  http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
  Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.






Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Roberto Cortez
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
  From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org 
users@tomee.apache.org 
 Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
should be ok now


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau




2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
 Hi Roberto.

 you are right, will fix it quickly

 Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
 écrit :

 This one is fixed :)
 I was looking into some other errors, namely:
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink

 And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
 what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
 OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
 org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
 Is this correct?
 Cheers,Roberto
      From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
  To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 Yeah we need to do something about it :)
      From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com


  To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 hehe love this error:

 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console

 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
 but
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
  It does yes
 
  Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
 
  There is only one failing bug with transactions in
  CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
  Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
  now
  with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
 
 
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
  http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
  Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





  

Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Daniel Cunha
Roberto,

sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
 wrote:

 Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
 Building now...
   From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
  To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org 
 users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 should be ok now


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau




 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
  Hi Roberto.
 
  you are right, will fix it quickly
 
  Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
  écrit :
 
  This one is fixed :)
  I was looking into some other errors, namely:
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
 
  And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
  what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
  OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
  org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
  Is this correct?
  Cheers,Roberto
   From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
   To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  Yeah we need to do something about it :)
   From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 
 
   To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  hehe love this error:
 
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
 
 
 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
  but
 
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
 
 
  Romain Manni-Bucau
  @rmannibucau
  http://www.tomitribe.com
  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
  https://github.com/rmannibucau
 
 
  2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
   It does yes
  
   Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
  
   There is only one failing bug with transactions in
   CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
   Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
 work
   now
   with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
  
  
  
   --
   View this message in context:
  
  
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
   Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 






-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha


Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
 Roberto,

 sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.

 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
 wrote:

 Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
 Building now...
   From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
  To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org 
 users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 should be ok now


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau




 2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
  Hi Roberto.
 
  you are right, will fix it quickly
 
  Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
  écrit :
 
  This one is fixed :)
  I was looking into some other errors, namely:
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
 
  And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
  what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
  OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
  org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
  Is this correct?
  Cheers,Roberto
   From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
   To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  Yeah we need to do something about it :)
   From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 
 
   To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  hehe love this error:
 
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
 
 
 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
  but
 
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
 
 
  Romain Manni-Bucau
  @rmannibucau
  http://www.tomitribe.com
  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
  https://github.com/rmannibucau
 
 
  2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
   It does yes
  
   Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
  
   There is only one failing bug with transactions in
   CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
   Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
 work
   now
   with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
  
  
  
   --
   View this message in context:
  
  
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
   Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 






 --
 Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
 Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
 GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
 LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha


Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:

 TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
  Roberto,
 
  sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
 radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
  wrote:
 
  Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
  Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
   To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org 
  users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  should be ok now
 
 
  Romain Manni-Bucau
  @rmannibucau
  http://www.tomitribe.com
  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
  https://github.com/rmannibucau
 
 
 
 
  2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
   Hi Roberto.
  
   you are right, will fix it quickly
  
   Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
 a
   écrit :
  
   This one is fixed :)
   I was looking into some other errors, namely:
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
  
   And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
 For
   what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
   OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
   org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
   Is this correct?
   Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
  
  
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   hehe love this error:
  
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
  
  
 
 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
   but
  
 
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
  
  
   Romain Manni-Bucau
   @rmannibucau
   http://www.tomitribe.com
   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
   https://github.com/rmannibucau
  
  
   2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 :
It does yes
   
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
   
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
  work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
   
   
   
--
View this message in context:
   
   
 
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
  Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
  GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
  LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha



Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Roberto Cortez
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
  From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
 To: users@tomee.apache.org 
 Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com



On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:

 TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
  Roberto,
 
  sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
 radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
  wrote:
 
  Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
  Building now...
       From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
   To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org 
  users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  should be ok now
 
 
  Romain Manni-Bucau
  @rmannibucau
  http://www.tomitribe.com
  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
  https://github.com/rmannibucau
 
 
 
 
  2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
   Hi Roberto.
  
   you are right, will fix it quickly
  
   Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
 a
   écrit :
  
   This one is fixed :)
   I was looking into some other errors, namely:
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
  
   And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
 For
   what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
   OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
   org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
   Is this correct?
   Cheers,Roberto
        From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
    To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
    Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
    Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   Yeah we need to do something about it :)
        From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
  
  
    To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
    Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
    Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   hehe love this error:
  
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
  
  
 
 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
   but
  
 
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
  
  
   Romain Manni-Bucau
   @rmannibucau
   http://www.tomitribe.com
   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
   https://github.com/rmannibucau
  
  
   2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 :
It does yes
   
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
   
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
  work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
   
   
   
--
View this message in context:
   
   
 
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
  Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
  GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
  LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha


  

Re: Eclipse TomEE Serve modules without publishing

2014-12-11 Thread Alexander Wagner
A simple workaround is to create a symlink from the deployed web project 
to the jsf module project:


ln -s 
~/workspace/m2m-ram/jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/resources/myjsfcomp 
~/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp3/wtpwebapps/myportal/myjsfcomp


Tomcat will not follow links by default but you can configure it in the 
server.xml (e.g. in 
workspace/Servers/tomee-plus-1.7.0-config/server.xml). Add to context 
allowLinking=true:


Server ...
...
  Context path=/myportal allowLinking=true ... //Host
...
/Server

Now if you make changes to your myjsfcomp resources the changes are 
directly visible obviously without publishing, because the symlink 
ensures that the used resource files are directly from workspace folder. 
Technically speaking the changes in the myjsfcomp will take affect 
faster than the changes to resources from the myportal. :-)


So now have fun with fast jsf module developing with TomEE, Eclipse and 
Maven.


Am 01.12.2014 um 15:45 schrieb Alexander Wagner:

Hello Comunity,

I would like to know if someone use successfully TomEE in Eclipse with
the configuration Serve modules without publishing. If it works, is
there a special configuration needed?

If I start my projects with this option no manged beans seems to be
loaded, maybe CDI does not work.

I would like to use this option, so that we can make changes to jsf
modules without restarting TomEE.

Environment: Eclipse Kepler/Luna. TomEE 1.7.0/1

What I found so far:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15575302/technical-details-of-serve-modules-without-publishing-in-eclipse-wtp-and-tomcat


https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387733
Not sure at all if this issue relates to this bug entry..


Best regards
Alexander Wagner






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Eclipse TomEE Serve modules without publishing

2014-12-11 Thread Felipe Jaekel
Thanks for the tip.

Does it work for Java classes too?

2014-12-11 14:35 GMT-02:00 Alexander Wagner alexander.wag...@inside-m2m.de
:

 A simple workaround is to create a symlink from the deployed web project
 to the jsf module project:

 ln -s ~/workspace/m2m-ram/jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/resources/myjsfcomp
 ~/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.
 server.core/tmp3/wtpwebapps/myportal/myjsfcomp

 Tomcat will not follow links by default but you can configure it in the
 server.xml (e.g. in workspace/Servers/tomee-plus-1.7.0-config/server.xml).
 Add to context allowLinking=true:

 Server ...
 ...
   Context path=/myportal allowLinking=true ... //Host
 ...
 /Server

 Now if you make changes to your myjsfcomp resources the changes are
 directly visible obviously without publishing, because the symlink ensures
 that the used resource files are directly from workspace folder.
 Technically speaking the changes in the myjsfcomp will take affect faster
 than the changes to resources from the myportal. :-)

 So now have fun with fast jsf module developing with TomEE, Eclipse and
 Maven.

 Am 01.12.2014 um 15:45 schrieb Alexander Wagner:

  Hello Comunity,

 I would like to know if someone use successfully TomEE in Eclipse with
 the configuration Serve modules without publishing. If it works, is
 there a special configuration needed?

 If I start my projects with this option no manged beans seems to be
 loaded, maybe CDI does not work.

 I would like to use this option, so that we can make changes to jsf
 modules without restarting TomEE.

 Environment: Eclipse Kepler/Luna. TomEE 1.7.0/1

 What I found so far:
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15575302/technical-
 details-of-serve-modules-without-publishing-in-eclipse-wtp-and-tomcat


 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387733
 Not sure at all if this issue relates to this bug entry..


 Best regards
 Alexander Wagner






Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid:
 You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
   From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
  To: users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
 probably another one for source code.

 --
 Jean-Louis Monteiro
 http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
 http://www.tomitribe.com



 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
  Roberto,
 
  sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
 radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
  wrote:
 
  Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
  Building now...
   From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
   To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org 
  users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  should be ok now
 
 
  Romain Manni-Bucau
  @rmannibucau
  http://www.tomitribe.com
  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
  https://github.com/rmannibucau
 
 
 
 
  2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
   Hi Roberto.
  
   you are right, will fix it quickly
  
   Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
 a
   écrit :
  
   This one is fixed :)
   I was looking into some other errors, namely:
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
  
   And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
 For
   what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
   OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
   org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
   Is this correct?
   Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
  
  
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   hehe love this error:
  
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
  
  
 
 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
   but
  
 
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
  
  
   Romain Manni-Bucau
   @rmannibucau
   http://www.tomitribe.com
   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
   https://github.com/rmannibucau
  
  
   2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 :
It does yes
   
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
   
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
  work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
   
   
   
--
View this message in context:
   
   
 
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
  Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
  Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
  GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
  LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha





Re: Eclipse TomEE Serve modules without publishing

2014-12-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
For Java classes fakereplace works but issue is deployment lifecycle
is no more respected so not sure it is a good solution


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-12-11 17:42 GMT+01:00 Felipe Jaekel fkjae...@gmail.com:
 Thanks for the tip.

 Does it work for Java classes too?

 2014-12-11 14:35 GMT-02:00 Alexander Wagner alexander.wag...@inside-m2m.de
 :

 A simple workaround is to create a symlink from the deployed web project
 to the jsf module project:

 ln -s ~/workspace/m2m-ram/jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/resources/myjsfcomp
 ~/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.
 server.core/tmp3/wtpwebapps/myportal/myjsfcomp

 Tomcat will not follow links by default but you can configure it in the
 server.xml (e.g. in workspace/Servers/tomee-plus-1.7.0-config/server.xml).
 Add to context allowLinking=true:

 Server ...
 ...
   Context path=/myportal allowLinking=true ... //Host
 ...
 /Server

 Now if you make changes to your myjsfcomp resources the changes are
 directly visible obviously without publishing, because the symlink ensures
 that the used resource files are directly from workspace folder.
 Technically speaking the changes in the myjsfcomp will take affect faster
 than the changes to resources from the myportal. :-)

 So now have fun with fast jsf module developing with TomEE, Eclipse and
 Maven.

 Am 01.12.2014 um 15:45 schrieb Alexander Wagner:

  Hello Comunity,

 I would like to know if someone use successfully TomEE in Eclipse with
 the configuration Serve modules without publishing. If it works, is
 there a special configuration needed?

 If I start my projects with this option no manged beans seems to be
 loaded, maybe CDI does not work.

 I would like to use this option, so that we can make changes to jsf
 modules without restarting TomEE.

 Environment: Eclipse Kepler/Luna. TomEE 1.7.0/1

 What I found so far:
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15575302/technical-
 details-of-serve-modules-without-publishing-in-eclipse-wtp-and-tomcat


 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387733
 Not sure at all if this issue relates to this bug entry..


 Best regards
 Alexander Wagner






Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Daniel Cunha
I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:

 CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid:
  You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
   To: users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
  probably another one for source code.
 
  --
  Jean-Louis Monteiro
  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
  http://www.tomitribe.com
 
 
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
 rmannibu...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
 
 
  Romain Manni-Bucau
  @rmannibucau
  http://www.tomitribe.com
  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
  https://github.com/rmannibucau
 
 
  2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
   Roberto,
  
   sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
  
   On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
  radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
   wrote:
  
   Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
   Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
 
   users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   should be ok now
  
  
   Romain Manni-Bucau
   @rmannibucau
   http://www.tomitribe.com
   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
   https://github.com/rmannibucau
  
  
  
  
   2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 :
Hi Roberto.
   
you are right, will fix it quickly
   
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez
 radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
  a
écrit :
   
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
   
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
   
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
  For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
 From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
 To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
 From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
   
   
 To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
hehe love this error:
   
   
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
   
   
  
 
 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
   
  
 
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
   
   
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
   
   
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau 
 rmannibu...@gmail.com
  :
 It does yes

 Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :

 There is only one failing bug with transactions in
 CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
 Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
 would
   work
 now
 with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?



 --
 View this message in context:


  
 
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
 Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   --
   Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
   Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
   Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
   GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
   LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
 
 
 




-- 
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha


Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing
code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
 I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(

 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid:
  You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
   To: users@tomee.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
   Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
 
  Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
  probably another one for source code.
 
  --
  Jean-Louis Monteiro
  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
  http://www.tomitribe.com
 
 
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
 rmannibu...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
 
 
  Romain Manni-Bucau
  @rmannibucau
  http://www.tomitribe.com
  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
  https://github.com/rmannibucau
 
 
  2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
   Roberto,
  
   sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
  
   On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
  radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
   wrote:
  
   Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
   Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
 
   users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   should be ok now
  
  
   Romain Manni-Bucau
   @rmannibucau
   http://www.tomitribe.com
   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
   https://github.com/rmannibucau
  
  
  
  
   2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 :
Hi Roberto.
   
you are right, will fix it quickly
   
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez
 radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
  a
écrit :
   
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
   
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
   
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
  For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
 From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
 To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
 From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
   
   
 To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
hehe love this error:
   
   
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
   
   
  
 
 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
   
  
 
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
   
   
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
   
   
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau 
 rmannibu...@gmail.com
  :
 It does yes

 Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :

 There is only one failing bug with transactions in
 CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
 Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
 would
   work
 now
 with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?



 --
 View this message in context:


  
 
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
 Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   --
   Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
   Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
   Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
   GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
   LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
 
 
 




 --
 Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
 Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
 Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
 GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
 LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha


Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

2014-12-11 Thread Daniel Cunha
Thank you Romain. :)

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:

 if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing
 code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw)


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
  I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(
 
  On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
 rmannibu...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
 
 
  Romain Manni-Bucau
  @rmannibucau
  http://www.tomitribe.com
  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
  https://github.com/rmannibucau
 
 
  2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
 :
   You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
 From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
  
   Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list
 and
   probably another one for source code.
  
   --
   Jean-Louis Monteiro
   http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
   http://www.tomitribe.com
  
  
  
   On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau 
  rmannibu...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
  
  
   Romain Manni-Bucau
   @rmannibucau
   http://www.tomitribe.com
   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
   https://github.com/rmannibucau
  
  
   2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
Roberto,
   
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
   
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
   radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
   
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
 From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; 
 users@tomee.apache.org
  
users@tomee.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
should be ok now
   
   
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
   
   
   
   
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau 
 rmannibu...@gmail.com
  :
 Hi Roberto.

 you are right, will fix it quickly

 Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez
  radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
   a
 écrit :

 This one is fixed :)
 I was looking into some other errors, namely:

   
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink

 And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton
 Resources.
   For
 what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
 OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
 org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
 Is this correct?
 Cheers,Roberto
  From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
  To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 Yeah we need to do something about it :)
  From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com


  To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7

 hehe love this error:


   
  
 
 https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console


   
  
 
 expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
 but

   
  
 
 was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau
 http://www.tomitribe.com
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
 https://github.com/rmannibucau


 2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau 
  rmannibu...@gmail.com
   :
  It does yes
 
  Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit
 :
 
  There is only one failing bug with transactions in
  CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
  Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
  would
work
  now
  with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
 
 
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 
   
  
 
 http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
  Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.




   
   
   
   
   
   
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  --