Re: rpc question
Hi all, thanks for all responses. Currently I will solve my problem by rewritting original qooxdoo-rpc-java server to be usable also from wicket. I don't know if my solution is clear, but if I get feeling that it's not bad I will share my code with community. Regards - Petr 2009/9/20 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com: And, if you want access to the session from within your web service, you can wrap the wicket session filter around your servlet, service, etc, so that it has access to Session.get(). There are a quite a few posts on this mailing list that will steer you in the right direction for that. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Eelco Hillenius eelco.hillen...@gmail.comwrote: While you could use Wicket for this, personally I think you're getting close to viewing Wicket as the golden hammer :-) Why not use Jersey for instance. I just used that myself (in a project where the UI is in Wicket), and especially together with Jackson for JSON -- Pojo serialization this seems to work pretty well. It's also part of a standard (JaxRS), which imho should never be the main reason to choose something, but is a nice little extra. Eelco 2009/9/18 Petr Kobalíček kobalicek.p...@gmail.com: Thanks guys, the solution from Pedro ( http://blog.brunoborges.com.br/2008/11/restful-web-services-with-wicket.html ) is very close I talked about. I think that wicket supports to send JSON instead of XML, so I'm going to play with this. I have another question, maybe very OT, can I connect this solution with standard RPC server to check for types, etc? For example with http://jabsorb.org/ ? I'd like to use wicket sessions and request cycle with RPC services, or is my demand stupid (I mean that there are better solutions)? My problem is that I have quite big application in qooxdoo that communicates only through JSON (not strictly RPC). This is used for administration part. And second part of application is pure wicket solution. I'd like to stay with qooxdoo for administration, i like it. Cheers and thanks - Petr 2009/9/18 Marc Ende mli...@e-beyond.de: Hi Petr, sorry, I've misunderstood your mail... :) you've meant the other way round. May be you should try to build a restful webservice. It's also possible with wicket if you decide xml as a resultpage. For example: http://java.dzone.com/news/wicket-creating-restful-urls Am Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:48:01 +0200 schrieb Marc Ende mli...@e-beyond.de: Hi Petr, I think you should use a LoadableDetachableModel. Within the method load() you can execute your call to the webservice or other remote-service. http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html#WorkingwithWicketmodels-DetachableModels yours marc Am Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:20:27 + schrieb Petr Kobalíček kobalicek.p...@gmail.com: Hi list, is there a simple tutorial about making RPC services in wicket? I mean all integrated with wicket RequestCycle and Sessions, ideally that I can expose web services through some Wicket page like class. I'm porting one application and we have admin interface in qooxdoo toolkit (it communicates through json requests). I'd like to hear about wicket solution to this problem. Thanks for possibilities - Petr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
how to control visibility of Border's markup?
I would like to control programmatically the visibility of the border itself, meaning that components within the border are always visible. I can create two different borders and switch between them but it looks too complicated.
RE: Is it a bug that Enclosure is not invoking component resolver to resolve its children?
as far as i rememember there is a collection registered in setttings and then each component can also implement a resolver. the contract can be seen in markupcontainer#rendernext method 1) first walk over the component hierarchy and check if any are resolvers 2) walk over collection of resolvers in the settings as soon as true is returned from resolve iteration is stopped. What method should I override in Enclosure to invoke the above process? It would have to be a method that gets called prior to Enclosure calling getChildComponent() which it does from onComponentBodyTag... does that represent a staging problem? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
keep on getting non-bookmarkable URL with QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy...
Hi, I have mounted a specific page using QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy to a specific URL. Nevertheless, when I use setResponsePage(MyPage.class, pageParams), I keep on getting a URL that has a session-specific parameter with name 'x'. Is there anything I am doing wrong. I just have one parameter in the page parameters that I want to see appearing in the URL. Cheers Erik
Re: post a form to external website
thinking about this now I think it would be very elegant to first do Ajax submit and then in onSubmit() append a Javascript code to change the form's action (and the method too if needed) attribute and submit it. El sáb, 19-09-2009 a las 20:55 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson escribió: If you actually want to redirect them to the other site (with a post, and not just a get), you will just need to render a form and rely on javascript to auto-submit it for you (likely with a click here if not redirected link). The hidden fields could be rendered with attribute modifiers on webmarkupcontainers for example. Or you could use an actual form and override the action URL, but that's probably a little heavy-handed for this. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bgwrote: El vie, 18-09-2009 a las 10:51 +, Vadim Tesis escribió: all, i have a form with some input fields. after the user populates the form and hits submit button, i'd like to do some processing on my website and then redirect the user to external website by posting another form with dynamically generated hidden fields. what's the best way to do it in wicket 1.4? There is no automatic Wicket way to do this. You could forward the data with UrlConnection or apache-httpclient in your onSubmit() callback method. Thanks, Vadim _ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: keep on getting non-bookmarkable URL with QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy...
El dom, 20-09-2009 a las 15:44 +0200, Erik Brakkee escribió: Hi, I have mounted a specific page using QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy to a specific URL. Nevertheless, when I use setResponsePage(MyPage.class, pageParams), I keep on getting a URL that has a session-specific parameter with name 'x'. Is there anything I am doing wrong. I just have one parameter in the page parameters that I want to see appearing in the URL. Should be OK. Please create a quickstart application that reproduce the problem and attach it to Jira ticket or upload it somewhere so we could take a look. Cheers Erik - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: defaultFormProcessing is no longer considered when processing multipart form in ajax request
the problem is that trunk did not have version numbers updated so it
was building as 1.4 for a while. this has been fixed so latest
snapshots should be properly built out of branch.
-igor
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Vladimir K koval...@gmail.com wrote:
The latest 1.4 snapshot does not define IComponentBorder interface in
addition to disappeared form component persistence.
Is it supposed that 1.4.2 breaks compatibility with 1.4.1?
I see the only way to check the fix in wicket-ajax.js - mix it into wicket
1.4.1 jar.
Vladimir K wrote:
I use 1.4-snapshot from
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.4-SNAPSHOT/
Persistence of form components has been removed from 1.4 as well.z
martin-g wrote:
You have to use 1.4.x branch.
trunk is for 1.5. form persistence is removed only in trunk
El vie, 18-09-2009 a las 05:32 -0700, Vladimir K escribió:
Igor, thanks for the fix.
I tried to compile against 1.4.2-20090916 and obtained two compilation
errors. Now FormComponent does not contain method setPersistent() and
Page
does not contain method removePersistedFormData().
What API should be used instead?
Vladimir K wrote:
Igor, could you plan it for 1.4.2?
Vladimir K wrote:
done
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2463
Vladimir K wrote:
sure
igor.vaynberg wrote:
i guess create a quickstart and attach it to a jira issue. when i
tested buttons, while developing the feature, it seemed to work
fine.
-igor
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Vladimir K koval...@gmail.com
wrote:
it is attached to the input tag as follows:
form wicket:id=actionForm
enctype='multipart/form-data'
div class=buttonBox
input
wicket:id=cancelAction
type=submit
wicket:message=value:command.cancelAction/input
/div
/form
From my perspective the request is submitted very similar to as I
remember
submitting drop downs many years ago
select onchange=this.form.submit();
The request parameters contain the name of the form instead of the
name of
the button.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
this bit of javascript:
if (submitButton != null) { s += Wicket.Form.encode(submitButton)
+
=1;
}
is needed because we do perform a custom form serialization -
really
just constructing the query string - that we submit back to
server
via
ajax. the multipart handling performs a regular post into a
hidden
iframe so the browser performs the serialization - and that
should
include the button. what markup is your button attached to?
-igor
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Vladimir Kovalyuk
koval...@gmail.com
wrote:
I added
AjaxFallbackButton(Cancel).setDefaultFormProcessing(false)
to
the
multipart form and when it is pressed the form is handled as
well as
the
button would have defaultFormProcessing=true.
It happens because request parameters does not contain the name
of
the
submitting button.
The magic is in the new code in wicket-ajax.js
// Submits a form using ajax.
// This method serializes a form and sends it as POST body.
submitForm: function(form, submitButton) {
if (this.handleMultipart(form)) {
return true;
}
var body = function() {
var s = Wicket.Form.serialize(form);
if (submitButton != null) {
s += Wicket.Form.encode(submitButton) + =1;
}
return s;
}
return this.request.post(body);
},
I believe the problem is caused by handleMultipart(form)
invocation.
submitForm function accepts submitButton parameter but does not
passes it
to
handleMultipart function.
Igor could you clarify that?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/defaultFormProcessing-is-no-longer-considered-when-processing--multipart-form-in-ajax-request-tp25376538p25377594.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: keep on getting non-bookmarkable URL with QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy...
There is definitely something strange going on. It appears that whenever I use a parameter that has a '/' in it I get strange behavior. I do see the '/' being encoded properly but still these '/' characters are in the way. Typical behavior is to see an empty page with the default URL coding strategy and to get a non-bookmarkable page with the querystring strategy. As a workaround I am now replacing all '/' characters in the parameter by something else and then changing it back when using it. This is not the whole story because even if I apply this hack, the QueryStringURLCoder strategy still generates a non-bookmarkable page for the page I want to use. The way out was to use mountBookmarkablePage but I really don't want to use that. To reproduce it you would need to mount a page using the QueryStringURLCoder: mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/gpx-from-url, RemoteTrackMapPage.class)); make the RemoteTrackMapPage have either a default constructor or one with PageParameters (does not matter which one) and do a setResponsePage(RemoteTrackMapPage.class, new PageParameters()). If I have the time I will make an example. Cheers Erik
Re: post a form to external website
Yeah - that would be slick. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bgwrote: thinking about this now I think it would be very elegant to first do Ajax submit and then in onSubmit() append a Javascript code to change the form's action (and the method too if needed) attribute and submit it. El sáb, 19-09-2009 a las 20:55 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson escribió: If you actually want to redirect them to the other site (with a post, and not just a get), you will just need to render a form and rely on javascript to auto-submit it for you (likely with a click here if not redirected link). The hidden fields could be rendered with attribute modifiers on webmarkupcontainers for example. Or you could use an actual form and override the action URL, but that's probably a little heavy-handed for this. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bg wrote: El vie, 18-09-2009 a las 10:51 +, Vadim Tesis escribió: all, i have a form with some input fields. after the user populates the form and hits submit button, i'd like to do some processing on my website and then redirect the user to external website by posting another form with dynamically generated hidden fields. what's the best way to do it in wicket 1.4? There is no automatic Wicket way to do this. You could forward the data with UrlConnection or apache-httpclient in your onSubmit() callback method. Thanks, Vadim _ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Update parent component from child component
Well, one piece is to use findParent(SecureWebPage.class) rather than three
getParents or getPage()
The question is why do you want to refresh the whole page via AJAX? Doesn't
that sort of defeat the purpose.
Nonetheless, please turn your application from deployment to development
mode and use the ajax debug to debug this.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Ryan O'Hara rjoh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to update a parent's, parent's, parent component using AJAX. I
tried combing the archives and came up with some seemingly useful stuff (
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-update-base-page-panel-from-child-page--td20998486.html#a21015568),
although I'm still have trouble. Below is a code snippet:
AjaxSubmitLink asl = new AjaxSubmitLink(submitButton) {
public void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) {
target.addComponent(this.getParent().getParent().getParent());
}
};
'this' is an AjaxSubmitLink
1st getParent() is a Form
2nd getParent() is a Panel
3rd getParent() is a SecureWebPage
I'd like to reload SecureWebPage, so that all of its Panel child components
(and their child components) are reloaded. I've tried explicitly calling
setOutputMarkupId(true) on each Form, Panel, and SecureWebPage component.
I've also tried wrapping the Panels with a WebMarkupContainer and updating
that, but that didn't seem to work either. Any advice?
Thanks,
Ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Is it a bug that Enclosure is not invoking component resolver to resolve its children?
as far as i rememember there is a collection registered in setttings and then each component can also implement a resolver. the contract can be seen in markupcontainer#rendernext method 1) first walk over the component hierarchy and check if any are resolvers 2) walk over collection of resolvers in the settings as soon as true is returned from resolve iteration is stopped. What method should I override in Enclosure to invoke the above process? It would have to be a method that gets called prior to Enclosure calling getChildComponent() which it does from onComponentBodyTag... does that represent a staging problem? I've tried many different combinations over a frustrating 3 days now in an attempt to get enclosure to fire off a 'resolve' on its children like most other parent components do. I'm beginning to wonder if what I'm doing is actually possible in wicket. Perhaps the retrieval of the dependent child component is happening to early in the lifecycle i.e. before the resolve has had a chance to instantiate and populate the children in the parent. Any ideas on the relative chance of success of this endeavour? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
