Re: OnlyTargetActivePage param
Hi,
I understand the usege of this two methods. But what I really don't
understand is that one of them create callback adress which can be process
also on non-active page, but second not.
In my app I had to switch off multi window support. So now I have only one
page map for
all my pages (also opened in other tabs or window.)
Problem is that my page is composed from several component especially
AjaxLink and
AjaxButton. So when I open some other page in new tab and then return to
first page
some components do nothing (AjaxButton -> resolve EmptyRequestTarget) and
other works fine (AjaxLink). I tried to find what's the prob and found that
reason is differece between set onlyTargetActivePage param (see my first
question in this thread).
Dave.
Pedro H. O. dos Santos wrote:
>
> One method will return an url that address the behavior, the another one
> will to return an script that send an ajax request to that behaviour.
> the usage in javascript looks like:
> document.location = generatedUrlReturnedByBehaviour;
> eval( generatedScriptGeneratedByBehaviour);
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:12 PM, David Skuben
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I'm now looking in classes AbstractAjaxBehavior and
>> AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.
>> There are two similar methods: getCallbackUrl() and getCallbackScript()
>> and
>> I don't understand why
>> first set onlyTargetActivePage to "true" and second to "false". Is it
>> right
>> ?
>>
>> If someone know about that, please let me know.
>> Thanks a lot.
>> Dave
>>
>> AbstractAjaxBehavior:
>> public CharSequence getCallbackUrl()
>>{
>>return getCallbackUrl(true);
>>}
>>
>> AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior:
>> protected CharSequence getCallbackScript()
>>{
>>return getCallbackScript(false);
>>}
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/OnlyTargetActivePage-param-tp27786617p27806850.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: tomcat session replication
not with java serialization afaik -igor On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Douglas Ferguson wrote: > I can't deal with removing fields or changing method > signatures/implementations? > > D/ > > On Mar 6, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > >> as long as all you do is add fields you are ok... >> >> -igor >> >> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Douglas Ferguson >> wrote: >>> So as long as the serial I'd is the same the classlader won't care the >>> fields don't match? >>> >>> Douglas Ferguson >>> 512-293-7279 >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:37 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" >>> wrote: >>> in the wicket code we override serial ids to 1, you should do the same in your code. -igor On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Douglas Ferguson wrote: > I'm considering a 0 downtime deployment but am concerned with the > amount of state in the wicket session. > > This is the scenario that concerns me. > > 1) There are 2 tomcats running > 2) A change is made to a serializable object and the serial version > id is updated > 3) 1 tomcat instance is taken down for updating > 4) tomcat instance comes back up with new object and now tries to > update state from other tomcat and the wicket session has a > reference to the old version of the serializable. > > On Mar 5, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > >> yes >> >> -igor >> >> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Douglas Ferguson >> wrote: >>> Has anybody had success with wicket using tomcat's session >>> replication? >>> >>> D/ >>> >>> --- >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --- >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Serving CSS directories
you can use a simple servlet to stream the contents of a directory where the uploads are put. -igor On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:18 AM, M. Hammer wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to give my users a way to upload an archive containing CSS and > images, and use it to skin their own views. In the CSS, the images need to > be referenced relative to the CSS file (e.g., if the archive does not > contain subdirectories, all the images should be referenced by url(filename) > only). What would be the best way to achieve this with Wicket? I think > something like the IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy would be nice (first > parameter referencing the uploaded archive, second the file), but I think > this does not work with resources? > > Thank you for any help, and for your great framework! > > Moritz > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Customize generating javascript in wicket
How to force wicket to generate javascript at the end of html, not inline ? I'm using SortableListView and addContainment method, but containtment option doesn't work. I think not work because of that "important note" - from scriptaculous docs: " containment Enables dragging and dropping between Sortables. Takes an array of elements or element-ids (of the containers). Important note: To ensure that two way dragging between containers is possible, place all Sortable.create calls after the container elements." -- Greetings, marioosh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: tomcat session replication
I can't deal with removing fields or changing method signatures/implementations? D/ On Mar 6, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > as long as all you do is add fields you are ok... > > -igor > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Douglas Ferguson > wrote: >> So as long as the serial I'd is the same the classlader won't care the >> fields don't match? >> >> Douglas Ferguson >> 512-293-7279 >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:37 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" >> wrote: >> >>> in the wicket code we override serial ids to 1, you should do the same >>> in your code. >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Douglas Ferguson >>> wrote: I'm considering a 0 downtime deployment but am concerned with the amount of state in the wicket session. This is the scenario that concerns me. 1) There are 2 tomcats running 2) A change is made to a serializable object and the serial version id is updated 3) 1 tomcat instance is taken down for updating 4) tomcat instance comes back up with new object and now tries to update state from other tomcat and the wicket session has a reference to the old version of the serializable. On Mar 5, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > yes > > -igor > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Douglas Ferguson > wrote: >> Has anybody had success with wicket using tomcat's session >> replication? >> >> D/ >> >> --- >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > --- > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Clear feedback panel
I thought the feedback messages were stored in the request by default? At least I remember a thread from a week and a half ago about a person doing a redirect and loosing his messages so he had to manually switch to saving them in the Session... On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Martin Makundi < martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > Maybe you are not really replacing the feedback using ajax. Look at > wicket-debug popup. Do you hae > feedbackPanel.setOutputMarkupId(true);? > > ** > Martin > > 2010/3/5 Anna Simbirtsev : > > It does not work for some reason. > > > > Session.get().cleanupFeedbackMessages(); > > target.addComponent(feedback); > > > > The message is still visible. > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Martin Makundi < > > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > > > >> session.cleanupfeedbackmessages. > >> > >> 2010/3/5 Anna Simbirtsev : > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > How can I clear FeedbackPanel messages? > >> > I want to remove them from the page using target.addComponent(f); > where f > >> is > >> > FeedbackPanel. > >> > I just don't know how to set messages to null. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Anna > >> > > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Anna Simbirtsev > > (416) 729-7331 > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Re: Page Expired
Hi Add "implements Serializable" to all your pages/components. That solved the problem for me. Best regards Dick Larsson/Stockholm/Sweden/www.amantech.se Alexander Monakhov-3 wrote: > > Hi, guys. > > I've got problem with 'Page Expired' message. I'm developing application > that is worked on GAE. > It has one page with help content. There is two help pages. Help page > contains two separated divs. One div for table of content, second - for > content. > When user clicks on link, page is reloaded with appropriated content. So, > when I load this page first time all works fine. But when I click on any > link, > I get 'Page Expired' message. > I set log level to debug. Here is some messages: > > 13:46:14,140 DEBUG [org.apache.wicket.Session] - Getting page [path = > 3:tabpanel:panel:toc-panel:help.panel.navigation:1:help.panel.link, > versionNumber = 1 > 13:46:14,141 INFO [org.apache.wicket.Page] - No version manager available > to > retrieve requested versionNumber 1 > 13:46:14,141 INFO [org.apache.wicket.AccessStackPageMap] - Unable to get > version 1 of page [Page class = > com.dominity.web2care.wicket.pages.BasePage, > id = 3, version = 0] > 13:46:14,142 DEBUG [org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle] - setting request > target > to > [bookmarkablepagerequesttar...@974813593pageclass=org.apache.wicket.markup.html.pages.pageexpirederrorpage] > > So, could you explain me what's wrong with this and what is it about: No > version manager available? > > If you'd like I show you source code and markup. > > BTW, please, bear in mind, that the same page works fine of GAE SDK > without > any page expirations, but on server side I get always Page Expired > message. > > Best regards, Alexander. > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Page-Expired-tp27756201p27804267.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Announce: wicket page test 1.2 is now available
Dear all,
Wicket page test allows you to unit test Wicket pages easily including
its AJAX functionality.
Major enhancements in 1.2 is that now you can wait for the completion
of Ajax easily, without writing any Javascript. For example, in a test
case, do something like:
WicketSelenium ws = new WicketSelenium(selenium);
selenium.click("link=Calculate next"); //this is an ajax link
ws.waitUntilAjaxDone();
assert selenium.getText("output").equals("Current: 1");
For more info, please see http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: tomcat session replication
During deserialization, memcached-session-manager's xml/javolution based serialization strategy just ignores fields that are no longer existing in new classes. Of course one needs to be careful with renaming fields, but I'd also like to have some mechanism to provide specific upgrade handlers. Cheers, Martin On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 20:16 -0800, Douglas Ferguson wrote: > So as long as the serial I'd is the same the classlader won't care the > fields don't match? > > Douglas Ferguson > 512-293-7279 > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:37 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" > wrote: > > > in the wicket code we override serial ids to 1, you should do the same > > in your code. > > > > -igor > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Douglas Ferguson > > wrote: > >> I'm considering a 0 downtime deployment but am concerned with the > >> amount of state in the wicket session. > >> > >> This is the scenario that concerns me. > >> > >> 1) There are 2 tomcats running > >> 2) A change is made to a serializable object and the serial version > >> id is updated > >> 3) 1 tomcat instance is taken down for updating > >> 4) tomcat instance comes back up with new object and now tries to > >> update state from other tomcat and the wicket session has a > >> reference to the old version of the serializable. > >> > >> On Mar 5, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > >> > >>> yes > >>> > >>> -igor > >>> > >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Douglas Ferguson > >>> wrote: > Has anybody had success with wicket using tomcat's session > replication? > > D/ > > --- > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > >>> > >>> --- > >>> -- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Serving CSS directories
Hi all, I want to give my users a way to upload an archive containing CSS and images, and use it to skin their own views. In the CSS, the images need to be referenced relative to the CSS file (e.g., if the archive does not contain subdirectories, all the images should be referenced by url(filename) only). What would be the best way to achieve this with Wicket? I think something like the IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy would be nice (first parameter referencing the uploaded archive, second the file), but I think this does not work with resources? Thank you for any help, and for your great framework! Moritz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
