[RELEASE] Wicket Stuff 6.0.0-beta3
This is my first Wicket Stuff release, so I hope I didn't mess up. Below are the changes since 6.0.0-beta1 The release tag is wicketstuff-core-6.0.0-beta3 Have fun! Martijn Dashorst Martin Grigorov (9): Merge pull request #122 from JoachimRohde/master Merge pull request #124 from td-github/master Merge pull request #126 from td-github/master Merge pull request #132 from jesselong/master Merge pull request #133 from pausb/master Merge pull request #137 from minman/fix-130 Merge pull request #139 from wickeria/master Merge pull request #142 from svieujot/master Merge pull request #141 from JoachimRohde/master Martin Tzvetanov Grigorov (6): issue 123 - [wicket-html5] AjaxGeoLocationBehaviour does not work with Wicket 6 Upgrade versions of Maven plugins and Scala Fix compiling of Console project Rework the test to test for output instead of returned value [inmethod-grid] Upgrade InMethod Grid to Wicket 6.0-SNAPSHOT Add parameters to PageParameters. Jesse Long (5): IXmlPullParser no longer throws ResourceStreamNotFoundException Latest packaged version of jquery is 1.7.2 Add missing jquery-1.6.1.js file Generify SecureTabbedPanel like regular TabbedPanel Update package name for UrlDecoder and UrlEncoder imports svenmeier (4): fixed compile error and got slider running in browser again, change doesn't trigger the callback though :/ IErrorMessageSource#substituteVariables() is merged into getMessage() make logo path absolute, otherwise it will not be loaded fixed resource reference to rpc resource Georg Buschbeck (4): updated jquery dependencies added js files fixed version typo in LibraryData forgot file in previous commit Merge remote branch 'upstream/master' j.rohde (3): Fixed compilation issue Make the wicketstuff-twitter module work with Wicket 6. [wicketstuff-security-wasp] Fixed compilation error. Sven Meier (2): datatable now generified for sort parameter datatable now generified for sort parameter JoachimRohde (2): Fixed compilation issue and a NPE in GMap2. - wicket.contrib.gmap.api.GClientGeocoder#getCallbackScript could not be compiled because getCallbackFunction didn't accept strings as parameters. - In GOverlay a NullPointerException occured when using the DragEndListener. Merge pull request #144 from JoachimRohde/master Martijn Dashorst (2): Wicket 6.0.0-beta3 Release Wicket Stuff 6.0.0-beta3 with Wicket 6.0.0-beta3 dan (1): normal links doesn't work in columns Sylvain Vieujot (1): Create excel cells for the TH tags. jr (1): Implemented a callback method for the HTML5 Geolocation API in case the user denies or ignores/dismisses the request for sharing his location. Along the way the example code was updated to demonstrate the new callback method. And since Foursquare (which was used before in the example) requires authentication now, a reverse geocoding request to OpenStreetMap is used as an example. mam (1): fix-130 NPE when redirected from ajax pausb (1): Changed Progress.java to support indeterminate progress elements Emond Papegaaij (1): ported GMap2 and openlayers to Wicket 6, I'm not in the position to test this, so it could still be broken - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: I think it's time for a new book.... Igor and Co ?
Am 27.07.2012 00:16, schrieb Igor Vaynberg: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: Seeing how the previous book authors became less active after writing a book I think this is not a very good idea... :-/ Is this because the books didn't sell well enough? i can only speak for myself, define enough :) i agreed to work on the book knowing full well it was not going to sell a million copies. i wrote it so the community has an easily accessible resource. same for me.. but a german market differ from a more global one:) I don't know the authors personally and I don't know much about the publishing world so it could very well be another reason altogether. writing the book was a very long and a very exhausting effort, much much more then i thought it would be. when i was done the book was actually twice as long as what was published, but the publisher wanted me to trim it down to keep the cost low... they would have to charge more if the book had more pages :/ I had to come upfront with how much pages it would be in the end. The publisher made their calculation based on it, so the page count is more strict than some one may think. the combination of those two things has burned me out somewhat. at least enough to make me want to go play with other things for a while. -igor same for me, but more time has passed, so i would take the pain again:) maybe i am a fool:) Michael:) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: I think it's time for a new book.... Igor and Co ?
What if the developers donate (or do a fund raising... ) to fund the writing of the book? We could set a budget ... then start pledging for the same.. when the pledge amount is enough, we pay and the work begins. Then we get the book for free . or something like that. Josh On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Michael Mosmann mich...@mosmann.dewrote: Am 27.07.2012 00:16, schrieb Igor Vaynberg: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: Seeing how the previous book authors became less active after writing a book I think this is not a very good idea... :-/ Is this because the books didn't sell well enough? i can only speak for myself, define enough :) i agreed to work on the book knowing full well it was not going to sell a million copies. i wrote it so the community has an easily accessible resource. same for me.. but a german market differ from a more global one:) I don't know the authors personally and I don't know much about the publishing world so it could very well be another reason altogether. writing the book was a very long and a very exhausting effort, much much more then i thought it would be. when i was done the book was actually twice as long as what was published, but the publisher wanted me to trim it down to keep the cost low... they would have to charge more if the book had more pages :/ I had to come upfront with how much pages it would be in the end. The publisher made their calculation based on it, so the page count is more strict than some one may think. the combination of those two things has burned me out somewhat. at least enough to make me want to go play with other things for a while. -igor same for me, but more time has passed, so i would take the pain again:) maybe i am a fool:) Michael:) --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: I think it's time for a new book.... Igor and Co ?
+1 :) Cheers, Stefan Am 27.07.2012 09:27, schrieb Josh Kamau: What if the developers donate (or do a fund raising... ) to fund the writing of the book? We could set a budget ... then start pledging for the same.. when the pledge amount is enough, we pay and the work begins. Then we get the book for free . or something like that. Josh On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Michael Mosmann mich...@mosmann.dewrote: Am 27.07.2012 00:16, schrieb Igor Vaynberg: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: Seeing how the previous book authors became less active after writing a book I think this is not a very good idea... :-/ Is this because the books didn't sell well enough? i can only speak for myself, define enough :) i agreed to work on the book knowing full well it was not going to sell a million copies. i wrote it so the community has an easily accessible resource. same for me.. but a german market differ from a more global one:) I don't know the authors personally and I don't know much about the publishing world so it could very well be another reason altogether. writing the book was a very long and a very exhausting effort, much much more then i thought it would be. when i was done the book was actually twice as long as what was published, but the publisher wanted me to trim it down to keep the cost low... they would have to charge more if the book had more pages :/ I had to come upfront with how much pages it would be in the end. The publisher made their calculation based on it, so the page count is more strict than some one may think. the combination of those two things has burned me out somewhat. at least enough to make me want to go play with other things for a while. -igor same for me, but more time has passed, so i would take the pain again:) maybe i am a fool:) Michael:) --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: I think it's time for a new book.... Igor and Co ?
+1 too About the found raising, maybe could it be a book project in My Major Company or Kickstarter for instance... Regards, Sebastien. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: What if the developers donate (or do a fund raising... ) to fund the writing of the book? We could set a budget ... then start pledging for the same.. when the pledge amount is enough, we pay and the work begins. Then we get the book for free . or something like that. Josh On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Michael Mosmann mich...@mosmann.de wrote: Am 27.07.2012 00:16, schrieb Igor Vaynberg: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: Seeing how the previous book authors became less active after writing a book I think this is not a very good idea... :-/ Is this because the books didn't sell well enough? i can only speak for myself, define enough :) i agreed to work on the book knowing full well it was not going to sell a million copies. i wrote it so the community has an easily accessible resource. same for me.. but a german market differ from a more global one:) I don't know the authors personally and I don't know much about the publishing world so it could very well be another reason altogether. writing the book was a very long and a very exhausting effort, much much more then i thought it would be. when i was done the book was actually twice as long as what was published, but the publisher wanted me to trim it down to keep the cost low... they would have to charge more if the book had more pages :/ I had to come upfront with how much pages it would be in the end. The publisher made their calculation based on it, so the page count is more strict than some one may think. the combination of those two things has burned me out somewhat. at least enough to make me want to go play with other things for a while. -igor same for me, but more time has passed, so i would take the pain again:) maybe i am a fool:) Michael:) --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: how to get dropdownlist selected value
attrvalueChoice.getModelObject();
On 26 July 2012 10:15, lxw_first lxw_fi...@hotmail.com wrote:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4650788/aaa.bmp
html:
select wicket:id=attrvalue/select
code
final ListView trView=new ListView(tritems, new PropertyModel(this,
attrBizRoles)) {
private IBizRole attrvalueBizRole=new BizRole();
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
attrBizRole = (IBizRole) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(lblattr, attrBizRole.getName()));
// this list can get from attr
attrvalueBizRoles = (ListIBizRole)
attrBizRole.getChildBizRole();
if (attrvalueBizRoles.size()0) {
attrvalueBizRole=attrvalueBizRoles.get(0);
}
DropDownChoice attrvalueChoice = new
DropDownChoice(attrvalue,new
PropertyModelIBizRole(this, attrvalueBizRole), attrvalueBizRoles,new
IChoiceRenderer() {
@Override
public Object getDisplayValue(Object object) {
attrvalueBizRole = (IBizRole) object;
return attrvalueBizRole.getName();
}
@Override
public String getIdValue(Object object, int index)
{
attrvalueBizRole = (IBizRole) object;
return
String.valueOf(attrvalueBizRole.getId());
}
});
item.add(attrvalueChoice);
}
};
i want to get the dropdownlist selected value.how to get value?
Can anyone tell me how to achieve this.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/how-to-get-dropdownlist-selected-value-tp4650788.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Fergal Keating
IT Senior Engineer
---
e. fergal.keat...@directski.com
p. NA
w. www.directski.com
Re: I think it's time for a new book.... Igor and Co ?
As a motivation everyone or probably top donnors could have their names somewhere on the book ;) j On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Sebastien seb...@gmail.com wrote: +1 too About the found raising, maybe could it be a book project in My Major Company or Kickstarter for instance... Regards, Sebastien. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote: What if the developers donate (or do a fund raising... ) to fund the writing of the book? We could set a budget ... then start pledging for the same.. when the pledge amount is enough, we pay and the work begins. Then we get the book for free . or something like that. Josh On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Michael Mosmann mich...@mosmann.de wrote: Am 27.07.2012 00:16, schrieb Igor Vaynberg: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet ber...@step.polymtl.ca wrote: Seeing how the previous book authors became less active after writing a book I think this is not a very good idea... :-/ Is this because the books didn't sell well enough? i can only speak for myself, define enough :) i agreed to work on the book knowing full well it was not going to sell a million copies. i wrote it so the community has an easily accessible resource. same for me.. but a german market differ from a more global one:) I don't know the authors personally and I don't know much about the publishing world so it could very well be another reason altogether. writing the book was a very long and a very exhausting effort, much much more then i thought it would be. when i was done the book was actually twice as long as what was published, but the publisher wanted me to trim it down to keep the cost low... they would have to charge more if the book had more pages :/ I had to come upfront with how much pages it would be in the end. The publisher made their calculation based on it, so the page count is more strict than some one may think. the combination of those two things has burned me out somewhat. at least enough to make me want to go play with other things for a while. -igor same for me, but more time has passed, so i would take the pain again:) maybe i am a fool:) Michael:) --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: renderHead() / wicket:head page / component order
Le 26/07/2012 20:54, Martin Grigorov a écrit : Another question : can you confirm me there are no equivalent in Wicket 1.5 for the Wicket 6 CssContentHeaderItem https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/wicket-1.5.x/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/internal/HeaderResponse.java#L59 Thanks Martin, I shouldn't have missed that :/ It's a correct workaround for my specific problem with a hierarchy of 3 pages ! When serving the css in page B and C with IHeaderResponse#renderCSS() they are correctly inserted after the main css that is added in renderhead() method in page A. Plus B and C are inserted in the correct order. When serving the static css of page B and C with render:head as it used to be, they are served in the correct order (B then C) but before the page A main CSS. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Change http status code on ajax response redirect?
Hi, During the handling of an ajax request I have an exception thrown, this is then managed by wicket to have an ajax-response returned with a redirect. The response returns an http status code 200. I would like to change this to be a 301/2 (still with the ajax-response redirect) but am not sure of the best approach. I need to do this as the response goes through our load balancer which manages ssh keys. It won't rewrite the redirect URL from http to https if the code is 200. Any tips much appreciated. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Change-http-status-code-on-ajax-response-redirect-tp4650793.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
