Re: [6.16] AjaxButton.onSubmit not working after upgrading to wicket 6

[Martin Grigorov]

I believe https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5585 is related.
Do you use Wicket 6.16.0 ?

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov


On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:00 AM, smallufo  wrote:

> sorry , There is no stack trace.
> Because it triggers nothing , the server doesn't receive anything.
>
>
>
> 2014-07-07 14:21 GMT+08:00 Michael Haitz :
>
> > please provide the full stacktrace.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Michael
> >
> > Am 06.07.2014 um 05:44 schrieb smallufo :
> >
> > > It seems working now.
> > > But such removal also make theme-switching not working :
> > >
> > > If I enable the ThemeProvider :
> > >
> > >final ThemeProvider themeProvider = new
> > > BootswatchThemeProvider(BootswatchTheme.Flatly);
> > >
> > >
> >
> settings.setJsResourceFilterName("footer-container").setThemeProvider(themeProvider);
> > >
> > > without "footer-container" in the BasePage
> > >
> > > wicket-bootstrap will throw
> > >
> > > WicketRuntimeException: theme does not exists: bootstrap
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> >
> de.agilecoders.wicket.themes.settings.BootswatchThemeProvider.byName(BootswatchThemeProvider.java:49)
> > >
> > >
> > > So I could only use the native bootstrap theme now.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-07-06 11:30 GMT+08:00 smallufo :
> > >
> > >> I found where goes wrong ,
> > >> it's RenderJavaScriptToFooterHeaderResponseDecorator that causes the
> > >> problem.
> > >>
> > >> I am not familiar with wicket-bootstrap , so I mimicked
> wicket-bootstrap
> > >> sample's architecture :
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/tree/master/bootstrap-samples/src/main/java/de/agilecoders/wicket/samples
> > >>
> > >> This is my 'not' working architecture :
> > >> http://pastebin.com/vB3Ek2t9
> > >>
> > >> After removing RenderJavaScriptToFooterHeaderResponseDecorator ,
> > >> footer-container , it works fine.
> > >>
> > >> http://pastebin.com/kAehvaRr
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2014-07-05 21:10 GMT+08:00 Francois Meillet <
> francois.meil...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>
> > >> Run your app in debug mode and set some breakpoint.
> > >>>
> > >>> eclipse
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/debugging-with-intellij.html
> > >>> http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/EclipseDebugging/article.html
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://help.eclipse.org/juno/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.jdt.doc.user%2Freference%2Fpreferences%2Frun-debug%2Fref-run_debug.htm
> > >>>
> > >>> intellij
> > >>> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/webhelp/run-debug-configurations.html
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/webhelp/creating-and-editing-run-debug-configurations.html
> > >>>
> > >>> François Meillet
> > >>> Formation Wicket - Développement Wicket
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Le 5 juil. 2014 à 14:56, smallufo  a écrit :
> > >>>
> >  2014-07-05 20:55 GMT+08:00 smallufo :
> > 
> > >
> > > But i still find another "id6c" or "id6d"  in the source code.
> > >
> > 
> >  sorry typo :
> > 
> >  But i still *cannot* find another "id6c" or "id6d"  in the source
> > code.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [6.16] AjaxButton.onSubmit not working after upgrading to wicket 6

[smallufo]

sorry , There is no stack trace.
Because it triggers nothing , the server doesn't receive anything.



2014-07-07 14:21 GMT+08:00 Michael Haitz :

> please provide the full stacktrace.
>
> cheers,
> Michael
>
> Am 06.07.2014 um 05:44 schrieb smallufo :
>
> > It seems working now.
> > But such removal also make theme-switching not working :
> >
> > If I enable the ThemeProvider :
> >
> >final ThemeProvider themeProvider = new
> > BootswatchThemeProvider(BootswatchTheme.Flatly);
> >
> >
> settings.setJsResourceFilterName("footer-container").setThemeProvider(themeProvider);
> >
> > without "footer-container" in the BasePage
> >
> > wicket-bootstrap will throw
> >
> > WicketRuntimeException: theme does not exists: bootstrap
> >
> > at
> >
> de.agilecoders.wicket.themes.settings.BootswatchThemeProvider.byName(BootswatchThemeProvider.java:49)
> >
> >
> > So I could only use the native bootstrap theme now.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-07-06 11:30 GMT+08:00 smallufo :
> >
> >> I found where goes wrong ,
> >> it's RenderJavaScriptToFooterHeaderResponseDecorator that causes the
> >> problem.
> >>
> >> I am not familiar with wicket-bootstrap , so I mimicked wicket-bootstrap
> >> sample's architecture :
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/tree/master/bootstrap-samples/src/main/java/de/agilecoders/wicket/samples
> >>
> >> This is my 'not' working architecture :
> >> http://pastebin.com/vB3Ek2t9
> >>
> >> After removing RenderJavaScriptToFooterHeaderResponseDecorator ,
> >> footer-container , it works fine.
> >>
> >> http://pastebin.com/kAehvaRr
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-07-05 21:10 GMT+08:00 Francois Meillet  >:
> >>
> >> Run your app in debug mode and set some breakpoint.
> >>>
> >>> eclipse
> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/debugging-with-intellij.html
> >>> http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/EclipseDebugging/article.html
> >>>
> >>>
> http://help.eclipse.org/juno/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.jdt.doc.user%2Freference%2Fpreferences%2Frun-debug%2Fref-run_debug.htm
> >>>
> >>> intellij
> >>> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/webhelp/run-debug-configurations.html
> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/webhelp/creating-and-editing-run-debug-configurations.html
> >>>
> >>> François Meillet
> >>> Formation Wicket - Développement Wicket
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Le 5 juil. 2014 à 14:56, smallufo  a écrit :
> >>>
>  2014-07-05 20:55 GMT+08:00 smallufo :
> 
> >
> > But i still find another "id6c" or "id6d"  in the source code.
> >
> 
>  sorry typo :
> 
>  But i still *cannot* find another "id6c" or "id6d"  in the source
> code.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Feedback/Error message.

[Paul Bors]

Have a look at the Sortable DataTable:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Simple+Sortable+DataTable+Example

It has a build in message for when there are no results matching your
filter or the model is empty.
You can override it to display your own custom message as well.


On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 9:11 AM, K  wrote:

> Hi
>
> I am trying to build a web application in which i have to display list of
> items on search...
>
> this part has been done but i have to add a errror message in the same page
> if the search result comes out null...
>
> I am using DataView for displaying the results. using condition in java is
> simple but for the unreachable id that i mention in condition the mark up
> is
> not being rendered if the condition is true.
>
> any help is well appriciated...
>
> Thanks
>
>
> -
>
> K
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Feedback-Error-message-tp1874404p4666330.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Displaying Images Stored in DB on Openshift

[David Beer]

Hi All

I am developing and application that is running on openshift. The
application is still in heavy development, using wicket 6.14 at the moment.
I am running Wildlfy 8.1.0 and testing locally.

The problem I am facing is simply that the images that I am storing are not
being displayed on Openshift but work fine locally. I am retrieving the
image as a byte[] from the database and then displaying the Image.

I have tried using a simple ByteArray Resource like the following:

ThumbnailImageResource imageResource = new ThumbnailImageResource(new
ByteArrayResource("image/jpeg", userAccount.getProfileimage().getFile()),
150);
Image profileImage = new Image("profileImage", imageResource);
add(profileImage);

However on Openshift the image does not display. There is no error logged
just no image and the resource link does not seem to work either.

Any thoughts would be most helpful.

Thanks

David

wicket portlet in Liferay 6.2

[Ciocoiu Elvis]

Hi,

I'm facing a problem with wicketstuff-portlet-6.16 in Liferay 6.2. I'm
using AjaxLink in a portlet and WicketAjax call failure with: Error while
parsing response: Invalid XML. I know there were some problems (starting
with wicket 1.5.9) but this problems were solved using a custom
IRequestCycleProvider. Can anybody help me with an answer if some
workaround is needed in wicketstuff-portlet 6.16?

Thank you

-- 
_
Elvis Ciocoiu
Senior Consultant

Everlight Solutions ROMANIA

address: http://www.everlight.ro 
e-mail: elvis.cioc...@everlight.ro 
mobile : (40) 0745 13 75 85

This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
confidential or privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient, please refrain from any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.
Please be aware that such actions are prohibited. If you have received
this transmission in error, kindly notify us by email to
off...@everlight.ro . We appreciate your cooperation.

Re: Contribution to Wicket WIKI

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

Since a while the WIKI is locked up for editing by everyone because there
was too much spam (according to Apache sysadmins).
Give us your WIKI id and we will add you to the list of editors.

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov


On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Štefan Šimík  wrote:

> I would like to ask, how is possible to update WIKI.
>
> I found som info at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/How+to+contribute+documentation+to+the+Wiki
>
> but I cannot find any link for editing of the page (I am logged in, as
> common user).
>
> Stefan
>

Contribution to Wicket WIKI

[Štefan Šimík]

I would like to ask, how is possible to update WIKI.

I found som info at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/How+to+contribute+documentation+to+the+Wiki

but I cannot find any link for editing of the page (I am logged in, as
common user).

Stefan

wicket-select2 - adding sub categories seen in select2

[Vishal Popat]

Hi,

Is it possible to add categories to the lists in wicket-select2 like seen in 
http://ivaynberg.github.io/select2/#basics (The Time Zone labels)?
Also is it possible to add functionality like the flag images as well?

Regards
Vishal

Re: Model data lost when calling target.add before onSubmit

[vp143]

Many thanks!
I solved my original issue using AjaxWizardButtonBar which I was not aware
of as I was using an older version of Wicket.

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Model-data-lost-when-calling-target-add-before-onSubmit-tp4666385p4666458.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Ajax Form Submit via jquery plugin / javascript

[vp143]

I wasnt able to get anything working... I tried adding wicket:id via jquery
to the plugin button but wicket did not recognise it.

However, I had been using wicket 6.7.0 up until then. 
I see that AjaxWizardButtonBar within the Wizard functionality has been
added in a latter wicket version which I had not found when researching.
This solved my problems perfectly!

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Ajax-Form-Submit-via-jquery-plugin-javascript-tp4666170p4666457.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How to handle click on removed links - WicketRuntimeException (Component 'xxx' has been removed from page)?

[Martin Grigorov]

Please create a ticket!
With a patch with the custom exception will make its processing even faster!
Thank you!

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov


On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Daniel Stoch 
wrote:

> I think the simplest solution for now (until we invent a better one)
> is to define a dedicated exception class for such case (similar to
> ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException which is raised if user tries
> click on disabled links). Then we can catch such exception and handle
> it eg. as described by Martin in my previous post ("How to handle
> click on disabled links - ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException?").
>
> --
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>  wrote:
> > maybe what is needed is a "fail silently ajax request" ;-)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Stoch 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sorry, but for me all these solutions are hacks :).
> >>>
> >>
> >> Why? As far as they are under control... Isn't software development
> >> production controlled "hacks"? Wicket itself is a "hack" and so do are
> >> other WEB frameworks like GWT. As far as you remain in control I do not
> see
> >> the problem. All frameworks have limitations... Why not get the best of
> >> them and circumvent those.
> >>
> >>
> >>> I want to use standard components (eg. AjaxLink) to do simple things.
> >>> I don't want to think everywhere how to handle such scenarios. It
> >>> should be handled properly on a framework level. I think there is
> >>> always possibility that component state on server and DOM tree on
> >>> client browser are inconsistent (and not necessary because of push
> >>> requests). Maybe it should be a dedicated exception on such situation
> >>> ("Component 'xxx' has been removed from page.") at least or maybe we
> >>> can invent a better solution in core?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I do agree that would be optimal.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Daniel
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >>>  wrote:
> >>> > Maybe you could even just push JSON to client side and generate items
> >>> > content at client side which is going to be way faster
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >>> > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Why don't you try routing all the click to a part of you application
> >>> that
> >>> >> is always available? E.g.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 1- You have a list of items that are pushed... They are in a certain
> >>> >> container that is "always" there... At client and server side
> >>> >> 2- The items are pushed but instead of normal AJAX link you use
> link to
> >>> >> the parent never changing container passing ID of item. This way
> click
> >>> will
> >>> >> never fail and it is still sort of object oriented...
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Stoch <
> daniel.st...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org
> >>> >
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > You can use Atmopshere to hide/disable the client side too, not
> >>> just the
> >>> >>> > server side.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Of course, I already do that.
> >>> >>> But user can click the link after state was changed on the server
> side
> >>> >>> but before these changes are pushed to client browser.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> --
> >>> >>> Daniel
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Martin Grigorov
> >>> >>> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>> >>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Stoch <
> >>> daniel.st...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Sven Meier 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> >> >> So page was rendered in a browser,
> >>> >>> >> >> on the server component tree was changed
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> > What triggers the change to the component tree? On which
> thread?
> >>> Are
> >>> >>> you
> >>> >>> >> > using websockets?
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> > Sven
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> In general this thread is not initialized by user action but by
> >>> >>> >> application. So yes, it can be push from a server (eg. using
> >>> >>> >> Atmosphere - this is my case) or by ajax self updating behavior.
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> --
> >>> >>> >> DS
> >>> >>> >>
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> >
> >>> >>> >> > On 07/04/2014 12:13 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >> Hi all,
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >> I think such question occurs from time to time on this list,
> >>> but I
> >>> >>> >> >> have never found a good answer how to solve such problem in
> >>> general.
> >>> >>> >> >> The problem is similar to my last question:
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>> >>> >>

Re: How to handle click on removed links - WicketRuntimeException (Component 'xxx' has been removed from page)?

[Daniel Stoch]

I think the simplest solution for now (until we invent a better one)
is to define a dedicated exception class for such case (similar to
ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException which is raised if user tries
click on disabled links). Then we can catch such exception and handle
it eg. as described by Martin in my previous post ("How to handle
click on disabled links - ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException?").

--
Daniel

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
 wrote:
> maybe what is needed is a "fail silently ajax request" ;-)
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Stoch 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, but for me all these solutions are hacks :).
>>>
>>
>> Why? As far as they are under control... Isn't software development
>> production controlled "hacks"? Wicket itself is a "hack" and so do are
>> other WEB frameworks like GWT. As far as you remain in control I do not see
>> the problem. All frameworks have limitations... Why not get the best of
>> them and circumvent those.
>>
>>
>>> I want to use standard components (eg. AjaxLink) to do simple things.
>>> I don't want to think everywhere how to handle such scenarios. It
>>> should be handled properly on a framework level. I think there is
>>> always possibility that component state on server and DOM tree on
>>> client browser are inconsistent (and not necessary because of push
>>> requests). Maybe it should be a dedicated exception on such situation
>>> ("Component 'xxx' has been removed from page.") at least or maybe we
>>> can invent a better solution in core?
>>>
>>
>> I do agree that would be optimal.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>>>  wrote:
>>> > Maybe you could even just push JSON to client side and generate items
>>> > content at client side which is going to be way faster
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
>>> > reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Why don't you try routing all the click to a part of you application
>>> that
>>> >> is always available? E.g.
>>> >>
>>> >> 1- You have a list of items that are pushed... They are in a certain
>>> >> container that is "always" there... At client and server side
>>> >> 2- The items are pushed but instead of normal AJAX link you use link to
>>> >> the parent never changing container passing ID of item. This way click
>>> will
>>> >> never fail and it is still sort of object oriented...
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Stoch 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Martin Grigorov >> >
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> > Hi,
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > You can use Atmopshere to hide/disable the client side too, not
>>> just the
>>> >>> > server side.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Of course, I already do that.
>>> >>> But user can click the link after state was changed on the server side
>>> >>> but before these changes are pushed to client browser.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Daniel
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Martin Grigorov
>>> >>> > Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> >>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Stoch <
>>> daniel.st...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Sven Meier 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> So page was rendered in a browser,
>>> >>> >> >> on the server component tree was changed
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > What triggers the change to the component tree? On which thread?
>>> Are
>>> >>> you
>>> >>> >> > using websockets?
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > Sven
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> In general this thread is not initialized by user action but by
>>> >>> >> application. So yes, it can be push from a server (eg. using
>>> >>> >> Atmosphere - this is my case) or by ajax self updating behavior.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> --
>>> >>> >> DS
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> > On 07/04/2014 12:13 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> Hi all,
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> I think such question occurs from time to time on this list,
>>> but I
>>> >>> >> >> have never found a good answer how to solve such problem in
>>> general.
>>> >>> >> >> The problem is similar to my last question:
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-handle-click-on-disabled-links-ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException-td4666287.html
>>> >>> >> >> but now there is a situation when link was removed from page
>>> (not
>>> >>> >> >> disabled).
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> So page was rendered in a browser, on the server component tree
>>> was
>>> >>> >> >> changed, but user clicks a link in a browser before this changes
>>> >>> will
>>> >>> >> >> be pushed to it. It leads to an exception:
>>> >>> >> >>
>>> >>> >> >> org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Component 'xx