Re: how to connect elements - label and input (checkbox)

2014-09-30 Thread miguel
wow this is the strangest thing. i searched for the same thing a year later
(to the day almost) and again its a silly "agree to terms" checkbox and
guess what... wicket 6.17.0 seems to have the same problem...

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/how-to-connect-elements-label-and-input-checkbox-tp4650304p4667770.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



wicket session and wildfly

2014-01-30 Thread miguel
.java:240)
[jboss-modules.jar:1.3.0.Final]
at
org.jboss.marshalling.ModularClassResolver.resolveClass(ModularClassResolver.java:106)
... 80 more
Caused by: an exception which occurred:
in map value at index [0] of size [2]

at first i thought it was because an object created by an @Inject annotation
but i've removed it to test. i'm not sure if its a wicket or wildfly issue
as I don't have an quick way to isolate the two right now.

has anybody else seem similar issues? the biggest problem with this is that
browsers that were running before continue to attempt to use the bad session
until they clear cookies. it effectively breaks the site unless i restart
jboss.

-miguel


--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-session-and-wildfly-tp4664073.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: continueToOriginalDestination hacks

2014-01-25 Thread miguel
nevermind. there was a rogue try/catch catching the
continueToOriginalDestination exception...

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/continueToOriginalDestination-hacks-tp4663947p4663950.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



continueToOriginalDestination hacks

2014-01-24 Thread miguel
I'm building an app that uses oauth to login but I found that
continueToOriginalDestination doesn't work when I login via twitter but it
works when I use google to login. The user instead ends up in the fallback
value I used:

continueToOriginalDestination();
setResponsePage(MemberHome.class);

The oauth code for google vs twitter is pretty much the same and before I
realized it was specific to twitter, I thought it was a wicket bug. I'm
trying to add another fallback method wherein I manually store the "original
destination" value and deal with it myself.

If anybody is curious I use the following setup:

scribe-java for oauth
a LoginPanel class that shows 2 login forms (google, twitter) 
form submits end in something like: throw new
RedirectToUrlException(twitterLoginUrl);
login panel handles the return from oauth using page parameters and upon
success calls:
  - signIn on websession
  - continueToOriginalDestination();
  - setResponsePage(MemberHome.class);

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/continueToOriginalDestination-hacks-tp4663947.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: Bunch of Page Expired exceptions in Wicket 6.10.0

2014-01-24 Thread miguel
Yes, but in my example, I was referring to how 2 different apps with
different cookies are both running on localhost with different ports. I get
this issue all the time on chromium when I test multiple apps all on
location with different ports. I keep having to login whenever I refresh a
different tab. (yeah, i know it took me 4 months to get back to this but i
was busy. :-) )

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Bunch-of-Page-Expired-exceptions-in-Wicket-6-10-0-tp4661502p4663946.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: how to connect elements - label and input (checkbox)

2013-10-01 Thread miguel
aha! it seems that the first time it renders it doesn't include the id in the
checkbox. when it fails validation, the id appears and the label works as
expected. i'll dig into the code when i get a chance.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/how-to-connect-elements-label-and-input-checkbox-tp4650304p4661649.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: how to connect elements - label and input (checkbox)

2013-10-01 Thread miguel
I found this searching for the same answer and my existing code was:


I agree to the terms

but the output is:


I agree to the terms

but sometimes it seems that the id isn't set on the checkbox. I'm still
trying to figure out why. (using 6.10 still)



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/how-to-connect-elements-label-and-input-checkbox-tp4650304p4661648.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: wicket + autowired annotation

2013-09-27 Thread miguel
If you are using _only_ spring and no wicket you _still_ can't do the "new
ClsDb()" method and have the @Autowired fields populated. You're question
isn't really specific to wicket anymore in that situation.


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:32 PM, dan123 [via Apache Wicket] <
ml-node+s1842946n4661583...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:

> Thanks to everybody for help.
>
> Paul Bors wrote
> As far as I can tell you the Spring native annotations work within the
> implementation of a bean you already injected in your wicket component.
> First crate a service for yourself and inject it where needed in Wicket
> via
> @SpringBean. Then inside your service feel free to inject other Spring
> dependencies via Spring's native annotations.
>
>
> It works.
> But I thought, that I can set something (something like a scanning all
> classes) in web.xml or springContext.xml file to scan for all @Autowired
> annotations and it will be autowired in all classes. So why I have to use
> "@SpringBean ClsDb clsDb;" in my HomePage.class and then I can use
> @Autowired in CldDb class. Why I cannon use only "new ClsDb();"? There is
> no way how to autowired all beans?
>
> --
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-autowired-annotation-tp4661529p4661583.html
>  To unsubscribe from wicket + autowired annotation, click 
> here
> .
> NAML
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-autowired-annotation-tp4661529p4661586.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: wicket + autowired annotation

2013-09-27 Thread miguel
I forgot to also mention...

I've noticed that @Autowired does NOT work whereas @Inject does. Also,
@Value annotations don't work either.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-autowired-annotation-tp4661529p4661575.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: wicket + autowired annotation

2013-09-26 Thread miguel
how do you instantiate ClsDb? I don't see a @Component/@Service/etc
annotation on it so my guess is you use something like...

clsdb = new ClsDb();
clsdb.save();

You need to have the class creaed by spring's bean factory or injected by
wicket's component instantiation listener.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-autowired-annotation-tp4661529p4661543.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



custom markup from db

2013-09-26 Thread miguel
i'm trying to be a proof-of-concept where I use wicket to use "styles" that
are loaded from the database. I've managed to get my custom markup to load
but it seems that its only loaded once then cached (even in dev mode). This
is what I've tried:

IResourceSettings settings = getResourceSettings();
settings.setResourcePollFrequency(Duration.seconds(10));
settings.getResourceFinders().add(0, new SkinResourceFinder());

I searched for references to IResourceSettings.getResourcePollingFrequency()
and found this:


org.apache.wicket.devutils.inspector - src/main/java - wicket-devutils
ApplicationView
ApplicationView(String, Application)

org.apache.wicket.jmx - src/main/java - wicket-jmx
ResourceSettings
getResourcePollFrequency()

org.apache.wicket.settings.def - src/main/java - wicket-core
ResourceSettings
getResourcePollFrequency()
getResourceWatcher(boolean)

My guess is that getResourceWatcher(boolean) is where the polling value gets
used but I assume that since polling works in dev mode for normal resource
finder then there is something else going on. My implementation of
IResourceFinder basically returns:

return new StringResourceStream(sw.toString(), "text/html");

any ideas?

-m



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/custom-markup-from-db-tp4661542.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: Bunch of Page Expired exceptions in Wicket 6.10.0

2013-09-26 Thread miguel
by tabs do you mean browser tabs?

if you have 2 tabs:

http://localhost:8080/Foo

and

http://localhost:8081/Bar

then reloading each tab will often invalidate the previous tab. the session
cookie is overwritten.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Bunch-of-Page-Expired-exceptions-in-Wicket-6-10-0-tp4661502p4661540.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: CSS Links and request forwarding

2008-07-08 Thread Miguel Paraz
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:37 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try redirecting rather than forwarding

I'm trying to avoid redirecting.

Do you mean, forwarding cannot retain the correct URL?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CSS Links and request forwarding

2008-07-08 Thread Miguel Paraz
Hi,
I have a servlet on /site. Depending on the User-Agent, it will use
the RequestDispatcher and forward to /site1 or /site2.
/site1 is mapped to the Wicket filter, /site2 is another plain servlet.

When I open site1 directly, the CSS link is alright.

In the original html:



In the processed html:




But, when I open this through /site and it passes through the
RequestDispatcher, the processed html becomes:




How did the base URL change?
Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



WebApplication-level styles?

2008-07-03 Thread Miguel Paraz
Hi,
Is it possible to set the style once, at the WebApplication, instead
of getting the Session in every Page, and calling setStyle() ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: UTF-8 Byte Order Marks in .html files

2008-06-25 Thread Miguel Paraz
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Sven Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if your editor prefixes your templates with a BOM(1), Wicket is not able to
> recognize the encoding in your xml declaration, see
> org.apache.wicket.util.io.XmlReader#xmlDecl .
>
> You might want to create a JIRA request, that Wicket should skip a leading
> BOM in the encoding detection.

Hi Sven,
Thanks for pointing this out!

I do not need to file a JIRA request - I just wanted to know the
behavior, since it's not documented in the Wicket internationalization
wikis/blogs I found.

I'm using Notepad++ (on Windows) which has the choices "UTF-8" and
"UTF-8 without BOM," which to a newbie like me makes it appear that
having the BOM is the default.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: UTF-8 Byte Order Marks in .html files

2008-06-25 Thread Miguel Paraz
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Brill Pappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it might be your browser that is not displaying the unicode chars.
> That you see the odd symbols at all means that the made it to the client
> side.
>
> Are you on a Mac?

Hi! Thanks for the reply.

No, I'm on Firefox 3 on Windows.

Do you have an idea why removing the BOM fixes it?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



UTF-8 Byte Order Marks in .html files

2008-06-25 Thread Miguel Paraz
Hi,
I found out - through a lot of trial and error - that if your .html
file has a Byte Order Mark, the  at the top
of the document is ignored.
The document is treated as something else - I'm not sure what.

The effect is that the special output characters become the 
unknown characters.

Is this a known issue?
Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exception adding a SimpleAttributeModifier to a TextField

2008-03-26 Thread Miguel Munoz
I couldn't find a link to Jira on the Apache Wicket web site. Can you send me a 
link?

-- Miguel Munoz


-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:27 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exception adding a SimpleAttributeModifier to a TextField

where is the test case?
please do not send those things to the list, they get lost
make jira issues.

johan


On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Miguel Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Here's a test case to reproduce the bug. I'm doing something slightly
> unorthodox, but it shouldn't cause the bug I'm seeing.
>
> I'm using an application structure adapted from the book Wicket in Action.
>
> -- Miguel Muñoz
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:22 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Exception adding a SimpleAttributeModifier to a TextField
>
> Do you have a testcase that you can attach to a jira issue?
>
> This is strange because why is there a behaviorrequesttarget created
> for that attribute modifier, that seems very strange
>
> On 3/24/08, Miguel Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Comrades,
> >
> >   I'm getting a strange exception. I created a SimpleAttributeModifier
> and
> > added it to a TextField component, like this:
> >
> >   textField.add(modifier);
> >
> > When I run it, I get an exception that says this:
> >
> > java.lang.ClassCastException:
> > org.apache.wicket.behavior.SimpleAttributeModifier cannot be cast to
> > org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener
> >  at
> >
> org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents
> (BehaviorRequestTarget.java:91)
> >
> > The line of code that generates the exception looks like this:
> >
> >   behaviorListener =
> > (IBehaviorListener)component.getBehaviors().get(idAsInt);
> >
> > It appears to be extracting from a list of IBehaviors, so I have no idea
> why
> > it's trying to cast it as an IBehaviorListener. Does anybody know what
> I'm
> > doing wrong? Or is this a bug in Wicket?
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Exception-adding-a-SimpleAttributeModifier-to-a-TextField-tp16262822p16262822.html
> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exception adding a SimpleAttributeModifier to a TextField

2008-03-25 Thread Miguel Munoz
Here's a test case to reproduce the bug. I'm doing something slightly 
unorthodox, but it shouldn't cause the bug I'm seeing.

I'm using an application structure adapted from the book Wicket in Action.

-- Miguel Muñoz



-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:22 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exception adding a SimpleAttributeModifier to a TextField

Do you have a testcase that you can attach to a jira issue?

This is strange because why is there a behaviorrequesttarget created
for that attribute modifier, that seems very strange

On 3/24/08, Miguel Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comrades,
>
>   I'm getting a strange exception. I created a SimpleAttributeModifier and
> added it to a TextField component, like this:
>
>   textField.add(modifier);
>
> When I run it, I get an exception that says this:
>
> java.lang.ClassCastException:
> org.apache.wicket.behavior.SimpleAttributeModifier cannot be cast to
> org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener
>  at
> org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents(BehaviorRequestTarget.java:91)
>
> The line of code that generates the exception looks like this:
>
>   behaviorListener =
> (IBehaviorListener)component.getBehaviors().get(idAsInt);
>
> It appears to be extracting from a list of IBehaviors, so I have no idea why
> it's trying to cast it as an IBehaviorListener. Does anybody know what I'm
> doing wrong? Or is this a bug in Wicket?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Exception-adding-a-SimpleAttributeModifier-to-a-TextField-tp16262822p16262822.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exception adding a SimpleAttributeModifier to a TextField

2008-03-24 Thread Miguel Munoz

Comrades,

  I'm getting a strange exception. I created a SimpleAttributeModifier and
added it to a TextField component, like this:

  textField.add(modifier);

When I run it, I get an exception that says this:

java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.wicket.behavior.SimpleAttributeModifier cannot be cast to
org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener
 at
org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.processEvents(BehaviorRequestTarget.java:91)

The line of code that generates the exception looks like this:

behaviorListener =
(IBehaviorListener)component.getBehaviors().get(idAsInt);

It appears to be extracting from a list of IBehaviors, so I have no idea why
it's trying to cast it as an IBehaviorListener. Does anybody know what I'm
doing wrong? Or is this a bug in Wicket?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Exception-adding-a-SimpleAttributeModifier-to-a-TextField-tp16262822p16262822.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]