Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
I just released "Hello, World!" v9.0 for the ultimate price of just $500. Who is interested? Am 02.04.2011 um 03:11 schrieb Bruno Borges: > Of course it is the best. It has no software error-prone... :-) > > No GC problems, no heap calculations. > > =) > > Bruno Borges > www.brunoborges.com.br > +55 21 76727099 > > "The glory of great men should always be > measured by the means they have used to > acquire it." > - Francois de La Rochefoucauld > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Chris Colman > wrote: > >> I poon you all with my Atari 7800! >> >> Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version >> number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best! >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM >>> To: users@wicket.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering >>> >>> I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a >> number, >>> and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals? >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://apache- >>> wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering- >>> tp3420887p3421249.html >>> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Of course it is the best. It has no software error-prone... :-) No GC problems, no heap calculations. =) Bruno Borges www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 "The glory of great men should always be measured by the means they have used to acquire it." - Francois de La Rochefoucauld On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Chris Colman wrote: > I poon you all with my Atari 7800! > > Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version > number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best! > > >-Original Message- > >From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com] > >Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM > >To: users@wicket.apache.org > >Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering > > > >I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a > number, > >and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals? > > > >-- > >View this message in context: http://apache- > >wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering- > >tp3420887p3421249.html > >Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
RE: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
I poon you all with my Atari 7800! Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best! >-Original Message- >From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com] >Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM >To: users@wicket.apache.org >Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering > >I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number, >and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals? > >-- >View this message in context: http://apache- >wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering- >tp3420887p3421249.html >Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number, and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-tp3420887p3421249.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
OMG?!? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Here we are already using WINDOWS 2000 with OFFICE 2010 ;) (Note: never ever believe any mails, blogs, newspapers on april 1st *g*) Am 01.04.11 20:14, schrieb nino martinez wael: Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better . 2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg: where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun! -igor On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham wrote: I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket framework. In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon 2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket 1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine 1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat 1 JavaServer Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 ManyDesigns Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4 Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring 3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6 ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6 The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because they have the highest version number. So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and release version 10.0. Who's with me? -- Jim Spinal Tap Industries, Inc. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- whiskyworld e.K. http://www.whiskyworld.de Ziegelfeld 6 94481 Grafenau/ Haus im Wald Tel. 08555/ 406 320 Fax. 08555/ 406 319 Amtsgericht Passau: HRA 11760 Geschäftsführer: Ulrike Bachl UstID: DE260619452 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
hah some of our servers are 2008 r2 :) However im considering doing a nix distribution called "HAL 9000" as it probably will attract a lot of users based on the high number... 2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg : > im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind. > > -igor > > > 2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński : >> W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze: >>> >>> Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. >>> >>> Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? >>> Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows >>> 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better >> >> You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95 >> >> Rafał Krupiński >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind. -igor 2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński : > W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze: >> >> Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. >> >> Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? >> Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows >> 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better > > You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95 > > Rafał Krupiński > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze: Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95 Rafał Krupiński - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better . 2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg : > where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun! > > -igor > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham wrote: >> I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket >> framework. >> >> In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks >> >> *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon >> 2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket >> 1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine >> 1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat >> 1 JavaServer >> Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 >> ManyDesigns >> Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4 >> Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring >> 3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill >> Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6 >> ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6 >> >> The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because >> they have the highest version number. >> >> So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and >> release version 10.0. >> >> Who's with me? >> >> -- Jim >> >> Spinal Tap Industries, Inc. >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun! -igor On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham wrote: > I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket > framework. > > In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks > > *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon > 2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket > 1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine > 1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat > 1 JavaServer > Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 ManyDesigns > Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4 > Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring > 3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill > Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6 > ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6 > > The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because > they have the highest version number. > > So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and > release version 10.0. > > Who's with me? > > -- Jim > > Spinal Tap Industries, Inc. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
[Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket framework. In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon 2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket 1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine 1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat 1 JavaServer Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 ManyDesigns Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4 Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring 3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6 ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6 The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because they have the highest version number. So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and release version 10.0. Who's with me? -- Jim Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.
