Re: Any info on wasp-swarm?

2011-12-09 Thread James Carman
Auth-roles has always worked fine for me.
On Dec 9, 2011 10:59 AM, "Dan Alvizu"  wrote:

> Ah, thanks for the info!
>
> @Other Dan: I poorly worded that. Role-based access is exactly what I want
> to do.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Emond Papegaaij
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of
> > wicketstuff-core
> > and as such is released for every wicket release. It is maintained and it
> > will
> > continue to work, as all our major applications are built on top of it.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Emond Papegaaij
> >
> > On Friday 09 December 2011 08:52:40 Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Dan Alvizu 
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do
> not
> > > > want users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that
> they
> > > > have. I think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being
> maintained
> > > > anymore? I can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1
> > > > announcement.
> > > >
> > > > The link on the wiki leads nowhere as well:
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-se
> > > > curity-parent
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/core-1.5.x/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-se
> > > curity-parent
> > >
> > > You ask for 1.5.x branch ...
> > >
> > > Master branch now is against Wicket trunk (i.e. 6.0)
> > >
> > > > (linked from)
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wasp-swarm-security.html
> > > >
> > > > So I guess my question is three part -- is wasp-swarm what I'm
> looking
> > > > for? Is it usable for wicket 1.5 or only wicket 1.4? And where the
> heck
> > > > did it go? ;)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > -Dan
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>


Re: Any info on wasp-swarm?

2011-12-09 Thread Dan Alvizu
Ah, thanks for the info!

@Other Dan: I poorly worded that. Role-based access is exactly what I want
to do.

-Dan

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Emond Papegaaij
wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of
> wicketstuff-core
> and as such is released for every wicket release. It is maintained and it
> will
> continue to work, as all our major applications are built on top of it.
>
> Best regards,
> Emond Papegaaij
>
> On Friday 09 December 2011 08:52:40 Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Dan Alvizu 
> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not
> > > want users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they
> > > have. I think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained
> > > anymore? I can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1
> > > announcement.
> > >
> > > The link on the wiki leads nowhere as well:
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-se
> > > curity-parent
> >
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/core-1.5.x/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-se
> > curity-parent
> >
> > You ask for 1.5.x branch ...
> >
> > Master branch now is against Wicket trunk (i.e. 6.0)
> >
> > > (linked from)
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wasp-swarm-security.html
> > >
> > > So I guess my question is three part -- is wasp-swarm what I'm looking
> > > for? Is it usable for wicket 1.5 or only wicket 1.4? And where the heck
> > > did it go? ;)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > -Dan
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


Re: Any info on wasp-swarm?

2011-12-09 Thread Emond Papegaaij
Hi Dan,

As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of wicketstuff-core 
and as such is released for every wicket release. It is maintained and it will 
continue to work, as all our major applications are built on top of it.

Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij

On Friday 09 December 2011 08:52:40 Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Dan Alvizu  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not
> > want users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they
> > have. I think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained
> > anymore? I can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1
> > announcement.
> > 
> > The link on the wiki leads nowhere as well:
> > 
> > https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-se
> > curity-parent
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/core-1.5.x/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-se
> curity-parent
> 
> You ask for 1.5.x branch ...
> 
> Master branch now is against Wicket trunk (i.e. 6.0)
> 
> > (linked from)
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wasp-swarm-security.html
> > 
> > So I guess my question is three part -- is wasp-swarm what I'm looking
> > for? Is it usable for wicket 1.5 or only wicket 1.4? And where the heck
> > did it go? ;)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > -Dan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: Any info on wasp-swarm?

2011-12-08 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Dan Alvizu  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not want
> users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they have. I
> think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained anymore? I
> can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1 announcement.
>
> The link on the wiki leads nowhere as well:
>
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-security-parent

https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/core-1.5.x/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-security-parent

You ask for 1.5.x branch ...

Master branch now is against Wicket trunk (i.e. 6.0)

> (linked from)
> https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wasp-swarm-security.html
>
> So I guess my question is three part -- is wasp-swarm what I'm looking for?
> Is it usable for wicket 1.5 or only wicket 1.4? And where the heck did it
> go? ;)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Dan



-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: Any info on wasp-swarm?

2011-12-08 Thread Dan Retzlaff
Hi, Dan. Can you clarify the requirements of your application? If users'
access are not based on their roles, then what are they based on?

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Dan Alvizu  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not want
> users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they have. I
> think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained anymore? I
> can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1 announcement.
>
> The link on the wiki leads nowhere as well:
>
>
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-security-parent
> (linked from)
> https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wasp-swarm-security.html
>
> So I guess my question is three part -- is wasp-swarm what I'm looking for?
> Is it usable for wicket 1.5 or only wicket 1.4? And where the heck did it
> go? ;)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Dan
>


Any info on wasp-swarm?

2011-12-08 Thread Dan Alvizu
Hi,

I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not want
users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they have. I
think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained anymore? I
can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1 announcement.

The link on the wiki leads nowhere as well:

https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/wicket-security-parent
(linked from)
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wasp-swarm-security.html

So I guess my question is three part -- is wasp-swarm what I'm looking for?
Is it usable for wicket 1.5 or only wicket 1.4? And where the heck did it
go? ;)

Thanks,

-Dan