Markupstream.hasMore vs. MarkupStream.next

2016-05-13 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Hi all,

hasMore: return currentIndex < markup.size();
next:if (++currentIndex < markup.size()) {...}
me:  while (markupStream.hasMore()) {...}

I get a null element within the while loop which I wouldn't expect to
get. markup.size() is 73, currentIndex 72, so hasMore returns true,
while next returns null, because it already advanced the index on its
check.

Is this a bug or is using hasMore the wrong idiom in this case?

I just followed code in the core codebase, like in Enclosure, the only
difference there is that the result of next is ignored. Of course I
can check for null and such, I just didn't expect such a behavior.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning   E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme  http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...05151-  9468- 55
Fax...05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: Markupstream.hasMore vs. MarkupStream.next

2016-05-15 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Thorsten Schöning,
am Freitag, 13. Mai 2016 um 20:14 schrieben Sie:

> Is this a bug or is using hasMore the wrong idiom in this case?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6165

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning   E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme  http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...05151-  9468- 55
Fax...05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org