RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
>Fixed in 1.4.x. Can you try a snapshot build and verify? I built a snapshot and tested it. It works beautifully! Thanks for fixing this one. Regards, Chris > >-- >Jeremy Thomerson >http://www.wickettraining.com > > > >On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Chris Colman >> wrote: > >> >> > > Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest >> >> 1.9.x. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in "submarine mode". I >> >> mean, >> >> > Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding >> edge >> >> :) >> >> >> >> Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep our >> >> covert 1.9.x development a secret but it's all out now! We're working >> on >> >> advanced features like a neural interface where you stick electrodes >> >> into your cranial and merely think of the UI you desire and the >> wicket >> >> code is generated for you automatically.) >> > >> > >> >Sounds great! >> >> Yeah, but we're having trouble getting beta testers - that whole >> electrodes in the brain kinda scares them off :) >> >> >But back to a serious note, if nobody else works on that >> >issue soon, I'll try to look at it this week. >> >> That would be most appreciated Jeremy, thanks! >> >> > >> >Jeremy >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Chris Colman wrote: > >Fixed in 1.4.x. > > Cool! Thanks for such a quick turn around on that one. > > > Can you try a snapshot build and verify? > > Yes. By snapshot do you mean there is a prebuilt snapshot ready to > download somewhere or will I need to create my own snapshot from svn and > build it? > You'll need to build it - I'm not sure the status of our automated builds right now. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
>Fixed in 1.4.x. Cool! Thanks for such a quick turn around on that one. > Can you try a snapshot build and verify? Yes. By snapshot do you mean there is a prebuilt snapshot ready to download somewhere or will I need to create my own snapshot from svn and build it? >-- >Jeremy Thomerson >http://www.wickettraining.com > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
Fixed in 1.4.x. Can you try a snapshot build and verify? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Chris Colman wrote: > >> > > Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest > >> 1.9.x. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in "submarine mode". I > >> mean, > >> > Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding > edge > >> :) > >> > >> Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep our > >> covert 1.9.x development a secret but it's all out now! We're working > on > >> advanced features like a neural interface where you stick electrodes > >> into your cranial and merely think of the UI you desire and the > wicket > >> code is generated for you automatically.) > > > > > >Sounds great! > > Yeah, but we're having trouble getting beta testers - that whole > electrodes in the brain kinda scares them off :) > > >But back to a serious note, if nobody else works on that > >issue soon, I'll try to look at it this week. > > That would be most appreciated Jeremy, thanks! > > > > >Jeremy > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
>> > > Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest >> 1.9.x. >> > > >> > > >> > WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in "submarine mode". I >> mean, >> > Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding edge >> :) >> >> Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep our >> covert 1.9.x development a secret but it's all out now! We're working on >> advanced features like a neural interface where you stick electrodes >> into your cranial and merely think of the UI you desire and the wicket >> code is generated for you automatically.) > > >Sounds great! Yeah, but we're having trouble getting beta testers - that whole electrodes in the brain kinda scares them off :) >But back to a serious note, if nobody else works on that >issue soon, I'll try to look at it this week. That would be most appreciated Jeremy, thanks! > >Jeremy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Chris Colman wrote: > > > Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest > 1.9.x. > > > > > > > > WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in "submarine mode". I > mean, > > Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding edge > :) > > Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep our > covert 1.9.x development a secret but it's all out now! We're working on > advanced features like a neural interface where you stick electrodes > into your cranial and merely think of the UI you desire and the wicket > code is generated for you automatically.) Sounds great! But back to a serious note, if nobody else works on that issue soon, I'll try to look at it this week. Jeremy
RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
> > Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x. > > > > > WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in "submarine mode". I mean, > Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding edge :) Yeah, whoops! I meant to say 1.4.9 ... (I had intended to keep our covert 1.9.x development a secret but it's all out now! We're working on advanced features like a neural interface where you stick electrodes into your cranial and merely think of the UI you desire and the wicket code is generated for you automatically.) > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Chris Colman wrote: > Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x. > > WHOA! You guys must be working pretty hard in "submarine mode". I mean, Igor's only working on 1.5.x and I thought he was on the bleeding edge :) -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
RE: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
>Is this also same as: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2636 ? It looks very similar though the conditions are slightly different. 2882 doesn't need to be in an 'extends' markup context to occur. I note this from the comments in 2636: " - Creates a Wicket component on the fly." Which makes these bugs much more similar than they seem at first glance. They could in fact be caused by the same problem even though they are distinct bugs. 2882 is also related to components that are created on the fly - not using the wicket:component tag but using an IComponentResolver implementation which will also result in a component being created on the fly. There may be some fundamental lifecycle issue here that is a result of the way 'on the fly' components do not undergo the same 'ordering of the lifecycle processing' that 'pre instantiated' components do. It's a shame because the ability to create components on the fly, whether by wicket:component or using component resolvers is a majorly powerful feature of wicket that I haven't been able to find in most other frameworks. >I whish this could be fixed for 1.4.9.1 Ditto bro! I'm very keen to migrate from 1.4.1 up to the latest 1.9.x. > >** >Martin > >2010/5/21 Chris Colman : >> Enclosures have to be one of the top ten awesome features of wicket as >> they allow us to wrap the many optional components in our CMS. They're >> awesome because the 'wrapping' is automatically ditched if the 'wrappee' >> is not visible. >> >> I was just wondering if anyone was able to reproduce this issue with the >> quickstart I provided. We are wanting to redeploy a major wicket powered >> CMS with the latest version of wicket but this issue is holding us back >> at wicket version 1.4.1 but we need fixes and features included in more >> recent releases. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2882 >> >> I've downloaded the source code and tried debugging the problem myself >> but my lack of understanding of how wicket works internally with regard >> to the lifecycle, the chain of resolvers and the interactions with child >> components that may or may not be present means I get 'stumped' (pardon >> the wicket pun) pretty quickly :) >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WICKET-2882 Enclosures issue
Is this also same as: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2636 ? I whish this could be fixed for 1.4.9.1 ** Martin 2010/5/21 Chris Colman : > Enclosures have to be one of the top ten awesome features of wicket as > they allow us to wrap the many optional components in our CMS. They're > awesome because the 'wrapping' is automatically ditched if the 'wrappee' > is not visible. > > I was just wondering if anyone was able to reproduce this issue with the > quickstart I provided. We are wanting to redeploy a major wicket powered > CMS with the latest version of wicket but this issue is holding us back > at wicket version 1.4.1 but we need fixes and features included in more > recent releases. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2882 > > I've downloaded the source code and tried debugging the problem myself > but my lack of understanding of how wicket works internally with regard > to the lifecycle, the chain of resolvers and the interactions with child > components that may or may not be present means I get 'stumped' (pardon > the wicket pun) pretty quickly :) > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
