Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release
By the way Wicket is growing and changing i thought that the book would never been finished as one chapter was probably done, another would have to be refactored to keep it up to date with the API. Actually the only time when i had to rewrite code for switching to another version was from 1.2 to 1.3 and the migration guide made that quite painless. Congratulations on finishing, although the MEAP is no good for me, as Romania seems not to be a valid country(too many of us getting rich from buying pdf books with fake cards i guess or something) so will need to wait for Amazon paper version :(. Eelco Hillenius wrote: > >> I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in >> Action. > > Hi Ned, > > I'm afraid not, because we are right now finalizing the book and we > still have to start working on 1.4. I would also mean weeks of extra > work for us, and after more than 2 years of writing, we've had it :-) > > The good thing is that it shouldn't make a big difference to start > with; you should be able to use 1.4 without the generics just fine if > you just ignore the compiler warnings. > > Maybe we'll bring out an extension to the book sometime around when > 1.4 becomes final. But no promises. :-) > > Eelco > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-in-Action---1.4-pending-release-tp16228144p16361218.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release
> I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in Action. Hi Ned, I'm afraid not, because we are right now finalizing the book and we still have to start working on 1.4. I would also mean weeks of extra work for us, and after more than 2 years of writing, we've had it :-) The good thing is that it shouldn't make a big difference to start with; you should be able to use 1.4 without the generics just fine if you just ignore the compiler warnings. Maybe we'll bring out an extension to the book sometime around when 1.4 becomes final. But no promises. :-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release
Yeah for 2.0 they can make a new revision 'wicket in action 2' On 3/23/08, Ned Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Heh, nah :) the book is great so far. > > I know generics is pretty much just a syntactic nicety, so it doesn't matter > one way or the other. > > Perhaps a good way to sell a sequel ;) > > > "C." Bergström wrote: > > > > You must want Martijn or Eelco to really hurt you huh? ;) > > > > I just want to congratulate them on all the hard work thus far... > > > > ./C > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-in-Action---1.4-pending-release-tp16228144p16232646.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release
Heh, nah :) the book is great so far. I know generics is pretty much just a syntactic nicety, so it doesn't matter one way or the other. Perhaps a good way to sell a sequel ;) "C." Bergström wrote: > > You must want Martijn or Eelco to really hurt you huh? ;) > > I just want to congratulate them on all the hard work thus far... > > ./C > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-in-Action---1.4-pending-release-tp16228144p16232646.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 16:01 -0700, Ned Collyer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in Action. > > It would be great if when it's released in paper form, that examples match > the current version version of wicket. I can imagine it would be a huge > effort to update it :( You must want Martijn or Eelco to really hurt you huh? ;) I just want to congratulate them on all the hard work thus far... ./C - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]