Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release

2008-03-28 Thread serban.balamaci

By the way Wicket is growing and changing i thought that the book would never
been finished as one chapter was probably done, another would have to be
refactored to keep it up to date with the API. Actually the only time when i
had to rewrite code for switching to another version was from 1.2 to 1.3 and
the migration guide made that quite painless. Congratulations on finishing,
although the MEAP is no good for me, as Romania seems not to be a valid
country(too many of us getting rich from buying pdf books with fake cards i
guess or something) so will need to wait for Amazon paper version :(.


Eelco Hillenius wrote:
 
  I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in
 Action.
 
 Hi Ned,
 
 I'm afraid not, because we are right now finalizing the book and we
 still have to start working on 1.4. I would also mean weeks of extra
 work for us, and after more than 2 years of writing, we've had it :-)
 
 The good thing is that it shouldn't make a big difference to start
 with; you should be able to use 1.4 without the generics just fine if
 you just ignore the compiler warnings.
 
 Maybe we'll bring out an extension to the book sometime around when
 1.4 becomes final. But no promises. :-)
 
 Eelco
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-in-Action---1.4-pending-release-tp16228144p16361218.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release

2008-03-23 Thread Ned Collyer

Heh, nah :) the book is great so far.

I know generics is pretty much just a syntactic nicety, so it doesn't matter
one way or the other.

Perhaps a good way to sell a sequel ;)


quot;C.quot; Bergström wrote:
 
 You must want Martijn or Eelco to really hurt you huh? ;)
 
 I just want to congratulate them on all the hard work thus far...
 
 ./C
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-in-Action---1.4-pending-release-tp16228144p16232646.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release

2008-03-23 Thread Johan Compagner
Yeah for 2.0 they can make a new revision 'wicket in action 2'

On 3/23/08, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Heh, nah :) the book is great so far.

 I know generics is pretty much just a syntactic nicety, so it doesn't matter
 one way or the other.

 Perhaps a good way to sell a sequel ;)


 quot;C.quot; Bergström wrote:
 
  You must want Martijn or Eelco to really hurt you huh? ;)
 
  I just want to congratulate them on all the hard work thus far...
 
  ./C
 

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-in-Action---1.4-pending-release-tp16228144p16232646.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release

2008-03-23 Thread Eelco Hillenius
  I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in Action.

Hi Ned,

I'm afraid not, because we are right now finalizing the book and we
still have to start working on 1.4. I would also mean weeks of extra
work for us, and after more than 2 years of writing, we've had it :-)

The good thing is that it shouldn't make a big difference to start
with; you should be able to use 1.4 without the generics just fine if
you just ignore the compiler warnings.

Maybe we'll bring out an extension to the book sometime around when
1.4 becomes final. But no promises. :-)

Eelco

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release

2008-03-22 Thread Ned Collyer

Hi,

I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in Action.

It would be great if when it's released in paper form, that examples match
the current version version of wicket.  I can imagine it would be a huge
effort to update it :(
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-in-Action---1.4-pending-release-tp16228144p16228144.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Wicket in Action - 1.4 pending release

2008-03-22 Thread C.

On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 16:01 -0700, Ned Collyer wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in Action.
 
 It would be great if when it's released in paper form, that examples match
 the current version version of wicket.  I can imagine it would be a huge
 effort to update it :(

You must want Martijn or Eelco to really hurt you huh? ;)

I just want to congratulate them on all the hard work thus far...

./C


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]