subject:"Wicket7\: MediaComponent and Source classes"

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Sven Meier  wrote:

> Yes, an overriden method with ART parameter will be something to be
> migrated :/.
>
> > We can try though!
>
> I've greped the Wicket's souce code once again, and only on*()- and
> respond()-methods kept their ART.
> All other 'active' methods (e.g. ModalWindow#close()) take a
> IPartialPageRequestHandler now.
>

I've missed that ModalWindow#close() is changed too.
I'll do a grep as well.

Since this change is done for Wicket then it should be done for other more
important UI libraries like Wicket jQuery UI, Wicket Bootstrap and
WicketStuff Foundation.
I suggest to postpone the release of Wicket 7.0.0 with few weeks until we
make the changes and test them for few days.
WDYT?


>
> If it helps, I could create a pull-request for the relevant methods in
> wicket-jquery-ui.
>
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 09.07.2015 22:32, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:
>>
>>  Ok. you're partially right :/
>>>
>>>  The compilation error would happen if an application extends ModalWindow
>> and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra tasks. I
>> have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
>> applications.
>>
>>
>>  #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)

>>> Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has
>>> changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
>>> But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
>>> recompiled anyway.
>>>
>>
>> The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
>> candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too late. We
>> can try though!
>>
>>
>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Martin,

  This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>
 the parameter from ART

> to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to fix
>
 the compilation error.

 but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.

   If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to

> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>
>  Nope, see above.

 Regards
 Sven

 On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:

  Hi Sven,
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:
>
>   Hi,
>
>> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget
>> to
>> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>
>> I don't think this change is too disruptive:
>>
>>  - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
>
>  modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
>>
>>   What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually
>> changes
>>
> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
> WebSocket response.
> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
> the
> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses
> ModalWindow
> will have to fix the compilation error.
>
>
>   - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
>
>>   AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
>>
>>   It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is
>>
> OK.
> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this
> is
> needed.
>
>
>   - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
>
>> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
>>   find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
>>
>>   Those are good changes!
>>
>
>   If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their
> signature
>
>> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
>> without breaking the API.
>>
>>  No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>
>
>
> we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little
>> bit
>>
>>  concerned
>>>
>>>   So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further
>>>
>> instead
>> of 2 steps back.
>>
>>   IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does
>>
> this
> from time to time).
> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:
>
> MyComponent.java:
>
> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
>   {
>>>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Yes, an overriden method with ART parameter will be something to be 
migrated :/.


> We can try though!

I've greped the Wicket's souce code once again, and only on*()- and 
respond()-methods kept their ART.
All other 'active' methods (e.g. ModalWindow#close()) take a 
IPartialPageRequestHandler now.


If it helps, I could create a pull-request for the relevant methods in 
wicket-jquery-ui.


Sven


On 09.07.2015 22:32, Martin Grigorov wrote:

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:


Ok. you're partially right :/


The compilation error would happen if an application extends ModalWindow
and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra tasks. I
have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
applications.



#close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)

Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has
changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
recompiled anyway.


The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too late. We
can try though!




Sven



On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:


Hi Martin,


This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of

the parameter from ART

to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to fix

the compilation error.

but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.

  If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to

#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
Every application will both at compile time and runtime.


Nope, see above.

Regards
Sven

On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:


Hi Sven,

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:

  Hi,

I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget
to
IPartialPageRequestHandler.

I don't think this change is too disruptive:


- client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.


modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)

  What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes

exactly like ModalWindow#close().
He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
WebSocket response.
This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
the
parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
will have to fix the compilation error.


  - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.

  AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)

  It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is

OK.
The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this
is
needed.


  - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with

IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
  find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)

  Those are good changes!


  If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature

to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
without breaking the API.


No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
Every application will both at compile time and runtime.




   we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little
bit


concerned

  So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further

instead
of 2 steps back.

  IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does

this
from time to time).
Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:

MyComponent.java:

add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
IWebSocketPushMessage message)
  {
 AjaxRequestTarget target =
WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());

 modalWindow.close(target);
  }
});


  Regards

Sven



On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:

  Hi Sven,


   But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?


   True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with


"on"-prefix).
In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like
#open,
#close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
#find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.


  -

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands,

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:

> Ok. you're partially right :/
>

The compilation error would happen if an application extends ModalWindow
and overrides #close(AjaxRequestTarget) method to do some extra tasks. I
have such code for Wicket Bootstrap's Modal component in one of my
applications.


>
> >#close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)
>
> Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has
> changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
> But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be
> recompiled anyway.


The problem is that we probably won't find and change all possible
candidates for this change. And once 7.0.0 is out it will be too late. We
can try though!


>
>
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> > This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>> the parameter from ART
>> > to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to fix
>> the compilation error.
>>
>> but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.
>>
>>  If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>>
>>
>> Nope, see above.
>>
>> Regards
>> Sven
>>
>> On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sven,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,

 I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget
 to
 IPartialPageRequestHandler.

 I don't think this change is too disruptive:

>>> - client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
>>>
 modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)

  What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
>>> exactly like ModalWindow#close().
>>> He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
>>> WebSocket response.
>>> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of
>>> the
>>> parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
>>> will have to fix the compilation error.
>>>
>>>
>>>  - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
  AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)

  It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is
>>> OK.
>>> The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this
>>> is
>>> needed.
>>>
>>>
>>>  - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
 IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
  find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)

  Those are good changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>  If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature
 to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
 without breaking the API.

>>>
>>> No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
>>> #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
>>> Every application will both at compile time and runtime.
>>>
>>>
>>>
   we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little
 bit

> concerned
>
>  So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further
 instead
 of 2 steps back.

  IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does
>>> this
>>> from time to time).
>>> Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
>>> suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:
>>>
>>> MyComponent.java:
>>>
>>> add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
>>> protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
>>> IWebSocketPushMessage message)
>>>  {
>>> AjaxRequestTarget target =
>>> WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
>>>
>>> modalWindow.close(target);
>>>  }
>>> });
>>>
>>>
>>>  Regards
 Sven



 On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:

  Hi Sven,
>
>
>   But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>
>>
>>   True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
>>
> "on"-prefix).
> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like
> #open,
> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>
> Thanks & best regards,
> Sebastien.
>
>
>  -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



>>
>>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Ok. you're partially right :/

>#close(AjaxRequestTarget) to #close(IPartialPageRequestHandler)

Every application has to be recompiled as the method argument type has 
changed. But there won't be any compilation error.
But for a migration to Wicket 7 each application will have to be 
recompiled anyway.

Sven

On 09.07.2015 20:11, Sven Meier wrote:

Hi Martin,

> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type 
of the parameter from ART
> to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to 
fix the compilation error.

but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.

If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
Every application will both at compile time and runtime.

Nope, see above.

Regards
Sven

On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:

Hi Sven,

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:

Hi,

I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from 
AjaxRequestTarget to

IPartialPageRequestHandler.

I don't think this change is too disruptive:

- client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.

modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)

What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
exactly like ModalWindow#close().
He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
WebSocket response.
This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type 
of the

parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
will have to fix the compilation error.

- all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
 AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)

It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is OK.
The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like 
this is

needed.

- a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
 find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)

Those are good changes!

If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their 
signature

to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
without breaking the API.

No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
Every application will both at compile time and runtime.

  we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a 
little bit

concerned

So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further 
instead

of 2 steps back.

IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does 
this

from time to time).
Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:

MyComponent.java:

add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
IWebSocketPushMessage message)
 {
AjaxRequestTarget target =
WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage()); 

modalWindow.close(target);
 }
});

Regards
Sven

On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:

Hi Sven,

  But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this 
kind?

  True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with

"on"-prefix).
In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like 
#open,

#close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
#find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Hi Martin,

> This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type 
of the parameter from ART
> to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow will have to 
fix the compilation error.

but ART *is* an IPPRH, so there will be no compilation error.

If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
Every application will both at compile time and runtime.

Nope, see above.

Regards
Sven

On 09.07.2015 16:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:

Hi Sven,

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:

Hi,

I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget to
IPartialPageRequestHandler.

I don't think this change is too disruptive:

- client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.

 modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)

What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
exactly like ModalWindow#close().
He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
WebSocket response.
This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of the
parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
will have to fix the compilation error.

- all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
 AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)

It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is OK.
The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this is
needed.

- a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
 find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)

Those are good changes!

If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature
to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
without breaking the API.

No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
Every application will both at compile time and runtime.

  we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit

concerned

So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further instead
of 2 steps back.

IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does this
from time to time).
Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:

MyComponent.java:

add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
IWebSocketPushMessage message)
 {
AjaxRequestTarget target =
WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
modalWindow.close(target);
 }
});

Regards
Sven

On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:

Hi Sven,

  But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?

  True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with

"on"-prefix).
In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like #open,
#close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
#find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Hi Sven,

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sven Meier  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget to
> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>
> I don't think this change is too disruptive:

- client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
> modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
>

What Maxim wanted as changes in Wicket jQuery UI are actually changes
exactly like ModalWindow#close().
He needs to be able to close jQuery UI dialogs (non-modal window) from
WebSocket response.
This is what I meant as too disruptive change. If we change the type of the
parameter from ART to IPPRH then every application that uses ModalWindow
will have to fix the compilation error.

> - all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
> AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
>

It is not possible to click a link with WebSocket request so this is OK.
The application developer can roll WebSocketLink if something like this is
needed.

> - a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with
> IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:
> find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)
>

Those are good changes!

>
> If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature
> to use IPartialPageRequestHandler
> without breaking the API.

No. If we broaden the API from #close(AjaxRequestTarget) to
#close(IPartialPageRequestHandler) then this will be an API break.
Every application will both at compile time and runtime.

>
>
>  we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit
>> concerned
>>
>
> So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further instead
> of 2 steps back.
>

IMO, it is OK-ish to change APIs in Wicket jQuery UI (Sebastien does this
from time to time).
Even if we decide to not break the API of some component then as I
suggested it should be possible to create an adapter from IPPRH to ART:

MyComponent.java:

add(new WebSocketBehavior() {
protected void onPush(WebSocketRequestHandler handler,
IWebSocketPushMessage message)
{
   AjaxRequestTarget target =
WebApplication.get().getAjaxRequestTargetProvider().get(handler.getPage());
   modalWindow.close(target);
}
});

>
> Regards
> Sven
>
>
>
> On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:
>
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>>
>>  But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>>>
>>>
>>>  True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with
>> "on"-prefix).
>> In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like #open,
>> #close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
>> #find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
>> This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
>> 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
>> previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...
>>
>> Thanks & best regards,
>> Sebastien.
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes


Hi,

I've just changed all relevant places in Wicket from AjaxRequestTarget 
to IPartialPageRequestHandler.


I don't think this change is too disruptive:
- client code can still call the existing methods with an ART, e.g.
modalWindow.close(ajaxRequestTarget)
- all places needing an ART remain unchanged, e.g.
AjaxLink#onClick(AjaxRequestTarget)
- a dozen Wicket components had to be changed to cooperate with 
IPartialPageRequestHandler instead of just ART:

find(IPartialPageRequestHandler.class)

If we identify other methods later, we can still broaden their signature 
to use IPartialPageRequestHandler

without breaking the API.


we are very (very) close to release 7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit 
concerned


So am I, but for now I think it's simpler to go one step further instead 
of 2 steps back.


Regards
Sven


On 09.07.2015 00:31, Sebastien wrote:

Hi Sven,



But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?



True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with "on"-prefix).
In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like #open,
#close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
#find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Hi Sebastien,

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Sebastien  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry, little bit late on the topic...
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
>> HI Maxim,
>>
>> This will lead to a big API break.
>> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
>> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
>> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>>
>
> That's exactly the point I am worrying about... All signatures have to be
> checked to see whether or not it's an AjaxRequestTarget usage only or a
> method that can works with websockets too (and then change the signature to
> IPartialPageRequestHandler)... With the same idea,
> IListener/AbstractListener are part of ART. But #add(Component...) is part
> of IPartialPageRequestHandler, so adding a component via websocket will not
> trigger IListener#onBeforeRespond (1) ? This would probably lead to some
> unexpected behaviors, like for instance in Wicket jQuery UI where there is
> a "DestroyListener" (which handles the jquery #destroy of the widget)...
>
> Am I accurate on the analysis or did I missed a point?
>

You are correct!
But this is the case even now (in Wicket 6.x) because
WebSocketRequestHandler has empty implementations of the listener related
methods:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/wicket-6.x/wicket-native-websocket/wicket-native-websocket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/protocol/ws/api/WebSocketRequestHandler.java#L72-L82

There is a workaround though - it is very easy to create AjaxRequestHandler
out of IPartialPageRequestHandler and use it when this is needed.


>
> Thanks & best regards,
> Sebastien.
>
> (1) actually I never double checked this is the case, but on the
> principle/theoretically I guess it should be...
>
>
>
>>
>> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
>> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>>
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Martin,
>>>
>>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>>>
>>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > The change is rather big:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>>> > I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
>>> use
>>> > them with WebSocket.
>>> > The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>>> >
>>> > Martin Grigorov
>>> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>> > Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>> >
>>>
>>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-08 Thread Sebastien

Hi Sven,


> But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?
>
>
True, about 85 methods (taking an ART without starting with "on"-prefix).
In these, I should identify the ones that should be changed (like #open,
#close, #show, #hide, #refresh, etc), the others, plus 2 calls to
#find(ART.class) to be taken into account...
This is a new change since -M6 and we are very (very) close to release
7.0.0, that's why I am a little bit concerned (did I wrote "worried"
previously? ;)). I hope I/we do not miss/forget something here...

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-08 Thread Sven Meier

Hi,

that change seems to have a hight impact - sorry, I didn't think of
these implications.

> But #add(Component...) is part of IPartialPageRequestHandler
> so adding a component via websocket will not trigger
IListener#onBeforeRespond

WebSockerRequestHandler#addListener() was a noop previously, so we don't
lose anything here

>I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior#onTimer

Why, an Ajax timer is triggered by Ajax calls only, isn't it?

AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior#restart() and #stop() could be invoked from a
WebSocket request though.

>All signatures have to be checked ... AjaxRequestTarget or ...
IPartialPageRequestHandler

I checked Wicket's code for methods that take ART as argument and having
a name which doesn't start with an 'on'-prefix:
There are the two methods above and ModalWindow#show() and #close() that
should be changed to IPartialPageRequestHandler. These are backwards
compatible changes actually.

There are half a dozen calls to #find(AjaxRequestTarget.class) in Wicket
classes which should switch from ART to IPartialPageRequestHandler, to
restore cooperation with WebSockets.

But it seems in wicket-jquery-ui there are more methods of this kind?

Regards
Sven

On 08.07.2015 21:30, Sebastien wrote:

Hi,

Sorry, little bit late on the topic...

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:

HI Maxim,

This will lead to a big API break.
If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.

That's exactly the point I am worrying about... All signatures have to be
checked to see whether or not it's an AjaxRequestTarget usage only or a
method that can works with websockets too (and then change the signature to
IPartialPageRequestHandler)... With the same idea,
IListener/AbstractListener are part of ART. But #add(Component...) is part
of IPartialPageRequestHandler, so adding a component via websocket will not
trigger IListener#onBeforeRespond (1) ? This would probably lead to some
unexpected behaviors, like for instance in Wicket jQuery UI where there is
a "DestroyListener" (which handles the jquery #destroy of the widget)...

Am I accurate on the analysis or did I missed a point?

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.

(1) actually I never double checked this is the case, but on the
principle/theoretically I guess it should be...

We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:

Hello Martin,

I guess following method need to be additionally updated:

org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:

The change is rather big:

https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af

I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to

use

them with WebSocket.
The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-08 Thread Sebastien

Hi,

Sorry, little bit late on the topic...

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> HI Maxim,
>
> This will lead to a big API break.
> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>

That's exactly the point I am worrying about... All signatures have to be
checked to see whether or not it's an AjaxRequestTarget usage only or a
method that can works with websockets too (and then change the signature to
IPartialPageRequestHandler)... With the same idea,
IListener/AbstractListener are part of ART. But #add(Component...) is part
of IPartialPageRequestHandler, so adding a component via websocket will not
trigger IListener#onBeforeRespond (1) ? This would probably lead to some
unexpected behaviors, like for instance in Wicket jQuery UI where there is
a "DestroyListener" (which handles the jquery #destroy of the widget)...

Am I accurate on the analysis or did I missed a point?

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.

(1) actually I never double checked this is the case, but on the
principle/theoretically I guess it should be...

>
> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Martin,
>>
>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>>
>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The change is rather big:
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>> > I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
>> use
>> > them with WebSocket.
>> > The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>> >
>> > Martin Grigorov
>> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> > Wicket Training and Consulting
>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> >
>>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-06 Thread Maxim Solodovnik

Just have tried :)
hopefully it'll help :)

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> May it helps when you add me to your contact list.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 05.07.2015 um 07:40 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> >
> > Hello Tobias,
> >
> > Everything seems to work as expected!
> > sorry for the late response, your emails are still going into Spam :(((
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> @Maxim: Is there anything left to be done within the media components?
> >> Otherwise I am going to vote +1
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 03.07.2015 um 07:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik  >:
> >>>
> >>> OK, will try
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  HI Maxim,
> 
>  This will lead to a big API break.
>  If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to
> >> keep
>  it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
>  developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with
> IPartialPageRequestHandler.
> 
>  We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
>  wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
> 
> > Hello Martin,
> >
> > I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
> >
> > org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The change is rather big:
> >>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> >> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs
> to
> > use
> >> them with WebSocket.
> >> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax...@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> >>> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>  mgrigo...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
>  Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
>  reason
> >> for
>  the change :-)
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax...@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
> 
> > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
>  be
> >
> > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > instead of
> > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> >> A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>  solomax...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> >> used
> >>> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> >>> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> > push
> > updated
> >>> component .
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>  solomax...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Thanks a lot Tobias!
> 
>  On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>  tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
>  Thank
> >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-05 Thread Tobias Soloschenko

May it helps when you add me to your contact list. 

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 05.07.2015 um 07:40 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> 
> Hello Tobias,
> 
> Everything seems to work as expected!
> sorry for the late response, your emails are still going into Spam :(((
> 
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> @Maxim: Is there anything left to be done within the media components?
>> Otherwise I am going to vote +1
>> 
>> kind regards
>> 
>> Tobias
>> 
>>> Am 03.07.2015 um 07:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
>>> 
>>> OK, will try
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 HI Maxim,
 
 This will lead to a big API break.
 If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to
>> keep
 it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
 developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
 
 We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
 wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
 
 Martin Grigorov
 Freelancer. Available for hire!
 Wicket Training and Consulting
 https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
 
 On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
 wrote:
 
> Hello Martin,
> 
> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
> 
> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
> 
>> The change is rather big:
>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
> use
>> them with WebSocket.
>> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com
> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
>>> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
 mgrigo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
 Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
 reason
>> for
 the change :-)
 
 Martin Grigorov
 Freelancer. Available for hire!
 Wicket Training and Consulting
 https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
 
 On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 
> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
 be
> 
> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> instead of
> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
>> A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
 solomax...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
>> used
>>> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
>>> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> push
> updated
>>> component .
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
 solomax...@gmail.com
>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Thanks a lot Tobias!
 
 On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
 tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
 
> Hi Maxim,
> 
> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
 Thank
>> you
 for
>> your
> suggestions! :-)
> 
> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
> of
>>> the
> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> 
> kind regards
> 
> Tobias
> 
>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com
>>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-04 Thread Maxim Solodovnik

Hello Tobias,

Everything seems to work as expected!
sorry for the late response, your emails are still going into Spam :(((

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> @Maxim: Is there anything left to be done within the media components?
> Otherwise I am going to vote +1
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 03.07.2015 um 07:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> >
> > OK, will try
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> HI Maxim,
> >>
> >> This will lead to a big API break.
> >> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to
> keep
> >> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
> >> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
> >>
> >> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
> >> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Martin,
> >>>
> >>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  The change is rather big:
> >>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
>  I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
> >>> use
>  them with WebSocket.
>  The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> >>>
>  wrote:
> 
> > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> >> Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
> >> reason
>  for
> >> the change :-)
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>  solomax...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
> >> be
> >>>
> >>> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> >>> instead of
> >>> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>  mgrigo...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
>  A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax...@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
> 
> > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
>  used
> > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> >>> push
> >>> updated
> > component .
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax...@gmail.com
> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks a lot Tobias!
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Maxim,
> >>>
> >>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
> >> Thank
>  you
> >> for
>  your
> >>> suggestions! :-)
> >>>
> >>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
> >>> of
> > the
> >>> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> >>>
> >>> kind regards
> >>>
> >>> Tobias
> >>>
>  Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
>  solomax...@gmail.com
> >> :
> 
>  Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
>  Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>  seems
> >>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-03 Thread Tobias Soloschenko

@Maxim: Is there anything left to be done within the media components? 
Otherwise I am going to vote +1

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 03.07.2015 um 07:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> 
> OK, will try
> Thanks
> 
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
> 
>> HI Maxim,
>> 
>> This will lead to a big API break.
>> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
>> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
>> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>> 
>> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
>> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello Martin,
>>> 
>>> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>>> 
>>> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 The change is rather big:
>> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
 I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
>>> use
 them with WebSocket.
 The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
 
 Martin Grigorov
 Freelancer. Available for hire!
 Wicket Training and Consulting
 https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
 
 On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik >> 
 wrote:
 
> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
>> Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
>> reason
 for
>> the change :-)
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
 solomax...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
>> be
>>> 
>>> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
>>> instead of
>>> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
 mgrigo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
 A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
 
 Martin Grigorov
 Freelancer. Available for hire!
 Wicket Training and Consulting
 https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
 
 On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 
> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
 used
> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
>>> push
>>> updated
> component .
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com
 
> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks a lot Tobias!
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Maxim,
>>> 
>>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
>> Thank
 you
>> for
 your
>>> suggestions! :-)
>>> 
>>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
>>> of
> the
>>> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
>>> 
>>> kind regards
>>> 
>>> Tobias
>>> 
 Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
 solomax...@gmail.com
>> :
 
 Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
 Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
 seems
 doesn't contain it :(
 
 And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> PageParameters
 passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add
>> public
>> getter
 for
>>> it?
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
 tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
 
> Hi Maxim,
> 
> hope the chang

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

OK, will try
Thanks

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> HI Maxim,
>
> This will lead to a big API break.
> If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
> it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
> developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.
>
> We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
> wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Martin,
> >
> > I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
> >
> > org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The change is rather big:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> > > I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
> > use
> > > them with WebSocket.
> > > The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > > > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > > > > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good
> reason
> > > for
> > > > > the change :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to
> be
> > > > > >
> > > > > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > > > > instead of
> > > > > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> > > used
> > > > > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> > push
> > > > > > updated
> > > > > > > > component .
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening.
> Thank
> > > you
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > > > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add
> public
> > > > > getter
> > > > > >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

HI Maxim,

This will lead to a big API break.
If we change this signature then we will have to change many more to keep
it consistent, and this will lead to a lot of work for the application
developers to change AjaxRequestTarget with IPartialPageRequestHandler.

We may need to make this change for Wicket 8.x if there are many users
wanting this change, but for now I'd suggest you to create an adapter.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> Hello Martin,
>
> I guess following method need to be additionally updated:
>
> org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
> > The change is rather big:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> > I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to
> use
> > them with WebSocket.
> > The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > > > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason
> > for
> > > > the change :-)
> > > >
> > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> > > > >
> > > > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > > > instead of
> > > > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> > used
> > > > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to
> push
> > > > > updated
> > > > > > > component .
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank
> > you
> > > > for
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> > > > getter
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > >> it?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > >> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Hello Martin,

I guess following method need to be additionally updated:

org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior.onTimer

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> The change is rather big:
>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to use
> them with WebSocket.
> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason
> for
> > > the change :-)
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> > > >
> > > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > > instead of
> > > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> used
> > > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> > > > updated
> > > > > > component .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank
> you
> > > for
> > > > > your
> > > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of
> > the
> > > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > seems
> > > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> > > getter
> > > > > for
> > > > > > >> it?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > >> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> > > because
> > > > > you
> > > > > > >> also
> > > > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> > > > resource
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > > > > information
> > > > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-02 Thread Tobias Soloschenko


Hi,

just wanted to mention that there are getter / setter for the 
PageParameters, now.


kind regards

Tobias

Am 02.07.15 um 16:21 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:

I also doing this regularly :)

WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Jul 2, 2015 8:09 PM, "Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro" 
wrote:


Doing it all the time :-)

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:


Hi,

I send a request to the google forum and they answered that I have to
bring enought users to unmark my Mails as Spam.

So if all who receiving my mails please click at "this is not a Spam

Mail"

kind regards

Tobias


Am 02.07.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <

reier...@gmail.com>:

@Tobias,

OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span

account

at gmail...

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:


Hi Maxim,

no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for

your

suggestions! :-)

Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the

buildbot

server. However the build was triggered already.

kind regards

Tobias


Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <

solomax...@gmail.com

:

Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT

seems

doesn't contain it :(

And one more question: I would like to be able to modify

PageParameters

passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for

it?

Thanks in advance

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:


Hi Maxim,

hope the change is like you wanted it to be:

https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4

But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because

you

also

can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource

is

streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more

information

refer to the Javadoc of the method.

kind regards

Tobias


Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:

Thanks a lot!
It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
will do migration and examine examples

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <

mgrigo...@apache.org

wrote:

For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <

solomax...@gmail.com

wrote:

sorry, most probably missed that email

Thanks!

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <

mgrigo...@apache.org>

wrote:

Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going

to

improve it tonight.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <

solomax...@gmail.com
wrote:

Thanks Martin :)

will look through sources :)

can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being

used

in

MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can

answer

this
question?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <

mgrigo...@apache.org

wrote:

Everything is possible.

All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <

solomax...@gmail.com
wrote:

Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
wicket7

examples as well?

I believe this might be very useful :)

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <

an.delb...@gmail.com

wrote:

Hi,

in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
org.apache.wicket.examples.media

Andrea.


On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:

Hello All,

Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and

found

lots

of

improvements:

1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and

"accept-range"

which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)

2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed

from

wicketstuff)
which is great :))

3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as

resourceReference
:(( why it can't be ResourceReference?

Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video

Component?

Thanks in advance!

-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org

For additional commands, e-mail:

users-h...@wicket.apache.org

--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax



-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

-
To unsubscrib

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

I also doing this regularly :)

WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Jul 2, 2015 8:09 PM, "Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro" 
wrote:

> Doing it all the time :-)
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I send a request to the google forum and they answered that I have to
> > bring enought users to unmark my Mails as Spam.
> >
> > So if all who receiving my mails please click at "this is not a Spam
> Mail"
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> > > Am 02.07.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reier...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > @Tobias,
> > >
> > > OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span
> account
> > > at gmail...
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Maxim,
> > >>
> > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
> your
> > >> suggestions! :-)
> > >>
> > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > buildbot
> > >> server. However the build was triggered already.
> > >>
> > >> kind regards
> > >>
> > >> Tobias
> > >>
> > >>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > >>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> seems
> > >>> doesn't contain it :(
> > >>>
> > >>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> PageParameters
> > >>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> > it?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks in advance
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > >>> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Hi Maxim,
> > 
> >  hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > 
> >  But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
> you
> > >> also
> >  can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
> is
> >  streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> information
> >  refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > 
> >  kind regards
> > 
> >  Tobias
> > 
> > > Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot!
> > > It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > will do migration and examine examples
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigo...@apache.org
> > >>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > >>
> > >> Martin Grigorov
> > >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> sorry, most probably missed that email
> > >>> Thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> > to
> >  improve it tonight.
> > 
> >  Martin Grigorov
> >  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >  Wicket Training and Consulting
> >  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > 
> >  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > >>> wrote:
> > 
> >  Thanks Martin :)
> > > will look through sources :)
> > >
> > > can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> used
> > >> in
> > > MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> > >> answer
> >  this
> > >>>
> >  question?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >  mgrigo...@apache.org
> > >>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Everything is possible.
> > >> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > >>
> > >> Martin Grigorov
> > >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> > >> wicket7
> > >>>
> >  examples as well?
> > >>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > >> an.delb...@gmail.com
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-02 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Doing it all the time :-)

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I send a request to the google forum and they answered that I have to
> bring enought users to unmark my Mails as Spam.
>
> So if all who receiving my mails please click at "this is not a Spam Mail"
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 02.07.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > @Tobias,
> >
> > OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span account
> > at gmail...
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> >> suggestions! :-)
> >>
> >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> buildbot
> >> server. However the build was triggered already.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik  >:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> >>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> >>> doesn't contain it :(
> >>>
> >>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> >>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> it?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Maxim,
> 
>  hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> 
>  But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> >> also
>  can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
>  streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
>  refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> 
>  kind regards
> 
>  Tobias
> 
> > Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> > It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > will do migration and examine examples
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org
> >>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> sorry, most probably missed that email
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> to
>  improve it tonight.
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>> solomax...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Thanks Martin :)
> > will look through sources :)
> >
> > can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> >> in
> > MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> >> answer
>  this
> >>>
>  question?
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>  mgrigo...@apache.org
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >
> > Everything is possible.
> >> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >> wicket7
> >>>
>  examples as well?
> >>> I believe this might be very useful :)
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >> an.delb...@gmail.com
> 
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> 
>  in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
>  org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> 
>  Andrea.
> 
> 
>  On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> 
>  Hello All,
> >
> > Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>  found
> >>>
>  lots
> >
> >> of
> >>>
>  impro

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-02 Thread Tobias Soloschenko

Hi,

I send a request to the google forum and they answered that I have to bring 
enought users to unmark my Mails as Spam. 

So if all who receiving my mails please click at "this is not a Spam Mail"

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 02.07.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro :
> 
> @Tobias,
> 
> OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span account
> at gmail...
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Maxim,
>> 
>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
>> suggestions! :-)
>> 
>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot
>> server. However the build was triggered already.
>> 
>> kind regards
>> 
>> Tobias
>> 
>>> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
>>> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
>>> doesn't contain it :(
>>> 
>>> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
>>> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Maxim,
 
 hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
 
 But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
>> also
 can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
 streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
 refer to the Javadoc of the method.
 
 kind regards
 
 Tobias
 
> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> will do migration and examine examples
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov >> 
> wrote:
> 
> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>> 
>> sorry, most probably missed that email
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
 improve it tonight.
 
 Martin Grigorov
 Freelancer. Available for hire!
 Wicket Training and Consulting
 https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
 
 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>> solomax...@gmail.com
>> 
>>> wrote:
 
 Thanks Martin :)
> will look through sources :)
> 
> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
>> in
> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
>> answer
 this
>>> 
 question?
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
 mgrigo...@apache.org
>> 
>>> wrote:
> 
> Everything is possible.
>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
 
> wrote:
>> 
>> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
>> wicket7
>>> 
 examples as well?
>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
>> an.delb...@gmail.com
 
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
 
 in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
 org.apache.wicket.examples.media
 
 Andrea.
 
 
 On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
 
 Hello All,
> 
> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
 found
>>> 
 lots
> 
>> of
>>> 
 improvements:
> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
 "accept-range"
> 
>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> wicketstuff)
> which is great :))
> 
> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
 resourceReference

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Thanks a million!
Could you please publish SNAPSHOT so I can test it?

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> The change is rather big:
>
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
> I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to use
> them with WebSocket.
> The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> > Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason
> for
> > > the change :-)
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> > > >
> > > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > > instead of
> > > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be
> used
> > > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> > > > updated
> > > > > > component .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank
> you
> > > for
> > > > > your
> > > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of
> > the
> > > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> > 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > seems
> > > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> > > getter
> > > > > for
> > > > > > >> it?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > >> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> > > because
> > > > > you
> > > > > > >> also
> > > > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> > > > resource
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > > > > information
> > > > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > > >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

The change is rather big:
https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/commit/e94f89d8f07f2b1af2b327a4aaec5ddd4b1400af
I guess many other methods will need to be changed too if one needs to use
them with WebSocket.
The improvement in the Wicket API looked so innocent ...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
> Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
> > @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> > Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason for
> > the change :-)
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> > >
> > > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > > instead of
> > > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > > >
> > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> > > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> > > updated
> > > > > component .
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you
> > for
> > > > your
> > > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of
> the
> > > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> kind regards
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Tobias
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest
> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > > seems
> > > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > > PageParameters
> > > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> > getter
> > > > for
> > > > > >> it?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > >> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> > because
> > > > you
> > > > > >> also
> > > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> > > resource
> > > > > is
> > > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > > > information
> > > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>  Martin Grigorov
> > > > > >>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > >>  Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > >>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > > >> 
> > > > > >>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Done: https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/177
Sorry, forgot about Sebastians vacation :(

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> @Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
> Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason for
> the change :-)
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
> >
> > public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> > instead of
> > public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> > > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> > updated
> > > > component .
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you
> for
> > > your
> > > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> kind regards
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Tobias
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > seems
> > > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > > PageParameters
> > > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public
> getter
> > > for
> > > > >> it?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > >> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice,
> because
> > > you
> > > > >> also
> > > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> > resource
> > > > is
> > > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > > information
> > > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> kind regards
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Tobias
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>  Martin Grigorov
> > > > >>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > >>  Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > >>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > >> solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>  wrote:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >>  sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > > >> > Thanks!
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is
> > > going
> > > > to
> > > > >> >> improve it tonight.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Martin Grigorov
> > > > >> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > >> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > >> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

@Maxim: Please create an issue at Wicket jQuery UI github.
Sebastien is on vacation. I can do it but first I need a good reason for
the change :-)

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> @Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be
>
> public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
> instead of
> public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> > A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> > > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push
> updated
> > > component .
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > >>
> > > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
> > your
> > > >> suggestions! :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > > >>
> > > >> kind regards
> > > >>
> > > >> Tobias
> > > >>
> > > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > seems
> > > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > > >> >
> > > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > > PageParameters
> > > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter
> > for
> > > >> it?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks in advance
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > >> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
> > you
> > > >> also
> > > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the
> resource
> > > is
> > > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > > information
> > > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> kind regards
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Tobias
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > > >> 
> > > >>  Martin Grigorov
> > > >>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >>  Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >> 
> > > >>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > >> solomax...@gmail.com
> > > >> >
> > > >>  wrote:
> > > >> 
> > > >>  sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > >> > Thanks!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is
> > going
> > > to
> > > >> >> improve it tonight.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Martin Grigorov
> > > >> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > >> >>
> > > >> > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > >> 
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Thanks Martin :)
> > > >> >>> will look through sources :)
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> > > used
> > > >> in
> > > >> >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias
> can
> > > >> answer
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >> this
> > > >> >
> > > >> >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

@Sebastian could you please modify AbstractDialog.open method to be

public final void open(IPartialPageRequestHandler target)
instead of
public final void open(AjaxRequestTarget target)

Thanks in advance!


On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
> A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> > as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> > Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push updated
> > component .
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Maxim,
> > >>
> > >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
> your
> > >> suggestions! :-)
> > >>
> > >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> > >>
> > >> kind regards
> > >>
> > >> Tobias
> > >>
> > >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> seems
> > >> > doesn't contain it :(
> > >> >
> > >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> > PageParameters
> > >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter
> for
> > >> it?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks in advance
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > >> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi Maxim,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > >> >>
> > >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
> you
> > >> also
> > >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
> > is
> > >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> > information
> > >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> kind regards
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Tobias
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> > >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > >> 
> > >>  Martin Grigorov
> > >>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >>  Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >> 
> > >>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >>  wrote:
> > >> 
> > >>  sorry, most probably missed that email
> > >> > Thanks!
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is
> going
> > to
> > >> >> improve it tonight.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Martin Grigorov
> > >> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> >>
> > >> > solomax...@gmail.com
> > >> 
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks Martin :)
> > >> >>> will look through sources :)
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> > used
> > >> in
> > >> >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> > >> answer
> > >> >>>
> > >> >> this
> > >> >
> > >> >> question?
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >> >>>
> > >> >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> > >> 
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Everything is possible.
> > >>  All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > >> 
> > >>  Martin Grigorov
> > >>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >>  Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >> 
> > >>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >> 
> > >> >>> solomax...@gmail.co

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-02 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

@Tobias,

OT: For some obscure reason your massages always goo into my Span account
at gmail...

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> suggestions! :-)
>
> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot
> server. However the build was triggered already.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> > doesn't contain it :(
> >
> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>
> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> also
> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot!
> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> >
>  wrote:
> 
>  sorry, most probably missed that email
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> >> improve it tonight.
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Martin :)
> >>> will look through sources :)
> >>>
> >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> in
> >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> answer
> >>>
> >> this
> >
> >> question?
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> 
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Everything is possible.
>  All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> 
> >>> solomax...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >
>  wicket7
> >
> >> examples as well?
> > I believe this might be very useful :)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >
>  an.delb...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >>
> >> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>
> >> Andrea.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >>>
> >> found
> >
> >> lots
> >>>
>  of
> >
> >> improvements:
> >>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >>>
> >> "accept-range"
> >>>
>  which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> >>> wicketstuff)
> >>> which is great :))
> >>>
> >>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >>>
> >> resourceReference
> >
> >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>
> >>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >>>
> >> Component?
> 
> > Thanks in advance!
> >>>
> >>>
> >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Yes, another minor cleanup: there is now
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/request/handler/IPartialPageRequestHandler.java
A base interface for Ajax and WebSocket.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
> as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
> Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push updated
> component .
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot Tobias!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> >> suggestions! :-)
> >>
> >> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> >> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik  >:
> >> >
> >> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> >> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> >> > doesn't contain it :(
> >> >
> >> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> PageParameters
> >> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> >> it?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Maxim,
> >> >>
> >> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >> >>
> >> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> >> also
> >> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
> is
> >> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> information
> >> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >> >>
> >> >> kind regards
> >> >>
> >> >> Tobias
> >> >>
> >> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks a lot!
> >> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> >> 
> >>  Martin Grigorov
> >>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>  Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> 
> >>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> solomax...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >>  wrote:
> >> 
> >>  sorry, most probably missed that email
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> to
> >> >> improve it tonight.
> >> >>
> >> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> >>
> >> > solomax...@gmail.com
> >> 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks Martin :)
> >> >>> will look through sources :)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> used
> >> in
> >> >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> >> answer
> >> >>>
> >> >> this
> >> >
> >> >> question?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >> >>>
> >> >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> >> 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Everything is possible.
> >>  All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >> 
> >>  Martin Grigorov
> >>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>  Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >> 
> >>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >> 
> >> >>> solomax...@gmail.com
> >> >>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> 
> >>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >> >
> >>  wicket7
> >> >
> >> >> examples as well?
> >> > I believe this might be very useful :)
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >> >
> >>  an.delb...@gmail.com
> >> >>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >> >> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >> >>
> >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Please see http://markmail.org/message/ji4nixgscvnbgi7z

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> Thanks for the clarifications Martin
> This seems to be caching issue on my side
>
> Could you please answer additional question regarding ListView
> It seems to be impossible in latest snapshot to create ListView("list",
> new List())
> It was working as expected in M6 and previous versions 
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
> > There is a new build. The snapshots should be updated.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Maxim,
> > >
> > > no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for
> your
> > > suggestions! :-)
> > >
> > > Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> > buildbot
> > > server. However the build was triggered already.
> > >
> > > kind regards
> > >
> > > Tobias
> > >
> > > > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> seems
> > > > doesn't contain it :(
> > > >
> > > > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify
> PageParameters
> > > > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> > it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Maxim,
> > > >>
> > > >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > > >>
> > > >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because
> you
> > > also
> > > >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource
> is
> > > >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more
> information
> > > >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > > >>
> > > >> kind regards
> > > >>
> > > >> Tobias
> > > >>
> > > >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks a lot!
> > > >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > > >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigo...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > > 
> > >  Martin Grigorov
> > >  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >  Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > 
> > >  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > >  wrote:
> > > 
> > >  sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> > to
> > > >> improve it tonight.
> > > >>
> > > >> Martin Grigorov
> > > >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > >>
> > > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks Martin :)
> > > >>> will look through sources :)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being
> used
> > > in
> > > >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> > > answer
> > > >>>
> > > >> this
> > > >
> > > >> question?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > > >>>
> > > >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Everything is possible.
> > >  All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > 
> > >  Martin Grigorov
> > >  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >  Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > 
> > >  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > 
> > > >>> solomax...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > 
> > >  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> > > >
> > >  wicket7
> > > >
> > > >> examples as well?
> > > > I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea de

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Additionally it looks like WebSocketRequestHandler can not be used
as AjaxRequestTarget any longer
Previously it was possible to use WebSocketRequestHandler to push updated
component .

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> Thanks a lot Tobias!
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
>> suggestions! :-)
>>
>> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
>> buildbot server. However the build was triggered already.
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
>> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
>> > doesn't contain it :(
>> >
>> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
>> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
>> it?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Maxim,
>> >>
>> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>> >>
>> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
>> also
>> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
>> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
>> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>> >>
>> >> kind regards
>> >>
>> >> Tobias
>> >>
>> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks a lot!
>> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>> >>> will do migration and examine examples
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigo...@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>> 
>>  Martin Grigorov
>>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com
>> >
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>  sorry, most probably missed that email
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> mgrigo...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
>> >> improve it tonight.
>> >>
>> >> Martin Grigorov
>> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> >>
>> > solomax...@gmail.com
>> 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Martin :)
>> >>> will look through sources :)
>> >>>
>> >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
>> in
>> >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
>> answer
>> >>>
>> >> this
>> >
>> >> question?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> >>>
>> >> mgrigo...@apache.org
>> 
>> > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Everything is possible.
>>  All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>> 
>>  Martin Grigorov
>>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> 
>> >>> solomax...@gmail.com
>> >>
>> >>> wrote:
>> 
>>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
>> >
>>  wicket7
>> >
>> >> examples as well?
>> > I believe this might be very useful :)
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
>> >
>>  an.delb...@gmail.com
>> >>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >>
>> >> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
>> >> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>> >>
>> >> Andrea.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello All,
>> >>>
>> >>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>> >>>
>> >> found
>> >
>> >> lots
>> >>>
>>  of
>> >
>> >> improvements:
>> >>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>> >>>
>> >> "accept-range"
>> >>>
>>  which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>> >>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
>> >>> wicketstuff)
>> >>> which is great :))
>> >>>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Thanks a lot Tobias!

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> suggestions! :-)
>
> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot
> server. However the build was triggered already.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> > doesn't contain it :(
> >
> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>
> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> also
> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot!
> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> >
>  wrote:
> 
>  sorry, most probably missed that email
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> >> improve it tonight.
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Martin :)
> >>> will look through sources :)
> >>>
> >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> in
> >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> answer
> >>>
> >> this
> >
> >> question?
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> 
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Everything is possible.
>  All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> 
> >>> solomax...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >
>  wicket7
> >
> >> examples as well?
> > I believe this might be very useful :)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >
>  an.delb...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >>
> >> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>
> >> Andrea.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >>>
> >> found
> >
> >> lots
> >>>
>  of
> >
> >> improvements:
> >>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >>>
> >> "accept-range"
> >>>
>  which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> >>> wicketstuff)
> >>> which is great :))
> >>>
> >>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >>>
> >> resourceReference
> >
> >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>
> >>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >>>
> >> Component?
> 
> > Thanks in advance!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Thanks for the clarifications Martin
This seems to be caching issue on my side

Could you please answer additional question regarding ListView
It seems to be impossible in latest snapshot to create ListView("list",
new List())
It was working as expected in M6 and previous versions 

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> There is a new build. The snapshots should be updated.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> > suggestions! :-)
> >
> > Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the
> buildbot
> > server. However the build was triggered already.
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> > > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik  >:
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> > > doesn't contain it :(
> > >
> > > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> > > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for
> it?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Maxim,
> > >>
> > >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> > >>
> > >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> > also
> > >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> > >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> > >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> > >>
> > >> kind regards
> > >>
> > >> Tobias
> > >>
> > >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks a lot!
> > >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> > >>> will do migration and examine examples
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> > 
> >  Martin Grigorov
> >  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >  Wicket Training and Consulting
> >  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > 
> >  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> > >
> >  wrote:
> > 
> >  sorry, most probably missed that email
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going
> to
> > >> improve it tonight.
> > >>
> > >> Martin Grigorov
> > >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > >>
> > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Martin :)
> > >>> will look through sources :)
> > >>>
> > >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> > in
> > >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> > answer
> > >>>
> > >> this
> > >
> > >> question?
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> > >>>
> > >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Everything is possible.
> >  All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > 
> >  Martin Grigorov
> >  Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >  Wicket Training and Consulting
> >  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > 
> >  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > 
> > >>> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > >>> wrote:
> > 
> >  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> > >
> >  wicket7
> > >
> > >> examples as well?
> > > I believe this might be very useful :)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > >
> >  an.delb...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >>
> > >> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > >> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > >>
> > >> Andrea.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello All,
> > >>>
> > >>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> > >>>
> > >> found
> > >
> > >> lots
> >

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

There is a new build. The snapshots should be updated.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your
> suggestions! :-)
>
> Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot
> server. However the build was triggered already.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> > Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> > doesn't contain it :(
> >
> > And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> > passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >>
> >> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> also
> >> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> >> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> >> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot!
> >>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >>> will do migration and examine examples
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> >
>  wrote:
> 
>  sorry, most probably missed that email
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> >> improve it tonight.
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Martin :)
> >>> will look through sources :)
> >>>
> >>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used
> in
> >>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can
> answer
> >>>
> >> this
> >
> >> question?
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>
> >> mgrigo...@apache.org
> 
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Everything is possible.
>  All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> 
>  Martin Grigorov
>  Freelancer. Available for hire!
>  Wicket Training and Consulting
>  https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> 
> >>> solomax...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> >
>  wicket7
> >
> >> examples as well?
> > I believe this might be very useful :)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> >
>  an.delb...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >>
> >> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> >> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >>
> >> Andrea.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >>>
> >> found
> >
> >> lots
> >>>
>  of
> >
> >> improvements:
> >>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >>>
> >> "accept-range"
> >>>
>  which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> >>> wicketstuff)
> >>> which is great :))
> >>>
> >>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >>>
> >> resourceReference
> >
> >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>>
> >>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >>>
> >> Component

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-02 Thread Tobias Soloschenko

Hi Maxim,

no problem I am going to add the getter this evening. Thank you for your 
suggestions! :-)

Maybe the SNAPSHOT isn't refreshed because of the downtime of the buildbot 
server. However the build was triggered already.

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 02.07.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik :
> 
> Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
> Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
> doesn't contain it :(
> 
> And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
> passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Maxim,
>> 
>> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>> 
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>> 
>> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you also
>> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
>> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
>> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>> 
>> kind regards
>> 
>> Tobias
>> 
>>> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>>> will do migration and examine examples
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
 
 Martin Grigorov
 Freelancer. Available for hire!
 Wicket Training and Consulting
 https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
 
 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik  
 wrote:
 
 sorry, most probably missed that email
> Thanks!
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
> 
> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
>> improve it tonight.
>> 
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> 
> solomax...@gmail.com
 
> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Martin :)
>>> will look through sources :)
>>> 
>>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
>>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer
>>> 
>> this
> 
>> question?
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>> 
>> mgrigo...@apache.org
 
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Everything is possible.
 All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
 
 Martin Grigorov
 Freelancer. Available for hire!
 Wicket Training and Consulting
 https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
 
 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
 
>>> solomax...@gmail.com
>> 
>>> wrote:
 
 Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> 
 wicket7
> 
>> examples as well?
> I believe this might be very useful :)
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> 
 an.delb...@gmail.com
>> 
>>> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>> 
>> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
>> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>> 
>> Andrea.
>> 
>> 
>> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>> 
>> Hello All,
>>> 
>>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>>> 
>> found
> 
>> lots
>>> 
 of
> 
>> improvements:
>>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>>> 
>> "accept-range"
>>> 
 which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
>>> wicketstuff)
>>> which is great :))
>>> 
>>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>>> 
>> resourceReference
> 
>> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>> 
>>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
>>> 
>> Component?
 
> Thanks in advance!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> 
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
> 
> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
> 
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-07-01 Thread Maxim Solodovnik

Thanks a lot for the changes Tobias,
Unfortunately I'm unable to test it due to latest 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT seems
doesn't contain it :(

And one more question: I would like to be able to modify PageParameters
passed to source, maybe it would be possible to add public getter for it?

Thanks in advance

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>
> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you also
> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more information
> refer to the Javadoc of the method.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
>> Thanks a lot!
>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>> will do migration and examine examples
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov 
>> wrote:
>>
>>  For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>>>
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik >> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  sorry, most probably missed that email
 Thanks!

 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
 wrote:

  Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> improve it tonight.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>
 solomax...@gmail.com
>>>
 wrote:
>
>  Thanks Martin :)
>> will look through sources :)
>>
>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer
>>
> this

> question?
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>
> mgrigo...@apache.org
>>>
 wrote:
>>
>>  Everything is possible.
>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>>>
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>
>> solomax...@gmail.com
>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have

>>> wicket7

> examples as well?
 I believe this might be very useful :)

 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <

>>> an.delb...@gmail.com
>
>> wrote:

  Hi,
>
> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>
> Andrea.
>
>
> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
>  Hello All,
>>
>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>>
> found

> lots
>>
>>> of

> improvements:
>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>>
> "accept-range"
>>
>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
>> wicketstuff)
>> which is great :))
>>
>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>>
> resourceReference

> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>
>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
>>
> Component?
>>>
 Thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>>
>
> -
>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
 --
 WBR
 Maxim aka solomax


>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>

 --
 WBR
 Maxim aka solomax


>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

We already using external storage :)
This is why this issue is arise :)
Thanks for the fix! I asked my only question on GitHub :)


On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
> >
> > But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you
> also
> > can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> > streamed directly
>
>
> I wouldn't recommend to use PackageResRef for bigger files which should be
> streamed.
> PackageResRef loads its resource with the class loader. That means you have
> to put the big resource in your .war/.ear.
> For bigger files I'd recommend to use external storage, not the application
> archive.
>
>
> > without loading it into memory. For more information refer to the Javadoc
> > of the method.
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> > Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >
> >  Thanks a lot!
> >> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
> >> will do migration and examine examples
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>  For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
> >>>
> >>> Martin Grigorov
> >>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> >>> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  sorry, most probably missed that email
>  Thanks!
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org>
>  wrote:
> 
>   Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> > improve it tonight.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >
>  solomax...@gmail.com
> >>>
>  wrote:
> >
> >  Thanks Martin :)
> >> will look through sources :)
> >>
> >> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
> >> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer
> >>
> > this
> 
> > question?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>
> > mgrigo...@apache.org
> >>>
>  wrote:
> >>
> >>  Everything is possible.
> >>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >>>
> >>> Martin Grigorov
> >>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> >>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>
> >> solomax...@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> 
> >>> wicket7
> 
> > examples as well?
>  I believe this might be very useful :)
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> 
> >>> an.delb...@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> 
>   Hi,
> >
> > in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >
> > Andrea.
> >
> >
> > On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >
> >  Hello All,
> >>
> >> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> >>
> > found
> 
> > lots
> >>
> >>> of
> 
> > improvements:
> >> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> >>
> > "accept-range"
> >>
> >>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> >> wicketstuff)
> >> which is great :))
> >>
> >> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> >>
> > resourceReference
> 
> > :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>
> >> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> >>
> > Component?
> >>>
>  Thanks in advance!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > -
> >
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>  --
>  WBR
>  Maxim aka solomax
> 
> 
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >>
> 
>  --
>  WBR
>  Maxim a

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> hope the change is like you wanted it to be:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4
>
> But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you also
> can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource is
> streamed directly


I wouldn't recommend to use PackageResRef for bigger files which should be
streamed.
PackageResRef loads its resource with the class loader. That means you have
to put the big resource in your .war/.ear.
For bigger files I'd recommend to use external storage, not the application
archive.


> without loading it into memory. For more information refer to the Javadoc
> of the method.
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
>  Thanks a lot!
>> It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
>> will do migration and examine examples
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov 
>> wrote:
>>
>>  For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>>>
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik >> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  sorry, most probably missed that email
 Thanks!

 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
 wrote:

  Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> improve it tonight.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>
 solomax...@gmail.com
>>>
 wrote:
>
>  Thanks Martin :)
>> will look through sources :)
>>
>> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
>> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer
>>
> this

> question?
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>
> mgrigo...@apache.org
>>>
 wrote:
>>
>>  Everything is possible.
>>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>>>
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>
>> solomax...@gmail.com
>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have

>>> wicket7

> examples as well?
 I believe this might be very useful :)

 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <

>>> an.delb...@gmail.com
>
>> wrote:

  Hi,
>
> in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> org.apache.wicket.examples.media
>
> Andrea.
>
>
> On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
>  Hello All,
>>
>> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
>>
> found

> lots
>>
>>> of

> improvements:
>> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
>>
> "accept-range"
>>
>>> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
>> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
>> wicketstuff)
>> which is great :))
>>
>> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>>
> resourceReference

> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>>
>> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
>>
> Component?
>>>
 Thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>>
>
> -
>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
 --
 WBR
 Maxim aka solomax


>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>

 --
 WBR
 Maxim aka solomax


>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-06-29 Thread Tobias Soloschenko


Hi Maxim,

hope the change is like you wanted it to be:

https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/e20bfa738aa64f35b668f05866e0c0b7ca71c1f4

But again: The PackageResourceReference is best practice, because you 
also can use "readBuffered(false)" of it - with this option the resource 
is streamed directly without loading it into memory. For more 
information refer to the Javadoc of the method.


kind regards

Tobias

Am 29.06.15 um 10:22 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:

Thanks a lot!
It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
will do migration and examine examples

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:


For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:


sorry, most probably missed that email
Thanks!

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:


Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
improve it tonight.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <

solomax...@gmail.com

wrote:


Thanks Martin :)
will look through sources :)

can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer

this

question?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <

mgrigo...@apache.org

wrote:


Everything is possible.
All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <

solomax...@gmail.com

wrote:


Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have

wicket7

examples as well?
I believe this might be very useful :)

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <

an.delb...@gmail.com

wrote:


Hi,

in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
org.apache.wicket.examples.media

Andrea.


On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:


Hello All,

Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and

found

lots

of

improvements:
1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and

"accept-range"

which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
wicketstuff)
which is great :))

3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as

resourceReference

:(( why it can't be ResourceReference?

Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video

Component?

Thanks in advance!





-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax




--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax




--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Juergen Donnerstag owns it.
He gave me the credentials several years ago.

So far it is as simple as deploy the new version and restart Tomcat 6.x.
I've tried before to use Tomcat 7.x but it seems there are some (cron?!)
scripts by the hosting provider which start Tomcat 6.x no matter what.
I'll have to debug these scripts and see whether there is Tomcat 8.x
installation because Wicket 7.x needs Servlet 3.0.
So, it will take a while...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:47 AM, andrea del bene 
wrote:

>
> I could do it if I knew what to do. Who is maintaining the examples site
> (in addition to you Martin)?
>
>  Everything is possible.
>> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>>
>> Martin Grigorov
>> Freelancer. Available for hire!
>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have wicket7
>>> examples as well?
>>> I believe this might be very useful :)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,

 in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
 org.apache.wicket.examples.media

 Andrea.


 On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:

  Hello All,
>
> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and found lots
>
 of
>>>
 improvements:
> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and "accept-range"
> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> wicketstuff)
> which is great :))
>
> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
>
 resourceReference
>>>
 :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
>
> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video Component?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>  -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-06-29 Thread andrea del bene



I could do it if I knew what to do. Who is maintaining the examples site 
(in addition to you Martin)?

Everything is possible.
All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:


Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have wicket7
examples as well?
I believe this might be very useful :)

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene 
wrote:


Hi,

in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
org.apache.wicket.examples.media

Andrea.


On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:


Hello All,

Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and found lots

of

improvements:
1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and "accept-range"
which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
wicketstuff)
which is great :))

3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as

resourceReference

:(( why it can't be ResourceReference?

Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video Component?

Thanks in advance!



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Thanks a lot!
It was gmail SPAM filter :(((
will do migration and examine examples

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > sorry, most probably missed that email
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> > > improve it tonight.
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Martin :)
> > > > will look through sources :)
> > > >
> > > > can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
> > > > MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer
> > this
> > > > question?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Everything is possible.
> > > > > All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> > wicket7
> > > > > > examples as well?
> > > > > > I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > > an.delb...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > > > > org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Andrea.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hello All,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> > found
> > > > lots
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > >> improvements:
> > > > > > >> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> > > > "accept-range"
> > > > > > >> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > > > > >> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> > > > > > >> wicketstuff)
> > > > > > >> which is great :))
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > > > > > resourceReference
> > > > > > >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video
> Component?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks in advance!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > -
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

For some reason Tobias' mails are marked as SPAM by GMail...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> sorry, most probably missed that email
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
> > Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> > improve it tonight.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Martin :)
> > > will look through sources :)
> > >
> > > can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
> > > MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer
> this
> > > question?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Everything is possible.
> > > > All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > > >
> > > > Martin Grigorov
> > > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have
> wicket7
> > > > > examples as well?
> > > > > I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> > an.delb...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > > > org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andrea.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hello All,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and
> found
> > > lots
> > > > > of
> > > > > >> improvements:
> > > > > >> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> > > "accept-range"
> > > > > >> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > > > >> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> > > > > >> wicketstuff)
> > > > > >> which is great :))
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > > > > resourceReference
> > > > > >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video Component?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks in advance!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > -
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > WBR
> > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

sorry, most probably missed that email
Thanks!

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
> improve it tonight.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Martin :)
> > will look through sources :)
> >
> > can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
> > MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer this
> > question?
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Everything is possible.
> > > All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> > >
> > > Martin Grigorov
> > > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have wicket7
> > > > examples as well?
> > > > I believe this might be very useful :)
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene <
> an.delb...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > > org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrea.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hello All,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and found
> > lots
> > > > of
> > > > >> improvements:
> > > > >> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> > "accept-range"
> > > > >> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > > >> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> > > > >> wicketstuff)
> > > > >> which is great :))
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > > > resourceReference
> > > > >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video Component?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks in advance!
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Tobias already explained that it was an oversight and he is going to
improve it tonight.

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> Thanks Martin :)
> will look through sources :)
>
> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer this
> question?
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
> > Everything is possible.
> > All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have wicket7
> > > examples as well?
> > > I believe this might be very useful :)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > >
> > > > Andrea.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello All,
> > > >>
> > > >> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and found
> lots
> > > of
> > > >> improvements:
> > > >> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> "accept-range"
> > > >> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > >> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> > > >> wicketstuff)
> > > >> which is great :))
> > > >>
> > > >> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > > resourceReference
> > > >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > >>
> > > >> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video Component?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks in advance!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

2015-06-29 Thread Tobias Soloschenko

Hi,

I answered already:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket7-MediaComponent-and-Source-classes-tp4671386p4671387.html

kind regards

Tobias

P.S.: Maybe it went into the SPAM-Filter.

2015-06-29 10:10 GMT+02:00 Maxim Solodovnik :

> Thanks Martin :)
> will look through sources :)
>
> can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
> MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer this
> question?
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov 
> wrote:
>
> > Everything is possible.
> > All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Freelancer. Available for hire!
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have wicket7
> > > examples as well?
> > > I believe this might be very useful :)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > > org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > > >
> > > > Andrea.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello All,
> > > >>
> > > >> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and found
> lots
> > > of
> > > >> improvements:
> > > >> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and
> "accept-range"
> > > >> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > > >> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> > > >> wicketstuff)
> > > >> which is great :))
> > > >>
> > > >> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > > resourceReference
> > > >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > > >>
> > > >> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video Component?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks in advance!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Thanks Martin :)
will look through sources :)

can you please tell me why PackageResourceReference is being used in
MediaComponent and not ResourceReference? Or maybe Tobias can answer this
question?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Martin Grigorov 
wrote:

> Everything is possible.
> All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer. Available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have wicket7
> > examples as well?
> > I believe this might be very useful :)
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > > org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> > >
> > > Andrea.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello All,
> > >>
> > >> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and found lots
> > of
> > >> improvements:
> > >> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and "accept-range"
> > >> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> > >> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> > >> wicketstuff)
> > >> which is great :))
> > >>
> > >> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> > resourceReference
> > >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> > >>
> > >> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video Component?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks in advance!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes

Everything is possible.
All I need is longer day. 24 hours are not enough...

Martin Grigorov
Freelancer. Available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Maxim Solodovnik 
wrote:

> Is it possible update http://www.wicket-library.com/ to have wicket7
> examples as well?
> I believe this might be very useful :)
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:49 PM, andrea del bene 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > in wicket-examples take a look at the project in
> > org.apache.wicket.examples.media
> >
> > Andrea.
> >
> >
> > On 29/06/2015 06:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> Recently I have upgraded to Wicket+wicketstuff 7.0.0-M6 and found lots
> of
> >> improvements:
> >> 1) AbstractResource is now supports "content-range" and "accept-range"
> >> which is great! I'll remove my custom code for this :)
> >> 2) HTML5 Video is supported by wicket itself (was removed from
> >> wicketstuff)
> >> which is great :))
> >>
> >> 3) MediaComponent requires *PackageResourceReference* as
> resourceReference
> >> :(( why it can't be ResourceReference?
> >>
> >> Are there any examples in wicket7 regarding new Video Component?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance!
> >>
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Re: Wicket7: MediaComponent and Source classes