Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
On 11/16/2010 12:06 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>
>
> Raluca Stavro wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/15/2010 09:18 AM, Raluca Stavro wrote:
>>>
Hello Ricardo,
Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
take a look at the SSX documentation:
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
.
Example of usage:
#if(!$hasEdit)
#body{
background-color: red;
}
#end
>>> This is problematic, since the extension is cached on the clientside
>>> (browser cache). So if a user visits the wiki once unauthenticated,
>>> after he logs in the same CSS file (already parsed) is used, so nothing
>>> will change in the UI.
>>>
>>> To load the re-parsed CSS, either refresh the browser cache, or you can
>>> set the Cache property of the extension to "Forbid", which is bad for
>>> performance.
>>>
>>
>> You are right, Sergiu. Another solution would be to use different ssx
>> objects from different documents (supposing that the SSX are being
>> used on demand). For example:
>> * Space1.Page1 having an SSX object - for common styles
>> * Space2.Page2 having another SSX object - for users that have edit rights
>>
>> In the velocity code (a template or a page in wiki mode), you can do this:
>> $xwiki.ssx.use('Space1.Page1')## common styles
>> #if($hasEdit)
>>$xwiki.ssx.use('Space2.Page2')## styles for users that have edit rights
>> #end
>>
>> Raluca.
>>
>>
>>
>
> OK! Please, one question here. I see in AnnotationCode.Script two
> XWiki.JavaScriptExtension objects. AnnotationCode.Style has only one
> XWiki.StyleSheetExtension object and you are proposing two documents,
> each of them holding one SSX object. So, I understand that only one SSX
> could be hold by a document or at least only one SSX can be addressed by
> each document. Am I right?
>
> Thanks!
A document can have as many ssx or jsx object as it needs, but a skin
extension is identified by the name of the document, so in the end an
extension is a document. The content of a skin extension is the
concatenation of the objects in that document, so it's impossible to
write two different extensions in a single document, only different
parts of the same extension.
>>
>>
Raluca.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
wrote:
> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
>> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
>> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>>
>> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ricardo
>>
>>
>>
> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>
> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>
> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>
> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
> structures to control how page elements are show?
>
> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>
> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>
> Best,
>
> Ricardo
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] Automatically list and link files in a directory with Groovy
Lockie wrote:
> Okay I got it working and I'm very happy with the result! I'll share what I
> did incase anyone else is interested in doing this. Note that the links
> don't work in Firefox (the file:// part doesn't seem to generate). My users
> only use IE so I didn't really explore this problem, but you can play around
> with it to get it working. Also, the user has to have access to the
> directory so this is only useful on an Intranet with networked drives.
>
> First step install the PHP Macro, then copy/paste this code in your page
> making sure you change the desired drive.
>
>
> {{velocity}}
> $xwiki.jsfx.use("js/xwiki/table/tablefilterNsort.js")
> $xwiki.ssfx.use("js/xwiki/table/table.css")
> {{/velocity}}
>
> {{php}}
> {{html}}
> cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0">
>
> Form Name
> Path
>
> $dirname = "R:/Quality/FORMS/";
> $dir = opendir($dirname);
>
> while(false != ($file = readdir($dir)))
> {
> if(($file != ".") and ($file != ".."))
> {
> echo(" $file ");
> echo(" $dirname$file Open Form ");
> }
> }
> ?>
>
> {{/html}}
> {{/php}}
>
>
> This results in a filterable table with a list of all the files in the
> directory and subfolders of it with the file names in the left column and a
> link to open the file in the right column.
>
> Regards,
>
> -
>
> Lockie
>
Thanks, Lockie. I've not used this yet. If I'm not wrong, I think that
some PHP developer here will be happy to use some of the scripts they
have programmed within XWiki :-)
Greetings,
Ricardo
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] [myxwiki] new wiki request
On 11/16/2010 12:12 AM, Jonathan Hansford wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to set up a wiki for my local church. I am registered on > myxwiki.org; my user name is Dangthrimble. My preferred server name is > crindau.myxwiki.org. > > I requested a wiki on Friday, as did Dan Weinstein (apparently after me); his > request was granted on Sunday whereas mine is still outstanding. Sorry, didn't see your original mail. Your wiki is ready. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
Vincent Massol wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>
>
>> Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/15/2010 01:15 PM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi Raluca!
Raluca Stavro wrote:
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
> take a look at the SSX documentation:
> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
> .
>
> Example of usage:
> #if(!$hasEdit)
> #body{
> background-color: red;
> }
> #end
>
>
>
Thanks! It is great to be able to use Velocity inside SSX and JSX!
But I'm facing some problems. Please, see this:
#set( $fruit = "orange" )
/* Menu */
.actionmenu #tmAnnotations {
background-image: #imgURL('note') !important;
/* Padding, margin and bg-position are adjusted in order to give this
element
the 'tab' look when active and the settings panel is displayed */
background-position: 0 1px;
padding-right: 5px !important;
padding-top: 0 !important;
padding-bottom: 4px;
margin-right: 5px !important;
margin-top: 2px !important;
#if($fruit == "apple")visibility:hidden;#end
}
This evaluates correctly. But I'm not able to get this working:
#if($isGuest)visibility:hidden;#end
or
#if(!$hasEdit)visibility:hidden;#end
I've never get visibility:hidden; in. Those same expressions work fine
in a simple XWiki 1.0 syntax doc. I get visibility:hidden; printed out
when expected.
Please, do you know why these two expressions don't work inside a
XWiki.StyleSheetExtension object?
>>> These variables are defined in xwikivars.vm, which is parsed when
>>> rendering a document with the surrounding UI. You can either use the API
>>> code that was used to set those variables, or you can add this line at
>>> the top:
>>>
>>> #template('xwikivars.vm')
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks, Sergiu. I clearly keeps failing at getting a clear general idea
>> about how XWiki produces the output of a document.
>>
>> Time ago I started to create a kind of "flowchart" showing the
>> relationships among templates, templates and actions and actions.
>> Please, could you tell me if this is an good actual starting point to
>> understanding this process?
>>
>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
>>
>
> This is a design document for the future. This hasn't been really discussed
> yet and it represents how Thomas and me see how the front end architecture
> could be modeled in the future.
>
> Right now it's:
> http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/Architecture#HHTTPRequestAnalysis
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
Thanks!
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
Thanks!
> Raluca.
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
>>> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
>>> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>>>
>>> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given
>>> doc.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
>> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>>
>> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for
>> me.
>>
>> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
>> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>>
>> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
>> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
>> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
>> structures to control how page elements are show?
>>
>> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>>
>> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ricardo
>>
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 03:05 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/2010 09:18 AM, Raluca Stavro wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Ricardo,
>>>
>>> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
>>> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
>>> take a look at the SSX documentation:
>>> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
>>> .
>>>
>>> Example of usage:
>>> #if(!$hasEdit)
>>> #body{
>>> background-color: red;
>>> }
>>> #end
>>>
>> This is problematic, since the extension is cached on the clientside
>> (browser cache). So if a user visits the wiki once unauthenticated,
>> after he logs in the same CSS file (already parsed) is used, so nothing
>> will change in the UI.
>>
>> To load the re-parsed CSS, either refresh the browser cache, or you can
>> set the Cache property of the extension to "Forbid", which is bad for
>> performance.
>>
>
> In this particular case changing the JavaScript code that loads the
> annotation feature is better IMO.
I tried but failed to do that.
> Ricardo, did you check
> AnnotationCode.Script ? I can see these lines at the end of the second
> JSX (named "Annotation Javascript -- Annotation application"):
>
> // if the action on the current document is not view, don't load annotations
> if (XWiki.contextaction != "view") {
>return;
> }
>
> I'm sure you can extend the test for your needs.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Marius
>
>
I think I get the point. Even though I'm not able to understand this
script now or how to tweak it, I understand that this option blocks the
loading process of the annotation feature. It is "cheaper" to do that as
it stops a process not required for a given type of users.
But, please, one more question. When is this script executed? Each time
a document is loaded or even reloaded?
Thanks!
>>> Raluca.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
>>>wrote:
>>>
Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>
> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ricardo
>
>
>
The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
this also hides them for users with edit rights.
Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
structures to control how page elements are show?
I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
Best,
Ricardo
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> ___
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@xwiki.org
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] [myxwiki] new wiki request
Hi, I would like to set up a wiki for my local church. I am registered on myxwiki.org; my user name is Dangthrimble. My preferred server name is crindau.myxwiki.org. I requested a wiki on Friday, as did Dan Weinstein (apparently after me); his request was granted on Sunday whereas mine is still outstanding. Thanks, Jonathan ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
Raluca Stavro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/2010 09:18 AM, Raluca Stavro wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Ricardo,
>>>
>>> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
>>> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
>>> take a look at the SSX documentation:
>>> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
>>> .
>>>
>>> Example of usage:
>>> #if(!$hasEdit)
>>>#body{
>>> background-color: red;
>>>}
>>> #end
>>>
>> This is problematic, since the extension is cached on the clientside
>> (browser cache). So if a user visits the wiki once unauthenticated,
>> after he logs in the same CSS file (already parsed) is used, so nothing
>> will change in the UI.
>>
>> To load the re-parsed CSS, either refresh the browser cache, or you can
>> set the Cache property of the extension to "Forbid", which is bad for
>> performance.
>>
>
> You are right, Sergiu. Another solution would be to use different ssx
> objects from different documents (supposing that the SSX are being
> used on demand). For example:
> * Space1.Page1 having an SSX object - for common styles
> * Space2.Page2 having another SSX object - for users that have edit rights
>
> In the velocity code (a template or a page in wiki mode), you can do this:
> $xwiki.ssx.use('Space1.Page1')## common styles
> #if($hasEdit)
> $xwiki.ssx.use('Space2.Page2')## styles for users that have edit rights
> #end
>
> Raluca.
>
>
>
OK! Please, one question here. I see in AnnotationCode.Script two
XWiki.JavaScriptExtension objects. AnnotationCode.Style has only one
XWiki.StyleSheetExtension object and you are proposing two documents,
each of them holding one SSX object. So, I understand that only one SSX
could be hold by a document or at least only one SSX can be addressed by
each document. Am I right?
Thanks!
>
>
>>> Raluca.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
>>> wrote:
>>>
Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>
> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ricardo
>
>
>
The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
this also hides them for users with edit rights.
Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
structures to control how page elements are show?
I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
Best,
Ricardo
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> ___
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@xwiki.org
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Sergiu Dumitriu
>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
>> ___
>> users mailing list
>> users@xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 09:18 AM, Raluca Stavro wrote:
>
>> Hello Ricardo,
>>
>> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
>> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
>> take a look at the SSX documentation:
>> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
>> .
>>
>> Example of usage:
>> #if(!$hasEdit)
>>#body{
>> background-color: red;
>>}
>> #end
>>
>
> This is problematic, since the extension is cached on the clientside
> (browser cache). So if a user visits the wiki once unauthenticated,
> after he logs in the same CSS file (already parsed) is used, so nothing
> will change in the UI.
>
> To load the re-parsed CSS, either refresh the browser cache, or you can
> set the Cache property of the extension to "Forbid", which is bad for
> performance.
>
>
I adopted this solution here sacrificing performance as I need the
described behaviour (Annotation shown only for registered users). But I
still get see some weird thing I've not been able to consistently
reproduce yet.
I'm using a XE/XEM 2.4.30451 in production and a XE 2.7-SNAPSHOT.32908
as trial environment. I'll keep this thread updated or open new ones as
required when I gather more information!
An example:
Working with a virtual wiki. I've modified AnnotationCode.Style
(XWiki.StyleSheetExtension) this way...
## Defining global variables; added by Ricardo Rodriguez on November the
15th to apply conditional rules to CSS
#template('xwikivars.vm')
/* Menu */
.actionmenu #tmAnnotations {
background-image: #imgURL('note') !important;
/* Padding, margin and bg-position are adjusted in order to give this
element
the 'tab' look when active and the settings panel is displayed */
background-position: 0 1px;
padding-right: 5px !important;
padding-top: 0 !important;
padding-bottom: 4px;
margin-right: 5px !important;
margin-top: 2px !important;
#if($isGuest)visibility:hidden;#end
}
.actionmenu #tmAnnotations a {
padding-top: 0 !important;
}
.actionmenu .active {
background-color: $theme.pageContentBackgroundColor;
##$theme.backgroundSecondaryColor;
}
.actionmenu .active a {
color: $theme.menuSelectedEntryLinkColor !important;
}
I never see "Annotations" in the right side of the action bar when
browsing the site as Guest. When I log in, Annotations appears. And it
persists consistently throughout the site for all spaces but those set
as exceptions in the Annotations configuration panel.
BUT, if I reload a page, any page, Annotations disappears. I cleaned the
cache, restarted the browser, restarted the computer,... Nothing. By
reloading the page several times, it ends appearing again. But I'm not
able to find a pattern.
ONE "FUNNY" THING: if Firebug Console is on, the reload is OK.
Annotations persists.
Those are the errors logged by Firebug:
*
xpected end of value but found ':'. Error in parsing value for
'text-transform'. Declaration dropped.
[Break on this error] .actionmenu #tmAnnotations{background-...ontent
blockquote{margin-bottom:10px;}
Style?language=en (line 1)
Unknown property 'border-radius'. Declaration dropped.
[Break on this error] border-radius: 1.2em;
colibri.css (line 205)
Unknown property 'border-radius'. Declaration dropped.
[Break on this error] border-radius: 1.2em;
*
XE 2.7-SNAPSHOT.32908 doesn't show this behaviour.
Please, any idea? I don't know if this relates with any know issue or it
relates with any error on my side. Any idea will be welcome!
Thanks!
>> Raluca.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
Thanks!
Ricardo
>>> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
>>> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>>>
>>> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>>>
>>> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
>>> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>>>
>>> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
>>> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
>>> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
>>> structures to control how page elements are show?
>>>
>>> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>>>
>>> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ricardo Rodríguez
>>> CTO
>>> eBioTIC.
>>> Life Sciences, Data Modeli
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>
>
> Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>> On 11/15/2010 01:15 PM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raluca!
>>>
>>> Raluca Stavro wrote:
>>>
Hello Ricardo,
Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
take a look at the SSX documentation:
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
.
Example of usage:
#if(!$hasEdit)
#body{
background-color: red;
}
#end
>>> Thanks! It is great to be able to use Velocity inside SSX and JSX!
>>>
>>> But I'm facing some problems. Please, see this:
>>>
>>> #set( $fruit = "orange" )
>>> /* Menu */
>>> .actionmenu #tmAnnotations {
>>> background-image: #imgURL('note') !important;
>>> /* Padding, margin and bg-position are adjusted in order to give this
>>> element
>>> the 'tab' look when active and the settings panel is displayed */
>>> background-position: 0 1px;
>>> padding-right: 5px !important;
>>> padding-top: 0 !important;
>>> padding-bottom: 4px;
>>> margin-right: 5px !important;
>>> margin-top: 2px !important;
>>> #if($fruit == "apple")visibility:hidden;#end
>>> }
>>>
>>> This evaluates correctly. But I'm not able to get this working:
>>>
>>> #if($isGuest)visibility:hidden;#end
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> #if(!$hasEdit)visibility:hidden;#end
>>>
>>> I've never get visibility:hidden; in. Those same expressions work fine
>>> in a simple XWiki 1.0 syntax doc. I get visibility:hidden; printed out
>>> when expected.
>>>
>>> Please, do you know why these two expressions don't work inside a
>>> XWiki.StyleSheetExtension object?
>>>
>>
>> These variables are defined in xwikivars.vm, which is parsed when
>> rendering a document with the surrounding UI. You can either use the API
>> code that was used to set those variables, or you can add this line at
>> the top:
>>
>> #template('xwikivars.vm')
>>
>
>
> Thanks, Sergiu. I clearly keeps failing at getting a clear general idea
> about how XWiki produces the output of a document.
>
> Time ago I started to create a kind of "flowchart" showing the
> relationships among templates, templates and actions and actions.
> Please, could you tell me if this is an good actual starting point to
> understanding this process?
>
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
This is a design document for the future. This hasn't been really discussed yet
and it represents how Thomas and me see how the front end architecture could be
modeled in the future.
Right now it's:
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/Architecture#HHTTPRequestAnalysis
Thanks
-Vincent
> Thanks!
>
>
>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
Raluca.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
wrote:
> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
>> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
>> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>>
>> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ricardo
>>
>>
>>
>>
> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>
> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>
> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>
> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
> structures to control how page elements are show?
>
> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>
> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>
> Best,
>
> Ricardo
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 01:15 PM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>
>> Hi Raluca!
>>
>> Raluca Stavro wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Ricardo,
>>>
>>> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
>>> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
>>> take a look at the SSX documentation:
>>> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
>>> .
>>>
>>> Example of usage:
>>> #if(!$hasEdit)
>>>#body{
>>> background-color: red;
>>>}
>>> #end
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks! It is great to be able to use Velocity inside SSX and JSX!
>>
>> But I'm facing some problems. Please, see this:
>>
>> #set( $fruit = "orange" )
>> /* Menu */
>> .actionmenu #tmAnnotations {
>>background-image: #imgURL('note') !important;
>>/* Padding, margin and bg-position are adjusted in order to give this
>> element
>> the 'tab' look when active and the settings panel is displayed */
>>background-position: 0 1px;
>>padding-right: 5px !important;
>>padding-top: 0 !important;
>>padding-bottom: 4px;
>>margin-right: 5px !important;
>>margin-top: 2px !important;
>>#if($fruit == "apple")visibility:hidden;#end
>> }
>>
>> This evaluates correctly. But I'm not able to get this working:
>>
>> #if($isGuest)visibility:hidden;#end
>>
>> or
>>
>> #if(!$hasEdit)visibility:hidden;#end
>>
>> I've never get visibility:hidden; in. Those same expressions work fine
>> in a simple XWiki 1.0 syntax doc. I get visibility:hidden; printed out
>> when expected.
>>
>> Please, do you know why these two expressions don't work inside a
>> XWiki.StyleSheetExtension object?
>>
>
> These variables are defined in xwikivars.vm, which is parsed when
> rendering a document with the surrounding UI. You can either use the API
> code that was used to set those variables, or you can add this line at
> the top:
>
> #template('xwikivars.vm')
>
Thanks, Sergiu. I clearly keeps failing at getting a clear general idea
about how XWiki produces the output of a document.
Time ago I started to create a kind of "flowchart" showing the
relationships among templates, templates and actions and actions.
Please, could you tell me if this is an good actual starting point to
understanding this process?
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/FrontEndArchitecture
Thanks!
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> Raluca.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>
> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ricardo
>
>
>
>
The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
this also hides them for users with edit rights.
Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
structures to control how page elements are show?
I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
Best,
Ricardo
>
>
>
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] where put macros?
Ok, I did figure out the problem: after downloading and uploading the xar, what I needed to do was click on the xar file. That displays a Page content panel on the right side of the Import page, describing the macro. Then click "Import". After this I can see the imported macro in the WYSIWYG macro editor. -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/where-put-macros-tp5696249p5741135.html Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] [myxwiki] XWiki Enterprise 2.6 RC2 Upgrade
Hello, myxwiki.org has been upgraded to XWiki Enterprise 2.6 RC2, if you own a wiki hosted there you should have a look at: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Main/ReleaseNotesXWikiEnterprise26RC2 We also strongly recommend an upgrade to the latest wiki version. To upgrade you must download the 2.6 RC2 XWiki XAR from: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Main/Download And follow the upgrade guide available at : http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/AdminGuide/Installation#HUpgradingwikidocuments To be notified of the myxwiki.org server upgrade you can follow myxwiki on twitter: http://twitter.com/myxwiki Thanks, -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [ANN] XWiki Enterprise 2.6 RC2 Released
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 14:28, Vincent Massol wrote: > The XWiki development team is pleased to announce the release of XWiki > Enterprise 2.6 RC2. > > Go grab it at http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download > > Changes from 2.5: > > • Revamped Recent Activity Dashboard, which is now called Activity Stream > • Share page by mail feature > • Icon/Emoticon Support > • Auto linking of WikiWords > • New Recent Activity Macro > New Activity Macro > > For more information see the Release notes at: > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotesXWikiEnterprise26RC2 > > Thanks > -The XWiki dev team > ___ > devs mailing list > d...@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
On 11/15/2010 03:05 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 09:18 AM, Raluca Stavro wrote:
>> Hello Ricardo,
>>
>> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
>> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
>> take a look at the SSX documentation:
>> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
>> .
>>
>> Example of usage:
>> #if(!$hasEdit)
>> #body{
>> background-color: red;
>> }
>> #end
>
> This is problematic, since the extension is cached on the clientside
> (browser cache). So if a user visits the wiki once unauthenticated,
> after he logs in the same CSS file (already parsed) is used, so nothing
> will change in the UI.
>
> To load the re-parsed CSS, either refresh the browser cache, or you can
> set the Cache property of the extension to "Forbid", which is bad for
> performance.
In this particular case changing the JavaScript code that loads the
annotation feature is better IMO. Ricardo, did you check
AnnotationCode.Script ? I can see these lines at the end of the second
JSX (named "Annotation Javascript -- Annotation application"):
// if the action on the current document is not view, don't load annotations
if (XWiki.contextaction != "view") {
return;
}
I'm sure you can extend the test for your needs.
Hope this helps,
Marius
>
>> Raluca.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
Hi,
I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
Thanks!
Ricardo
>>>
>>> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
>>> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>>>
>>> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>>>
>>> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
>>> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>>>
>>> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
>>> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
>>> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
>>> structures to control how page elements are show?
>>>
>>> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>>>
>>> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ricardo Rodríguez
>>> CTO
>>> eBioTIC.
>>> Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
>>>
>>> ___
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@xwiki.org
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>> ___
>> users mailing list
>> users@xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] where put macros?
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 15:45, afrey wrote: > > Does that mean I have to create a macro out of the xar file that I imported > ( -> edit -> objects -> New Object -> Select > XWiki.WikiMacroClass)? If that is the case, how do I do that? Where do I > specify the xar file for the macro that I may need to create? > What I did so far is download the xar file, then,imported the file using > Wiki Preferences -> Import -> Browse to downloaded xar. On the "Import" page > I can see all the xar files that I downloaded for macros or applications. > The problem is that I don't know what to do from here. How do I use these > xar files? If the macro is done properly that's all you have to do. What macro are you trying to install exactly ? > > Thank you, > > Alina. > -- > View this message in context: > http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/where-put-macros-tp5696249p5740061.html > Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ___ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Thomas Mortagne ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] where put macros?
And yes, I did stop and restart xwiki. -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/where-put-macros-tp5696249p5740065.html Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] where put macros?
Does that mean I have to create a macro out of the xar file that I imported ( -> edit -> objects -> New Object -> Select XWiki.WikiMacroClass)? If that is the case, how do I do that? Where do I specify the xar file for the macro that I may need to create? What I did so far is download the xar file, then,imported the file using Wiki Preferences -> Import -> Browse to downloaded xar. On the "Import" page I can see all the xar files that I downloaded for macros or applications. The problem is that I don't know what to do from here. How do I use these xar files? Thank you, Alina. -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/where-put-macros-tp5696249p5740061.html Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing
W dniu 10-11-15 14:18, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote: > > > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote: >> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > > >> W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >> >> >> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi :) W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > Hi! > > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > > > > >> Hello :) >> >> I configured my XWiki instance in the following way: >> >> >> >> #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing. >> xwiki.section.edit=1 >> >> #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section >> editing. >> #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing. >> xwiki.section.depth=6 >> >> >> I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order >> to minimize document locking and possible >> merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I >> noticed that when, for instance, two users >> edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the >> message: >> >> This object is currently locked by user1 >> >> I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of >> concurrent changes to that document, but the >> message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's >> possible to change xwiki configuration to >> not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs >> within the same page ? >> >> >> >> > To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, > if > any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message. > > I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems > following the same problem. When an user received this message, > although > she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they > are > in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a > document using the same user at two different locations, you won't > receive the locking message. > > > > Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular way of collaborative editing ( avoiding the whole page locks ). >>> I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current >>> MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a >>> warning only if two users edit the same section? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >> To be sure, I did some tests here: >> >> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox >> >> no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to >> get through the merge phase. In that >> case you see such a message: >> >> Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The >> upper text area contains the page text >> as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. >> You will have to merge your changes >> into the existing text. >> >> >> >> >> > Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki > sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here! > > Just summing up: > > Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts: > 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current > XWiki release. > > Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the article content overridden by someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try to fix edits manually. > 2. Locking is done at document level. > > Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks user groups/communities from working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make that lock 'section sensitive', architecture-wise ? If someone could describe what should be done / changed in order to achieve that, maybe we could figure out a solution for that issue. > 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way
Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing
W dniu 10-11-15 12:14, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > On 11/15/2010 12:03 PM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> >> >> W dniu 10-11-15 11:34, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >>> On 11/15/2010 11:23 AM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote: W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote: > > > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > > >> Hi :) >> >> >> W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello :) I configured my XWiki instance in the following way: #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing. xwiki.section.edit=1 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section editing. #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing. xwiki.section.depth=6 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to minimize document locking and possible merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed that when, for instance, two users edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the message: This object is currently locked by user1 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent changes to that document, but the message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's possible to change xwiki configuration to not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within the same page ? >>> To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. >>> So, if >>> any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message. >>> >>> I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some >>> problems >>> following the same problem. When an user received this message, >>> although >>> she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if >>> they are >>> in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a >>> document using the same user at two different locations, you won't >>> receive the locking message. >>> >>> >>> >> Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty >> popular way of collaborative editing ( >> avoiding the whole page locks ). >> >> > I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current > MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a > warning only if two users edit the same section? > > Thanks! > > To be sure, I did some tests here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to get through the merge phase. In that case you see such a message: Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper text area contains the page text as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. You will have to merge your changes into the existing text. >>> Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki >>> sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case >>> here! >>> >>> Just summing up: >>> >> >> Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts: >> >> >> >>> 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current >>> XWiki release. >>> >> >> Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( >> or maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - >> I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the >> article content overridden by >> someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and >> try to fix edits manually. >> >> >>> 2. Locking is done at document level. >>> >> >> Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically >> blocks user groups/communities from >> working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 09:18 AM, Raluca Stavro wrote:
>> Hello Ricardo,
>>
>> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
>> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
>> take a look at the SSX documentation:
>> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
>> .
>>
>> Example of usage:
>> #if(!$hasEdit)
>> #body{
>> background-color: red;
>> }
>> #end
>
> This is problematic, since the extension is cached on the clientside
> (browser cache). So if a user visits the wiki once unauthenticated,
> after he logs in the same CSS file (already parsed) is used, so nothing
> will change in the UI.
>
> To load the re-parsed CSS, either refresh the browser cache, or you can
> set the Cache property of the extension to "Forbid", which is bad for
> performance.
You are right, Sergiu. Another solution would be to use different ssx
objects from different documents (supposing that the SSX are being
used on demand). For example:
* Space1.Page1 having an SSX object - for common styles
* Space2.Page2 having another SSX object - for users that have edit rights
In the velocity code (a template or a page in wiki mode), you can do this:
$xwiki.ssx.use('Space1.Page1')## common styles
#if($hasEdit)
$xwiki.ssx.use('Space2.Page2')## styles for users that have edit rights
#end
Raluca.
>
>> Raluca.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
Hi,
I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
Thanks!
Ricardo
>>>
>>> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
>>> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>>>
>>> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>>>
>>> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
>>> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>>>
>>> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
>>> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
>>> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
>>> structures to control how page elements are show?
>>>
>>> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>>>
>>> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ricardo Rodríguez
>>> CTO
>>> eBioTIC.
>>> Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
>>>
>>> ___
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@xwiki.org
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>> ___
>> users mailing list
>> users@xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergiu Dumitriu
> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing
Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote: > >> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> >>> W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >>> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > > > >> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi :) >>> >>> >>> W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi! Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > Hello :) > > I configured my XWiki instance in the following way: > > > > #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing. > xwiki.section.edit=1 > > #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section > editing. > #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing. > xwiki.section.depth=6 > > > I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to > minimize document locking and possible > merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I > noticed that when, for instance, two users > edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the > message: > > This object is currently locked by user1 > > I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of > concurrent changes to that document, but the > message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's > possible to change xwiki configuration to > not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs > within the same page ? > > > > To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message. I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems following the same problem. When an user received this message, although she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a document using the same user at two different locations, you won't receive the locking message. >>> Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular >>> way of collaborative editing ( >>> avoiding the whole page locks ). >>> >>> >>> >> I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current >> MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a >> warning only if two users edit the same section? >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> > To be sure, I did some tests here: > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox > > no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to > get through the merge phase. In that > case you see such a message: > > Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The > upper text area contains the page text > as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. > You will have to merge your changes > into the existing text. > > > > > Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here! Just summing up: >>> Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts: >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current XWiki release. >>> Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or >>> maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - >>> I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the >>> article content overridden by >>> someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try >>> to fix edits manually. >>> >>> >>> 2. Locking is done at document level. >>> Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks >>> user groups/communities from >>> working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make >>> that lock 'section sensitive', >>> architecture-wise ? If someone could describe what should be done / >>> changed in order to achieve that, maybe >>> we could figure out a solution for that issue. >>> >>> >>> >>> 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will solve all th
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
On 11/15/2010 09:18 AM, Raluca Stavro wrote:
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
> take a look at the SSX documentation:
> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
> .
>
> Example of usage:
> #if(!$hasEdit)
>#body{
> background-color: red;
>}
> #end
This is problematic, since the extension is cached on the clientside
(browser cache). So if a user visits the wiki once unauthenticated,
after he logs in the same CSS file (already parsed) is used, so nothing
will change in the UI.
To load the re-parsed CSS, either refresh the browser cache, or you can
set the Cache property of the extension to "Forbid", which is bad for
performance.
> Raluca.
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
>>> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
>>> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>>>
>>> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
>> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>>
>> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>>
>> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
>> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>>
>> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
>> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
>> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
>> structures to control how page elements are show?
>>
>> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>>
>> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ricardo
>>
>> --
>> Ricardo Rodríguez
>> CTO
>> eBioTIC.
>> Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
>>
>> ___
>> users mailing list
>> users@xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] Watchlist issuie (page links give localhost)
On 11/14/2010 12:40 PM, Eugen Colesnicov wrote: > > After updating XWiki to 2.5.1 (before was 2.2.6), in watchlist emais, in page > links, instead of network name of a resoure (servername or local domain > synonym) shows "localhost". Is it some bug in 2.5.1 or I can setup this by > some parameters? XWiki uses inside local network as a intranet. I think this is a kind of configuration issue. The watchlist uses a URLFactory which is initialized in the first request, and which remembers the hostname/port used in that request. So to fix this it should be enough to restart the server and make the first request using the external URL. I'm not sure, but you can also configure this using xwiki.home in WEB-INF/xwiki.cfg. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
On 11/15/2010 01:15 PM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
> Hi Raluca!
>
> Raluca Stavro wrote:
>> Hello Ricardo,
>>
>> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
>> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
>> take a look at the SSX documentation:
>> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
>> .
>>
>> Example of usage:
>> #if(!$hasEdit)
>>#body{
>> background-color: red;
>>}
>> #end
>>
>
> Thanks! It is great to be able to use Velocity inside SSX and JSX!
>
> But I'm facing some problems. Please, see this:
>
> #set( $fruit = "orange" )
> /* Menu */
> .actionmenu #tmAnnotations {
>background-image: #imgURL('note') !important;
>/* Padding, margin and bg-position are adjusted in order to give this
> element
> the 'tab' look when active and the settings panel is displayed */
>background-position: 0 1px;
>padding-right: 5px !important;
>padding-top: 0 !important;
>padding-bottom: 4px;
>margin-right: 5px !important;
>margin-top: 2px !important;
>#if($fruit == "apple")visibility:hidden;#end
> }
>
> This evaluates correctly. But I'm not able to get this working:
>
> #if($isGuest)visibility:hidden;#end
>
> or
>
> #if(!$hasEdit)visibility:hidden;#end
>
> I've never get visibility:hidden; in. Those same expressions work fine
> in a simple XWiki 1.0 syntax doc. I get visibility:hidden; printed out
> when expected.
>
> Please, do you know why these two expressions don't work inside a
> XWiki.StyleSheetExtension object?
These variables are defined in xwikivars.vm, which is parsed when
rendering a document with the surrounding UI. You can either use the API
code that was used to set those variables, or you can add this line at
the top:
#template('xwikivars.vm')
>
> Thanks!
>> Raluca.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
Thanks!
Ricardo
>>> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
>>> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>>>
>>> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>>>
>>> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
>>> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>>>
>>> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
>>> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
>>> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
>>> structures to control how page elements are show?
>>>
>>> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>>>
>>> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Ricardo
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[xwiki-users] [ANN] XWiki Enterprise 2.6 RC2 Released
The XWiki development team is pleased to announce the release of XWiki Enterprise 2.6 RC2. Go grab it at http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download Changes from 2.5: • Revamped Recent Activity Dashboard, which is now called Activity Stream • Share page by mail feature • Icon/Emoticon Support • Auto linking of WikiWords • New Recent Activity Macro For more information see the Release notes at: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotesXWikiEnterprise26RC2 Thanks -The XWiki dev team ___ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
Hi Raluca!
Raluca Stavro wrote:
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
> need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
> take a look at the SSX documentation:
> http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
> .
>
> Example of usage:
> #if(!$hasEdit)
> #body{
> background-color: red;
> }
> #end
>
Thanks! It is great to be able to use Velocity inside SSX and JSX!
But I'm facing some problems. Please, see this:
#set( $fruit = "orange" )
/* Menu */
.actionmenu #tmAnnotations {
background-image: #imgURL('note') !important;
/* Padding, margin and bg-position are adjusted in order to give this
element
the 'tab' look when active and the settings panel is displayed */
background-position: 0 1px;
padding-right: 5px !important;
padding-top: 0 !important;
padding-bottom: 4px;
margin-right: 5px !important;
margin-top: 2px !important;
#if($fruit == "apple")visibility:hidden;#end
}
This evaluates correctly. But I'm not able to get this working:
#if($isGuest)visibility:hidden;#end
or
#if(!$hasEdit)visibility:hidden;#end
I've never get visibility:hidden; in. Those same expressions work fine
in a simple XWiki 1.0 syntax doc. I get visibility:hidden; printed out
when expected.
Please, do you know why these two expressions don't work inside a
XWiki.StyleSheetExtension object?
Thanks!
> Raluca.
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
> wrote:
>
>> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
>>> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
>>> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>>>
>>> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
>> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>>
>> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>>
>> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
>> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>>
>> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
>> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
>> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
>> structures to control how page elements are show?
>>
>> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>>
>> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ricardo
>>
>> --
>> Ricardo Rodríguez
>> CTO
>> eBioTIC.
>> Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
>>
>> ___
>> users mailing list
>> users@xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
--
Ricardo Rodríguez
CTO
eBioTIC.
Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing
On 11/15/2010 12:03 PM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > > > W dniu 10-11-15 11:34, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> On 11/15/2010 11:23 AM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> >>> >>> W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote: Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > >> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> >>> W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >>> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > Hi :) > > > W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > > > >> Hi! >> >> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hello :) >>> >>> I configured my XWiki instance in the following way: >>> >>> >>> >>> #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing. >>> xwiki.section.edit=1 >>> >>> #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section >>> editing. >>> #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing. >>> xwiki.section.depth=6 >>> >>> >>> I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order >>> to minimize document locking and possible >>> merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I >>> noticed that when, for instance, two users >>> edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the >>> message: >>> >>> This object is currently locked by user1 >>> >>> I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of >>> concurrent changes to that document, but the >>> message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's >>> possible to change xwiki configuration to >>> not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs >>> within the same page ? >>> >>> >>> >> To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, >> if >> any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message. >> >> I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some >> problems >> following the same problem. When an user received this message, >> although >> she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they >> are >> in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a >> document using the same user at two different locations, you won't >> receive the locking message. >> >> >> > Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular > way of collaborative editing ( > avoiding the whole page locks ). > > I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a warning only if two users edit the same section? Thanks! >>> To be sure, I did some tests here: >>> >>> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox >>> >>> no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to >>> get through the merge phase. In that >>> case you see such a message: >>> >>> Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The >>> upper text area contains the page text >>> as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. >>> You will have to merge your changes >>> into the existing text. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki >> sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here! >> >> Just summing up: >> > > Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts: > > > >> 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current >> XWiki release. >> > > Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( > or maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - > I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the > article content overridden by > someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and > try to fix edits manually. > > >> 2. Locking is done at document level. >> > > Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically > blocks user groups/communities from > working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make > that lock 'section sensitive', > architecture-wise ? If someone could describe what should be done / > changed in order to achieve that, maybe > we could figure out
Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing
W dniu 10-11-15 11:34, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > On 11/15/2010 11:23 AM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> >> >> W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote: >>> >>> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > >> W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >> >> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> >>> Hi :) W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > Hi! > > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > > > >> Hello :) >> >> I configured my XWiki instance in the following way: >> >> >> >> #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing. >> xwiki.section.edit=1 >> >> #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section >> editing. >> #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing. >> xwiki.section.depth=6 >> >> >> I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order >> to minimize document locking and possible >> merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I >> noticed that when, for instance, two users >> edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the >> message: >> >> This object is currently locked by user1 >> >> I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of >> concurrent changes to that document, but the >> message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's >> possible to change xwiki configuration to >> not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs >> within the same page ? >> >> >> > To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, > if > any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message. > > I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems > following the same problem. When an user received this message, > although > she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they > are > in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a > document using the same user at two different locations, you won't > receive the locking message. > > > Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular way of collaborative editing ( avoiding the whole page locks ). >>> I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current >>> MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a >>> warning only if two users edit the same section? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >> To be sure, I did some tests here: >> >> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox >> >> no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to >> get through the merge phase. In that >> case you see such a message: >> >> Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The >> upper text area contains the page text >> as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. >> You will have to merge your changes >> into the existing text. >> >> >> >> > Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki > sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here! > > Just summing up: > Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts: > 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current > XWiki release. > Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the article content overridden by someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try to fix edits manually. > 2. Locking is done at document level. > Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks user groups/communities from working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make that lock 'section sensitive', architecture-wise ? If someone could describe what should be done / changed in order to achieve that, maybe we could figure out a solution for that issue. > 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will > solve all these issues! > Well, it could be, but it's based on th
Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing
On 11/15/2010 11:23 AM, Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > > > W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote: >> >> >> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > > >> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> >> >>> Hi :) >>> >>> >>> W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi! Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > Hello :) > > I configured my XWiki instance in the following way: > > > > #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing. > xwiki.section.edit=1 > > #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section > editing. > #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing. > xwiki.section.depth=6 > > > I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to > minimize document locking and possible > merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I > noticed that when, for instance, two users > edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the > message: > > This object is currently locked by user1 > > I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of > concurrent changes to that document, but the > message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's > possible to change xwiki configuration to > not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs > within the same page ? > > > To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message. I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems following the same problem. When an user received this message, although she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a document using the same user at two different locations, you won't receive the locking message. >>> Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular >>> way of collaborative editing ( >>> avoiding the whole page locks ). >>> >>> >> I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current >> MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a >> warning only if two users edit the same section? >> >> Thanks! >> >> > To be sure, I did some tests here: > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox > > no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to > get through the merge phase. In that > case you see such a message: > > Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The > upper text area contains the page text > as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. > You will have to merge your changes > into the existing text. > > > > Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here! Just summing up: >>> >>> Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts: >>> >>> >>> 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current XWiki release. >>> >>> Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or >>> maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - >>> I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the >>> article content overridden by >>> someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try >>> to fix edits manually. >>> >>> 2. Locking is done at document level. >>> >>> Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks >>> user groups/communities from >>> working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make >>> that lock 'section sensitive', >>> architecture-wise ? If someone could describe what should be done / >>> changed in order to achieve that, maybe >>> we could figure out a solution for that issue. >>> >>> >>> 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will solve all these issues! >>> >>> Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to >>> achieve a good level of >>> compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs is >>> a good example here ). Of course >>> I'd take that right a
Re: [xwiki-users] This object is currently locked by - section editing
W dniu 10-11-13 09:50, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote: > > > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >> W dniu 10-11-04 21:28, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> W dniu 10-11-04 12:13, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: > Piotr Dziubecki wrote: > > >> Hi :) >> >> >> W dniu 10-11-04 11:08, [Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Piotr Dziubecki wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello :) I configured my XWiki instance in the following way: #-# This parameter will activate the sectional editing. xwiki.section.edit=1 #-# This parameter controls the depth of sections that have section editing. #-# By default level 1 and level 2 sections have section editing. xwiki.section.depth=6 I have many users working on documents simultaneously and in order to minimize document locking and possible merging I encourage them to edit sections/paragraphs instead. I noticed that when, for instance, two users edit different sections within the same page, the latter gets the message: This object is currently locked by user1 I checked and it's possible to force editing and save both of concurrent changes to that document, but the message itself is a bit confusing to the users. I'm asking if it's possible to change xwiki configuration to not display that message when the users edit different paragraphs within the same page ? >>> To the best of my understanding locking is set a document level. So, if >>> any user edits a section, all other users will receive that message. >>> >>> I think what you are doing is a bit risky. I've had here some problems >>> following the same problem. When an user received this message, although >>> she/he is editing only a section, there is no way of knowing if they are >>> in the same section or in a different one. Even more, if you edit a >>> document using the same user at two different locations, you won't >>> receive the locking message. >>> >>> >>> >> Yes, I came from the Media Wiki and section editing is pretty popular >> way of collaborative editing ( >> avoiding the whole page locks ). >> >> > I also arrives to XWiki from MediaWiki years ago. So, with the current > MediaWiki release, is it possible to do section edition and get a > warning only if two users edit the same section? > > Thanks! > > To be sure, I did some tests here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sandbox no warnings, you can even edit the same section but then you'll need to get through the merge phase. In that case you see such a message: Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it. The upper text area contains the page text as it currently exists. Your changes are shown in the lower text area. You will have to merge your changes into the existing text. >>> Well, I don't see this blocking behaviour working with MediaWiki >>> sandbox... I don't know why! In any case, MediaWiki is not the case here! >>> >>> Just summing up: >>> >> >> Thanks for that summary, let me comment on your thoughts: >> >> >> >>> 1. Simultaneous edition is possible, but not advisable with the current >>> XWiki release. >>> >> >> Yes, especially that there is no merge phase after concurrent editing ( or >> maybe there is a 'merge plugin' - >> I'd be grateful for any info on that ). In that case you end up with the >> article content overridden by >> someone else and your only hope is to dig in the document's history and try >> to fix edits manually. >> >> >>> 2. Locking is done at document level. >>> >> >> Is that going to change in the future ? In my opinion that basically blocks >> user groups/communities from >> working on the documents in a collaborative way. Is it much work to make >> that lock 'section sensitive', >> architecture-wise ? If someone could describe what should be done / changed >> in order to achieve that, maybe >> we could figure out a solution for that issue. >> >> >> >>> 3. A true real-time edition editor for XWiki is on its way and will >>> solve all these issues! >>> >> >> Well, it could be, but it's based on the js/ajax - it could be tricky to >> achieve a good level of >> compatibility between browsers ( of course it could be done, Google docs is >> a good example here ). Of course >> I'd take that right away in the stable form. But I think merging/lock on the >> section level could be more >> than enough for the ordinary wiki users ( Wikipedia is basing on that model >> on a huge scale and it's doing >> fine ;) )
Re: [xwiki-users] showing/hiding annotations entry in contentmenu
Hello Ricardo,
Yes, you can use velocity code inside SSX and JSX objects. What you
need to do is to set the 'Parse content' property to 'Yes'. You can
take a look at the SSX documentation:
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Plugins/SkinExtensionsPlugin#HTip:Howtoreferafilefromaskinextension
.
Example of usage:
#if(!$hasEdit)
#body{
background-color: red;
}
#end
Raluca.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.]
wrote:
>
>
> Ricardo Rodriguez [eBioTIC.] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see how to control edit, export, action and watch appearance in
>> contentmenu div by tweaking contentmenu.vm. But, please, how could I get
>> the same control over Annotations entry in the same are?
>>
>> I want to show annotations only to users with edit rights in a given doc.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ricardo
>>
>>
>
> The object of type XWiki.StyleSheetExtension in AnnotationCode.Style
> holds the code that seems to control how the action menu entry is shown.
>
> Currently, to hide the annotation icon on this menu will be enough for me.
>
> I can add visibility:hidden; to the concerned .actionmenu elements, but
> this also hides them for users with edit rights.
>
> Please, is it possible to add ##if($hasEdit)...#else...#end structures
> in a SSE? My bet is that this is not possible: this extensions holds CSS
> code, not a script. So, please, how could I introduce conditional
> structures to control how page elements are show?
>
> I guess I must tweak AnnotationCode.Script but, please, how?
>
> Any help will be welcome! Thanks.
>
> Best,
>
> Ricardo
>
> --
> Ricardo Rodríguez
> CTO
> eBioTIC.
> Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
