Hi, On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:39 PM, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Chris Moller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:11:57 -0400 > >> I agree in principal, but there are years and years of old cruft in gdb >> too and I'm not altogether sure that separating the experience from the >> cruft is possible or, at least, any less work than just starting over >> and accumulating new cruft. > > For the current GDB sources, I respectfully disagree with you. > > It's about as clean as I've ever seen a debugger of it's size > and number of targets supported. It's a work of art.
In terms of backtraces generation, you could also look at libunwind approach, specially in cases where you need fast and reliable ways to catch backtraces from a remote process. []s -- Bruno de Oliveira Abinader Mobile Linux Software (MLS) / Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia (INdT) Tel: +55 92 21261068
