Re: [Vala] [OT] Vala -> C#

[Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra]

Don't let your dreams be dreams, check this: 
https://github.com/chebizarro/LibDotNet 

Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra  
Estudiante Ing. Sistemas - Universidad del Norte mru...@uninorte.edu.co - 
twitter.com/desiderantes -
joindiaspora.com/u/desiderantes


El Lunes, 28 de marzo, 2016 17:48:19, Edwin De La Cruz  
escribió:


>
>
>2016-03-28 16:19 GMT-05:00 Edwin De La Cruz :
>> 2016-03-26 9:59 GMT-05:00 Steven Oliver :
>>> If having an IDE is high on your list check out builder. It's support for
>>> Vala is getting better every release. They are also really good about taking
>>> new contributors.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Steven N. Oliver
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:49 PM -0700, "Edwin De La Cruz"
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 Dear. I'm using valac for quite some time, although work has been left
 aside, I'm starting to use c #, I find it more productive but I refuse
 to use it and recognize it, but it is.

 Among the ideas that came to my mind, including _mono_, I thought ...
 because someone does not develop something similar to c # but Vala,
 who has the same name functions, classes, methods, etc so if I have
 one codigo.cs simply change it by codigo.vala and compile directly.

 I know it's an idea a little crazy and not all libraries can be
 imported, but whether it would be much easier and productive to have
 such a code.

 I program in C # using their mimas classes, but at the time of
 compiling all transforms Vala.

 It would be great as well.

 I have made the task of doing that only with the most basic functions,
 just to prove, as a hobby.

 In the years that I go with Vala language seems very much potential,
 but lacks an IDE, MonoDevelop no longer supports it, also lacks more
 documentation, easier to use libraries as well as in c #.

 Sorry for the extension of this message and perhaps not relevant but
 needed to relieve the sadness of having to change Vala by c #.

 See you soon.


 Mis proyectos de software libre en:
 Github - edwinspire
 ___
 vala-list mailing list
 vala-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
>>
>>
>> Well, actually the IDE is not a priority, I've driven with gedit well,
>> that's no problem.
>>
>> Even I became a microide, what helps me is to compile and link the
>> binary libraries which depends with a simple click.
>>
>> Where I see the difficulty, or rather the obstacles to develop faster,
>> is in the documentation, examples, and functions that facilitate the
>> work.
>>
>> For example, to send an email in SMTP in c # is a matter of a couple
>> of lines and ready. With Vala me it was very difficult.
>>
>> Worse even if my applications development on the Linux (GNU / Debian)
>> but to deliver them to production will run on Windows.
>>
>> Last week tried C # to replace some parts where used Vala and I found
>> it very easy with Monodevelop.
>>
>> In 2 days with c # did the same as 8 days with Vala.
>>
>> What I suggested was to make a package that has the same functions and
>> classes that exist in C # but Vala, with the same names, which is
>> identical, so it would be very easy to move from one language to
>> another.
>>
>>
>> Mis proyectos de software libre en:
>> Github - edwinspire
>
>I meant to do something Como this:
>https://github.com/edwinspire/VSharp It is just an example , although
>it does not work but can best illustrate my idea.
>
>
>Mis proyectos de software libre en:
>Github - edwinspire
>___
>vala-list mailing list
>vala-list@gnome.org
>https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
>
>
>
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list

Re: [Vala] [OT] Vala -> C#

[Edwin De La Cruz]

2016-03-28 16:19 GMT-05:00 Edwin De La Cruz :
> 2016-03-26 9:59 GMT-05:00 Steven Oliver :
>> If having an IDE is high on your list check out builder. It's support for
>> Vala is getting better every release. They are also really good about taking
>> new contributors.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Steven N. Oliver
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:49 PM -0700, "Edwin De La Cruz"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear. I'm using valac for quite some time, although work has been left
>>> aside, I'm starting to use c #, I find it more productive but I refuse
>>> to use it and recognize it, but it is.
>>>
>>> Among the ideas that came to my mind, including _mono_, I thought ...
>>> because someone does not develop something similar to c # but Vala,
>>> who has the same name functions, classes, methods, etc so if I have
>>> one codigo.cs simply change it by codigo.vala and compile directly.
>>>
>>> I know it's an idea a little crazy and not all libraries can be
>>> imported, but whether it would be much easier and productive to have
>>> such a code.
>>>
>>> I program in C # using their mimas classes, but at the time of
>>> compiling all transforms Vala.
>>>
>>> It would be great as well.
>>>
>>> I have made the task of doing that only with the most basic functions,
>>> just to prove, as a hobby.
>>>
>>> In the years that I go with Vala language seems very much potential,
>>> but lacks an IDE, MonoDevelop no longer supports it, also lacks more
>>> documentation, easier to use libraries as well as in c #.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the extension of this message and perhaps not relevant but
>>> needed to relieve the sadness of having to change Vala by c #.
>>>
>>> See you soon.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mis proyectos de software libre en:
>>> Github - edwinspire
>>> ___
>>> vala-list mailing list
>>> vala-list@gnome.org
>>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
>
>
> Well, actually the IDE is not a priority, I've driven with gedit well,
> that's no problem.
>
> Even I became a microide, what helps me is to compile and link the
> binary libraries which depends with a simple click.
>
> Where I see the difficulty, or rather the obstacles to develop faster,
> is in the documentation, examples, and functions that facilitate the
> work.
>
> For example, to send an email in SMTP in c # is a matter of a couple
> of lines and ready. With Vala me it was very difficult.
>
> Worse even if my applications development on the Linux (GNU / Debian)
> but to deliver them to production will run on Windows.
>
> Last week tried C # to replace some parts where used Vala and I found
> it very easy with Monodevelop.
>
> In 2 days with c # did the same as 8 days with Vala.
>
> What I suggested was to make a package that has the same functions and
> classes that exist in C # but Vala, with the same names, which is
> identical, so it would be very easy to move from one language to
> another.
>
>
> Mis proyectos de software libre en:
> Github - edwinspire

I meant to do something Como this:
https://github.com/edwinspire/VSharp It is just an example , although
it does not work but can best illustrate my idea.

Mis proyectos de software libre en:
Github - edwinspire
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list

Re: [Vala] [OT] Vala -> C#

[Edwin De La Cruz]

2016-03-26 9:59 GMT-05:00 Steven Oliver :
> If having an IDE is high on your list check out builder. It's support for
> Vala is getting better every release. They are also really good about taking
> new contributors.
>
> Thank you,
> Steven N. Oliver
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:49 PM -0700, "Edwin De La Cruz"
>  wrote:
>
>> Dear. I'm using valac for quite some time, although work has been left
>> aside, I'm starting to use c #, I find it more productive but I refuse
>> to use it and recognize it, but it is.
>>
>> Among the ideas that came to my mind, including _mono_, I thought ...
>> because someone does not develop something similar to c # but Vala,
>> who has the same name functions, classes, methods, etc so if I have
>> one codigo.cs simply change it by codigo.vala and compile directly.
>>
>> I know it's an idea a little crazy and not all libraries can be
>> imported, but whether it would be much easier and productive to have
>> such a code.
>>
>> I program in C # using their mimas classes, but at the time of
>> compiling all transforms Vala.
>>
>> It would be great as well.
>>
>> I have made the task of doing that only with the most basic functions,
>> just to prove, as a hobby.
>>
>> In the years that I go with Vala language seems very much potential,
>> but lacks an IDE, MonoDevelop no longer supports it, also lacks more
>> documentation, easier to use libraries as well as in c #.
>>
>> Sorry for the extension of this message and perhaps not relevant but
>> needed to relieve the sadness of having to change Vala by c #.
>>
>> See you soon.
>>
>>
>> Mis proyectos de software libre en:
>> Github - edwinspire
>> ___
>> vala-list mailing list
>> vala-list@gnome.org
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list


Well, actually the IDE is not a priority, I've driven with gedit well,
that's no problem.

Even I became a microide, what helps me is to compile and link the
binary libraries which depends with a simple click.

Where I see the difficulty, or rather the obstacles to develop faster,
is in the documentation, examples, and functions that facilitate the
work.

For example, to send an email in SMTP in c # is a matter of a couple
of lines and ready. With Vala me it was very difficult.

Worse even if my applications development on the Linux (GNU / Debian)
but to deliver them to production will run on Windows.

Last week tried C # to replace some parts where used Vala and I found
it very easy with Monodevelop.

In 2 days with c # did the same as 8 days with Vala.

What I suggested was to make a package that has the same functions and
classes that exist in C # but Vala, with the same names, which is
identical, so it would be very easy to move from one language to
another.


Mis proyectos de software libre en:
Github - edwinspire
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list