Re: [Vala] [OT] Vala -> C#
Don't let your dreams be dreams, check this: https://github.com/chebizarro/LibDotNet Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra Estudiante Ing. Sistemas - Universidad del Norte mru...@uninorte.edu.co - twitter.com/desiderantes - joindiaspora.com/u/desiderantes El Lunes, 28 de marzo, 2016 17:48:19, Edwin De La Cruzescribió: > > >2016-03-28 16:19 GMT-05:00 Edwin De La Cruz : >> 2016-03-26 9:59 GMT-05:00 Steven Oliver : >>> If having an IDE is high on your list check out builder. It's support for >>> Vala is getting better every release. They are also really good about taking >>> new contributors. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Steven N. Oliver >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:49 PM -0700, "Edwin De La Cruz" >>> wrote: >>> Dear. I'm using valac for quite some time, although work has been left aside, I'm starting to use c #, I find it more productive but I refuse to use it and recognize it, but it is. Among the ideas that came to my mind, including _mono_, I thought ... because someone does not develop something similar to c # but Vala, who has the same name functions, classes, methods, etc so if I have one codigo.cs simply change it by codigo.vala and compile directly. I know it's an idea a little crazy and not all libraries can be imported, but whether it would be much easier and productive to have such a code. I program in C # using their mimas classes, but at the time of compiling all transforms Vala. It would be great as well. I have made the task of doing that only with the most basic functions, just to prove, as a hobby. In the years that I go with Vala language seems very much potential, but lacks an IDE, MonoDevelop no longer supports it, also lacks more documentation, easier to use libraries as well as in c #. Sorry for the extension of this message and perhaps not relevant but needed to relieve the sadness of having to change Vala by c #. See you soon. Mis proyectos de software libre en: Github - edwinspire ___ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list >> >> >> Well, actually the IDE is not a priority, I've driven with gedit well, >> that's no problem. >> >> Even I became a microide, what helps me is to compile and link the >> binary libraries which depends with a simple click. >> >> Where I see the difficulty, or rather the obstacles to develop faster, >> is in the documentation, examples, and functions that facilitate the >> work. >> >> For example, to send an email in SMTP in c # is a matter of a couple >> of lines and ready. With Vala me it was very difficult. >> >> Worse even if my applications development on the Linux (GNU / Debian) >> but to deliver them to production will run on Windows. >> >> Last week tried C # to replace some parts where used Vala and I found >> it very easy with Monodevelop. >> >> In 2 days with c # did the same as 8 days with Vala. >> >> What I suggested was to make a package that has the same functions and >> classes that exist in C # but Vala, with the same names, which is >> identical, so it would be very easy to move from one language to >> another. >> >> >> Mis proyectos de software libre en: >> Github - edwinspire > >I meant to do something Como this: >https://github.com/edwinspire/VSharp It is just an example , although >it does not work but can best illustrate my idea. > > >Mis proyectos de software libre en: >Github - edwinspire >___ >vala-list mailing list >vala-list@gnome.org >https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list > > > ___ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
Re: [Vala] [OT] Vala -> C#
2016-03-28 16:19 GMT-05:00 Edwin De La Cruz: > 2016-03-26 9:59 GMT-05:00 Steven Oliver : >> If having an IDE is high on your list check out builder. It's support for >> Vala is getting better every release. They are also really good about taking >> new contributors. >> >> Thank you, >> Steven N. Oliver >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:49 PM -0700, "Edwin De La Cruz" >> wrote: >> >>> Dear. I'm using valac for quite some time, although work has been left >>> aside, I'm starting to use c #, I find it more productive but I refuse >>> to use it and recognize it, but it is. >>> >>> Among the ideas that came to my mind, including _mono_, I thought ... >>> because someone does not develop something similar to c # but Vala, >>> who has the same name functions, classes, methods, etc so if I have >>> one codigo.cs simply change it by codigo.vala and compile directly. >>> >>> I know it's an idea a little crazy and not all libraries can be >>> imported, but whether it would be much easier and productive to have >>> such a code. >>> >>> I program in C # using their mimas classes, but at the time of >>> compiling all transforms Vala. >>> >>> It would be great as well. >>> >>> I have made the task of doing that only with the most basic functions, >>> just to prove, as a hobby. >>> >>> In the years that I go with Vala language seems very much potential, >>> but lacks an IDE, MonoDevelop no longer supports it, also lacks more >>> documentation, easier to use libraries as well as in c #. >>> >>> Sorry for the extension of this message and perhaps not relevant but >>> needed to relieve the sadness of having to change Vala by c #. >>> >>> See you soon. >>> >>> >>> Mis proyectos de software libre en: >>> Github - edwinspire >>> ___ >>> vala-list mailing list >>> vala-list@gnome.org >>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list > > > Well, actually the IDE is not a priority, I've driven with gedit well, > that's no problem. > > Even I became a microide, what helps me is to compile and link the > binary libraries which depends with a simple click. > > Where I see the difficulty, or rather the obstacles to develop faster, > is in the documentation, examples, and functions that facilitate the > work. > > For example, to send an email in SMTP in c # is a matter of a couple > of lines and ready. With Vala me it was very difficult. > > Worse even if my applications development on the Linux (GNU / Debian) > but to deliver them to production will run on Windows. > > Last week tried C # to replace some parts where used Vala and I found > it very easy with Monodevelop. > > In 2 days with c # did the same as 8 days with Vala. > > What I suggested was to make a package that has the same functions and > classes that exist in C # but Vala, with the same names, which is > identical, so it would be very easy to move from one language to > another. > > > Mis proyectos de software libre en: > Github - edwinspire I meant to do something Como this: https://github.com/edwinspire/VSharp It is just an example , although it does not work but can best illustrate my idea. Mis proyectos de software libre en: Github - edwinspire ___ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
Re: [Vala] [OT] Vala -> C#
2016-03-26 9:59 GMT-05:00 Steven Oliver: > If having an IDE is high on your list check out builder. It's support for > Vala is getting better every release. They are also really good about taking > new contributors. > > Thank you, > Steven N. Oliver > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:49 PM -0700, "Edwin De La Cruz" > wrote: > >> Dear. I'm using valac for quite some time, although work has been left >> aside, I'm starting to use c #, I find it more productive but I refuse >> to use it and recognize it, but it is. >> >> Among the ideas that came to my mind, including _mono_, I thought ... >> because someone does not develop something similar to c # but Vala, >> who has the same name functions, classes, methods, etc so if I have >> one codigo.cs simply change it by codigo.vala and compile directly. >> >> I know it's an idea a little crazy and not all libraries can be >> imported, but whether it would be much easier and productive to have >> such a code. >> >> I program in C # using their mimas classes, but at the time of >> compiling all transforms Vala. >> >> It would be great as well. >> >> I have made the task of doing that only with the most basic functions, >> just to prove, as a hobby. >> >> In the years that I go with Vala language seems very much potential, >> but lacks an IDE, MonoDevelop no longer supports it, also lacks more >> documentation, easier to use libraries as well as in c #. >> >> Sorry for the extension of this message and perhaps not relevant but >> needed to relieve the sadness of having to change Vala by c #. >> >> See you soon. >> >> >> Mis proyectos de software libre en: >> Github - edwinspire >> ___ >> vala-list mailing list >> vala-list@gnome.org >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list Well, actually the IDE is not a priority, I've driven with gedit well, that's no problem. Even I became a microide, what helps me is to compile and link the binary libraries which depends with a simple click. Where I see the difficulty, or rather the obstacles to develop faster, is in the documentation, examples, and functions that facilitate the work. For example, to send an email in SMTP in c # is a matter of a couple of lines and ready. With Vala me it was very difficult. Worse even if my applications development on the Linux (GNU / Debian) but to deliver them to production will run on Windows. Last week tried C # to replace some parts where used Vala and I found it very easy with Monodevelop. In 2 days with c # did the same as 8 days with Vala. What I suggested was to make a package that has the same functions and classes that exist in C # but Vala, with the same names, which is identical, so it would be very easy to move from one language to another. Mis proyectos de software libre en: Github - edwinspire ___ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list