Re: varnish version question

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Olivier Beau writes:

- Which version of varnish is good for production ?

Hi Olivier,

We are getting very close to a 2.0 release, so right now the best code
we have is the trunk version from subversion.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev

varnish version question

[Olivier Beau]

Hi,

(i'm posting on this list because i havent found a varnish-user list.. hope
that's ok)

I discovered varnish a couple days, did some pretty good testing of 1.1.2 using
the rpm available on sourceforge; i was peretty impressed by the performance and
by the stability under heavy load.. (though there seems to be at least one
little bug: after 2 hours of production, varnish just hangs; at least the master
thread; didnt have time to do any debugging yet..)

Anyway..

- Which version of varnish is good for production ?
(maybe this information should be made clear on varnish's website ?)

Concerning my case : i will probably be installing varnish on ~100 servers
(currently running apache, with or without squid..); I (and my team) will have
time for testing, patching and mailling on this list for bugs and features
requests.. 
- should i consider using trunk ?


Best Regards, 

Olivier Beau

ps: is there a who's using varnish page with number of requests per second,
etc.. ?
(the kind of page my management would like seeing ;)
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev