Re: Overflowed work requests
Hi, PF> What does "overflowed work requests" in varnishstat signify ? If this PF> number is large is it a bad sign ? I have similar problem. "overflowed work requests" and "dropped work requests" is too large. FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE varnish-2.0.2 from ports > varnishstat -1 uptime385 . Child uptime client_conn115120 299.01 Client connections accepted client_req 113731 295.41 Client requests received cache_hit 39565 102.77 Cache hits cache_hitpass833821.66 Cache hits for pass cache_miss 65744 170.76 Cache misses backend_conn74104 192.48 Backend connections success backend_unhealthy0 0.00 Backend connections not attempted backend_busy0 0.00 Backend connections too many backend_fail0 0.00 Backend connections failures backend_reuse 73414 190.69 Backend connections reuses backend_recycle 73469 190.83 Backend connections recycles backend_unused 0 0.00 Backend connections unused n_srcaddr3207 . N struct srcaddr n_srcaddr_act 456 . N active struct srcaddr n_sess_mem 1910 . N struct sess_mem n_sess 1780 . N struct sess n_object63603 . N struct object n_objecthead63603 . N struct objecthead n_smf 126931 . N struct smf n_smf_frag 1 . N small free smf n_smf_large 18446744073709551614 . N large free smf n_vbe_conn239 . N struct vbe_conn n_bereq 391 . N struct bereq n_wrk 496 . N worker threads n_wrk_create 496 1.29 N worker threads created n_wrk_failed0 0.00 N worker threads not created n_wrk_max 47907 124.43 N worker threads limited n_wrk_queue 455 1.18 N queued work requests n_wrk_overflow 111098 288.57 N overflowed work requests n_wrk_drop 47232 122.68 N dropped work requests n_backend 1 . N backends n_expired1960 . N expired objects n_lru_nuked 0 . N LRU nuked objects n_lru_saved 0 . N LRU saved objects n_lru_moved 32435 . N LRU moved objects n_deathrow 0 . N objects on deathrow losthdr22 0.06 HTTP header overflows n_objsendfile 0 0.00 Objects sent with sendfile n_objwrite 85336 221.65 Objects sent with write n_objoverflow 0 0.00 Objects overflowing workspace s_sess 77004 200.01 Total Sessions s_req 113233 294.11 Total Requests s_pipe 0 0.00 Total pipe s_pass 863822.44 Total pass s_fetch 73696 191.42 Total fetch s_hdrbytes 33793720 87775.90 Total header bytes s_bodybytes3821523829 9926035.92 Total body bytes sess_closed 691517.96 Session Closed sess_pipeline3056 7.94 Session Pipeline sess_readahead330 0.86 Session Read Ahead sess_linger 0 0.00 Session Linger sess_herd 104807 272.23 Session herd shm_records 7238597 18801.55 SHM records shm_writes 606387 1575.03 SHM writes shm_flushes44 0.11 SHM flushes due to overflow shm_cont 2188 5.68 SHM MTX contention shm_cycles 3 0.01 SHM cycles through buffer sm_nreq148189 384.91 allocator requests sm_nobj126908 . outstanding allocations sm_balloc 4091076608 . bytes allocated sm_bfree 5572595712 . bytes free sma_nreq0 0.00 SMA allocator requests sma_nobj0 . SMA outstanding allocations sma_nbytes 0 . SMA outstanding bytes sma_balloc 0 . SMA bytes allocated sma_bfree 0 . SMA bytes free sms_nreq1 0.00 SMS allocator requests sms_nobj0 . SMS outstanding allocations sms_nbytes 0 . SMS outstanding bytes sms_balloc453 . SMS bytes allocated sms_bfree 453 . SMS bytes freed backend_req 74104 192.48 Backend requests made n_vcl 1 0.00 N vcl total n_vcl_avail 1 0.00 N vc
Re: varnish2.0.2 on Suse 10.3
]] "Paras Fadte" | I installed the same version on openSUSE 10.1 (X86-64) and it runs | fine .What could be the issue? Do you have a compiler installed? What happens if you run varnishd with the -C flag? -- Tollef Fog Heen Redpill Linpro -- Changing the game! t: +47 21 54 41 73 ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: varnish2.0.2 on Suse 10.3
Where did you get your Varnish package? Or did you build it from source? Is there a working C compiler environment on both systems? --Michael On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Paras Fadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I installed the same version on openSUSE 10.1 (X86-64) and it runs > fine .What could be the issue? > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Michael S. Fischer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Smells like an architecture mismatch. Any chance you're running a >> 32-bit Varnish build? >> >> --Michael >> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Paras Fadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have installed varnish 2.0.2 on openSUSE 10.3 (X86-64) , but it >>> doesn't seem to start and I get "VCL compilation failed" message. What >>> could be the issue ? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> -Paras >>> ___ >>> varnish-misc mailing list >>> varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no >>> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>> >>> >> > > ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: varnish2.0.2 on Suse 10.3
I installed the same version on openSUSE 10.1 (X86-64) and it runs fine .What could be the issue? On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Michael S. Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Smells like an architecture mismatch. Any chance you're running a > 32-bit Varnish build? > > --Michael > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Paras Fadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have installed varnish 2.0.2 on openSUSE 10.3 (X86-64) , but it >> doesn't seem to start and I get "VCL compilation failed" message. What >> could be the issue ? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> -Paras >> ___ >> varnish-misc mailing list >> varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no >> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >> >> > ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: varnish2.0.2 on Suse 10.3
Smells like an architecture mismatch. Any chance you're running a 32-bit Varnish build? --Michael On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Paras Fadte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed varnish 2.0.2 on openSUSE 10.3 (X86-64) , but it > doesn't seem to start and I get "VCL compilation failed" message. What > could be the issue ? > > Thanks in advance. > > -Paras > ___ > varnish-misc mailing list > varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no > http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > > ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: round-robin director
]] "Michael Moyle" | Is it possible that the fix to the random director in this release | fixed round-robin as well? No, it only affected the random director. | In addition I will note that round-robin load balance selects | different hosts on our top page as desired. After a session cookie is | issued it stuck with one host (sticky session) which is what we want. | I could not find any varnish docs on this and was concerned sticky | session was not implemented. I even found some posts on this list | suggesting that it was not there and would need to be implemented in | the vcl. However it appears to work fine out of the box. Can you (or | anyone) confirm that sticky session is implemented? I am fairly sure we have not implemented sticky sessions, so I am not sure why you are seeing this behaviour. -- Tollef Fog Heen Redpill Linpro -- Changing the game! t: +47 21 54 41 73 ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
varnish2.0.2 on Suse 10.3
Hi, I have installed varnish 2.0.2 on openSUSE 10.3 (X86-64) , but it doesn't seem to start and I get "VCL compilation failed" message. What could be the issue ? Thanks in advance. -Paras ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
