RE: [vchkpw] Vpopmail (5.2.1 and 5.3.20) won't compile on debian sarge ?!
Hi! > You are using an MySQL backend, correct? When you put the > appropriate into > into the vmysql.h file, you left something without quotation > marks. Go > back and check the file, make sure whatever you changed is correct. No, I don't. I just use > ./configure > --enable-tcprules-prog=/usr/bin/tcprules > --enable-tcpserver-file=/etc/tcp.smtp ;-) Greets Florian
RE: [vchkpw] Vpopmail (5.2.1 and 5.3.20) won't compile on debian sarge ?!
Hi! > Apply this patch to vmysql.h: > > diff -u vpopmail-5.3.20/vmysql.h vpopmail-5.3.20-tc/vmysql.h > --- vpopmail-5.3.20/vmysql.h2003-03-18 17:27:18.0 -0700 > +++ vpopmail-5.3.20-tc/vmysql.h 2003-06-27 22:35:09.0 -0700 > @@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ > primary key (pw_name, pw_domain ) " > #else > #define TABLE_LAYOUT "pw_name char(32) not null, \ > -pw_domain char(64) not null, > +pw_domain char(64) not null, \ > pw_passwd char(40), \ > pw_uid int, pw_gid int, \ > pw_gecos char(48), \ > -pw_dir char(160), > +pw_dir char(160), \ > pw_shell char(20), \ > primary key (pw_name, pw_domain ) " > #endif Could you please tell me, how to apply this?? I don't know anything about this... :-( THX and greets, Florian
[vchkpw] Ezmlm Upgrade
Dear All As my server currently broke down, I would like to do a mass import of email address from my excel file into EZMLM. I'm thinking of converting Excel to CSV before doing so, and I'm positive there are rather automatic ways to do so rather then have me manually inputting everyone's addie in. Can someone guide me on the best way to do it? Regards, David Choo
[vchkpw] Re: Ezmlm Upgrade
Hello David, On Sunday, June 29, 2003 at 4:02:48 PM you wrote (at least in part): > As my server currently broke down, I would like to do a mass import of > email address from my excel file into EZMLM. > I'm thinking of converting Excel to CSV before doing so, and I'm > positive there are rather automatic ways to do so rather then have me > manually inputting everyone's addie in. > Can someone guide me on the best way to do it? I don't see how his interacts with vpopmail, so I don't know why you don't ask the ezmlm-mailinglist. But the most obvious answer to your question is: - read the man pages - execute ezmlm-sub -N $ML_DIR address_01 [address_02 ... address_XX] Keep in mind the maximum number of arguments allowed to pass to a single command and a probably existing maximum length of a single command line. Make use of 'xargs' of the number of "about to subscribed" addresses would exceed any of this limitations. -- Best regards Peter Palmreuther [insert commercial here]
Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail (5.2.1 and 5.3.20) won't compile on debian sarge ?!
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 01:32 AM, Florian Schiessl wrote: diff -u vpopmail-5.3.20/vmysql.h vpopmail-5.3.20-tc/vmysql.h --- vpopmail-5.3.20/vmysql.h2003-03-18 17:27:18.0 -0700 +++ vpopmail-5.3.20-tc/vmysql.h 2003-06-27 22:35:09.0 -0700 @@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ primary key (pw_name, pw_domain ) " #else #define TABLE_LAYOUT "pw_name char(32) not null, \ -pw_domain char(64) not null, +pw_domain char(64) not null, \ pw_passwd char(40), \ pw_uid int, pw_gid int, \ pw_gecos char(48), \ -pw_dir char(160), +pw_dir char(160), \ pw_shell char(20), \ primary key (pw_name, pw_domain ) " #endif Could you please tell me, how to apply this?? I don't know anything about this... :-( It's a simple change, and you don't really need to use 'patch' to apply it. Open vmysql.h in an editor (vi, pico, emacs, etc.), go to line 48 and look for the "pw_domain" and "pw_dir" lines. Add the missing "\" to the end of those two lines. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: [vchkpw] Queue not delivered
well, something is definitely wrong on your end. this message was sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (no such address), and has no proper mailing list headers (as if sent to individual mailing list subscribers but separate from the list itself). looks like your configuration is messed up big-time. the first order of business for you, when experiencing a QMAIL failure, is to look at your QMAIL LOGS. what do they say? since we can't read your logs, we can only guess. Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 13058 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2003 18:19:42 - Received: from unknown (HELO fep05-svc.mail.telepac.pt) (194.65.5.209) by anastrophe.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2003 18:19:42 - Received: from NetClube05 ([213.13.72.36]) by fep05-svc.mail.telepac.pt (InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:19:38 +0100 From: Júlio Espada Olivares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [vchkpw] Queue not delivered MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--FH20025CT4UE0Q" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:19:39 +0100 X-UID: 62253 Hi I'm having a problem since today: queue is not delivered. At this moment I have 2800 messages in queue and 1500 in queue but not processed. I restarted qmail, even the box and nothing solves that. Any sugestions while my disk have free space ? :/ Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com http://folding.stanford.edu The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net
Re: [vchkpw] Re: Ezmlm Upgrade
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 08:08 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: - read the man pages - execute ezmlm-sub -N $ML_DIR address_01 [address_02 ... address_XX] Or, save the list of addresses to a file and do ezmlm-sub -N $ML_DIR < /tmp/addrlist.txt -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[vchkpw] Weird messages coming from telepac.pt user
A few messages have come through to list subscribers recently that didn't have proper headers. One of them claimed to be from Chad Morland, but using the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which is an invalid address). It looks like the machine at adsl-b3-72-36.telepac.pt (213.13.72.36) is infected with an email virus/worm that is reposting messages to subscribers of the list directly. Some of them are just simple re-posts (like the "Queue not delivered" message from Julio Espada Olivares that was originally sent May 12, 2003). But the resend from Chad Morland included a virus attachment. Keep an eye out for the messages, they'll include a received header like the following, and won't have proper mail list headers. Received: from NetClube05 ([213.13.72.36]) by fep01-svc.mail.telepac.pt (InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:26:57 +0100 And, if you're the subscriber to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that happens to have 213.13.72.36 as your IP address -- scan your system with an up-to-date virus checker! -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
