[vchkpw] Help me....

2003-07-13 Thread VJ.Srinivasan \(JINIS\)

(B
(B
(BDear all,
(BGreetings,
(B 
(BHow do I stop Unwanted mails roaming around in my 
(Bsmtp services.
(Bfor example:
(B 
(B@40003f1268be04521e04 delivery 11414: deferral: 
(BSorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/@40003f1268be045248fc 
(Bstatus: local 0/10 remote 178/255@40003f1268be0b797254 delivery 11398: 
(Bfailure: 
(B65.54.166.230_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_550_Requested_action_not_taken:_mailbox_unavailable/Giving_up_on_65.54.166.230./@40003f1268be0b79acec 
(Bstatus: local 0/10 remote 177/255@40003f1268be0ccd8cbc delivery 11404: 
(Bfailure: 
(B65.54.254.151_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_550_Requested_action_not_taken:_mailbox_unavailable/Giving_up_on_65.54.254.151./@40003f1268be0ccdbf84 
(Bstatus: local 0/10 remote 176/255@40003f1268be1a358a94 delivery 10342: 
(Bdeferral: 203.133.1.15_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_450_<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:_Sender_address_rejected:_Domain_not_found/Giving_up_on_203.133.1.15./@40003f1268be1a35c914 
(Bstatus: local 0/10 remote 175/255@40003f1268be20d8b2f4 delivery 11336: 
(Bfailure: 
(B211.20.188.150_failed_on_DATA_command./Remote_host_said:_509_Error:_do_not_treat_me_like_a_fool/@40003f1268be20d94764 
(Bstatus: local 0/10 remote 174/255
(B 
(BI have disbaled roaming users option in vpopmail. 
(Bbut even some junk users roaming in my smtp service. what is the 
(Bsolution.
(B 
(Bco-operation greatly appreciated.
(B 
(BKeep in 
(B>|<<< 
(BThanks & Regards,VJ. Srinivasan,System Administrator,Jin 
(BInformation System (P) Ltd.,401, Oxford House, 3rd Floor,Rustom Bagh 
(BMain Road,Off Airport Road, Bangalore, Karnataka,IndiaPhone -- 
(B91-80-5253001.
(B 
(B"You don't have to be great to start But You 
(Bhave to start to be great"
(B 
(B 

Re: [vchkpw] vppopmail 5.3 stable?

2003-07-13 Thread Sverre Nilsen
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Rick Macdougall wrote:

> Yes it is safe.
>
> Two caveats though.
>
> 1 -Backup your vpopmail/bin dir and vpopmail/etc dir before doing it
> (just in case).
>
> 2 - You may have to re-compile anything that works with libvpopmail -
> qmailadmin and courier-imap are two I can think of.
>
> Other than that, the only thing it will do is replace the contents of
> the bin and etc dirs with the updated binaries and lib files.

I've just upgraded vpopmail without any problems. And it seems to run just
fine. Thank you for your support. :-)

--
  .-.
  oo|  Sverre Nilsen | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 /`'\  Nilsen Consulting | http://www.nilsenconsulting.no/
(\_;/) (+47) 970 85 860



Re: [vchkpw] vppopmail 5.3 stable?

2003-07-13 Thread Rick Macdougall


Tom Collins wrote:

On Sunday, July 13, 2003, at 01:19  PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:

2 - You may have to re-compile anything that works with libvpopmail - 
qmailadmin and courier-imap are two I can think of.


And qmail-smtpd if you have the chkuser patch.

Doh,

You'd think I'd remember that by now, having forgotten twice in the last 
two month's to do exactly that.

Rick





Re: [vchkpw] vppopmail 5.3 stable?

2003-07-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Sunday, July 13, 2003, at 01:19  PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
2 - You may have to re-compile anything that works with libvpopmail - 
qmailadmin and courier-imap are two I can think of.
And qmail-smtpd if you have the chkuser patch.

--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester



Re: [vchkpw] vppopmail 5.3 stable?

2003-07-13 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi,

Yes it is safe.

Two caveats though.

1 -Backup your vpopmail/bin dir and vpopmail/etc dir before doing it 
(just in case).

2 - You may have to re-compile anything that works with libvpopmail - 
qmailadmin and courier-imap are two I can think of.

Other than that, the only thing it will do is replace the contents of 
the bin and etc dirs with the updated binaries and lib files.

Regards,

Rick

Sverre Nilsen wrote:

On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Sverre, we use 5.3.21 officially over here, so I wouldnt worry about
using that version.  As far as when it will be marked 'stable'
officially, I cant say for certian.


So you guys says it is as stable as 5.2.1? Ok, time to upgrade then...

Is it cakewalk to upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3? As stated before the box
handles mail for about 500 domains and I can't lose any mail accounts or
settings. Does it just owerwrite the binaries, or does it mess with the
whole vpopmail directory? I have the domain directory under the
vpopmail-dir containing all data and I can't afford any messing araound
with that...
They'll brake my neck if anything goes wrong. :-)

So, is it safe?

--
  .-.
  oo|  Sverre Nilsen | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 /`'\  Nilsen Consulting | http://www.nilsenconsulting.no/
(\_;/) (+47) 970 85 860





Re: [vchkpw] vppopmail 5.3 stable?

2003-07-13 Thread Sverre Nilsen
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Sverre, we use 5.3.21 officially over here, so I wouldnt worry about
> using that version.  As far as when it will be marked 'stable'
> officially, I cant say for certian.

So you guys says it is as stable as 5.2.1? Ok, time to upgrade then...

Is it cakewalk to upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3? As stated before the box
handles mail for about 500 domains and I can't lose any mail accounts or
settings. Does it just owerwrite the binaries, or does it mess with the
whole vpopmail directory? I have the domain directory under the
vpopmail-dir containing all data and I can't afford any messing araound
with that...

They'll brake my neck if anything goes wrong. :-)

So, is it safe?

--
  .-.
  oo|  Sverre Nilsen | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 /`'\  Nilsen Consulting | http://www.nilsenconsulting.no/
(\_;/) (+47) 970 85 860



Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and virusscanner

2003-07-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)



I'm using qmailscanner with NOD32. Fast, safe, cheap.
Ciao,
Tonino
At 13/07/03 13/07/03 +0200, Bård Tommy Nilsen wrote:
Hello

 

Have anyone set up a mail virus checker on a
FreeBSD machine with Qmail and vpopmail ??

 

What did you use ??

 

 

Best Regards

Bård Tommy Nilsen



   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
Interazioni di Antonio Nati 
  
http://www.interazioni.it 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  






Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and virusscanner

2003-07-13 Thread John Johnson



qmail scanner works good.
 
-John
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Bård 
  Tommy Nilsen 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 4:23 AM
  Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmail and 
  virusscanner
  
  
  Hello
   
  Have anyone set up a mail virus 
  checker on a FreeBSD machine with Qmail and vpopmail ??
   
  What did you use 
  ??
   
   
  Best Regards
  Bård Tommy 
  Nilsen


[vchkpw] Vpopmail Authentication Logging Information

2003-07-13 Thread Martin Chung



Hi,
 
I am using FreeBSD 4.7 + Qmail + Vpopmail 5.2.1 with mysql 
logging and authentication logging enabled. I checked the mysql table "lastauth" 
and found that the timestamps were not logged correctly, for 
example:
 
2000-10-58 08:26:04
2000-10-57 50:47:25
2000-10-57 74:08:59
 
These should be logged in year 2003 July but the date and time 
were strange. I also use vqadmin to check these logged times and it also showed 
incorrect timestamp. What's happen?
 
Thank you very much
 
Martin


Re: [vchkpw] RE:Re: [vchkpw] error: segmentation fault and unable to chdir vpopmail/users directory

2003-07-13 Thread lixiang



hi,Jens:> > Error: No such object> > 
matched DN: "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com"> > -ERR authorization  
failed> > This is a querry to user: 
"ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com"> But as you now know this your Basedn and not 
a valid user.i know what you mean is that the query is executed by the 
"ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" ,while it should be the "uid=, 
ou=test.com,ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" ?   if so, how i can control 
which  type dn  query is executed? and i remember that in the 
README.ldap in vpopmail, it tell me that modify slapd.conf  
like:suffix  
"o=vpop"rootdn  "cn=Manager, o=vpop"is it 
necessary?  if i use this default settings for my slapd.conf, what's the 
influence? and i think the dn that i have in my openldap now seems a 
little strange:  "uid=test, ou=test.com, ou=people, dc=koal, dc=com" , 
maybe the dn like this " uid=test, ou=people, dc=koal, dc=com" or "uid=test, 
dc=koal, dc=com"  seems more common.  but if we set up the basedn" 
dc=koal,dc=com",  and add the virtual domain through vadddomain and add 
user through vadduser,  then the dn like this "uid=test, ou=test.com, 
ou=people, dc=koal, dc=com" is unavoidable,  is there any way to avoid this 
?  i am not familiar with ldap ,  :-(,  thank you for your 
help.2. add user through qmailadmin ,it always report:  Email 
Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] (test1) could not be 
added, but this user actually has been added ,and its entry in ldap has also 
been added.    i have recomiled the qmailadmin, and upgrade my 
qmailadmin-1.0.6 to 1.0.20, but this strange situation 
remains..  BTW:  if i modify the core.schema,  
error like below occurs when start slapd:    
/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema: line 381: AttributeType not found: 
"mail"- Original Message - From: "Jens Jahr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
"lixiang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: 
Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:54 PMSubject: Re: [vchkpw] RE:Re: [vchkpw] error: 
segmentation fault and unable to chdir vpopmail/users directory> 
Zitat von lixiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> > Hi 
lixiang,> > > i used your 
qmailUser.schema;  but make no modification for my> > 
core.schema, because the modification you provide make the attributetype> 
> error when start slapd. and because i have had the dc=koal,dc=com entry, 
so> > my dn.ldif is :> >  > >   
dn:ou=people,dc=,dc=cn> >   objectclass: 
organizationalUnit> >   ou:people> > Ok, look 
here:> Each entry you add is now a subtree vom 
"ou=people,dc=,dc=cn"> So your domains will be stored:> 
> "ou=test1.com,ou=people,dc=,dc=cn"> 
"ou=bla.com,ou=people,dc=,dc=cn"> > etc.> > Your 
users will have entries like:> > 
"uid=user1,ou=test1.com,ou=people,dc=,dc=cn"> 
"uid=user567,ou=test1.com,ou=people,dc=,dc=cn"> > etc.> 
> Your basedn is> "ou=people,dc=,dc=cn"> > So 
you might use vckpw to auth your users!> See the problem you have 
?> > > Error: No such object> > matched DN: 
"ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com"> > -ERR authorization  failed> 
> This is a querry to user: "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com"> But as you 
now know this your Basedn and not a valid user.> > Everytime you 
recompile vpopmail, you have to recompile qmailadmin, because it > is 
limked against libvpopmail.a > > So try your commandline 
tools:> - vaddomain> - vadduser> - vmoduser> - 
vdeluser> > If they work, then try to recompile 
qmailadmin.> You should have a base user call postmaster, which has been 
setup on adding the > domain.> > Get a ldapbrowser like 
"gq", connect to your ldapserver and you should see > something 
like> >  
dc=koal,dc=com>   
|>    
->ou=people>   
|>    
-> 
ou=test1.com>    
|> 
->uid=postmaster> 
->uid=user1> 
->uid=user156> > BTW: I wonder that modifiying you core.schema 
results in an error, because I > just changed a "must"-flag to a 
"may"-flag.> > Best regards> Jens> > > 
> > > > > ldapadd succeed.  and now i 
add/delete  domain or users is indeed successful> > in command 
line. :-)  but i still have 2 problems:> > > > 1. add 
user through qmailadmin ,it always report:  Email Account> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (test1) could not be added, but 
this user actually has been> > added ,and its entry in ldap has also 
been added.  > > > > 2. i test the send/receive email 
through OE client and " telnet > > email-servers'ip 110" , the 
authentication always error:> > > > Error: No such 
object> > matched DN: "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com"> > -ERR 
authorization  failed> > > > i ensure the password is 
correct for that user.> > > -- > Jens Jahr> 
> 


[vchkpw] vpopmail and virusscanner

2003-07-13 Thread Bård Tommy Nilsen








Hello

 

Have anyone set up a mail virus checker on a FreeBSD
machine with Qmail and vpopmail ??

 

What did you use ??

 

 

Best Regards

Bård Tommy Nilsen