Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.17
On Thursday 20 February 2003 15:09, Bill Shupp wrote: Ken, All: I've posted 5.3.17: ChangeLog: http://shupp.org/patches/vpopmail-ChangeLog Download: http://shupp.org/patches/vpopmail-5.3.17.tar.gz Regards, Bill Shupp Bill, Thanks for the error checking to vpopbull! I haven't tested it yet, but my sanity greatly appreciates it! -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by up to 50%. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
[vchkpw] 5.3.17
Ken, All: I've posted 5.3.17: ChangeLog: http://shupp.org/patches/vpopmail-ChangeLog Download: http://shupp.org/patches/vpopmail-5.3.17.tar.gz Regards, Bill Shupp
Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.17
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 at 12:10:08, Bill Shupp wrote: Ken, All: I've posted 5.3.17: Thanks for the update! I'm running running vpopmail 5.2.1 and it's been running great for me! I know I need to upgrade to 5.3.x to be able to use SpamAssassin but outside of that is it safe or ok for me to stick with 5.2.1 for the time being? I'm running it with qmail 1.03. Are there any compelling reasons for me to upgrade to the 5.3.x level from 5.2.1? I guess I'm scared of breaking something :) Thanks in advance! Peace. Tom ___ http://jawmail.org/
Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.17
Thanks for the update! I'm running running vpopmail 5.2.1 and it's been running great for me! I know I need to upgrade to 5.3.x to be able to use SpamAssassin but outside of that is it safe or ok for me to stick with 5.2.1 for the time being? I'm running it with qmail 1.03. You don't need 5.3.x to run SpamAssassin -- I've been running 5.2.x with SA for quite some time now (a year?) by using Procmail -- actually the procmail option is better IMO since I can stuff the spam into a separate mailbox for the users, and use SquirrelMail to view the spam folder. Good for integration though, I will admit. Are there any compelling reasons for me to upgrade to the 5.3.x level from 5.2.1? I guess I'm scared of breaking something :) 5.3.x are developmental releases... they shouldn't be used on production servers without fair warning. :-) Regards, Andrew
Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.17
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 15:40, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: Thanks for the update! I'm running running vpopmail 5.2.1 and it's been running great for me! I know I need to upgrade to 5.3.x to be able to use SpamAssassin but outside of that is it safe or ok for me to stick with 5.2.1 for the time being? I'm running it with qmail 1.03. You don't need 5.3.x to run SpamAssassin -- I've been running 5.2.x with SA for quite some time now (a year?) by using Procmail -- actually the procmail option is better IMO since I can stuff the spam into a separate mailbox for the users, and use SquirrelMail to view the spam folder. Or, you can also run it with Qmail-Scanner. Then SpamAssassin will automatically scan every email that comes through qmail. Less customizable than the above..Currently, I just stick the headers in the message, and let the users filter them. Rick Good for integration though, I will admit. Are there any compelling reasons for me to upgrade to the 5.3.x level from 5.2.1? I guess I'm scared of breaking something :) 5.3.x are developmental releases... they shouldn't be used on production servers without fair warning. :-) Regards, Andrew
