Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-19 Thread X-Istence 
Adam Hooper wrote:



Forging the Delivered-To line could be to Mr. Spammer's advantage, 
because
he could send millions+ of messages to addresses that use vpopmail, and
could depend on the bouncing to deliver his mail;  just spoof the 
envelope
recipient/from and wala.


Not only that, but it gives information about the system's directory 
structure, which I always thought was a BAD thing.

(As an entirely separate bug: could the directory structure *not* be 
given to people who shouldn't see it?)

This could be done in vdelivermail code. It would just return a 
message_is_looping: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-19 Thread Adam Hooper 


Forging the Delivered-To line could be to Mr. Spammer's advantage, because
he could send millions+ of messages to addresses that use vpopmail, and
could depend on the bouncing to deliver his mail;  just spoof the envelope
recipient/from and wala.
Not only that, but it gives information about the system's directory 
structure, which I always thought was a BAD thing.

(As an entirely separate bug: could the directory structure *not* be 
given to people who shouldn't see it?)

--
Adam Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Jeremy Kister 
On Sunday, October 19, 2003 12:42 AM, Gregory Kuhn wrote:
> message_is_looping_/home/vpopmail/domains/ctch.net/gkuhn/Maildir//

ah ha!  :)  this would explain why: grep 'is looping' /var/log/qmail/current
bore no fruit :)

s/\s+/_/g;

sigh.  after resolving the PEBKAC error, I do see the entries in my logs.


since we're on the topic of guaranteed bouncing (since the Delivered-To:
header can still easily be forged), is it worth investing some crypto into
it ?  or even appending some Site-Unique level string to the end of
Delivered-To like the domain name --

instead of: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it'd be: Delivered-To-nntx.net: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

or some such.  Whatever the annex is, it'd have to be static (at the
site/domain level), because many people use the Delivered-To header for
processing via procmail/etc.

Forging the Delivered-To line could be to Mr. Spammer's advantage, because
he could send millions+ of messages to addresses that use vpopmail, and
could depend on the bouncing to deliver his mail;  just spoof the envelope
recipient/from and wala.



Jeremy Kister
www.jeremykister.com
Argus:  The World's Most Advanced Monitoring Software:
http://argus.tcp4me.com

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Tom Collins 
On Saturday, October 18, 2003, at 09:31  PM, Michael Bowe wrote:
I have opened a tracker [826231] on sourceforge for this bug
Can someone try this out on a development machine before I post it to 
CVS.  It seems to make sense to me and it compiles.  vdelivermail could 
definitely use a rewrite in the next development cycle.  I think that 
the looping code could be simplified greatly.

Index: vdelivermail.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/vpopmail/vpopmail/vdelivermail.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 vdelivermail.c
--- vdelivermail.c  2 Oct 2003 16:12:20 -   1.4
+++ vdelivermail.c  19 Oct 2003 05:44:04 -
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@
 while(fgets(loop_buf,sizeof(loop_buf),stdin)!=NULL){
 /* if we find the line, return error (looping) */
-if (strstr(loop_buf, "Delivered-To")!= 0 &&
+if (strncmp(loop_buf, "Delivered-To: ", 14) == 0 &&
 is_loop_match(loop_buf, address)==1 ) {
 /* return the loop found */
@@ -1313,6 +1313,7 @@
 /* walk forward in dt line for @ character */
 while ( *dt != '@' && *dt != 0 ) ++dt;
+if (*dt == 0) return 0;  /* no @ character found */
 /* now walk back to first space */
 while ( *dt != ' ' && dt != startdt) --dt;
===
The first change makes sure the line STARTS with 'Delivered-To: ' 
instead of just containing the words.

The second change aborts the loop checker if the line doesn't contain 
an @.

--
Tom Collins  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: The Tom Logic offices will be closed October 23 to November 18.
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/  Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Gregory Kuhn 
At 02:31 PM 10/19/2003 +1000, Michael Bowe wrote:
I found you can replicate this bug simply by sending yourself a message with
a subject like this :
test Delivered-To

Where  is a space char

I wonder if this effects all versions of vpopmail, or only the later devel
versions
I am running vpopmail-5.3.28

I have opened a tracker [826231] on sourceforge for this bug
I just tried and succeeded at duplicating this error using the methor you 
descibed and I got the same result with this showing up in my qmail-smtpd log;

@40003f9215690f97728c new msg 916709
@40003f9215690fa950c4 info msg 916709: bytes 644 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
qp 81663 uid 1003
@40003f921569102fbaec starting delivery 26386: msg 916709 to local 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40003f9215691030ff24 status: local 1/40 remote 1/40
@40003f9215691220c904 delivery 26386: failure: 
message_is_looping_/home/vpopmail/domains/ctch.net/gkuhn/Maildir//
@40003f921569127d0a34 status: local 0/40 remote 1/40
@40003f92156913b69ba4 bounce msg 916709 qp 81667
@40003f92156913d98cf4 end msg 916709
@40003f921569163c0e04 new msg 916741
@40003f921569164ca804 info msg 916741: bytes 1187 from <> qp 81667 uid 1008
@40003f92156916d11a44 starting delivery 26387: msg 916741 to local 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40003f92156916d2fea4 status: local 1/40 remote 1/40
@40003f9215691d37b6a4 delivery 26387: success: did_0+0+1/
@40003f9215691d6598bc status: local 0/40 remote 1/40
@40003f9215691d79ff64 end msg 916741

I am running vpopmail version 5.3.20 so it would seem at first glance that 
it affects all versions.

Greg

Gregory Kuhn
Coast to Coast Hosting
http://www.ctch.net
303-333-8947
303-726-4855 (Cell)

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Michael Bowe 
I found you can replicate this bug simply by sending yourself a message with
a subject like this :

test Delivered-To

Where  is a space char

I wonder if this effects all versions of vpopmail, or only the later devel
versions

I am running vpopmail-5.3.28

I have opened a tracker [826231] on sourceforge for this bug

Michael.

- Original Message - 
From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ezmlm warning


> I received a bounce like this as well
>
> I believe this is a bug
>
> vdelivermail looks in the message headers for any "Delivered-To" entries.
If
> it sees the same address popping up more than once, then this indicates a
> loop.
>
> I believe that the bug occurred with this particular message because the
> subject ended in "Delivered-To"
>
> Since only a EOL followed the Delivered-To string, I think it is likely
that
> vdelivermail fails to handle this occurrence correctly, and it incorrectly
> detects this as a loop
>
> Michael.
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Gregory Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 1:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ezmlm warning
>
>
> > At 11:10 PM 10/18/2003 -0400, Jeremy Kister wrote:
> > >I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> tonight,
> > >at about 10PM EST.
> > >
> > >I've kept a list of which messages from the vchkpw mailing list have
> > >bounced from your address.
> > >
> > >Here are the message numbers:
> > >
> > >23631
> >
> > Interestingly I got the same error message from the vchkpw list
concerning
> > the same message number 23631.  I think that this is a bug within the
> > vchkpw list, not your system.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > Gregory Kuhn
> > Coast to Coast Hosting
> > http://www.ctch.net
> > 303-333-8947
> > 303-726-4855 (Cell)
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Fw: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence 
Jeremy Kister wrote:

Upon examining the original message that my MTA bounced, I know this is not
a coincidence.
I trimmed the original message because I thought it was non-relevant, but it
clearly is.
something in the original message confused some part of my MTA; This _is_ a
bug; im just not sure if it's qmail or vpopmail
below is the original email message that my system bounced due to "message
is looping"
Tom!?  Ken!? :)

Jeremy Kister
www.jeremykister.com/jeremy
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 25209 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Oct 2003 08:13:55 -
Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.inter7.com) (209.218.8.2)
 by max.nntx.net with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 08:13:55 -
Received: (qmail 27027 invoked by uid 511); 7 Oct 2003 09:27:02 -
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Unsubscribe: 
List-Subscribe: 
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from unknown (HELO rous.redbarn.org) (204.152.188.41)
by evanston.inter7.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 09:27:01 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Ziegast)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:55:40 PDT."
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 01:12:40 -0700
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] unexpected Delivered-To
 

How can this happen?
   

*Any* header can be forged. :^)
 

Ok, but I'm not clear on one thing. qmail+vpopmail is going to route
locally based on the to field of the incoming message, right? So you are
saying this message was forged locally, meaning a hacked server?
   

The envelope recipient ("RCPT TO:") is what qmail mostly cares about.
The normal message headers are fluffy bits of superfluous information
that could help it detect a mail loop.
Your message appears to have had a "To:" header of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(forged) and an envelope recipient of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (not forged)
or maybe even some other address that aliases itself to kurt.
 

Curiously your off-list reply cased my server to generate this message:
message is looping /var/vpopmail/domains/breathsense.com/kkb/Maildir/
   

Why would your server bounce it in the first place? Fix that!
--
Eric Ziegast
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(aka [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(aka [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 

The envelope recipient ("RCPT TO:") is what qmail mostly cares about.
The normal message headers are fluffy bits of superfluous information
that could help it detect a mail loop.
Your message appears to have had a "To:" header of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(forged) and an envelope recipient of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (not forged)
Test.
or maybe even some other address that aliases itself to kurt.

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Michael Bowe 
I received a bounce like this as well

I believe this is a bug

vdelivermail looks in the message headers for any "Delivered-To" entries. If
it sees the same address popping up more than once, then this indicates a
loop.

I believe that the bug occurred with this particular message because the
subject ended in "Delivered-To"

Since only a EOL followed the Delivered-To string, I think it is likely that
vdelivermail fails to handle this occurrence correctly, and it incorrectly
detects this as a loop

Michael.

- Original Message - 
From: "Gregory Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ezmlm warning


> At 11:10 PM 10/18/2003 -0400, Jeremy Kister wrote:
> >I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
tonight,
> >at about 10PM EST.
> >
> >I've kept a list of which messages from the vchkpw mailing list have
> >bounced from your address.
> >
> >Here are the message numbers:
> >
> >23631
>
> Interestingly I got the same error message from the vchkpw list concerning
> the same message number 23631.  I think that this is a bug within the
> vchkpw list, not your system.
>
> Greg
>
> Gregory Kuhn
> Coast to Coast Hosting
> http://www.ctch.net
> 303-333-8947
> 303-726-4855 (Cell)
>
>
>

Fw: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Jeremy Kister 
Upon examining the original message that my MTA bounced, I know this is not
a coincidence.

I trimmed the original message because I thought it was non-relevant, but it
clearly is.

something in the original message confused some part of my MTA; This _is_ a
bug; im just not sure if it's qmail or vpopmail

below is the original email message that my system bounced due to "message
is looping"

Tom!?  Ken!? :)

Jeremy Kister
www.jeremykister.com/jeremy


Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 25209 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Oct 2003 08:13:55 -
Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.inter7.com) (209.218.8.2)
  by max.nntx.net with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 08:13:55 -
Received: (qmail 27027 invoked by uid 511); 7 Oct 2003 09:27:02 -
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Unsubscribe: 
List-Subscribe: 
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from unknown (HELO rous.redbarn.org) (204.152.188.41)
by evanston.inter7.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 09:27:01 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Ziegast)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:55:40 PDT."
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 01:12:40 -0700
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] unexpected Delivered-To

> >> How can this happen?
> >
> > *Any* header can be forged. :^)
>
> Ok, but I'm not clear on one thing. qmail+vpopmail is going to route
> locally based on the to field of the incoming message, right? So you are
> saying this message was forged locally, meaning a hacked server?
The envelope recipient ("RCPT TO:") is what qmail mostly cares about.
The normal message headers are fluffy bits of superfluous information
that could help it detect a mail loop.
Your message appears to have had a "To:" header of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(forged) and an envelope recipient of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (not forged)
or maybe even some other address that aliases itself to kurt.
> Curiously your off-list reply cased my server to generate this message:
> message is looping /var/vpopmail/domains/breathsense.com/kkb/Maildir/
Why would your server bounce it in the first place? Fix that!
--
Eric Ziegast
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(aka [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(aka [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence 




Jeremy Kister wrote:

  On Saturday, October 18, 2003 11:18 PM,  X-Istence wrote:
  
  
So basically, its on their side, unless something is looping on my side,
of which i know nothing.

  
  
It cannot be on their side; how would their MTA know my maildir is in
/home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/ ?

they also clearly attach the bounce which my system sent to them: from
qmail-02.nntx.net (which is mine)

did you receive the message at the same time I did ?


Jeremy Kister
www.jeremykister.com
Argus:  The World's Most Advanced Monitoring Software:
http://argus.tcp4me.com


  


I got it at 11:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, so i got it an hour and a
half later than you, but that could be a delay because of the amount of
emails their server has to send out if everyone were to get one of
these.

X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Gregory Kuhn 
At 11:10 PM 10/18/2003 -0400, Jeremy Kister wrote:
I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list tonight,
at about 10PM EST.
I've kept a list of which messages from the vchkpw mailing list have
bounced from your address.
Here are the message numbers:

   23631
Interestingly I got the same error message from the vchkpw list concerning 
the same message number 23631.  I think that this is a bug within the 
vchkpw list, not your system.

Greg

Gregory Kuhn
Coast to Coast Hosting
http://www.ctch.net
303-333-8947
303-726-4855 (Cell)

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Jeremy Kister 
On Saturday, October 18, 2003 11:18 PM,  X-Istence wrote:
> So basically, its on their side, unless something is looping on my side,
> of which i know nothing.

It cannot be on their side; how would their MTA know my maildir is in
/home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/ ?

they also clearly attach the bounce which my system sent to them: from
qmail-02.nntx.net (which is mine)

did you receive the message at the same time I did ?


Jeremy Kister
www.jeremykister.com
Argus:  The World's Most Advanced Monitoring Software:
http://argus.tcp4me.com

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence 
Jeremy Kister wrote:

I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list tonight,
at about 10PM EST.
please note i have obfuscated all email addresses slightly.
also note that I have been receiving mail fine from vchkpw, and havnt
modified my configuration recently.
the bounce my system sent was:

"user does not exist, but will deliver to
/home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/
message is looping /home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/Maildir/
mail is looping"
I am quite stumped on why my mailserver bounce this.  I immediately sent an
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from an outside account, and it was
received perfectly --  the fact that I've received this double-bounce shows
that my configuration is working.
I keep 8 rotations of 1MB qmail-send logs, and I dont have any record of
'mail is looping' in any of them.
the only [probable] record i have of this message is:
max> grep 129277 /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal
2003-10-18 21:58:08.502764500 starting delivery 129277: msg 30572 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-10-18 21:58:09.792902500 delivery 129277: success:
user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister
.co/jeremy//did_0+0+1/
which seems to say that the delivery was successful.

i have a .qmail-vpopmail file which places mail in my "jeremy" maildir.  my
.qmail-default also does this (among other things).  I do not have a
jeremy/.qmail file.
max> ls -ld .qmail-vpopmail .qmail-default jeremy/.qmail
jeremy/.qmail: No such file or directory
-rw-r-   1 vpopmail vchkpw   133 Oct  1 03:58 .qmail-default
-rw-r-   1 vpopmail vchkpw   107 Mar 26  2003 .qmail-vpopmail
before receiving this bounce, the last message my MUA has received from the
vpopmail list was 2003/10/18 4:18AM EST from Sigmund Gudvangen titled "Re:
[vchkpw] Multi domain bounce message handling"


 

Ah it seems i am not the only one with this problem. It seems that more 
people are seeing this then.

I also got the same message, and as far as i can see its in no way 
looping, no matter how i look at it.

So basically, its on their side, unless something is looping on my side, 
of which i know nothing.

[vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread Jeremy Kister 
I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list tonight,
at about 10PM EST.

please note i have obfuscated all email addresses slightly.
also note that I have been receiving mail fine from vchkpw, and havnt
modified my configuration recently.

the bounce my system sent was:

"user does not exist, but will deliver to
/home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/
message is looping /home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/Maildir/
mail is looping"

I am quite stumped on why my mailserver bounce this.  I immediately sent an
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from an outside account, and it was
received perfectly --  the fact that I've received this double-bounce shows
that my configuration is working.


I keep 8 rotations of 1MB qmail-send logs, and I dont have any record of
'mail is looping' in any of them.
the only [probable] record i have of this message is:
max> grep 129277 /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal
2003-10-18 21:58:08.502764500 starting delivery 129277: msg 30572 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-10-18 21:58:09.792902500 delivery 129277: success:
user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister
.co/jeremy//did_0+0+1/

which seems to say that the delivery was successful.

i have a .qmail-vpopmail file which places mail in my "jeremy" maildir.  my
.qmail-default also does this (among other things).  I do not have a
jeremy/.qmail file.

max> ls -ld .qmail-vpopmail .qmail-default jeremy/.qmail
jeremy/.qmail: No such file or directory
-rw-r-   1 vpopmail vchkpw   133 Oct  1 03:58 .qmail-default
-rw-r-   1 vpopmail vchkpw   107 Mar 26  2003 .qmail-vpopmail

before receiving this bounce, the last message my MUA has received from the
vpopmail list was 2003/10/18 4:18AM EST from Sigmund Gudvangen titled "Re:
[vchkpw] Multi domain bounce message handling"


the best working theory i had was that since qmail-02.nntx.net NFS mounts
/home/vpopmail/domains, then perhaps the share was unavailable for some
time, but that theory was quickly proven not to hold water because:
 1] the system would have sat and waited until the share did come on-line
before doing anything
 2] not only would the .qmail-vpopmail not be available, but .qmail-default
wouldnt have been either


any ideas?  this greatly worries me.

Jeremy Kister
www.jeremykister.com/jeremy/

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 11:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ezmlm warning

Return-Path:

Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 14139 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Oct 2003 01:58:07 -
Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.inter7.com) (209.218.8.2)
  by max.nntx.net with SMTP; 19 Oct 2003 01:58:07 -
Received: (qmail 7722 invoked by uid 511); 19 Oct 2003 03:12:06 -
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Date: 19 Oct 2003 03:12:06 -
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: ezmlm warning


Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.

 I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Messages to you from the vchkpw mailing list seem to
have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
message I received.

If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounces,
I will remove your address from the vchkpw mailing list,
without further notice.


I've kept a list of which messages from the vchkpw mailing list have
bounced from your address.

Here are the message numbers:

   23631

 --- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce message I received.

Return-Path: <>
Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-02.nntx.net) (64.115.47.41)
   by evanston.inter7.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 09:27:59 -
Received: (qmail 25216 invoked for bounce); 7 Oct 2003 08:13:56 -
Date: 7 Oct 2003 08:13:56 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice

 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at qmail-02.nntx.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
user does not exist, but will deliver to
/home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/
message is looping /home/vpopmail/domains/jeremykister.co/jeremy/Maildir/
mail is looping

 --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
[...]