Re: [vdr] A new possibility for lower power high performance VDR

2009-03-08 Thread Mika Laitio
I have myself thinked about the possibility of running vdr/xineliboutput 
client on low end systems that just have usb 2.0 but not any graphic 
cards or free pci slots available.

Has anybody experiences from the usb vga or usb dvi graphic card 
adapters like these?

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/adapter/usb-to-dvi-adapter-expands-screen-space-without-adding-video-cards-316944.php
http://www.ipcmax.com/product_info.php?products_id=1238

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] vdr 1.7.4 xineliboutput

2009-03-08 Thread Mika Laitio
 did you check it with dvb-s2 h264 hdtv channels too ?

At least arte worked for me about 1 or 2 week ago released xineliboutput 
cvs version. I however noticed it to be a little unstable in my system.
(crashed much easier than 1.0.4 with 1.6.0)

Mika

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] vdr 1.7.4 xineliboutput

2009-03-08 Thread Artem Makhutov
Hello,

On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:10:26AM +0200, Mika Laitio wrote:
  did you check it with dvb-s2 h264 hdtv channels too ?
 
 At least arte worked for me about 1 or 2 week ago released xineliboutput 
 cvs version. I however noticed it to be a little unstable in my system.
 (crashed much easier than 1.0.4 with 1.6.0)

The SD channels are working fine for me, but I have issues with the HD channels 
(audio and video).
It looks like there is a problem with the buffers or so.

So for HD channels I record them to the harddisk and then use xine to playback 
the recorded file.

I have also to increase some buffers in ~/.xine/config otherwise I had problems 
with the audio on ArteHD:

engine.buffers.audio_num_buffers:500
engine.buffers.video_num_buffers:1000

Regards, Artem

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] vdr-iptv-0.2.5

2009-03-08 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg

Hi,

a new IPTV plugin release is now available:

http://www.saunalahti.fi/~rahrenbe/vdr/iptv/

2009-03-08: Version 0.2.5

- Optimized TS packet data flow.
- Refactored section filter class.
- Cleaned up example scripts.
- Fixed pid scanner to set the existing video stream type
   (Thanks to ua0lnj for reporting this one).
- Added optional patches to disable CA updates.

BR,
--
rofa

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-08 Thread Marc Wernecke
 some x-vdr users reported problems with compiling mplayer and some plug-ins 
 like music too. We solved this by adding

 DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES

Why would this suddenly be necessary? 

I don't know, but it seems to work.

Marc

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Pvrinput and HVR1300

2009-03-08 Thread Kartsa
Martin Dauskardt kirjoitti:
 So does anyone know if the same applies for analogtv plugin also?

 \\Kartsa

 
 Forget the analogtv-plugin. Development stopped years ago. It does not 
 support 
 the current v4l2 mpeg API, so even a PVR150/250/350 would not work.

 My advise: Sell your HVR 1300 to a Windows user and buy a PVR150 + a 
 Linux-supported DVB-T USB-stick.
   
I have actually been thinking of that possibility also. The problem is 
there are no PVR150 available. At least I have not seen those for a 
while. Would PVR250 be as good/easy to install? I believe I could find 
one of those.

\\Kartsa

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[vdr] Clients with graphical output over USB (was: Re: A new possibility for lower power high performance VDR)

2009-03-08 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Mika,


Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 10:53 +0200 schrieb Mika Laitio:
 I have myself thinked about the possibility of running vdr/xineliboutput 
 client on low end systems that just have usb 2.0 but not any graphic 
 cards or free pci slots available.

So, does that mean, those boards do not have a graphic chip of any kind?

 Has anybody experiences from the usb vga or usb dvi graphic card 
 adapters like these?

Sorry, I do not.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] A new possibility for lower power high performance VDR

2009-03-08 Thread Alex Betis
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Mika Laitio lam...@pilppa.org wrote:

  I have myself thinked about the possibility of running vdr/xineliboutput
  client on low end systems that just have usb 2.0 but not any graphic
  cards or free pci slots available.
 
  Has anybody experiences from the usb vga or usb dvi graphic card
  adapters like these?
 
  I think the answer is here:
  Sewell claims that these USB-driven monitors have the same quality as
  standard DVI monitors at displays of* up to 20-inches*
  And what about all the GPU power? Someone has to handle MPEG decoding in
  hardware.
 
  As I see it, if you want low power silent box in your living room you'll
  have to keep a server with cards/USBs somewhere in your basement. If I
 had a
  basement, that's exactly that I would do :)

 Well, at the moment I have amd X2 4850 cpu on my server and one of the
 client is about 10 year old Pentium III 733 mhz with 10 mb network card
 and and integrated intel graphich card. This client user vdr-xineliboutput
 to 20 VGA monitor and works very well with SD channels.

 I have also tested streaming from VDR to Nokia N810 internet tablet.
 In that test I used the Streamdev plugin on server and mplayer on Nokia
 N810. (I have not tested xineliboutput with N810 because xine related libs
 seems to be hard to find for it and I did not had time by myself to start
 building everything for that...)

 So it indicates that the client do not neccessary need to have so much
 power on client unless the USB graphich card is very different beast from
 the resource eating standpoint.

The life is going toward high definition. My E6600 can hardly handle that
with CPU decoding.
By low power silent box I mean an Atom based set-top box with integrated
video chip - short term it's probably nVidia, but I think Intel will join
that club pretty soon.



 Mika

 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr