RE: [Veritas-bu] Third times the charm (I hope)

2006-03-10 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Solaris is a rock steady OS - Ive not really seen these go down unless there
is a hardware failure - and that is rare to.

I know NT gets a lot of slating, and it deserves to, but the Technology has
moved on and I am sure in time... We will see a Windows Server staying up
all the time!!

At this point we can now.. LAUGH OUT LOUD and go down the pub 
:-))

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Covington, Garrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 March 2006 16:32
To: WEAVER, Simon; 'MCare Backup'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Third times the charm (I hope)


Its even more stable on Solaris, ive been up for over twice that many days.
8-)

Thanks,
 
Garrett Covington
The TriZetto Group, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: 303-323-6886
c: 303-204-6695
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 12:00 AM
To: 'MCare Backup'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Third times the charm (I hope)


I have to say, I run NBU 5.1 on Win2k3 and to be honest, Win2k3 with NBU has
been more stable and reliable than on NT

To date, the last time the Server was ever rebooted was 72 days ago. - And
that was to apply a SP

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: MCare Backup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 08 March 2006 13:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Third times the charm (I hope)


I've had the exact same problem a couple of times before -- I had to reboot 
the master server to recover the ability to run restores.  However, I run 
NBU on Windows 2003 servers, so I have to reboot regularly anyway.   I've 
actually attributed it to too many simultaneous instances of the service 
that manages restores at one specific time, after which even one instance 
won't start properly -- the only way I can get it to return to normal is to 
restart all services at the Windows level (essentially rebooting).


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 8:59 AM
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Third times the charm (I hope)


I have asked this question twice before with no answers so I thought
I'd
try again.

 How can I tell why a restore job is queued? I submit restore jobs and
 they
 sit in the queue forever. There are plenty of tape drives, the necessary 
 tape is in the library. There are no pending mount requests. A restore to 
 the same client earlier today worked with no problem. I am at my wits end 
 trying to figure this out. Any feedback would be welcome, even if it is 
 just to let me know someone actually read this.

 Regards,

 Patrick Whelan ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate
or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The
views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium
Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any
contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered
Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] backing up databases

2006-03-10 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Hi Dave
Well I don't mind providing some input and some suggestions if that helps??

We used to Backup SQL Server with an agent, which allowed the Databases to
be backed up while it was online.

However, due to the costs of the agent, it was decided to get the SQL Admins
to configure SQL to perform its own Backups within SQL and place the files
on a separate partition.

Thus - Each Night we get full backups of the Databases, and SQL can still
run without being down.

No scripting is used in anyway. Backups are configured as SAN Media Servers
using SSO over fibre. Again, this may be withdrawn soon.

DBA Administrators SHOULD be responsible for the Databases, but need to be
aware if you are backing up using a type of Agent, or if you want them to
configure offline copies or snap shots

I would have thought Netbackup could be configured to perform Mounts and
Unmounts using a script, however in some of my cases, all Netbackup may do
is simply fail with a STATUS code. Unless another script can be run, PRIOR
to Netbackup starting the backup process? Maybe DBA Admin again perhaps?

Not sure if I have been of much help here, but thought I would reply to give
you an idea of what I currently implement.

Simon Weaver 
Technical Support 
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium 
Tel: 02392-708598 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 March 2006 17:10
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] backing up databases


Ok, been tasked with giving my input on a backup solution for a new project.
Someone had designed it to start backing up things using scripts from cron
calling other scripts and then netbackup bpbackup commands and all sorts of
random junk.

Anyway assume we are talking Solaris 8 or 9 with fiber attached units.

The question i have which was from the original design ( and i guess still a
requirement ) is how do people go around backing up database volumes. I
myself have had dbas ( running oracle ) to do hot_archives and then backup
that. The hot_archives are called from bpstart_notify so are captured within
netbackup if they take too long or if they fail. I can also do some checking
if directories exist etc before running the oracle backup. Also have the
added benefit of not writing to tape until exit call from hot_archive which
means db backup has finished.

Ok, thats one way, the other way i do on another project is use SSO option
on the database servers which have dedicated HBA's through fiber to the tape
units and shared drives. I just point at a location and assume everything in
there is ready to be backed up. This project is slightly different and the
DBA's are responsible for the backup.

The way this new project is wanting to go is by mounting a storage volume (
disk ) on the db server and writing a backup to it. then unmounting it and
then mounting it on the backup server to be written to tape directly.

What i want to know is how ( if we have to go this route ) can i control
this within netbackup and not start backups unless mount and unmount
requests have been done?

Do i have bpstart scripts on the db servers, which do the mounts, then the
oracle backups and then the unmounts. If this fails can i send something
back through bpstart so the backup doesnt run and fails with a certain
netbackup code?

The benefit of the mount, unmount is so the resource is not used on the db
servers to do backups, but im not sure how i am going to control the process
within netbackup to capture any errors. So has anyone done anything similar
which they can advise with??

Thanks
Dave
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Bakcup job takes time for appearing in the activity monitor

2006-03-10 Thread Sudharsan.N

Hi guys,

I have Netbackup 5.0 Enterprise server installed in a Sun 480R server. Things were going well for the last 1 year.However for the last 2 weeks I am facing a problem::

When I fire a backup job it is taking 5-6 minutes to come in the activity monitor . Earlier it used to come in the queue as soon as we fire the job.

The server is up for last 10 months and there has not been any midifications in the recent past.

Regards
Sudharsan.N





[Veritas-bu] VxSS - Veritas Security Service

2006-03-10 Thread Eric Ljungblad
 

Veritas Security Service

SYSTEM: 
5.1 (mp2) Datacenter 6+ 
soon:2003New Windows Server System: 
SingleMastermedia server -
 Command Central 
: 
Symantech Staffon site training users this week -
2 Robotsone2006 Overland 
Neo:Ultrium 3 - Capacity 
-8 drives - Media = 100 + -
1. Robot 2001 one SUN 
L1800:4 
DLT7000 -4 Drives - 96 Tape capacity 
-
1 Network to 
backup: 
35 New 2003 Servers, sql, clusters, mail, XP Pc's, SAN etc...
*5 
New HP/UX kick ass clients, Payroll, lawson, oracle etc...
WAN: 
NOT BACKED UP: 
35 Networks, 
largest spanning up to 2500Miles from local Frame relay 
-
SECURITY: CISCO's (ACL's):



QUESTION:VxSSIs 
it neccessary to use VxSS on this Backup System?
 
Is thereany issue's that we should be concerned with?
 
Is there a risk of failed restores?
Is 
this security system a hog?
 
Are there advantages within a local LAN?
 
Are there disadvantages within a local LANor in general?
 
Are there any solutions to existing issue's that may have been Corrected?
 

Any other suggestions for performance, tunning, updates or full Spectrum of 
our setup is Greatly Appreciated -


Thanks,
have a nice day -

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copley Information Services
La Jolla, CA
 
92037
(858) 729 - 8010

RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server

2006-03-10 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



DAvid
But 
dont you still need a SAN Media License or SSO license, even if their config is 
setup as you stated?


Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Spearman, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 March 2006 
  12:14To: WEAVER, Simon; Brandon Zermeno; Anthony Tocco; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange 
  Media Server
  Perhaps not in your case if you have a robot and drives fibre attached 
  already to the exchange cluster..
  
  David Spearman
  County of Henrico, Va.
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, 
SimonSent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:23 AMTo: 'Brandon 
Zermeno'; Anthony Tocco; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 
Exchange Media Server
So 
you need to implement a SAN MEdia Server with the Shared Storage Option 
then, yes?
Assuming you want to backup via fibre to tape?


Simon 
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows 
Domain Administrator 
EADS 
AstriumTel: 02392-708598 
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  
  -Original Message-From: Brandon 
  Zermeno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 March 2006 
  20:23To: Anthony Tocco; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 
  Exchange Media Server
  
  
  Why? We have a 
  dedicated LTO3 robot that will be attached to the Media server on the 
  SAN.
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  Anthony Tocco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 1:21 
  PMTo: Brandon Zermeno; 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange 
  Media Server
  
  You will need to 
  purchase SSO 
  
  
  Tony 
  Tocco
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  On Behalf Of Brandon 
  ZermenoSent: Thursday, 
  March 09, 2006 2:55 PMTo: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media 
  Server
  
  
  Does anyone have and 
  info about making an Exchange server a Media server? We are running NBU 6 
  on Win2k3, Exchange 2k3 on a SAN. We are looking at making one of the 
  Exchange cluster nodes a Media server to handle the backup to disk to 
  tape. What would the repercussions be of this in a disaster recovery 
  mode?
  
  Thanks
  Brandon
  
  
  
  
  CONFIDENTIALITY 
  NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material 
  for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
  distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you 
  have received this communication in error, please notify the sender 
  immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from 
  your computer. Thank you.
  
  
  
  
  
  CONFIDENTIALITY 
  NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material 
  for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
  distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you 
  have received this communication in error, please notify the sender 
  immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from 
  your computer. Thank you.
  
  

  
  
This email is for the intended 
  addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not 
  use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify 
  the sender by return email.The views of the author may not 
  necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.Nothing 
  in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
  obligation.EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and 
  Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, 
  Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, 
  England

This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server

2006-03-10 Thread Mark.Donaldson
San Media Server or SSO is only required when you wish to share physical drives 
with another server.  If the drives are dedicated to a server, a straight-up 
media server license will do.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:17 AM
To: 'Spearman, David'; Brandon Zermeno; Anthony Tocco; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server


DAvid
But dont you still need a SAN Media License or SSO license, even if their 
config is setup as you stated?


Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 
EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-708598 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-Original Message-
From: Spearman, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 10 March 2006 12:14
To: WEAVER, Simon; Brandon Zermeno; Anthony Tocco; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server


Perhaps not in your case if you have a robot and drives fibre attached already 
to the exchange cluster..

David Spearman
County of Henrico, Va.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:23 AM
To: 'Brandon Zermeno'; Anthony Tocco; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server


So you need to implement a SAN MEdia Server with the Shared Storage Option 
then, yes?
Assuming you want to backup via fibre to tape?


Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 
EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-708598 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Zermeno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 March 2006 20:23
To: Anthony Tocco; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server


Why? We have a dedicated LTO3 robot that will be attached to the Media server 
on the SAN.



From: Anthony Tocco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 1:21 PM
To: Brandon Zermeno; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server
You will need to purchase SSO 
Tony Tocco
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Zermeno
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:55 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server
Does anyone have and info about making an Exchange server a Media server? We 
are running NBU 6 on Win2k3, Exchange 2k3 on a SAN. We are looking at making 
one of the Exchange cluster nodes a Media server to handle the backup to disk 
to tape. What would the repercussions be of this in a disaster recovery mode?
Thanks
Brandon
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer.  
Thank you.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer.  
Thank you.


This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


This email is for the intended addressee only.
If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or 
otherwise deal with it.
Please notify the sender by return email.
The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS 
Astrium Limited.
Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or 
obligation.

EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Scan device path help

2006-03-10 Thread Kampen, Scott








Hello,



I have a V880 running Solaris 8 which is setup as a media
server to back itself up (SSO). From the OS I can see the 12 drive paths
to my tape devices, but when I run the scan command all I see it 8. How
can I make the Netbackup application see all 12 drives (which it use to see
until today) without performing a reboot of the system? My other media servers
see all twelve drives.



cfgadm a

c2
fc-fabric connected configured
unknown

c2::500507630f404307
tape
connected configured unusable

c2::500507630f404308
tape
connected configured unknown

c2::500507630f404309 tape
connected configured unknown

c2::500507630f40430a
tape
connected configured unknown

c2::500507630f40430b
tape
connected configured unknown

c2::500507630f40430c
tape connected
configured unknown

c3
fc-fabric connected configured
unknown

c3::500507630f404301
tape
connected configured unknown

c3::500507630f404302
tape
connected configured unknown

c3::500507630f404303
tape
connected configured unknown

c3::500507630f404304
tape
connected configured unknown

c3::500507630f404305
tape
connected configured unknown

c3::500507630f404306
tape
connected configured unknown





/usr/openv/volmgr/bin/scan | grep -i cbn | wc l

8












[Veritas-bu] Finally upgrading from 4.5 FP9 to 6!

2006-03-10 Thread Mike Day
Ok I might need a little guidance here.  I have the following questions.

1. I have to upgrade to 5.0 1st and then to 6.0?
2. Is it true that I have to upgrade my clients to 5.0 (or is it 6.0)
before I start?  
3. If so then will the 5.0 (or 6.0) client work with my 4.5 FP9 master
server because I'm sure I will not have time to upgrade all the clients
1st and upgrade the master server the same day to be ready for my backup
window by early evening.

Any other tips would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,
Mike Day
Inovis Systems Engineer

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Fixed or Variable length blocks

2006-03-10 Thread Lien, Mitch
Hi.

I am working on a project to duplicate several legacy tapes that were
written using a AIT-2 (SONY SDX-500C) tape drive to a different media
format.

I am getting read errors when attempting to perform the duplication on
almost ever backup image.

I have adjusted the st.conf (Solaris media server) file to the suggested
values, but it has not helped. The AIT-2 drives are running the 0200
firmware, so this shouldn't be a dip switch setting issue.

Does anyone know of a way to tell if the tapes may have been written in
fixed-length blocks instead of variable-length blocks???

Thanks!!!

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Exchange Media Server

2006-03-10 Thread Dean
If you have tape drives dedicated to the media server, you don't need SSO.If the Exchange box will only be backing itself up, you only need a SAN Media Server, which is a bit cheaper than a full Media Server.
A basic DR implication is that you would need a similar tape drive at the recovery site connected to the recovery Exchange server (although there are ways around this).However, in my opinion, running Exchange and NBU Media Server on the same box is far from ideal. There's too many ways the Media Server could adversely affect Exchange, and vice-versa.
Have you considered backing them up over Gigabit Ethernet, perhaps even a dedicated backup LAN ?On 3/10/06, Brandon Zermeno 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

















Does anyone have and info about making an
Exchange server a Media server? We are running NBU 6 on Win2k3, Exchange 2k3 on
a SAN. We are looking at making one of the Exchange cluster nodes a Media
server to handle the backup to disk to tape. What would the repercussions be of
this in a disaster recovery mode?



Thanks

Brandon







CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you.