Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 available

2006-07-04 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar




I will load it directly into my 
production system as soon as I have downloaded it.

 We call it RGE :-) (resume 
generating event) 


From: Johnny Oestergaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 7:19 PMTo: Dhotre, Shekhar; 
'Ian'; 'veritas-mail-list'Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 
available


I will load it directly 
into my production system as soon as I have downloaded 
it.
But in my case it is 
because I have had serious problema with loops in nbjm for the last 4 months and 
no help from Veritas on that issue, except sending them the same documentation 
over and over again.
So in my current 
situation nothing can be worse then running MP2 and I had to upgrade to that 
because of business moving Windows X64 systems into 
production.

/johnny





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dhotre, ShekharSent: 3. juli 2006 21:03To: Ian; veritas-mail-listSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 
available

I would try it on the 
test system first ,and see what it breaks if any 
.


Shekhar 
Dhotre
Sr.Unix-Storage 
Engineer/Architect.
ICTStorage 
Engineering.
v 404.846.7483 
| f 404.848.1077 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]48 
Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA 30346
"No one achieves a 
goal alone" 

#
IBM certified RS/6000AIX 
specialist.
Veritas Certified 
Specialist.(Netbackup)
Sun 
Certified admin for Solaris.
Microsoft Certified Systems 
Engineer. 
#






From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IanSent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:02 
AMTo: 
veritas-mail-listSubject: 
[Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 available
FYI, looks like 6.0 MP3 is available for download from 
support.veritas.com.http://support.veritas.com/menu_ddProduct_NBUESVR_view_DOWNLOAD.htmMmmm, 
should I? Shouldn't I? :-)




"This email (including any attachments) is confidential. If 
youare not the intended recipient you must not copy, use, 
disclose,distribute or rely on the information contained in it. If you 
havereceived this email in error, please notify the sender immediatelyby 
reply email and delete the email from your system.Confidentiality and legal 
privilege attached to this communicationare not waived or lost by reason of 
mistaken delivery to you. LendLease does not guarantee that this email or 
the attachment(s) areunaffected by computer virus, corruption or other 
defects. LendLease may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance 
withits Email Policy. Please note that our servers may not be locatedin 
your country."
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Storage and Performance HP Veritas Net Backup

2006-07-04 Thread Austin Murphy

On 7/1/06, Giblin Dean L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Backup Performance – The 8GB/Min Goal

  roughly 140MB/sec, continuous for 8 hrs 


Our future storage space requirements were estimated to be 4 TB. Our
requirement is to complete the backups within an 8 hour window.  To meet
this objective required a backup solution that could provide an 8 GB/Min
solution.



Hardware:summarized
DL580 G3 ,  Dual Processor, 4GB, LSI 320 to tape, HP RAID controller
MSA30 DB ,  14x  15K, 146 GB
MSL6030, Dual LTO 3



·HP SCSI drivers for Microsoft Windows have a 64K block size
limitation. All the test tools which could bypass this driver and set
communication parameters on the SCSI bus obtained increased performance. All of 
the applications which utilized the system driver suffered.


Supposedly there are Veritas drivers for windows that are faster.  See
previous discussions.


Our original design was to implement a RAID 10 solution using two 7 disk
RAID 0 arrays. This results in 490 GB of storage and approximately 1.8
GB/min data rate.


A 7x 146 GB RAID 5 array should EASILY give you 100MB/sec read
performance.  Probably much better.

The key to speed in NetBackup is SEPARATE I/O CHANNELS!  There is a
great performance document (which I can't find right now) that shows
how Oracle, Sun and Veritas demonstrated a 1TB/hr setup several years
ago.

Using 2 separate U320 SCSI channels you should be able to have both
halves of the MSA30-DB spitting out 100MB/sec or more.

Each LTO-3 tape drive needs its own U320 SCSI channel.  (The robotics
can piggyback on one of those channels.)

The system disks in the server itself need a separate SCSI channel as
well.  That brings us to a total of 5 separate high-speed SCSI
channels.  If you don't currently have 5 separate channels, you need
to add some of these: http://lsi.com/products/scsi_hbas/lsiu320.html

The other side of the equation is the network performance.  To backup
a NAS box over the network you need to optimize the network path.
Jumbo frames will probably help.  Aggregating 2 gigabit ports might
help too.   You didn't say how many other clients will be backing up
over the network.  If there are many clients, spread them across
multiple gigabit interfaces on the server.

To keep the LTO-3 drives happy, you need to feed them at least 40
MB/sec.  To meet your design goal of 8 GB/min you need to continuously
feed 2 drives @ 70 MB/sec each.  That will be fairly difficult and
will probably require 4 separate gigabit interfaces.  I suggest adding
one of these to the two built-in NICs:
http://intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro1000mt_dual_server_adapter.htm

The difficulty lies in having the clients produce data that fast.  You
will most likely need to have the client data streams multiplexed @ 4
or 8 streams per tape drive.
Disk staging is useful for slow clients, but is probably a negative
factor for the NAS box.

Here's my summary:
- Add I/O channels for a total of 4 gigabit Ethernet and 5 U320 SCSI channels.
- Optimize the network between the NAS box and the backup server.
- Send the NAS data directly to a single tape drive.
- Configure 1 LTO-3 tape drive per SCSI channel
- Configure 1 RAID5 array per SCSI channel
- Separate the system disks from the backup SCSI channels
- Use a High MPX on client backups to tape.
- Use disk staging only for VERY slow clients.
- Use the Vertias drivers where available, not Microsoft or HP.

You need to be able to read or write at over 100 MB/sec on each SCSI
channel and you will need to read from the network at over 50MB/sec on
each Gigabit interface ALL AT THE SAME TIME.  With a Solid PCI-X
backplane (like the DL 580G3 has) this is entirely reasonable.

Austin Murphy

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] license question re NDMP backup

2006-07-04 Thread Broun, Bevan
Hi All

Im figure Im more likely to get the correct answer here then from
veritas/semantic.

I have a netapp filter (a cluster actually) that I currently backup using
ndmp to the tape library attached to the (windows) master server. One of
the drives is configured as an ndmp drive.

The need to have one drive configured as ndmp is kill us and I believe from
info on this group that this is still not resolved with netbackup 6 and
netapp.

So I need another soln. If I was to directly attach a tape library to one
of the netapp filer heads, would netbackup be able to control the library?
Would i need another licenses beside the license for another library based
drive?

thanks

BB
-- 
Bevan Broun
Systems Engineer
THALES
Services Division
W: (02) 9562 2861
M: 0407 225 492
F: (02) 9562 2857


DISCLAIMER:---
This Email may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is 
intended 
solely for the addressee(s) named. If you have received this information in 
error, or
are advised that you have been posted this Email by accident, please notify the 
sender by return Email, do not redistribute it, delete the Email and keep no 
copies.
--
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Restore hanging

2006-07-04 Thread john hanson
Dear All 

we are runnung netbackup enterprise server 5.1 with
L100 tape library . restore is hanging it is almost 10
hour but no move forward . library have free drives
availble for restore . can someone face this kind of
issue 

here are messages from the logs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # less jbpZFAnVaGAB.log
Restore started 07/04/2006 17:49:19

17:49:21 (36662.xxx) Restore job id 36662 will require
2 images.
17:49:21 (36662.xxx) Media id A510L3 is needed for the
restore.
17:49:21 (36662.xxx) Media id A143L3 is needed for the
restore.
17:49:21 (36662.xxx) Media id A171L3 is needed for the
restore.
17:49:21 (36662.xxx) Media id Y526L3 is needed for the
restore.



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu