[Veritas-bu] Link To Download Exchange DB Extension
Title: Message Guys Got a license, but no software and cannot seem to find anything on Symantec site that allows me to download it. Does anyone have a hard link to use? Exchange 2003 on Win2k3 NetBackup 5.1 MP2 Thank you Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UPDATE
Title: Message Simon is correct. The software is on the Windows CD and the binary is automatically installed. The license key, when added to the Master server, will unlock the function and the Exchange policy can be configured. Thanks, Rockey J. Reed From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:14 AM To: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu' Subject: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UPDATE Actually, am I right in thinking the NetBackup CLIENT software will detect Exchange and add the compenent by default? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon Sent: 14 September 2006 07:12 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension Guys Got a license, but no software and cannot seem to find anything on Symantec site that allows me to download it. Does anyone have a hard link to use? Exchange 2003 on Win2k3 NetBackup 5.1 MP2 Thank you Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UP DATE
Title: Message Rockey Can you clarify something? In the Exchange Admin Guide for the install, it talks about installing the client, but is there a REQUIREMENT to install EXCHANGE 2003 FIRSt before installing the NetBackup client? Thanks Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Rockey Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 07:55To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UPDATE Simon is correct. The software is on the Windows CD and the binary is automatically installed. The license key, when added to the Master server, will unlock the function and the Exchange policy can be configured. Thanks, Rockey J. Reed From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, SimonSent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:14 AMTo: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'Subject: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UPDATE Actually, am I right in thinking the NetBackup CLIENT software will detect Exchange and add the compenent by default? Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: WEAVER, Simon Sent: 14 September 2006 07:12To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension Guys Got a license, but no software and cannot seem to find anything on Symantec site that allows me to download it. Does anyone have a hard link to use? Exchange 2003 on Win2k3 NetBackup 5.1 MP2 Thank you Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Policy Question ...
Hi all, I have a policy, whereby ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES directive does not apply to one host in the policy. Can I still keep that host in the policy and add excludes just to _that_ host ? Cheers -aW ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive
Hi, I just joined the list so I'm a newcomer, both in the list and in the NetBackup world in general. I've all of a sudden taken over the management of a Windows server having NetBackup ver 4.5 installed. There's a tape drive in the machine. Now, the server pointed to have been shut down since a long time ago and noone has been taking care of making backups since then. Someone said that he was sure it was possible to make a backup to the tape drive in the machine using NetBackup. But, from what I've understood, you can't do anything unless there's a NetBackup server somewhere that, in turn, connects to the tape drive. Is this true? Kind regards, Johan Kullberg ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Exchange Win2k3 Cluster
Title: Message Guys Clarification on what I would like to do and be sure your are all happy with this. 1 x NBU 5.1 MP2 Server and 2 x SAN Media Servers, all on win2k3 Will be adding 2 SAN Media Servers, using SSO and in a cluster (2 node cluster). These will also be running Exchange 2003. Virtual Name will be given for the Exchange Server, hence also allowing us to backup the Databases. Question: could I install the PC Client for Windows on the C:\ drive of the physical nodes, but perform the exchange online backups using the virtual server name? I am pretty sure this is what was done before in a 2 node cluster, but wanted to be sure I was not overlooking anything! Also, can anyone clarify this - if I want to backup Exchange, I need a license key. Do I need a license key for EACH Exchange Server, or does it cover ALL Exchange Servers in the business. Thank you Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive
In order for NetBackup to backup clients, it needs to know of a Tape Drive, or better, a Robotic Library. A Tape drive needs to be connected to the Netbackup Server, at least so it can detect it. So are you saying you have had no backups running at all ? I was confused about the statement that the server pointed to has been shut down. Thanks Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: J K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 09:27 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive Hi, I just joined the list so I'm a newcomer, both in the list and in the NetBackup world in general. I've all of a sudden taken over the management of a Windows server having NetBackup ver 4.5 installed. There's a tape drive in the machine. Now, the server pointed to have been shut down since a long time ago and noone has been taking care of making backups since then. Someone said that he was sure it was possible to make a backup to the tape drive in the machine using NetBackup. But, from what I've understood, you can't do anything unless there's a NetBackup server somewhere that, in turn, connects to the tape drive. Is this true? Kind regards, Johan Kullberg ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive
A now I understand :-) Well if its over 1 year, I would probably be inclined to start again. Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: J K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 10:30 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive I guess I could install the NetBackup server at the same machine where NetBackup client is installed? True, no backups made for more than one year. It's a non-commercial computer club, and all admin activities rely upon club members to volunteer, like I did some week ago. Best regards, Johan In order for NetBackup to backup clients, it needs to know of a Tape Drive, or better, a Robotic Library. A Tape drive needs to be connected to the Netbackup Server, at least so it can detect it. So are you saying you have had no backups running at all ? I was confused about the statement that the server pointed to has been shut down. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive
Actually, to add to Ed's comments, if this is a basic box, small environment and windows, use NTBackup :-) Its FREE, part of the OS! I am sure Unix must have some sort of other functionaility for doing backups - might be another option to consider :-) HTH Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 12:55 To: J K Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive On 9/14/2006 3:26 AM, J K wrote: Hi, I just joined the list so I'm a newcomer, both in the list and in the NetBackup world in general. I've all of a sudden taken over the management of a Windows server having NetBackup ver 4.5 installed. There's a tape drive in the machine. Now, the server pointed to have been shut down since a long time ago and noone has been taking care of making backups since then. Someone said that he was sure it was possible to make a backup to the tape drive in the machine using NetBackup. But, from what I've understood, you can't do anything unless there's a NetBackup server somewhere that, in turn, connects to the tape drive. Is this true? NetBackup has 3 major components - a master server (which holds the catalog), a media server (which writes to backup storage units like disk or tape), and clients. All 3 are required although they can all be on the same system. If you do not have a master server, then you're probably not going to want to install it just to back up one client - you'd be far cheaper off going with some like BackupExec. If you do have a master server, you could make your client a media server so that it can drive the tape drive. Those licenses aren't cheap either and you don't typically make a server a media server unless it's writing data to tape for multiple clients. A SAN media server license is cheaper and is typically used to backup just yourself directly to a tape drive. Again, you need to review the price of it versus another product completely especially for a small computer club. All that said, NetBackup 4.5 is old. You should upgrade to the latest maintenance pak in the 5.1 version. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive
Actually, to add to Ed's comments, if this is a basic box, small environment and windows, use NTBackup :-) Its FREE, part of the OS! I tried NTBackup first, before I noticed Veritas was installed. What I need to do is to quickly make a backup of the disks since, as I mentioned, we don't have any right now. NTBackup turned out to require some bureaucracy around media pools and stuff, and I just want to get the stuff over to the tape with as little admin as possible. I am sure Unix must have some sort of other functionaility for doing backups - might be another option to consider :-) We already have Unix and Linux machines - and they're even being backuped... ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive
Ok no problem - its just that maybe NetBackup is a bit OVER the TOP for such a small environment. Offering ntbackup would have been a cheaper (free) option :-) HTH Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: J K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 13:42 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive Actually, to add to Ed's comments, if this is a basic box, small environment and windows, use NTBackup :-) Its FREE, part of the OS! I tried NTBackup first, before I noticed Veritas was installed. What I need to do is to quickly make a backup of the disks since, as I mentioned, we don't have any right now. NTBackup turned out to require some bureaucracy around media pools and stuff, and I just want to get the stuff over to the tape with as little admin as possible. I am sure Unix must have some sort of other functionaility for doing backups - might be another option to consider :-) We already have Unix and Linux machines - and they're even being backuped... ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive
Agreed Jeff - my point that I was trying to get across Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 14:01 To: WEAVER, Simon; Ed Wilts; J K Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive UNIX/Linux have multiple utilities such as tar and cpio. (In fact NetBackup actually does its backups using a modified version of GNU tar.) If this is a single server with a single tape drive it does seem using NetBackup is overkill especially given the cost. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:10 AM To: 'Ed Wilts'; J K Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive Actually, to add to Ed's comments, if this is a basic box, small environment and windows, use NTBackup :-) Its FREE, part of the OS! I am sure Unix must have some sort of other functionaility for doing backups - might be another option to consider :-) HTH Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 12:55 To: J K Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive On 9/14/2006 3:26 AM, J K wrote: Hi, I just joined the list so I'm a newcomer, both in the list and in the NetBackup world in general. I've all of a sudden taken over the management of a Windows server having NetBackup ver 4.5 installed. There's a tape drive in the machine. Now, the server pointed to have been shut down since a long time ago and noone has been taking care of making backups since then. Someone said that he was sure it was possible to make a backup to the tape drive in the machine using NetBackup. But, from what I've understood, you can't do anything unless there's a NetBackup server somewhere that, in turn, connects to the tape drive. Is this true? NetBackup has 3 major components - a master server (which holds the catalog), a media server (which writes to backup storage units like disk or tape), and clients. All 3 are required although they can all be on the same system. If you do not have a master server, then you're probably not going to want to install it just to back up one client - you'd be far cheaper off going with some like BackupExec. If you do have a master server, you could make your client a media server so that it can drive the tape drive. Those licenses aren't cheap either and you don't typically make a server a media server unless it's writing data to tape for multiple clients. A SAN media server license is cheaper and is typically used to backup just yourself directly to a tape drive. Again, you need to review the price of it versus another product completely especially for a small computer club. All that said, NetBackup 4.5 is old. You should upgrade to the latest maintenance pak in the 5.1 version. .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Policy Question ...
Sure, I do it ALL THE TIME. Excludes are applied on a per host basis. -Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilkinson, Alex Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:12 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Policy Question ... Hi all, I have a policy, whereby ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES directive does not apply to one host in the policy. Can I still keep that host in the policy and add excludes just to _that_ host ? Cheers -aW ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension -UP DATE
I'm running 6.0MP3 backing up an Exchange 2K3 server. I don't recall that necessarily being a prereq and my docs aren't that clear either. That said, the Exchange Server was already up and running when we installed NBU on it. HTH, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:01 AM To: 'Rockey Reed'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension -UP DATE Rockey Can you clarify something? In the Exchange Admin Guide for the install, it talks about installing the client, but is there a REQUIREMENT to install EXCHANGE 2003 FIRSt before installing the NetBackup client? Thanks Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rockey Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 07:55 To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UPDATE Simon is correct. The software is on the Windows CD and the binary is automatically installed. The license key, when added to the Master server, will unlock the function and the Exchange policy can be configured. Thanks, Rockey J. Reed From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:14 AM To: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu' Subject: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UPDATE Actually, am I right in thinking the NetBackup CLIENT software will detect Exchange and add the compenent by default? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon Sent: 14 September 2006 07:12 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension Guys Got a license, but no software and cannot seem to find anything on Symantec site that allows me to download it. Does anyone have a hard link to use? Exchange 2003 on Win2k3 NetBackup 5.1 MP2 Thank you Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive
Are you backing up the UNIX machines with NetBackup? If so perhaps that's your master and you just need to setup a client backup policy for the Windows server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:20 AM To: 'J K'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive Ok no problem - its just that maybe NetBackup is a bit OVER the TOP for such a small environment. Offering ntbackup would have been a cheaper (free) option :-) HTH Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: J K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 13:42 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive Actually, to add to Ed's comments, if this is a basic box, small environment and windows, use NTBackup :-) Its FREE, part of the OS! I tried NTBackup first, before I noticed Veritas was installed. What I need to do is to quickly make a backup of the disks since, as I mentioned, we don't have any right now. NTBackup turned out to require some bureaucracy around media pools and stuff, and I just want to get the stuff over to the tape with as little admin as possible. I am sure Unix must have some sort of other functionaility for doing backups - might be another option to consider :-) We already have Unix and Linux machines - and they're even being backuped... ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Client is not validated to use this server
What does it say in the logs? You have a SERVER = your_windows_server in your bp.conf on the master right? You can ping your_windows_server, right? It should also have a forward / reverse DNS entry if you are using DNS, otherwise, the appropriate entry in each OS' hosts file. Justin. On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Don Klebba wrote: I have a windows server that I want to have the ability to do restores. When I go into the backup, archieve, restore screen and choose the select for restore button, I get the error, client is not validated to use this server. I've already gone in the host properties of the master server and allowed access to this server to allow both browse and restore. I've recycled the agents on the master after making this change and still get the same message. I'm running Netbackup 5.1 MP4, does anyone have any ideas? -- Don KLebba Quicken Loans Storage Management Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (734)805-7791 cell: (734)634-7486 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not being back-up with status code 1
Gents, Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when the status code is 1. Is there a way to retrieve this info? Cheers, Edwin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary
Setup: 1 NBU 6.0MP3 + eng binaries master, 1 NBU 6.0MP3 media Scalar i2K with 2 LTO3s, both shared to both servers I came in this morning and found that the cleaning flag was set by my ADIC on one of the drives. I have 5 cleaning tapes in the library, and NBU knows them to live in the NONE pool with a media type of HC3_CLN. When I tried to clean now, NBU responded with an error that request terminated, media not available (291). The Activity Monitor gave this: 9/14/2006 9:01:06 AM - requesting resource Tape1:__ANY__ 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - Error nbjm(pid=800) NBU status: 96, EMM status: No media is available 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - end operation unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) I've opened a ticket with support, but nothing heard yet. I'm 1.5 hours from my scheduled disk staging relocation. Anyone seen this one before? Ideas or suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2916 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension -UP DATE
Ok well I installed the NBU client and exchange will be applied tomorrow Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brooks, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 14:35 To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension -UP DATE I'm running 6.0MP3 backing up an Exchange 2K3 server. I don't recall that necessarily being a prereq and my docs aren't that clear either. That said, the Exchange Server was already up and running when we installed NBU on it. HTH, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:01 AM To: 'Rockey Reed'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension -UP DATE Rockey Can you clarify something? In the Exchange Admin Guide for the install, it talks about installing the client, but is there a REQUIREMENT to install EXCHANGE 2003 FIRSt before installing the NetBackup client? Thanks Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rockey Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 07:55 To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UPDATE Simon is correct. The software is on the Windows CD and the binary is automatically installed. The license key, when added to the Master server, will unlock the function and the Exchange policy can be configured. Thanks, Rockey J. Reed From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:14 AM To: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu' Subject: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension - UPDATE Actually, am I right in thinking the NetBackup CLIENT software will detect Exchange and add the compenent by default? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: WEAVER, Simon Sent: 14 September 2006 07:12 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension Guys Got a license, but no software and cannot seem to find anything on Symantec site that allows me to download it. Does anyone have a hard link to use? Exchange 2003 on Win2k3 NetBackup 5.1 MP2 Thank you Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited,
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not bei ngback-up with status code 1
Title: Message You could use the Problems Report - which gives a list of files not backed up. You can then export this info into word / excel, ect if you like. Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Edwin Bader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 15:36To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not beingback-up with status code 1 Gents, Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when the status code is 1. Is there a way to retrieve this info? Cheers, Edwin This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ?
Hi all, Did anybody meet problems with the VTL solution of StorageTek ( falcon solution ; ) ? Thanks Didier ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbein gback-up with status code 1
Title: Message Jonathan Actually, that is not always the case, because the Report tool goes into more details about every file. HTH Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 15:36To: Edwin Bader; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1 In the windows GUI if you click on the job and go to the details its in that log there. Alternately I think its in the BPKAR32 log? I'm not 100% sure because I always use the Windows GUI (its a lot easier than parsing log files.) -Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin BaderSent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:36 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not beingback-up with status code 1 Gents, Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when the status code is 1. Is there a way to retrieve this info? Cheers, Edwin This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1
Title: Message Simon, Thanks Simon for the tip I will try that... Regards, Edwin From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:38 PMTo: 'Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)'; Edwin Bader; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1 Jonathan Actually, that is not always the case, because the Report tool goes into more details about every file. HTH Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 15:36To: Edwin Bader; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1 In the windows GUI if you click on the job and go to the details its in that log there. Alternately I think its in the BPKAR32 log? I'm not 100% sure because I always use the Windows GUI (its a lot easier than parsing log files.) -Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin BaderSent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:36 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not beingback-up with status code 1 Gents, Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when the status code is 1. Is there a way to retrieve this info? Cheers, Edwin This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not beingback-up with status code 1
In the windows GUI if you click on the job and go to the details its in that log there. Alternately I think its in the BPKAR32 log? I'm not 100% sure because I always use the Windows GUI (its a lot easier than parsing log files.) -Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin BaderSent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:36 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not beingback-up with status code 1 Gents, Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when the status code is 1. Is there a way to retrieve this info? Cheers, Edwin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1
Title: Message When I run this against a client it only reports back "backup of client NLP17-15 exited with status 1 (the requested operation was partially successful) From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:38 PMTo: 'Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)'; Edwin Bader; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1 Jonathan Actually, that is not always the case, because the Report tool goes into more details about every file. HTH Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 15:36To: Edwin Bader; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1 In the windows GUI if you click on the job and go to the details its in that log there. Alternately I think its in the BPKAR32 log? I'm not 100% sure because I always use the Windows GUI (its a lot easier than parsing log files.) -Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin BaderSent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:36 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not beingback-up with status code 1 Gents, Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when the status code is 1. Is there a way to retrieve this info? Cheers, Edwin This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not being back-up with status code 1
* Edwin Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-14 16:35]: Gents, Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when the status code is 1. Is there a way to retrieve this info? bperror -client clientname -- David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Media server migration
All I am undertaking the task of migrating a windows media server and want to give the basic outline just in case I have missed anything. Just to add the new media server will be performing the exact same task as the old media server , windows 2000 to windows 2003 1. zone drives so new media server has visibility 2. reboot new media server 3. configure drives on new media server 4. Add device host and configure new drives on the master 5. Update SSO 6. Create STU's 7. List all media associated with old media server and move to standalone then apply the below on the same media bpmedia -movedb -m media_id -newserver hostname [-oldserver hostname] 8. Inventory new media 9. Change all policies using old media server stu's to reflect new 10. To avoid FORCE_RESTORE_MEDIA_SERVER being implemented on the old media server , get a list of all backupid's associated with old media server and apply the below to all bpimage: -newserver name [-oldserver name] [-id id] 11. Decomission old media server when ready Q 1. The new media server can currently see two test drives in the same library as what the production drives are in , all drives are stk 9940A and B's , all media servers using the same ACSLS host for robotic control. Upon zoning in the new drives and rebooting the new media server , should it be as straight forward as running C:\program files\veritas\volmgr\bin\scan to get all the new drive info or is there more that needs to be done for visibility of the new drives ? Regards David Notice to recipient:The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America, N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ?
Hi, I am interested in the answers you get. We are looking on stk/falconstor with there SIR function, and comparing them with diligent ProtecTier.. Please let me know what you find out. Thanks and regards, Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Didier BRUN Skickat: den 14 september 2006 16:36 Till: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Ämne: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ? Hi all, Did anybody meet problems with the VTL solution of StorageTek ( falcon solution ; ) ? Thanks Didier ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary
Finally talked with support. They're pointing that our cleaning tapes don't have actual CLN*** labels. Can anyone support/deny this allegation? Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Setup: 1 NBU 6.0MP3 + eng binaries master, 1 NBU 6.0MP3 media Scalar i2K with 2 LTO3s, both shared to both servers I came in this morning and found that the cleaning flag was set by my ADIC on one of the drives. I have 5 cleaning tapes in the library, and NBU knows them to live in the NONE pool with a media type of HC3_CLN. When I tried to clean now, NBU responded with an error that request terminated, media not available (291). The Activity Monitor gave this: 9/14/2006 9:01:06 AM - requesting resource Tape1:__ANY__ 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - Error nbjm(pid=800) NBU status: 96, EMM status: No media is available 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - end operation unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) I've opened a ticket with support, but nothing heard yet. I'm 1.5 hours from my scheduled disk staging relocation. Anyone seen this one before? Ideas or suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2916 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not being back-up with status code 1
Edwin,
If you have Aptare Storage console
it has a report run via an SQL command that provides this information
and sends it out via e-mail.
the report can be tailored to get the
information you are looking for. We use it for our windows reports.
=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edwin Bader
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/14/2006 10:35 AM
To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Command for finding out
witch files are not beingback-up with
status code 1
Gents,
Several customers are asking witch files
are not being backed up when the status code is 1.
Is there a way to retrieve this info?
Cheers,
Edwin
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates ("PHI"). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect of such communications.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary
Your barcodes don't have to have CLN in them. You do, however, have to have them defined as Cleaning tapes and of the correct type as the drives. But it looks like you have that (pending that your drives are hcart3). I would wonder why you would share the drives between a master and a media server. You probably are wasting money on either an SSO license or the media server license. With only 2 drives in an i2K, you are running on overkill anyway. But then I don't know anything about your environment. SSO and cleaning tapes were an issue in the 4.5MP6 days, but when I upgraded to 5.1, I did away with SSO. Bobby. From: Brooks, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/09/14 Thu PM 12:03:11 EDT To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Finally talked with support. They're pointing that our cleaning tapes don't have actual CLN*** labels. Can anyone support/deny this allegation? Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Setup: 1 NBU 6.0MP3 + eng binaries master, 1 NBU 6.0MP3 media Scalar i2K with 2 LTO3s, both shared to both servers I came in this morning and found that the cleaning flag was set by my ADIC on one of the drives. I have 5 cleaning tapes in the library, and NBU knows them to live in the NONE pool with a media type of HC3_CLN. When I tried to clean now, NBU responded with an error that request terminated, media not available (291). The Activity Monitor gave this: 9/14/2006 9:01:06 AM - requesting resource Tape1:__ANY__ 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - Error nbjm(pid=800) NBU status: 96, EMM status: No media is available 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - end operation unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) I've opened a ticket with support, but nothing heard yet. I'm 1.5 hours from my scheduled disk staging relocation. Anyone seen this one before? Ideas or suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2916 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ?
I saw this article back in July and would be interested in your comments ... Are they still a player? Have they re-defined a direction? http://www.techworld.com/storage/blogs/index.cfm?blogid=3entryid=216 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hampus Lind Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:59 AM To: 'Didier BRUN' Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ? Hi, I am interested in the answers you get. We are looking on stk/falconstor with there SIR function, and comparing them with diligent ProtecTier.. Please let me know what you find out. Thanks and regards, Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Didier BRUN Skickat: den 14 september 2006 16:36 Till: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Ämne: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ? Hi all, Did anybody meet problems with the VTL solution of StorageTek ( falcon solution ; ) ? Thanks Didier ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information of Northwestern Mutual. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify Northwestern Mutual immediately by returning it to the sender and delete all copies from your system. Please be advised that communications received via the Northwestern Mutual Secure Message Center are secure. Communications that are not received via the Northwestern Mutual Secure Message Center may not be secure and could be observed by a third party. Thank you for your cooperation. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Initiate Import
Hi, I have NB 5.1 MP5...I am trying to recover some images that have expired on particular media. The tapes have not been overwritten. When I try to initiate the import...I get the following error...can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? 9/14/2006 1:26:54 PM - begin Import 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - started process bptm (3176) 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - started process bptm (3176) 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - mounting AXH822 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - Error bptm(pid=3176) ERR - Assign of media id AXH822 in Media Manager volume database failed, host rvapbcksvr.imb.bminet.org, invalid volume pool. 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - Error bpimport(pid=3576) Status = cannot perform specified media import operation. 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - end Import; elapsed time: 00:00:47 cannot perform specified media import operation(176) ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Shadow Copy Components:\
Had a similar issue with a MsSQL cluster. Try a ntbackup of something on the system (like SystemShadowCopy). If ntbackup works, then open a case with Veritas. if ntbackup fails to backup, then open the case with MS. In our case, ntbackup was failing, and MS had to do some registry edits. -Andrew Veritas Netbackup wrote: Hi All, We have a strange problem, client = Windows 2003 x64 Netbackup = 5.1 MP1 We get error 13 while backing up the FS on the server, the backup does not even begin, it just waits for first write and then times out. The beauty is that the SQL backups are working notrmally. Any suggestions know fixes! On 9/1/06, Haskins, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KB913648 Regards -- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *WEAVER, Simon *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2006 11:06 PM *To:* '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Shadow Copy Components:\ *Hi* *What do you mean download and update the VSS version? Are you referring to Windows SP1 ?* *not aware Microsoft do a VSS update on its own?* *Regards* *Simon Weaver** **3rd Line Technical Support** Windows Domain Administrator* *EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)* *Anchorage Road**, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU* *Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 01 September 2006 06:44 *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Shadow Copy Components:\ I also faced the same problem , it is because of the VSS verion , download the updated VSS version from the Microsoft site and refire the backup Regards, Abhishek Dhingra *WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/2006 01:29 AM To:'Shyam Hazari' [EMAIL PROTECTED], veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc: Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Shadow Copy Components:\ *When using ALL LOCAL DRIVES, that does include the Shadow Copy.* *Is the client running the same MP and Client version of NetBackup that is on your Master Server? In other words, the client is not running older software, compared to the master running the latest version? (ie: 5.1 MP2) * *Thanks* *Regards* *Simon Weaver** 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator* *EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU* *Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-* From:* Shyam Hazari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Sent:* 31 August 2006 20:26* To:* * Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Backup Shadow Copy Components:\ I am trying to backup a Windows server 2003( with SQL on it) client using ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES directive and I don't see Shadow Copy Components:\ getting backed up. I created a separate policy for the Shadow Copy Components:\, but still the backup finishes successfully with zero bytes. I don't see any error messages in the event manager. Any idea what might be wrong ? I enabled the Volume Shaow Copy and Microsoft Shadow copy provider services, but still no luck. I have other windows 2003 servers, which backup the shadow copy just fine eve though Volume Shaow Copy and Microsoft Shadow copy provider services are disabled. Much appreciated. -Shyam __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist -
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary
Correct. Else Libraries without barcode readers could not use cleaning tapes. Run the command ..\Volmgr\bin\vmquery -m tape_ID That will tell you the type, pool, and the robot number / slot number If there is no robot number / slot number then that is the problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Williams Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:36 AM To: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Your barcodes don't have to have CLN in them. You do, however, have to have them defined as Cleaning tapes and of the correct type as the drives. But it looks like you have that (pending that your drives are hcart3). I would wonder why you would share the drives between a master and a media server. You probably are wasting money on either an SSO license or the media server license. With only 2 drives in an i2K, you are running on overkill anyway. But then I don't know anything about your environment. SSO and cleaning tapes were an issue in the 4.5MP6 days, but when I upgraded to 5.1, I did away with SSO. Bobby. From: Brooks, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/09/14 Thu PM 12:03:11 EDT To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Finally talked with support. They're pointing that our cleaning tapes don't have actual CLN*** labels. Can anyone support/deny this allegation? Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Setup: 1 NBU 6.0MP3 + eng binaries master, 1 NBU 6.0MP3 media Scalar i2K with 2 LTO3s, both shared to both servers I came in this morning and found that the cleaning flag was set by my ADIC on one of the drives. I have 5 cleaning tapes in the library, and NBU knows them to live in the NONE pool with a media type of HC3_CLN. When I tried to clean now, NBU responded with an error that request terminated, media not available (291). The Activity Monitor gave this: 9/14/2006 9:01:06 AM - requesting resource Tape1:__ANY__ 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - Error nbjm(pid=800) NBU status: 96, EMM status: No media is available 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - end operation unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) I've opened a ticket with support, but nothing heard yet. I'm 1.5 hours from my scheduled disk staging relocation. Anyone seen this one before? Ideas or suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2916 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ?
Hehe... Cool article.. But I don't know how much of it thats true... I am talking to both SUN and HDS for the moment and none of them has mentioned this. I will ask them about it. I have also heard that VSM open will be killed and that SUN will go with Falconstor instead. But regarding to my sells guy at SUN, they sells people havent got the word that they will kill VSM open, so they speculate in that it will come later on instead. I dont know what to believe for now.. I know Diligent is on the market, while falconstor and VSM open arent. So if you want de-dup function today, you have to look at diligent or perhaps data domain, but thats a different story. However, I have looked at both diligent and falconstor, and for now I think I would go with diligent.. What do you guys think?? Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 14 september 2006 19:18 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopia: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Ämne: RE: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ? I saw this article back in July and would be interested in your comments ... Are they still a player? Have they re-defined a direction? http://www.techworld.com/storage/blogs/index.cfm?blogid=3entryid=216 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hampus Lind Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:59 AM To: 'Didier BRUN' Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ? Hi, I am interested in the answers you get. We are looking on stk/falconstor with there SIR function, and comparing them with diligent ProtecTier.. Please let me know what you find out. Thanks and regards, Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Didier BRUN Skickat: den 14 september 2006 16:36 Till: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Ämne: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ? Hi all, Did anybody meet problems with the VTL solution of StorageTek ( falcon solution ; ) ? Thanks Didier ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information of Northwestern Mutual. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify Northwestern Mutual immediately by returning it to the sender and delete all copies from your system. Please be advised that communications received via the Northwestern Mutual Secure Message Center are secure. Communications that are not received via the Northwestern Mutual Secure Message Center may not be secure and could be observed by a third party. Thank you for your cooperation. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary
They do show up as cleaning, HC3_CLN, pool NONE and present in the robot. We are running LTO3 drives. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roy Vosberg Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:29 PM To: Bobby Williams; Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Correct. Else Libraries without barcode readers could not use cleaning tapes. Run the command ..\Volmgr\bin\vmquery -m tape_ID That will tell you the type, pool, and the robot number / slot number If there is no robot number / slot number then that is the problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Williams Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:36 AM To: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Your barcodes don't have to have CLN in them. You do, however, have to have them defined as Cleaning tapes and of the correct type as the drives. But it looks like you have that (pending that your drives are hcart3). I would wonder why you would share the drives between a master and a media server. You probably are wasting money on either an SSO license or the media server license. With only 2 drives in an i2K, you are running on overkill anyway. But then I don't know anything about your environment. SSO and cleaning tapes were an issue in the 4.5MP6 days, but when I upgraded to 5.1, I did away with SSO. Bobby. From: Brooks, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/09/14 Thu PM 12:03:11 EDT To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Finally talked with support. They're pointing that our cleaning tapes don't have actual CLN*** labels. Can anyone support/deny this allegation? Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Setup: 1 NBU 6.0MP3 + eng binaries master, 1 NBU 6.0MP3 media Scalar i2K with 2 LTO3s, both shared to both servers I came in this morning and found that the cleaning flag was set by my ADIC on one of the drives. I have 5 cleaning tapes in the library, and NBU knows them to live in the NONE pool with a media type of HC3_CLN. When I tried to clean now, NBU responded with an error that request terminated, media not available (291). The Activity Monitor gave this: 9/14/2006 9:01:06 AM - requesting resource Tape1:__ANY__ 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - Error nbjm(pid=800) NBU status: 96, EMM status: No media is available 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - end operation unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) I've opened a ticket with support, but nothing heard yet. I'm 1.5 hours from my scheduled disk staging relocation. Anyone seen this one before? Ideas or suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2916 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary
If the cleaning tape is configured as HC3_CLN, are your drives are also configured as hcart3 ? ..\Volmgr\bin\tpconfig -d -Original Message- From: Brooks, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:18 PM To: Roy Vosberg; Bobby Williams; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary They do show up as cleaning, HC3_CLN, pool NONE and present in the robot. We are running LTO3 drives. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roy Vosberg Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:29 PM To: Bobby Williams; Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Correct. Else Libraries without barcode readers could not use cleaning tapes. Run the command ..\Volmgr\bin\vmquery -m tape_ID That will tell you the type, pool, and the robot number / slot number If there is no robot number / slot number then that is the problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Williams Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:36 AM To: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Your barcodes don't have to have CLN in them. You do, however, have to have them defined as Cleaning tapes and of the correct type as the drives. But it looks like you have that (pending that your drives are hcart3). I would wonder why you would share the drives between a master and a media server. You probably are wasting money on either an SSO license or the media server license. With only 2 drives in an i2K, you are running on overkill anyway. But then I don't know anything about your environment. SSO and cleaning tapes were an issue in the 4.5MP6 days, but when I upgraded to 5.1, I did away with SSO. Bobby. From: Brooks, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/09/14 Thu PM 12:03:11 EDT To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Finally talked with support. They're pointing that our cleaning tapes don't have actual CLN*** labels. Can anyone support/deny this allegation? Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Cleaning Quandary Setup: 1 NBU 6.0MP3 + eng binaries master, 1 NBU 6.0MP3 media Scalar i2K with 2 LTO3s, both shared to both servers I came in this morning and found that the cleaning flag was set by my ADIC on one of the drives. I have 5 cleaning tapes in the library, and NBU knows them to live in the NONE pool with a media type of HC3_CLN. When I tried to clean now, NBU responded with an error that request terminated, media not available (291). The Activity Monitor gave this: 9/14/2006 9:01:06 AM - requesting resource Tape1:__ANY__ 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - Error nbjm(pid=800) NBU status: 96, EMM status: No media is available 9/14/2006 9:01:14 AM - end operation unable to allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available(96) I've opened a ticket with support, but nothing heard yet. I'm 1.5 hours from my scheduled disk staging relocation. Anyone seen this one before? Ideas or suggestions? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2916 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] avrd a CPU hog
My avrd has decided to start doing work. On an otherwise idle 4 processor machine, it's taking betwene 6 and 14 percent of the CPU. Trussing it, it's just doing what appears to be name lookups over and over and over open(/etc/hosts, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE)= 5 fcntl(5, F_DUPFD, 0x0100) Err#22 EINVAL read(5, #n # I n t e r n e t.., 1024) = 1024 close(5)= 0 open64(/etc/.name_service_door, O_RDONLY) = 5 fcntl(5, F_SETFD, 0x0001) = 0 door_info(5, 0xFEEC2748)Err#9 EBADF close(5)= 0 open(/etc/hosts, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE)= 5 fcntl(5, F_DUPFD, 0x0100) Err#22 EINVAL read(5, #n # I n t e r n e t.., 1024) = 1024 close(5)= 0 so_socket(2, 2, 0, , 1) = 5 bind(5, 0xFFBEE778, 16, 3) Err#126 EADDRNOTAVAIL close(5)= 0 open64(/etc/.name_service_door, O_RDONLY) = 5 fcntl(5, F_SETFD, 0x0001) = 0 door_info(5, 0xFEEC2748)Err#9 EBADF close(5)= 0 open(/etc/hosts, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE)= 5 [...] I don't know what it's looking for or why. I've got VERBOSE in vm.conf, I've touched /usr/openv/volmgr/AVRD_DEBUG and I've restarted. The only messages I can find for avrd are in the system messages file, and they're pretty normal connects to a library and the two drives inside the library. Things *seem* to be functioning, but I'm concerned that it's taking up so much CPU. That's not normal. Anyone seen something like this? NB 5.1. Solaris 9. -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1MP4 and Catalog Backups
Hi folks, I'm running NetBackup 5.1 MP4 under Win2003. Has anyone found a way to automate suspending active jobs prior to a catalog backup running, and restart it after the catalog completes? We're not ready to jump on 6.0 yet just for hot catalog backups. Any help is much appreciated. Jack Thweatt 205.268.5646 Office 205.337.8909 Cell 205.268.3474 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Initiate Import
I have figured out the issue...I had to move the tape from the Scratch pool to the pool that it was in before the images expired. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Conner, Mike Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:30 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Initiate Import Hi, I have NB 5.1 MP5...I am trying to recover some images that have expired on particular media. The tapes have not been overwritten. When I try to initiate the import...I get the following error...can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? 9/14/2006 1:26:54 PM - begin Import 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - started process bptm (3176) 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - started process bptm (3176) 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - mounting AXH822 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - Error bptm(pid=3176) ERR - Assign of media id AXH822 in Media Manager volume database failed, host rvapbcksvr.imb.bminet.org, invalid volume pool. 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - Error bpimport(pid=3576) Status = cannot perform specified media import operation. 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - end Import; elapsed time: 00:00:47 cannot perform specified media import operation(176) ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls
Title: Backup through firewalls Nb 5.0 mp6 Solaris 9 Do any of you backup servers through a firewall? What issues do you see in terms of failures? What ports do you typically open up for successful backups? Do you do anything special in the policy's for servers on the other side of a firewall? Greg This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. CEG-IP2 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls
Title: Backup through firewalls Without vnetd its been my experience that you need these ports opened: 512-5000 13701-13783 -Dave From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hindle, Greg Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:16 To: NB List Mail Subject: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls Nb 5.0 mp6 Solaris 9 Do any of you backup servers through a firewall? What issues do you see in terms of failures? What ports do you typically open up for successful backups? Do you do anything special in the policy's for servers on the other side of a firewall? Greg This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal,professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for theaddressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the informationin this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. CEG-IP2 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls
Title: Backup through firewalls There's a whole section on this in the SAG. Shortanswer, you need "bpcd" from the master or media server to the client, "vnetd" the reverse direction. You have to make sure you configure the client for "no callback connections" via the bpclient command or, no doubt, someplace in the GUI. Users on the client cannot perform their own restores using this. I'm told, but have not verified, that you can enable "bprd" from client to master to allow this. -M From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hindle, GregSent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:16 PMTo: NB List MailSubject: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls Nb 5.0 mp6 Solaris 9 Do any of you backup servers through a firewall? What issues do you see in terms of failures? What ports do you typically open up for successful backups? Do you do anything special in the policy's for servers on the other side of a firewall? Greg This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. CEG-IP2 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Vault
Use Vault or bpduplicate. Vault will require your dupe to a different volume pool, bpduplicate will not, but otherwise, not much diff. NDMP has it's own DTU, but isn't a media server in the sense you're thinking, because it doesn't track its own backups...you can dupe to any target storage unit attached to the media server doing the dupe. F'rinstance, I have 3 STUs...one for the NetApp, A, then two for a Media serverone for local drives, B, and one for my DR site drives, C. The NDMP backup runs to STU A, but when I do the Vault/bpduplicate, the tape duped using drives assigned to the media server Mounted/read from one assigned to STU B, and written to the offsite STU C. No SSO needed. Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Royer Sent: September 13, 2006 10:16 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Vault Continuing on my NDMP requirements thread, what is the proper way to duplicate (Vault) NDMP backups? Currently my Vault is configured to use the existing STU which does have a max fragment size. I seem to recall that you can't duplicate across media servers. It looks like the NDMP drive is going to be attached to the NetApp (via SAN zone). I'm assuming the NetApp with its local tape drive will be considered a media server for this purpose. Will I need two drives attached to the NetApp so I can make duplicates for vault? I intend to have all my drives (even NDMP) physically in one robot with robot control on the (linux) master. Will any of this require an SSO license? La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension -UP DATE
From what I can tell, though I haven't gotten too deep into is, is that the Netbackup for Exchange client is essentially just a Netbackup for Windows client.Exchange installed on the host is what makes it an Exchange client. So basically, it's just a windows server with Netbackup on it. You need to configure some stuff (accounts) on the Exchange server to make it talk properly to the installed Netbackup client...then you back it up pretty much the same as a windows box, ie, backup C, D, and whatever other drives you have on each physical box, via each individual host's node name, then you backup the Exchange DBs by the virtual name of the cluster. So you can't do a DR of the Exchange app, by installing the windows client on a windows box, then doing a FULL restore to it. You need an exchange server running to accept the restore data, as the restore will talk to the exchange API.so Exchange has to be installed AND running. I believe, but am not sure if you can install the NBU client first on the bare box, then install Exchange, but I *THINK* you can. You need an Exchange license for every instance of exchange you intend ot backup or restore to. ie. We have a production cluster, a restore instance on a different box, an instance in the lab, and one at our DR site that we will restore to in a DR, so we need 4 licences. Paul Can you clarify something? In the Exchange Admin Guide for the install, it talks about installing the client, but is there a REQUIREMENT to install EXCHANGE 2003 FIRSt before installing the NetBackup client? La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] BackupExec
Does BackupExec require much admin around tapes, media, pools or similar, or is it more straightforward? It turned out that we have a license for an older version for BackupExec, it's just that it's probably not installed. As I've mentioned, we have just one Windows server with a tape drive in it. Best regards, Johan Kullberg ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension -UP DATE
Just a note on licensing, if you are running the exchange DB agent in a cluster it is licensed per active node, although you need a client for each node. So... A cluster with 2 nodes and 1 active requires 2 Netbackup Protect (Client) Licenses but only 1 Exchange Database Option license. At least that's how we're spending our money w/ Symantec. =P -Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:24 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: Link To Download Exchange DB Extension -UP DATE From what I can tell, though I haven't gotten too deep into is, is that the Netbackup for Exchange client is essentially just a Netbackup for Windows client.Exchange installed on the host is what makes it an Exchange client. So basically, it's just a windows server with Netbackup on it. You need to configure some stuff (accounts) on the Exchange server to make it talk properly to the installed Netbackup client...then you back it up pretty much the same as a windows box, ie, backup C, D, and whatever other drives you have on each physical box, via each individual host's node name, then you backup the Exchange DBs by the virtual name of the cluster. So you can't do a DR of the Exchange app, by installing the windows client on a windows box, then doing a FULL restore to it. You need an exchange server running to accept the restore data, as the restore will talk to the exchange API.so Exchange has to be installed AND running. I believe, but am not sure if you can install the NBU client first on the bare box, then install Exchange, but I *THINK* you can. You need an Exchange license for every instance of exchange you intend ot backup or restore to. ie. We have a production cluster, a restore instance on a different box, an instance in the lab, and one at our DR site that we will restore to in a DR, so we need 4 licences. Paul Can you clarify something? In the Exchange Admin Guide for the install, it talks about installing the client, but is there a REQUIREMENT to install EXCHANGE 2003 FIRSt before installing the NetBackup client? ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-14 13:48]: There's a whole section on this in the SAG. Shortanswer, you need bpcd from the master or media server to the client, vnetd the reverse direction. You have to make sure you configure the client for no callback connections via the bpclient command or, no doubt, someplace in the GUI. Users on the client cannot perform their own restores using this. I'm told, but have not verified, that you can enable bprd from client to master to allow this. Speaking as a backup guy who is now on the firewall team, using vnetd is by far the recommended way of dealing with the firewall. If all you are dealing with is backup servers to client machine, the short list is: Server - Client port 13782 (bpcd) Client - Server ports 13724 (vnetd) and 13720 (bprd) Yes client initiated restores will work with just these ports. If your backup servers are hanging off of a DMZ so that your admin clients using the Java GUI need to get access, you can also use: Admin Client - Server ports 13722 (bpjava) and 13724 (vnetd) This will also require the /usr/openv/java/nbj.conf file setting of NBJAVA_CONNECT_OPTION=1 (default is 0) The only downside to vnetd that I have heard of but not seen personally is that you are limited to a single stream for backups, which could impact your backup model if you are trying to use NEW_STREAM file directives. If that is the case, you can configure port ranges and I highly recommend using ALLOW_NON_RESERVED_PORTS as part of that. Using low ports (1024) by default is one of the stupidest things NBU ever did. -- David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls
Hi, I've configured some firewaled NetBackup domains with vnetd and I never had any problem with streams. I have ages to hear from someone the port model. I had proposed this to some of my customers and when the firewall admin understood how many ports needed they refused it immediately. ---Original Message--- From: David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls Sent: 14 Sep '06 23:06 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-14 13:48]: There's a whole section on this in the SAG. Shortanswer, you need bpcd from the master or media server to the client, vnetd the reverse direction. You have to make sure you configure the client for no callback connections via the bpclient command or, no doubt, someplace in the GUI. Users on the client cannot perform their own restores using this. I'm told, but have not verified, that you can enable bprd from client to master to allow this. Speaking as a backup guy who is now on the firewall team, using vnetd is by far the recommended way of dealing with the firewall. If all you are dealing with is backup servers to client machine, the short list is: Server - Client port 13782 (bpcd) Client - Server ports 13724 (vnetd) and 13720 (bprd) Yes client initiated restores will work with just these ports. If your backup servers are hanging off of a DMZ so that your admin clients using the Java GUI need to get access, you can also use: Admin Client - Server ports 13722 (bpjava) and 13724 (vnetd) This will also require the /usr/openv/java/nbj.conf file setting of NBJAVA_CONNECT_OPTION=1 (default is 0) The only downside to vnetd that I have heard of but not seen personally is that you are limited to a single stream for backups, which could impact your backup model if you are trying to use NEW_STREAM file directives. If that is the case, you can configure port ranges and I highly recommend using ALLOW_NON_RESERVED_PORTS as part of that. Using low ports (1024) by default is one of the stupidest things NBU ever did. -- David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbei ngback-up with status code 1
Title: Message Well here, just tried on one client, and its reporting back the files its skipped. Also went to BPERROR from a command line, and that provided a much more in-depth look at the errors for a client. You could also try this perhaps. HTH Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Edwin Bader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 16:08To: WEAVER, Simon; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1 When I run this against a client it only reports back "backup of client NLP17-15 exited with status 1 (the requested operation was partially successful) From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:38 PMTo: 'Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)'; Edwin Bader; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1 Jonathan Actually, that is not always the case, because the Report tool goes into more details about every file. HTH Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 15:36To: Edwin Bader; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are notbeingback-up with status code 1 In the windows GUI if you click on the job and go to the details its in that log there. Alternately I think its in the BPKAR32 log? I'm not 100% sure because I always use the Windows GUI (its a lot easier than parsing log files.) -Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin BaderSent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:36 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Command for finding out witch files are not beingback-up with status code 1 Gents, Several customers are asking witch files are not being backed up when the status code is 1. Is there a way to retrieve this info? Cheers, Edwin This email is for the intended addressee only.If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it.Please notify the sender by return email.The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited.Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation.Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Initiate Import
Mike May want to take a look at this. http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/274213.htm Also, from memory, I created a specific volume pool called NBU_SAFE - by default, if the tape HAS expired and you place into the robot you may find its in the Netbackup or Scratch pool. Check this location, and where applicable place it in a safe pool, or if possible, the original pool it may have come from. Assuming you know :-) HTH Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Conner, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2006 18:30 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Initiate Import Hi, I have NB 5.1 MP5...I am trying to recover some images that have expired on particular media. The tapes have not been overwritten. When I try to initiate the import...I get the following error...can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? 9/14/2006 1:26:54 PM - begin Import 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - started process bptm (3176) 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - started process bptm (3176) 9/14/2006 1:26:55 PM - mounting AXH822 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - Error bptm(pid=3176) ERR - Assign of media id AXH822 in Media Manager volume database failed, host rvapbcksvr.imb.bminet.org, invalid volume pool. 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - Error bpimport(pid=3576) Status = cannot perform specified media import operation. 9/14/2006 1:27:41 PM - end Import; elapsed time: 00:00:47 cannot perform specified media import operation(176) ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
