Re: [Veritas-bu] Viewing vault duplication performance.
Use 2 GB fragments at the storage units. Then you can check bptm log. It has all the info you want in kb./sec -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:22 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Viewing vault duplication performance. Is this linux specific? I don't have a linux box handy to check, but I'd imagine iostat would do exactly that. On solaris, I use iostat with the -xnp args and follow it with the interval time and number of intervals. For example: iostat -xnp 5 100 Gives me 100 shots on 5 second intervals of all the tape devices, read and write in separate columns, as well as waits, and reads/writes per second. Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Dunham Sent: October 11, 2006 2:17 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Viewing vault duplication performance. I'm testing some vault duplication on a Linux master server. Since 'iostat' doesn't seem to show tape activity, is there any other way of calculating the speed? A completed duplication shows elapsed time, but not data transferred. Is there some log file that would contain the amount that was moved? NBU 6.0/MP3 Linux Thanks! -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] 2 Master Servers controlling Robotic Library
Title: Message Cheers, well I tested and ran into issues earlier, so backed out - using DSU at the mo Thanks anyhow! Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: smpt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2006 10:49To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 2 Master Servers controlling Robotic Library If your library support partitioning just give a drive and some slots to the vm. Else you can do it but you are asking for trouble. smpt From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, SimonSent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 7:36 PMTo: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'Subject: [Veritas-bu] 2 Master Servers controlling Robotic Library Hi again NBU 5.1 MP2 + 2 SAN Media Servers Win2k3 I am not a fan of 6.0, although I have decided to take the plunge and evaluate a clean install + MP3. My current setup uses an HP ESL fiber channel tape library, that is controlled by my 5.1 NBU Master and 2 SAN Media Servers also having access to the drives. I have installed NBU 6 on a Virtual Machine - part of my domain and fully installed. My question is this; Is it possible, if I configure my VM to see my Tape Library, that it COULD also control the library as well as my NBU 5.1 Master Server? Obviously not at the same time, purely for testing purposes only. More importantly, I do not want to disrupt the production system where possible. But can it be achieved? Failing this, I will just go back to disk-based backups, where I have 1TB of space available to play around with for the time being. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Thanks Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.-Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] error code 29
Hi Any Body can help me ..when I backup Database Oracle from Master by using Veritas Netbackup 6 and Oracle 9i when I starting Manual backup The Job will fail with error 29 (failed trying to exec a command) but when backup database from client backup done ... any body can help me to solve this problem ... Thanks anyway Apakah Anda Yahoo!?Kunjungi halaman depan Yahoo! Indonesia yang baru!___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups
Title: Managing Tape Rotations All, Is there a way to have netbackup keep the tape in drive of a robotic library? I'm doing hourly backups of the Oracle Archive Log, and the tape gets unmounted and put back into it's slot after the backup is completed. Is there a way to tell netbackup to keep the tape in the drive until the tape is full? We did that with Legato, and now the we have moved to netbackup we are concerned about the wear and tear on the tape drive. Since it's constantly mounting and unmounting the same tape. -- Mike Sponsler Northrop Grumman [EMAIL PROTECTED]. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NOM on Solaris 10?
Greetings, A while backup I installed NOM MP2 on a Solaris 10 box. For the longest time, I could not get any of the reporting to show, so I opened a call with Veritas support. After many calls, it was stated that NOM for NBU 6.0 does not work properly on Solaris 10 machines. Has anyone been able to get NOM working on Solaris 10 system? If so, is there any trick or any specific MP that was used? Thanks in advance, Thomas Gravizi UNIX Systems Administrator Enterprise Operations STERIS Corporation - Mentor, OH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 440.392.7630 - phone 440.350.7078 - fax ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups
Title: Managing Tape Rotations we used to use this in 3.4 and 4.5, it may still work in 5.x or 6.0. put it in bp.conf. i think the delay number is in seconds, we only needed the tape to stay in a short while as the next oracle stream would start within a minute. # stop tape from immediately unmounting for oracle backup/restores: MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY = 60 thanks, jerald From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sponsler, Michael Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups All, Is there a way to have netbackup keep the tape in drive of a robotic library? I'm doing hourly backups of the Oracle Archive Log, and the tape gets unmounted and put back into it's slot after the backup is completed. Is there a way to tell netbackup to keep the tape in the drive until the tape is full? We did that with Legato, and now the we have moved to netbackup we are concerned about the wear and tear on the tape drive. Since it's constantly mounting and unmounting the same tape. -- Mike Sponsler Northrop Grumman [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message, and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged material. It is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
Title: Message Steve Also found this; http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/277438.htm Not sure if you have had a look at this or not. Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2006 16:01To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Hello, Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the master/media servers. Regards and thanks, Steve This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
Starting with the basics: 71 is none of the files in the file list exist. What is in your file list and is there anything in that location on the client? -Rusty From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Haskins, SteveSent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:01 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Hello, Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the master/media servers. Regards and thanks, Steve ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] script writing for netbackup
need to learn writing scripting using perl in netbackup, guide me pls. That's a rather broad category. What area are you concerned about? Do you know perl and netbackup already? I don't think this forum is appropriate for teaching perl (or any language's) basics. What do you want to accomplish? NBU has many command line interfaces that are appropriate for automation tools. 'vmquery', 'bpmedialist', 'bpimagelist', 'bppllist' are all especially useful for gathering information. And 'vmchange', 'bpexpdate', 'bpduplicate', 'vmphyinv' and others are useful for making updates and modifications to the configuration. The man pages are the best start for those tools, but some of the output formats are not documented. You can usually find them with some good google searching. -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
Title: Message Steve What does it complain about for status 71 - is it system state, drive letter? Whats defined in the Policy? As a test, have you created a TEST Policy, added the client into this policy and attempted a backup? Thanks Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2006 16:01To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Hello, Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the master/media servers. Regards and thanks, Steve This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] error 71
Hello, Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the master/media servers. Regards and thanks, Steve ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
Hi Steve, We have so many clients that we see this one every once in a while. The usual problem is that a filesystem that is in the File List for the policy becomes unmounted, changes mount location, mount point becomes stale, or the area to be backed up is deleted by the client. My suggestion is to take the policy file list and go line-by-line through them to assure that everything in them is actually on each client in that policy. If any one does not exist, then you will get that error. Output from 'bperror -U -client client_name -problems' may be of help in finding the actual area that is not being found. Hope that helps. Cheers! --Chris Starting with the basics: 71 is none of the files in the file list exist. What is in your file list and is there anything in that location on the client? -Rusty From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Haskins, Steve Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:01 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Hello, Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the master/media servers. Regards and thanks, Steve ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM on Solaris 10?
I have NOM MP2 working on a Solaris 10 box. If you do a : /etc/init.d/vxnomd status Are all the services running? Is your NOM server your master server? If not, add your NOM server in you bp.conf file as a SERVER= Also, you need to install the latest solaris 10 patches, more specifically libc needs to be updated for it to run properly (you'll get a core dump). If you do a /usr/ccs/bin/what /lib/libc.so.1 what does the output say? -- Mike Sponsler Northrop Grumman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (703) 968-1302 12900 Federal Systems Pkwy Fairfax, VA 22033 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gravizi, ThomasSent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:40 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] NOM on Solaris 10? Greetings, A while backup I installed NOM MP2 on a Solaris 10 box. For the longest time, I could not get any of the reporting to show, so I opened a call with Veritas support. After many calls, it was stated that NOM for NBU 6.0 does not work properly on Solaris 10 machines. Has anyone been able to get NOM working on Solaris 10 system? If so, is there any trick or any specific MP that was used? Thanks in advance, Thomas Gravizi UNIX Systems Administrator Enterprise Operations STERIS Corporation - Mentor, OH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 440.392.7630 - phone 440.350.7078 - fax ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups
Title: Managing Tape Rotations I don't think that MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY works with NBU 6.0 MP2. Besides, I don't think the MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY would work for me. The backup occurs every hour, and if the tape needs changed, I don't want the full tape to sit for an hour before it's finaly ejected and a new tape put in, especially if more data has to spill over to a 2nd tape. -- Mike Sponsler From: Iverson, Jerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:08 AMTo: Sponsler, Michael; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups we used to use this in 3.4 and 4.5, it may still work in 5.x or 6.0. put it in bp.conf. i think the delay number is in seconds, we only needed the tape to stay in a short while as the next oracle stream would start within a minute. # stop tape from immediately unmounting for oracle backup/restores: MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY = 60 thanks, jerald From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sponsler, MichaelSent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:26 AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups All, Is there a way to have netbackup keep the tape in drive of a robotic library? I'm doing hourly backups of the Oracle Archive Log, and the tape gets unmounted and put back into it's slot after the backup is completed. Is there a way to tell netbackup to keep the tape in the drive until the tape is full? We did that with Legato, and now the we have moved to netbackup we are concerned about the wear and tear on the tape drive. Since it's constantly mounting and unmounting the same tape. -- Mike Sponsler Northrop Grumman [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message, and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged material. It is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
Title: Message Local drive. The client(s) weren't having a problem before the client version upgrade. Other clients (also updatedand existing in thesame policy(s) aren't having an issue.All Local Drives are defined. It doesn't specify what what file is missing in the file list in the GUI detail, I'm assuming it may me a temp file that is reoccurringly regenerated by the application. Rusty or Simon, What log would I look in? From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:16 AMTo: Haskins, Steve; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Steve What does it complain about for status 71 - is it system state, drive letter? Whats defined in the Policy? As a test, have you created a TEST Policy, added the client into this policy and attempted a backup? Thanks Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2006 16:01To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Hello, Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the master/media servers. Regards and thanks, Steve This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.-Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups
Michael, I would suggest that a better option might be a DSSU for this purpose- you get no mount/unmout time, typically faster throughput for both backups and restores, and you can control how often the DSSU destages to tape. Tom Burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Sponsler, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Is there a way to have netbackup keep the tape in drive of a robotic library? I'm doing hourly backups of the Oracle Archive Log, and the tape gets unmounted and put back into it's slot after the backup is completed. Is there a way to tell netbackup to keep the tape in the drive until the tape is full? We did that with Legato, and now the we have moved to netbackup we are concerned about the wear and tear on the tape drive. Since it's constantly mounting and unmounting the same tape. -- Mike Sponsler Northrop Grumman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up....
Title: Message Randy Unfortunatley, I am not a unix box, however, depending on the SAN and the capacity, it can take time to boot. We have an EVA attached to a HP UX and that takes 30 mins to boot.. thats around 3TB So it may be the storage - not Netbackup. Like I said, I dont know HP-UX, but I am reporting what I see here! HTH Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 October 2006 15:43To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up I have a question for the group. I have an HP-UX Media Server with 10TB of disk storage attached to the SAN. When we reboot this system it can take up to 90 minutes for it to come up. Is anybody out there experiencing this same issue? If so, Is there anything that can be done to speed this process up? Thanks, Randy Zimmer Unix System Administrator Monsanto Enterprise Infrastructure Team Office: 314-694-3109 Pager: 314-294-7966 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive such information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Please delete it and all attachments from any servers, hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail by you is strictly prohibited. All e-mails and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, reading and archival by Monsanto. The recipient of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking for the presence of "Viruses" or other "Malware". Monsanto accepts no liability for any damage caused by any such code transmitted by or accompanying this e-mail or any attachment. This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
Title: Message Enable logging and look for BPBKAR - or you can create the folder for this log file, if it does not exist. HTH Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2006 16:26To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Local drive. The client(s) weren't having a problem before the client version upgrade. Other clients (also updatedand existing in thesame policy(s) aren't having an issue.All Local Drives are defined. It doesn't specify what what file is missing in the file list in the GUI detail, I'm assuming it may me a temp file that is reoccurringly regenerated by the application. Rusty or Simon, What log would I look in? From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:16 AMTo: Haskins, Steve; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Steve What does it complain about for status 71 - is it system state, drive letter? Whats defined in the Policy? As a test, have you created a TEST Policy, added the client into this policy and attempted a backup? Thanks Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2006 16:01To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] error 71 Hello, Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the master/media servers. Regards and thanks, Steve This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.-Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Viewing vault duplication performance.
Use 2 GB fragments at the storage units. Then you can check bptm log. It has all the info you want in kb./sec There used to be several issues with duplicating and fragment size. I *think* that these issues are (supposed to be) addressed in 6.0, but I've been hesitant to attempt it. If it gets me what I need, I'll probably try it. For now though, it seems like I've hit a wall. None of my duplications are going faster than 27MB/s (LTO3s). I'll have to keep poking... -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] error code 29
Assuming youre using the oracle backup type rather than the standard. If so Ive never seen it work from the master but always from the client but admit that Ive never delved into it since I could schedule from the client (and usually wanted to anyway for RMAN and SAP backups). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of yudhi_billy harriman Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:56 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] error code 29 Hi Any Body can help me ..when I backup Database Oracle from Master by using Veritas Netbackup 6 and Oracle 9i when I starting Manual backup The Job will fail with error 29 (failed trying to exec a command) but when backup database from client backup done ... any body can help me to solve this problem ... Thanks anyway Apakah Anda Yahoo!? Kunjungi halaman depan Yahoo! Indonesia yang baru! ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 6, Issue 22
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2006 16:35 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 6, Issue 22 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest... Today's Topics: 1. error 71 (Haskins, Steve) 2. Re: script writing for netbackup (Darren Dunham) 3. Re: Keeping tape mounted between backups (Iverson, Jerald) 4. Re: error 71 (Major, Rusty) 5. Re: error 71 (WEAVER, Simon) 6. Re: error 71 (WEAVER, Simon) 7. Re: error 71 (Christopher Jay Manders) 8. Re: NOM on Solaris 10? (Sponsler, Michael) 9. Re: error 71 (Haskins, Steve) 10. Re: Keeping tape mounted between backups (Sponsler, Michael) 11. Re: Keeping tape mounted between backups (Tom Burrell) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:00:41 -0700 From: Haskins, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Veritas-bu] error 71 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello, Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the master/media servers. Regards and thanks, Steve -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/ 248b3afc/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:01:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] script writing for netbackup To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii need to learn writing scripting using perl in netbackup, guide me pls. That's a rather broad category. What area are you concerned about? Do you know perl and netbackup already? I don't think this forum is appropriate for teaching perl (or any language's) basics. What do you want to accomplish? NBU has many command line interfaces that are appropriate for automation tools. 'vmquery', 'bpmedialist', 'bpimagelist', 'bppllist' are all especially useful for gathering information. And 'vmchange', 'bpexpdate', 'bpduplicate', 'vmphyinv' and others are useful for making updates and modifications to the configuration. The man pages are the best start for those tools, but some of the output formats are not documented. You can usually find them with some good google searching. -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:07:56 -0500 From: Iverson, Jerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups To: Sponsler, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED], veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii we used to use this in 3.4 and 4.5, it may still work in 5.x or 6.0. put it in bp.conf. i think the delay number is in seconds, we only needed the tape to stay in a short while as the next oracle stream would start within a minute. # stop tape from immediately unmounting for oracle backup/restores: MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY = 60 thanks, jerald From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sponsler, Michael Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:26 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups All, Is there a way to have netbackup keep the tape in drive of a robotic library? I'm doing hourly backups of the Oracle Archive Log, and the tape gets unmounted and put back into it's slot after the backup is completed. Is there a way to tell netbackup to keep the tape in the drive until the tape is full? We did that with Legato, and now the we have moved to netbackup we are concerned about the wear and tear on the tape drive. Since it's constantly mounting and unmounting the same tape. -- Mike
Re: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up....
Title: Message Of course it depends a lot on the age and class of the equipment. My RP8420 with over 10 TB attached boots much faster than one of my old N Class machines with only 2 TB attached. Also he says HP-UX without mentioning version. 9x? 10x? 11? 11i?. Itanium box or PA-RISC? Many variables can affect this including how one has zoned storage (assuming a SAN). I recall one of the original EMC Symmetrix arrays to which we attached an HP-UX box (probably 10.20) took forever to do initial boot and errored out for the load because it actually scanned all the disk drives in the array not just the ones we were going to use on the particular host via the SCSI connections wed made. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hampus Lind Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:04 PM To: 'WEAVER, Simon'; 'ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up Hi, We are a large hpux customer. But I dont have any 10TB systems yet... But almost!! One of our media server have about 6 TB and I havent seen any time delay in boot time after adding more disk to the system. The boot time now is the same as it was before the 6 TB. If you look at the console when then server boots, what does it delay/hang on? I would also recommend you to look at itrc.hp.com (if you have a user). Often problem with DNS/NIS causes long boot time.. Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 October 2006 15:43 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up I have a question for the group. I have an HP-UX Media Server with 10TB of disk storage attached to the SAN. When we reboot this system it can take up to 90 minutes for it to come up. Is anybody out there experiencing this same issue? If so, Is there anything that can be done to speed this process up? Thanks, Randy Zimmer Unix System Administrator Monsanto Enterprise Infrastructure Team Office: 314-694-3109 Pager: 314-294-7966 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive such information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Please delete it and all attachments from any servers, hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail by you is strictly prohibited. All e-mails and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, reading and archival by Monsanto. The recipient of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking for the presence of Viruses or other Malware. Monsanto accepts no liability for any damage caused by any such code transmitted by or accompanying this e-mail or any attachment. This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up....
Title: Message Where I was going was to say it does matter what hes using and he hadnt provided that. Other comments here were making it sound as if there were never slow boots on HP equipment and since Ive been using HP since about 95 I know better. Not sure why that annoyed you it wasnt meant as an attack but rather to let him know it depends. From: Hampus Lind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:27 PM To: Jeff Lightner; 'WEAVER, Simon'; 'ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: SV: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up Yes of course old servers and older versions of OS take longer time to boot than new once. But I have never heard that if you attach 5 TB disk to old or new servers they will take more time booting up then if you attach 500 GB. Perhaps a couple of minutes but not more So I dont see where your going with this, if you want to help the guy I suggest you ask him directly what hw and sw that are in use and try to help him The best thing I can say is to check out the console and syslog for errors and run some searches on itrc.hp.com. If you dont have access to itrc you can send the errors to me and I can do some searching for you. Good luck Randy, Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 12 oktober 2006 19:05 Till: Hampus Lind; WEAVER, Simon; ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Ämne: RE: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up Of course it depends a lot on the age and class of the equipment. My RP8420 with over 10 TB attached boots much faster than one of my old N Class machines with only 2 TB attached. Also he says HP-UX without mentioning version. 9x? 10x? 11? 11i?. Itanium box or PA-RISC? Many variables can affect this including how one has zoned storage (assuming a SAN). I recall one of the original EMC Symmetrix arrays to which we attached an HP-UX box (probably 10.20) took forever to do initial boot and errored out for the load because it actually scanned all the disk drives in the array not just the ones we were going to use on the particular host via the SCSI connections wed made. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hampus Lind Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:04 PM To: 'WEAVER, Simon'; 'ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up Hi, We are a large hpux customer. But I dont have any 10TB systems yet... But almost!! One of our media server have about 6 TB and I havent seen any time delay in boot time after adding more disk to the system. The boot time now is the same as it was before the 6 TB. If you look at the console when then server boots, what does it delay/hang on? I would also recommend you to look at itrc.hp.com (if you have a user). Often problem with DNS/NIS causes long boot time.. Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 October 2006 15:43 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up I have a question for the group. I have an HP-UX Media Server with 10TB of disk storage attached to the SAN. When we reboot this system it can take up to 90 minutes for it to come up. Is anybody out there experiencing this same issue? If so, Is there anything that can be done to speed this process up? Thanks, Randy Zimmer Unix System Administrator Monsanto Enterprise Infrastructure Team Office: 314-694-3109 Pager: 314-294-7966 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive such information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Please delete it and all attachments from any servers, hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail by you is strictly prohibited. All e-mails and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, reading and archival by Monsanto. The recipient of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking for the presence of Viruses or other Malware. Monsanto accepts no liability for any damage caused by any such code transmitted by or accompanying this e-mail or any attachment. This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or
Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client exclude
Yes. As long as netbackup has access tot he client you can access the client through the GUI. go to host properties then clients and then the windows box you are trying to backup. Double click then Click on windows Client and you will see exclude lists option. Greg From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AdedaySent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 2:46 PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Windows client exclude can exclude be done on the master server for a windows client? I know exclude for unix clients is done on the client side.I have a windows client I have no access to. How can I exclude files for this client on the master server side? Master is Solaris 8, NBU 3.4 (Yes! 3.4..~:)Thanks This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. CEG-IP1 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Writing perl scripts for performance enhancement in NBU5.1
Hi Raghu, Please visit http://search.cpan.org/search?query=netbackupmode=all Are u a pro @ perl and newbie to netbackup or vice versa.! The foll is a set of perl modules for netbackup - all in one - http://search.cpan.org/~dutchman/NBU-0.90f/ Regards, PP BIJU KRISHNAN On 10/11/06, Raghunath kandakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,I am looking out for help for writing perl scripts forperformance enhancement in Netbackup 5.1 .Pls advise me..Thank u all,RegardsRaghu__ Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection aroundhttp://mail.yahoo.com___Veritas-bu maillist- Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduhttp://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client exclude
You can still download all of the manuals in pdf format for 3.4 http://support.veritas.com/menu_ddProduct_NETBACKUPDC_view_CL.htm Adeday [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/2006 2:46:04 PM can exclude be done on the master server for a windows client? I know exclude for unix clients is done on the client side.I have a windows client I have no access to. How can I exclude files for this client on the master server side? Master is Solaris 8, NBU 3.4 (Yes! 3.4..~:)Thanks ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] SharePoint policy and clients NBU6
Hi, Can anyone confirm that in a Sharepoint setup where the actual Sharepoint server is a front-end with a backend SQL server serving the actual Sharepoint DBs, that only the front-end server needs to be added as a client in the policy (i.e. you don't add the SQL server back-end into the policy; the Sharepoint agent connects to the back-end)? Cheers, - Tim Wilkinson I.T. Support Officer Science Corporate Information Systems Defence Science Technology Organisation Department of Defence Tel: (02) 96921484 Fax: (02) 96921562 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
