Re: [Veritas-bu] Media Write Errors - To Disk?!

2006-10-15 Thread WEAVER, Simon

Well have you enabled logging to check what happens at the time of the
error?

On the Windows system it would be Netbackup\Logs\Admin I think - also,
normally the Windows Event viewer would give some indication of what is
happening (ie: low on space, I/O error, scsi time out, ect).

Anything like that reported Jonathan?

Also, how large is the catalog - I recall someone on the list reported
similar problems with disk catalog backups when it was attempting to write
files larger than several GB.

I assume tape catalog backups are fine :-) ?

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 13 October 2006 20:21
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Media Write Errors - To Disk?!


As I eluded to in the E:\Catalog I've tried changing both directories
(D:\Catalog D:\Catalog etc..) and Drives (E:\Catalog, D:\Catalog.)  This
particular server has 4 different disks / partitions and they all produce
the same results.  I'm a bit perplexed.

-J 

-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:02 PM
To: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)
Cc: veritas-bu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Media Write Errors - To Disk?!



On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) wrote:

> NBU 5.1 MP5 I'm trying to backup the catalog to disk D:\Catalog and I
> get a MEDIA WRITE ERROR about 50% through it.  I've tried changing 
> drives (E:\Catalog) and chkdsk'ing the drives and I always get the 
> same thing.  Any ideas?  Does the catalog backup write a log I can
check?
> 
> -Jonathan
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 

Does it work to a different disk?

Sounds like you may have either hit a bug or bad sector(s) on the disk,
I would guess the latter.

Justin.

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do 
not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or 
disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments 
from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email 
transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] 3 Schedules in 1 policy - Monthly has ran twice

2006-10-15 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message



All
NBU 5.1 MP2 Win2k3 + 2 SAN MEdia 
Servers
 
Last week, I setup a policy to contain the 
following:
 
Weekly Full Schedule
Weekly INCR Schedule
Monthly Full Schedule
 
The Monthly Schedule has been set for Calendar, and ONLY to run on 
selected dates that I ticked (which shows a green 
tick).
 
The Monthly and Weekly Windows are set exactly the same 
timeframe.
 
I 
cannot think as to why this may have happened, because I set my other policies 
the same way, and their monthly ran last weekend, and this weekend, the weekly 
full schedules ran!
 
Does anyone have any ideas what could be wrong 
here?
Thanks
 
Regards
Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows 
Domain Administrator 
EADS Astrium 
Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 
5PU
Email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM Hardware Requirements

2006-10-15 Thread Mansell, Richard
 
FWIW, our NOM server runs in a VMWare partition and has 384MB memory and
a 4GB root disk. The disk filled up at one point but having read the
manual I invoked the NOM backup and log purge facility and disk space
usage seems pretty stable now.

Regards

Richard

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wilkinson, Tim
Sent: Monday, 16 October 2006 12:37 pm
To: Justin Piszcz; Koster, Phil
Cc: veritas-bu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM Hardware Requirements

We were advised to use at least 2GB RAM with 2 good processors. It's
hard to know how much disk space you'll need (depends on how many
reports you keep, and how many servers you're monitoring, etc.) but I
don't think 5GB will be enough. We've got 400GB+, just in case (will
probably never need that much but it means it is 'future-proofed'. I
asked Symantec and they said 30GB should be fine for a while in our
environment.
We're using a dedicated server as this has been recommended;
specifically Windows for NOM apparently, although it can run on other
platforms.
The NOM guides don't give too much information about this stuff but it's
a resource hungry beast.

Cheers,

Tim



**
This electronic email and any files transmitted with it are intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 

The views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Christchurch
City Council.

If you are not the correct recipient of this email please advise the
sender and delete.

Christchurch City Council
http://www.ccc.govt.nz
**


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM Hardware Requirements

2006-10-15 Thread Wilkinson, Tim
We were advised to use at least 2GB RAM with 2 good processors. It's
hard to know how much disk space you'll need (depends on how many
reports you keep, and how many servers you're monitoring, etc.) but I
don't think 5GB will be enough. We've got 400GB+, just in case (will
probably never need that much but it means it is 'future-proofed'. I
asked Symantec and they said 30GB should be fine for a while in our
environment.
We're using a dedicated server as this has been recommended;
specifically Windows for NOM apparently, although it can run on other
platforms.
The NOM guides don't give too much information about this stuff but it's
a resource hungry beast.

Cheers,

Tim

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Friday, 13 October 2006 10:36 PM
To: "Koster, Phil"
Cc: veritas-bu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM Hardware Requirements

$ du -sh *NOM*
234MNB_60_NOM.tar.gz

The program itself is big, you need to install ICS, setup
tunnel/authentication/brokering etc..  I remember the patches were
50-250MB as well, which I thought was crazy.  I had set this up 4-5
months ago for test purposes and I do not recall the exact amount of
memory; however, I do remember there were a lot of processes in use, the
ICS stuff, a number of webserver-like applications for NOM, etc..

Perhaps someone on the list who is -currently- using NOM can shed some
light on this?

Thanks,

Justin.

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, "Koster, Phil" wrote:

> My intention was on Linux but in this case I guess I will have to go
Windows.
> 
> What kind of RAM and HDD was this thing using?  GB of RAM and 5 GB
HDD?  More?  We are going to use VMWare/ESX 2.5 and I would rather get
this thing sized right to start with.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Phil
> 456-3136
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:08 AM
> To: Koster, Phil
> Cc: veritas-bu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM Hardware Requirements
> 
> Unless you meant running the application within Windows within VMWare 
> or
> similar-- I installed it once on a Windows Server box, it was a big
hog IMO for memory/disk space.
> 
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
> > NOM requires Solaris or Windows server, it is not supported on any 
> > other platform.
> > 
> > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, "Koster, Phil" wrote:
> > 
> > > We are getting ready to put NOM in a Linux VM.  Can anyone give me

> > > some idea as to what kind of resources this needs?  Specifically 
> > > looking for RAM and HDD space requirements.  I looked at the NOM 
> > > getting started guide, Admin guide for Windows vol I & II,  and 
> > > all I could find were common sense things like a "reliable
server".
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Phil Koster
> > > Network Administrator
> > > City of Grand Rapids
> > > Direct: 616-456-3136
> > > Helpdesk: 456-3999
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu