[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Encryption

2007-01-05 Thread Pondy p

Hello,


We are looking to implement NetBackup Encryption in our setup.
I would like to know some details from the people whoever using it.

What is the performance impact in backup/restore while using NetBackup
encryption in 5.1 and 6.0?
Is there cost benefits to management?

Thanks in advance.

Pondy
Storage Administrator
Bangalore,India
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread Bobby R Windle
I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are getting 
backing up windows servers.

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on master/media 
servers.

a.  Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director.
b.  IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives
c.  Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port feeding each 
tape drive.
d.  The storage on the windows servers is FC attached Hitachi 
Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.)
e.  Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32 bit. Seems 32 
bit servers are actually faster.

note:   Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix and Netware can 
get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration.
So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have some kind of 
idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows! 

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L. Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Migrating media: Undocumented Gotcha's??

2007-01-05 Thread Clem Kruger \(C\)

Hi Phil,

I would install the new drives and then clone the old tapes using the
cloning facility within vaulting. I have found this works well and
keeps the catalog updated correctly.

 
 
 
Regards, 
 
Clem Kruger
Telkom SA Ltd
ITS Infrastructure Storage Management

: +27 (12) 680 3102

: +27 (12) 680 3299

: +27 (83) 326 2260

: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Koster, Phil
Sent: 05 January 2007 15:16 PM
To: NetBackup List
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Migrating media: Undocumented Gotcha's??

We are getting a brand new Tape Library with LTO-3 drives.  Old system
is an STK silo with 9840's.  We have some media with 7 year retention
requirements that we want to migrate to the new media so we don't have
to maintain both systems.

Has anyone else done similar?  Did it go as well as the documentation
indicates?  Anything we should pay special attention too?

NBU 6 MP2 on Win 2K.

Thanks.

Phil Koster
Network Administrator
City of Grand Rapids, MI
Direct: 456-3136
Helpdesk: 456-3999

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at 
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread ckstehman
I have noticed that we usually get 10-15MB on our Solairs servers and 
about 6-7MB on windows.  Our connections are
1G in all cases. Like you I don't know why.  (Windows is windows...?)
=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bobby R Windle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/05/2007 08:27 AM

To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc

Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers







I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are getting 
backing up windows servers. 

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on master/media 
servers. 

a.Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director. 
b.IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives 
c.Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port feeding each 
tape drive. 
d.The storage on the windows servers is FC attached 
Hitachi Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.) 
e. Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32 bit. Seems 
32 bit servers are actually faster. 

note: Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix and Netware 
can get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration. 
So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have some kind of 
idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows! 

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L. Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright
belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI).  This Email is
intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed.  If
you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please immediately
notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies.  PHI
policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email
communication.  PHI will not accept any liability in respect of such
communications.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread Paul Keating
Are these LAN clients or SAN Media Servers or what?
I can get close to 30MB/s from HP DL360/380 G3s from local disks via the
onboard GigE card. IF I'm only running a single job
 
Paul
 
-- 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby R
Windle
Sent: January 5, 2007 8:28 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers



I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are
getting backing up windows servers. 

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on
master/media servers. 

a.Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director. 
b.IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives 
c.Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port
feeding each tape drive. 
d.The storage on the windows servers is FC
attached Hitachi Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.) 
e. Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32
bit. Seems 32 bit servers are actually faster. 

note: Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix
and Netware can get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration. 
So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have
some kind of idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows! 

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L. Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026



La version française suit le texte anglais.



This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank 
of
Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of 
this
email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately 
from
your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. 



Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
confidentielle.
La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute 
diffusion,
utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une
personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous 
recevez
ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans 
délai à
l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de 
votre
ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread Karl . Rossing
We get between 6MB/sec and 12MB/sec on single streams going to a NB 6.0 
MP3 server running Solaris 10 over the LAN. The data gets staged to the 
SAN and then gets backed up to LTO2 drives.

I have noticed a significant increase in backup speed with BroadCOM copper 
GB adapters by simply upgrading the Microsoft provided driver to a 
Broadcom driver. We currently like version 9.81d. It's kind of hit/miss 
with broadcom, some versions of the driver seem to work better than 
others.

This http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/242918.htm document helps you 
gage the backup disk speed on you're NB client. It's particularly useful 
in ruling out the local drives as a bottleneck.




Bobby R Windle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/05/2007 07:36 AM

To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc

Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers







I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are getting 
backing up windows servers. 

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on master/media 
servers. 

a.Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director. 
b.IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives 
c.Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port feeding each 
tape drive. 
d.The storage on the windows servers is FC attached 
Hitachi Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.) 
e. Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32 bit. Seems 
32 bit servers are actually faster. 

note: Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix and Netware 
can get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration. 
So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have some kind of 
idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows! 

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L. Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread Clem Kruger \(C\)

Hi There,

 

There are a number of issues that may cause the Windows backup to slow
down.

 

1.  Make sure you do not have tracker.exe running
2.  Ensure that all networks a set to full duplex. Some NIC's
cannot be set to 1000 full duplex. Rather set these to 100 full in
that case (Nic's and Switch)
3.  Make sure that all servers are set not to scan for virus when
a file is opened on the server. ( no sense in this if the incoming
file was scanned) Big cause of data backing up slowly.
4.  Make sure that you have the correct firmware on both the tapes
and library.
5.  Use iperf to test your network speed.
6.  Lower your logging

 

These are but a few items that may cause a backup to be slow. You can
find iperf @ http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/

 

Good luck.

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Clem Kruger

Listen to what is said, not he who speaks Arabian Proverb

Telkom SA Ltd

ITS Infrastructure Storage Management

 

: +27 (12) 680 3102

 

: +27 (12) 680 3299

 

: +27 (83) 326 2260

 

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 January 2007 15:57 PM
To: Bobby R Windle
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

 


I have noticed that we usually get 10-15MB on our Solairs servers and
about 6-7MB on windows.  Our connections are 
1G in all cases. Like you I don't know why.  (Windows is windows...?) 
=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Bobby R Windle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

01/05/2007 08:27 AM 

To

veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 

cc

 

Subject

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

 

 

 





I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are getting
backing up windows servers. 

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on master/media
servers. 

   a.Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director. 
   b.IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives 
   c.Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port feeding
each tape drive. 
   d.The storage on the windows servers is FC attached
Hitachi Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.) 
   e. Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32 bit.
Seems 32 bit servers are actually faster. 

note: Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix and
Netware can get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration. 
   So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have some kind
of idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows! 

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L. Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is
proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to
copyright belonging to Pepco Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates (PHI).
This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it
is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. PHI policies
expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive
statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by
Email communication. PHI will not accept any liability in respect of
such communications. 



~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at 
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~attachment: image004.jpg
attachment: image003.jpg
attachment: image002.jpg
attachment: image001.jpg
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
Ok ok, enough with all the winblows bashing. =P
 
We're running something similar to your config here.
 
MCData 4700 SAN Switches
HP LTO3 Drives
Qlogic 4Gb cards
FC Attached Hitachi AMS500 (Next get Tagmastore I think)
Dell 2950's
 
The best backup times I've seen over gigabit to gigabit Ethernet are
45MB/sec.  But your configuration and data contents are going to vary
that number greatly.  Using the same hardware and configurations I've
got all kinds of windows boxes that run at all kinds of different
speeds.  I'm having trouble getting my file servers better than 20MB/sec
because of all the small files, but my Oracle Database servers easily
push 30MB/sec or better.  My fastest backup is an Oracle DB and I think
with SAN tuning I can get that into the 60MB/sec range.
 
-Jonathan



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby R
Windle
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 8:28 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers



I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are getting
backing up windows servers. 

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on master/media
servers. 

a.Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director. 
b.IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives 
c.Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port feeding each
tape drive. 
d.The storage on the windows servers is FC attached
Hitachi Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.) 
e. Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32 bit.
Seems 32 bit servers are actually faster. 

note: Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix and
Netware can get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration. 
So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have some kind
of idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows! 

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L. Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Encryption

2007-01-05 Thread Len Boyle
Good Day Pondy

I did not notice any change between netbackup 5 and 6  in performance for the  
encryption option. 
 
The encryption option uses  large quantities of cpu on the client. If you have 
a client with plenty of spare cpu, you should see no difference in the backup 
speeds. But you will lose compression of the data at the tape drive if you are 
using  the tape hardware to compress your data. We have not tried software 
compression with the software encryption option. 
If your client has little or no spare cpu cycles, you will see a slow down in 
the backup speeds.
 
There is almost no management of the encryption keys with the netbackup 
encryption feature. You have to make sure that if you want to restore data to a 
client, that the key that was used to encrypt the data is installed on the 
client. So if you have data from client A from nov last year and want to 
restore it to client B. And you have data from client C from last jan that you 
want to restore to client B. And you have data from client B  from yesterday 
that you want to restore   to client B. You must have a keyfile with keys that 
match all three sets of data. Note-  as  far as I know there is only one active 
keyfile on the client and no  way to tell netbackup to look at more then one 
keyfile when search for a matching key for a restore.
 
If this morning you had changed the key on client B and you plan to do a backup 
on client B using the new key, you must make sure that this new key is the  
correct position in the keyfile. As the first key is the one used for backups. 
 
Unless your keyfiles for the different clients are all the same [And you can do 
this by maintaining a keyfile on one client and copying it to other clients] 
you must either do all the restores with a different keyfile installed on the 
client, or build a new keyfile with all the keys installed. With the current 
key installed last, even if it was already installed in the keyfile. 
 
 
len 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pondy p
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:40 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Encryption


Hello,


We are looking to implement NetBackup Encryption in our setup.
I would like to know some details from the people whoever using it.

What is the performance impact in backup/restore while using NetBackup 
encryption in 5.1 and 6.0?
Is there cost benefits to management?

Thanks in advance.

Pondy
Storage Administrator
Bangalore,India



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Standalone drive issue

2007-01-05 Thread Deiter Scott
 
Recently we setup a remote facility with a new media server with a
single standalone drive.
4 windows clients - two policies - two tape pools
Netbackup 5.1 mp4
This is similar to 3 other remote facilities.
 
The issue.  During a backup attempt netbackup will request a tape that
has already been written on instead of the tape that is successfully
mounted in the drive.  Because this is a manual setup our strategy to to
control the tapes by having the one mounted be used.
 
Why does the softwhere ask for a different tape?
 

Scott Deiter
System Administrator
Hanover Direct, Inc.
Hanover, PA
Voice: 717-633-3298
Fax: 717-633-3101 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread M S
Bobby,

You may also want to check if your NIC on windows server is throttled down 
by Windows by default.  I have heard about this that Windows by default will 
throttle down to some very low throughput.  Please check further into it.

Muhammad Shafi
Senior Unix Admin

-

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby R
Windle
Sent: January 5, 2007 8:28 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers



I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are
getting backing up windows servers.

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on
master/media servers.

a.Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director.
b.IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives
c.Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port
feeding each tape drive.
d.The storage on the windows servers is FC
attached Hitachi Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.)
e. Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32
bit. Seems 32 bit servers are actually faster.

note: Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix
and Netware can get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration.
So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have
some kind of idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows!

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L. Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread Edson Noboru Yamada

A important thing to consider is file system fragmentation and
number and size of files, which may impactseverely on performance.

In order to check this, try to create a single big file (2 GB, for example)
and
create a test policy to backup only that file. Under normal conditions,
on a idle system/network, you should be able to get over 50 MB/s.




On 1/5/07, M S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Bobby,

You may also want to check if your NIC on windows server is throttled down
by Windows by default.  I have heard about this that Windows by default
will
throttle down to some very low throughput.  Please check further into it.

Muhammad Shafi
Senior Unix Admin

-

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby R
Windle
Sent: January 5, 2007 8:28 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers



I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are
getting backing up windows servers.

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on
master/media servers.

a.Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director.
b.IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives
c.Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port
feeding each tape drive.
d.The storage on the windows servers is FC
attached Hitachi Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.)
e. Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32
bit. Seems 32 bit servers are actually faster.

note: Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix
and Netware can get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration.
So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have
some kind of idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows!

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L. Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread Cornely, David
You may also want to try these things (I found some of these in a forum
from a search on Google):

1) On a windows system, check to see if tracker.exe is running.  If it
is, kill it.  This will release some I/O on the filesystems.  You can
also check to see if it is started up at boot time and turn that off:
Start-Run-msconfig (hit enter)
Go to the Startup tab and uncheck the tracker.exe

2) On the client, touch the file /Install Path/netbackup/dont_sort_dir


3) In the client's bp.conf, add this:
LOCKED_FILE_ACTION = SKIP

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edson
Noboru Yamada
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:07
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

 



A important thing to consider is file system fragmentation and
number and size of files, which may impactseverely on performance.

In order to check this, try to create a single big file (2 GB, for
example) and 
create a test policy to backup only that file. Under normal conditions, 
on a idle system/network, you should be able to get over 50 MB/s.





On 1/5/07, M S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Bobby,

You may also want to check if your NIC on windows server is throttled
down
by Windows by default.  I have heard about this that Windows by default
will
throttle down to some very low throughput.  Please check further into
it. 

Muhammad Shafi
Senior Unix Admin

-

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby R
Windle
Sent: January 5, 2007 8:28 AM 
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers



I'm curious to hear what kind of speeds (mbs/sec) others are 
getting backing up windows servers.

Running Netbackup Enterprise 5.1 mp6 under Solaris10 on
master/media servers.

a.Using brocade 2g ports 48000 director.
b.IBM Ultrium LTO Gen2 drives 
c.Sun branded Qlogic 2gb cards. single port
feeding each tape drive.
d.The storage on the windows servers is FC
attached Hitachi Tagmastore 9990.  (Very fast drive configuration.) 
e. Servers are HP G5's also 64 bit. Some are 32
bit. Seems 32 bit servers are actually faster.

note: Some of my other backups such as Solaris, Linix
and Netware can get as much as 20 mb/sec with this configuration. 
So why are the windows servers so slow? Any  one have
some kind of idea what may be a cause?  Or it is what it is!  Windows!

Bobby Windle ( Data backup  Recovery )
W.L . Gore  associates, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell : (302) 588-7374 (preferred)
office: (302) 292-4026


___ 
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu 

 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

2007-01-05 Thread Ed Wilts
On 1/5/2007 12:06 PM, Edson Noboru Yamada wrote:
 A important thing to consider is file system fragmentation and number
 and size of files, which may impactseverely on performance.

Absolutely.  Lots and lots of litle files with a standard policy will
*kill* you in performance

 In order to check this, try to create a single big file (2 GB, for 
 example) and create a test policy to backup only that file. Under
 normal conditions, on a idle system/network, you should be able to
 get over 50 MB/s.

We see 60-70MB/sec regularly using FlashBackup on Windows while backup
over a GigE network to an LTO-3 drive (through a Decru encryption
appliance).  We set network buffer sizes to 132096.  On other clients
that have to walk the file system, we can see pretty dismal performance.

Try to backup from the client to the null device.  Instructions are on
the Veritas support site and in this list's archive.  That will tell you
how fast you're reading the file system using the NetBackup tools.  If
you can't read it off of disk fast enough, then NetBackup isn't going to
be doing much for you.

.../Ed
-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] solaris client version level

2007-01-05 Thread David Rock
* Curtis Preston [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-04 12:58]:
 You can also do this without ssh:
 
 for box in `cat customer-box-list`
 do
 echo Machine [$box] level is:
 bpgetconfig -M $box |grep -i ver
 done

Yes, but that is horribly inconsistient and nowhere near being reliable.
At best, you can usually get the base level of the version that is
installed, but you won't get any information about any maintenance
packs.

I have found that bpcoverage does a better job, but it's still not
perfect.

-- 
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu