[Veritas-bu] EMM Service cannot start
Heres exactly what happened: 1. I received a new license key and entered it. 2. After that I was asked to restart NetBackup services (as usual) 3. I did bpdown and Netbackup hung. 4. I restarted the entire machine. Now when I try to start NB console it opens the default page but when I try accessing Activity Monitor is hangs for a while then tells me cannot connect to Enterprise Media Manager. System log returns a emm cannot initialize. I recently upgraded from 5.1 MP5 to 6.0 MP4 and it was a smooth upgrade. I removed the key that I recently added. This is a critical problem and I already contacted my Symantec support. Any ideas?? Anas This mail has been scanned by Symantec Mail Security for SMTP at UP.ORG.QA___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM Service cannot start
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Anas Kayal wrote: Heres exactly what happened: 1.I received a new license key and entered it. 2.After that I was asked to restart NetBackup services (as usual) 3.I did bpdown and Netbackup hung. 4.I restarted the entire machine. Now when I try to start NB console it opens the default page but when I try accessing Activity Monitor is hangs for a while then tells me cannot connect to Enterprise Media Manager. System log returns a emm cannot initialize. I recently upgraded from 5.1 MP5 to 6.0 MP4 and it was a smooth upgrade. I removed the key that I recently added. This is a critical problem and I already contacted my Symantec support. Any ideas?? Anas This mail has been scanned by Symantec Mail Security for SMTP at UP.ORG.QA Did you use FQDN names when installing ICS? This is one of the reasons that can happen. Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] [Q] ERR - inode chnage time error?
we have DELL Redhat LINUX As 4.4 server with Netbackup 6.0 on it. I found on backup log file have following messages: 03:09:11.602 [1201] 4 bpbkar: INF - Compression: 99% /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs21.dbf 03:09:11.602 [1201] 16 bpbkar: ERR - inode change time has changed while backing up /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs21.dbf. 03:09:11.890 [1201] 4 bpbkar: INF - Compression: 98% /u2/hotbketdb3/controlfilebk.ctl 03:09:48.921 [1173] 4 bpbkar: INF - Compression: 99% /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs31.dbf 03:09:48.936 [1201] 4 bpbkar: INF - Compression: 99% /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs31.dbf 03:09:48.936 [1201] 16 bpbkar: ERR - inode change time has changed while backing up /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs31.dbf. I am pretty sure those files are NOT touch during backup time. Why we still get ERR - inode change time ..? How to fix it? Thanks. _ The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by Experian. http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=660600bcd=EMAILFOOTERAVERAGE ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Restore multiple SQL databases .... NB 5.1 MP4
Looking for an opinion on the best (most efficient) way to restore 148 SQL databases that were backed up on a SQL2000 server and need to be restored to a different server that has SQL2005 installed. The SQL2005 server has different path locations for the databases and it already has some databases on it that can't be deleted (thus master DB cant be erased). I can use a move template to perform this operation successfully on individual databases, but is there a way to script them without having to touch the move template for each DB restore as this will indeed be time consuming? thanks in advance for any advice. - This email (including any attachments) is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely on the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the email from your system. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s) are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email Policy. Please note that our servers may not be located in your country.___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] [Q] ERR - inode chnage time error?
The database is still running. Are you sure you've completely shut down the database before running the backup? Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bbb bb Sent: February 21, 2007 8:01 AM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] [Q] ERR - inode chnage time error? 03:09:11.602 [1201] 16 bpbkar: ERR - inode change time has changed while backing up /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs21.dbf. La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM Service cannot start
NEW FEATURE in 6.0 If there is a problem with just 1 little ol' single tapedrive. Guess what??? ltid will crap out. GREAT!!! huh? I had a tapedrive go bad yesterday. Ltid would start, then crap out. I deleted the tapedrive and ltid was then happy and would come up AND stay up! I'm happy. Are you happy? Anas Kayal [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/21/2007 2:55 AM Heres exactly what happened: I received a new license key and entered it. After that I was asked to restart NetBackup services (as usual) I did bpdown and Netbackup hung. I restarted the entire machine. Now when I try to start NB console it opens the default page but when I try accessing Activity Monitor is hangs for a while then tells me cannot connect to Enterprise Media Manager.System log returns a emm cannot initialize. I recently upgraded from 5.1 MP5 to 6.0 MP4 and it was a smooth upgrade. I removed the key that I recently added. This is a critical problem and I already contacted my Symantec support. Any ideas?? Anas This mail has been scanned by Symantec Mail Security for SMTP at UP.ORG.QA ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM Service cannot start
I agree with Justin, every time I have had an issue with EMM, it turned out to be name resolution/route. I have multiple NICs in my machines and backup over a dedicated connection. Issue occurred when one server talked over 1 network and other server replied from different. Not sure this is your issue, just my two cents Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 3:11 AM To: Anas Kayal Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM Service cannot start On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Anas Kayal wrote: Heres exactly what happened: 1.I received a new license key and entered it. 2.After that I was asked to restart NetBackup services (as usual) 3.I did bpdown and Netbackup hung. 4.I restarted the entire machine. Now when I try to start NB console it opens the default page but when I try accessing Activity Monitor is hangs for a while then tells me cannot connect to Enterprise Media Manager. System log returns a emm cannot initialize. I recently upgraded from 5.1 MP5 to 6.0 MP4 and it was a smooth upgrade. I removed the key that I recently added. This is a critical problem and I already contacted my Symantec support. Any ideas?? Anas This mail has been scanned by Symantec Mail Security for SMTP at UP.ORG.QA Did you use FQDN names when installing ICS? This is one of the reasons that can happen. Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu This message (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or duplication of this message by someone other than the intended addressee or their designated agent is strictly prohibited. Information included in this message that does not relate to the specified business of Worknet shall be understood as neither given by nor endorsed by Worknet or its employees. Any cost estimates or estimated quotes included in this message are considered non-binding estimates only and must not be considered final costs unless contained within an official proposal document. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] DSSU w/60 MP3 and Auto-Staging/Low Water Mark
I have a DSSU for my diffs that's set to have a 35% Low Water Mark (this is on my Master, a Win 2k3 SP1 box). Periodically, I've been finding that when jobs run, the auto migration to tape isn't occurring when a 129 is encountered. For instance, I cam in this morning and saw our main file server had reached about 35% complete and had been suspended because of a 129 - Disk full. I waited until a catalog backup finished, waited for a while to see if the DSSU would kick off, but it never did. Suggestions of where to look for problems? Something corrected in MP4? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2034 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes
Is there any way to eject tapes w/ command line? I'm on 5.1mp6. Kenneth ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes
/usr/openv/volmgr/bin/robtest. You can mv from tape drive to robot slot...along with all kinds of other good stuff. Steve _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth W Wilkinson Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:55 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes Is there any way to eject tapes w/ command line? I'm on 5.1mp6. Kenneth ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes
${VolMgr}/vmchange -multi_eject -w -h master_server -res -ml `cat
${eject_tape}` -rt robot_type -verbose -rh master_server -rn
robot_number -v out_of_library_vol_grp
${VolMgr}=/usr/openv/volmgr/bin
${eject_tape}=file with media IDs in the form of (as an example)
00:01:02:
--
Bill Jorgensen
CSG Systems, Inc.
(w) 303.200.3282
(p) 303.947.9733
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth
W Wilkinson
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 8:55 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes
Is there any way to eject tapes w/ command line? I'm on 5.1mp6.
Kenneth
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes
On 2/21/07, Kenneth W Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to eject tapes w/ command line? I'm on 5.1mp6. vmchange -multi_eject -w -res -rt robot-type -rn robot-number -rh master-hostname -ml mediaID:mediaID: ... :mediaID Austin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes
Thank you all for the responses. Good stuff. kww -Original Message- From: Austin Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 10:11 AM To: Kenneth W Wilkinson Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes On 2/21/07, Kenneth W Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to eject tapes w/ command line? I'm on 5.1mp6. vmchange -multi_eject -w -res -rt robot-type -rn robot-number -rh master-hostname -ml mediaID:mediaID: ... :mediaID Austin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes
In a Windows environment, for 5.1 I believe vmchange -multi_eject -w [-h HOST] may help? this can be found in the volmgr\bin folder Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kenneth W Wilkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 February 2007 15:55 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes Is there any way to eject tapes w/ command line? I'm on 5.1mp6. Kenneth This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. - Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes
robtest is a good utility for moving media and troubleshooting the robot but it won't update your inventory. The other command will. You can manually check or update inventory in vmadm if you have to rely on robtest. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth W Wilkinson Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:14 AM To: Austin Murphy Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes Thank you all for the responses. Good stuff. kww -Original Message- From: Austin Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 10:11 AM To: Kenneth W Wilkinson Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] ejecting tapes On 2/21/07, Kenneth W Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to eject tapes w/ command line? I'm on 5.1mp6. vmchange -multi_eject -w -res -rt robot-type -rn robot-number -rh master-hostname -ml mediaID:mediaID: ... :mediaID Austin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Mysteriously down tape drives
Ola, could you please check on the event viewer and run a 1) tpautoconf -t 2) tpautoconf -r 3) sgscan -c 4) sgscan -t Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] install encryption on client without using bpinst?
is it possible to install the encryption option on a netbackup 5.1 mp5 client without using the bpinst command? Our network/security requirements make bpinst not work. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] DSSU w/60 MP3 and Auto-Staging/Low Water Mark
In the DSSU configurations there is a staging schedule. Check that first. We have ours set to every hour because we were having similar problems with our DSSU's. That corrected it for us. There is also a command you can execute via Win Scheduled Tasks. I forget exactly what it is right at the moment but I do remember it wasn't obvious (not even in the manual). Hope that helps. Phil Koster Network Administrator City of Grand Rapids, MI Direct: 456-3136 Helpdesk: 456-3999 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brooks, Jason Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 10:38 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] DSSU w/60 MP3 and Auto-Staging/Low Water Mark I have a DSSU for my diffs that's set to have a 35% Low Water Mark (this is on my Master, a Win 2k3 SP1 box). Periodically, I've been finding that when jobs run, the auto migration to tape isn't occurring when a 129 is encountered. For instance, I cam in this morning and saw our main file server had reached about 35% complete and had been suspended because of a 129 - Disk full. I waited until a catalog backup finished, waited for a while to see if the DSSU would kick off, but it never did. Suggestions of where to look for problems? Something corrected in MP4? Thanks, Jason Jason Brooks Computer Systems Engineer IITS - Longwood University voice - (434) 395-2034 fax - (434) 395-2035 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Unexpected sparse restore of AFS volume using differential-inc method
All, We've recently moved our backup infrastructure from NB Ent. 5.0 MP6 driving dispersed SunStor L9 DLT and LTO-1 units to NB Ent. 6.0 MP4 driving a single Dell ML6000 (sibling of the ADIC, now Quantum, Scaler i500) LTO-3 library. I'm now experiencing a problem where NB will restore only the most recent differential-inc AFS volume image instead of cumulatively working up from the last full backup through the most recent diff-inc (which based on doc is how I understand diff-inc restores should work). All necessary tape volumes for the full through most recent diff-inc are in the library but NB reports only needing and only uses the single tape that contains the latest diff-inc image. As a result, the restored AFS volume is sparse; only the files that changed actually exist. There are referents to the unchanged files, so the names of all other files are visible, but they don't actually exist in the volume. This problem didn't occur before the upgrade but I was not involved in installing/configuring the previous system. I've poked around the new install and compared with the old but still don't see anything obvious. Any ideas? Thanks Lin ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1?
Before anyone says it - I know none of the 2.6 kernels for RH/FC are in the compatibility matrix. My question is despite the above has anyone got it successfully working on either Redhat or Fedora Core version 4 or higher with the 2.6 kernel? If so would you be willing to share how you got it going or at least the xinetd changes you made for it? It seems I saw a thread about this some time ago but I can't find it in the archives. By the way - is there a way to search the archives for keywords? The page I went to just gives me the archives by month so I have to open each one and even then I can only search on the thread titles. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1?
By the way - is there a way to search the archives for keywords? The page I went to just gives me the archives by month so I have to open each one and even then I can only search on the thread titles. The html page mentioned at the bottom of this message should have links both to the archives that you see and the search form. http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1?
This is what I've done to get it working on Fedora (I forget the exact kernel version). Don't know if this will work for you but it's here if you want to try. 1) Turned off SELinux because it was preventing some shared library activity required by bpcd. You have the option of running Security Enhanced Linux on Fedora but it's very paranoid and makes it hard to do a lot of things. So, we turned it off. Here's how: -Edit the /etc/selinux/config file and set the SELINUX variable to disabled -Rebooted the server (required to have this change take effect) 2) Ran the iptables commands to allow NBU servers access but I used the IP address of the master/media server instead of the hostname. 3) Then ran this to save the new iptables rules: # /sbin/service iptables save 4) Restarted xinetd /etc/init.d/xinetd restart Then we could access the client via NBU. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 14:15 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1? Before anyone says it - I know none of the 2.6 kernels for RH/FC are in the compatibility matrix. My question is despite the above has anyone got it successfully working on either Redhat or Fedora Core version 4 or higher with the 2.6 kernel? If so would you be willing to share how you got it going or at least the xinetd changes you made for it? It seems I saw a thread about this some time ago but I can't find it in the archives. By the way - is there a way to search the archives for keywords? The page I went to just gives me the archives by month so I have to open each one and even then I can only search on the thread titles. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] [Q] ERR - inode chnage time error?
The files are database backup files. we are not touch those file between 1:00 A.M. to 5:00 A.M. From: Paul Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: bbb bb [EMAIL PROTECTED], Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] [Q] ERR - inode chnage time error? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:17:56 -0500 The database is still running. Are you sure you've completely shut down the database before running the backup? Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bbb bb Sent: February 21, 2007 8:01 AM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] [Q] ERR - inode chnage time error? 03:09:11.602 [1201] 16 bpbkar: ERR - inode change time has changed while backing up /u2/hotbketdb3/tkcs21.dbf. La version française suit le texte anglais. This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _ The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by Experian. http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=660600bcd=EMAILFOOTERAVERAGE ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1?
Well duh! I had been there but clicked on the first link for the archives. I guess I expected the link for the search would be at that first link - it didn't occur to me it would be one line down on the original page. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Dunham Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:46 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1? By the way - is there a way to search the archives for keywords? The page I went to just gives me the archives by month so I have to open each one and even then I can only search on the thread titles. The html page mentioned at the bottom of this message should have links both to the archives that you see and the search form. http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1?
Thanks. Yep - I disabled SELinux during the OS install though I will mention that FC6 has a nice little config tool for SELinux now that might actually make me consider using it for something with less time pressure. I had worked it out before you wrote. The main problem I found is that for whatever reasons FC5 and FC6 (and maybe FC4 - I haven't looked at that yet) don't install xinetd by default! When I did the client software install NBU apparently checked for xinetd and not finding it assumed it was running inetd (it wasn't) so just created an inetd.conf with what it wanted. (To me that sounds a little brain dead but considering the answer to my second question who am I to talk? :-( ) Anyway based on the realization it didn't have xinetd I did the following to get it going: Doing yum install xinetd got me the correct xinetd stuff binary. Running /etc/init.d/xinetd start got it running. Reinstalled the NBU client and it created the appropriate files under /etc/xinetd.d Started a test backup which was sitting at connecting until it dawned on me I hadn't updated iptables (firewall) for NBU. I ran /etc/init.d/iptables stop to turn off iptables since it's an internal box. I'll probably go ahead and do firewall setup for it later since I'd already worked that out for some external boxes running earlier versions of RedHat but for now it's running the backup so I'll leave it alone. By the way for anyone reading it in the archives - if you decide not to use iptables and Veritas firewall setup make sure you use chkconfig to disable the automatic start of iptables on reboots. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cornely, David Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:07 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1? This is what I've done to get it working on Fedora (I forget the exact kernel version). Don't know if this will work for you but it's here if you want to try. 1) Turned off SELinux because it was preventing some shared library activity required by bpcd. You have the option of running Security Enhanced Linux on Fedora but it's very paranoid and makes it hard to do a lot of things. So, we turned it off. Here's how: -Edit the /etc/selinux/config file and set the SELINUX variable to disabled -Rebooted the server (required to have this change take effect) 2) Ran the iptables commands to allow NBU servers access but I used the IP address of the master/media server instead of the hostname. 3) Then ran this to save the new iptables rules: # /sbin/service iptables save 4) Restarted xinetd /etc/init.d/xinetd restart Then we could access the client via NBU. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 14:15 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1? Before anyone says it - I know none of the 2.6 kernels for RH/FC are in the compatibility matrix. My question is despite the above has anyone got it successfully working on either Redhat or Fedora Core version 4 or higher with the 2.6 kernel? If so would you be willing to share how you got it going or at least the xinetd changes you made for it? It seems I saw a thread about this some time ago but I can't find it in the archives. By the way - is there a way to search the archives for keywords? The page I went to just gives me the archives by month so I have to open each one and even then I can only search on the thread titles. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Redhat or Fedora 2.6 kernel NB 5.1?
On 2/21/2007 4:15 PM, Jeff Lightner wrote: Before anyone says it – I know none of the 2.6 kernels for RH/FC are in the compatibility matrix. They are too. We've been backing up RHEL 4 for a long time... .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
