Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-2 LTO-3 mix
But if the bar code rule changes, how does NetBackup know that it is not a new tape? If you have 25 tapes sitting in offsite storage that NB read as ABC001-025, you pull them back for a restore, NetBackup will not know anything about them, assign them to scratch and you sit there wondering why the tapes don't load. Another scenario is that Quantum comes in and has to update the firmware on a library and in the process has to remove all of the tapes to perform the library calibration/verification (I have been through several of these). All the tapes are put back into the robot (we know not all in the same place). How will NetBackup determine what is old, what is new, what is borrowed, which admin is blue. I have worked on this for over 6 months and have had a case opened/closed with Veritas. They concur with my dooms day scenario. I have already had a similar thing happen on the install of a new library on the same master that read 8 characters instead of 6 on the bar code label. I caught it before tapes got overwritten. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McCammont, Anderson (IT) Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor); Spearman, David; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-2 LTO-3 mix No - changing the media id generation rule (MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS in vm.conf) affects the media id. Changing the barcode rules (potentially) changes the media type and volume pool. Existing tapes won't be reallocated to a new pool on a barcode change - if they did then every inventory of the library would break netbackup. vmupdate(1M) only assigns attributes to new media. If we could put regexps into vmrule e.g. (made up vmrule -listall -b) barcode mediavolume max mounts/ tag type pool cleanings description -- *CU$ HC2_CLN None50 LTO Cleaning Tapes CLN DLT2_CLN None20 DLT Cleaning Tapes *L4$ HCART4 Scratch 0 LTO4 media *L3$ HCART3 Scratch 0 LTO3 media *L2$ HCART2 Scratch 0 LTO2 media NONE DEFAULT None 0 DEFAULTDEFAULT Scratch 0 -- then the world would be a better place. A trivial code change I'd bet and a feature request that's been outstanding for several years. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Williams Sent: 25 April 2007 18:21 To: McCammont, Anderson (IT); 'Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)'; 'Spearman, David'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-2 LTO-3 mix You can't change the bar code rules like that in mid stream. It would change the media id of every tape already in the library and put every existing tape in scratch. You are going to either have to partition the drives in separate partitions (Yuk), or just pick your default tape type and add all of the other types manually (not a big deal). Existing tapes don't use the bar code rules anyway, they are already known. It is only NEW to the robot tapes that need to have a bar code rule. I have 2 i2K's with both LTO-3 and LTO-2. No big deal. I have them in the same partition. I use the LTO-3's mostly for tape to tape duplication for offsite (LTO-2 duplicated to LTO-3 works great). Most of the clients can't push data fast enough to feed the LTO-3 tapes. (Yes, I do multiplex some mid range x3 to feed tapes data). I use Staging disks to catch the really slow ones and do disk to tape staging to the LTO-3 tapes. If you put the LTO-3's in their own partition, you could not use any tape duplication between partitions. Another major headache that I have at a site with 2 separate libraries (both ADIC 1k's) is when one runs out of media, everything fails with 96 errors and then moves to the other physical library. Not a big issue until failure stats are looked at. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McCammont, Anderson (IT) Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:24 PM To: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor); Spearman, David; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-2 LTO-3 mix If you do this you need to take part of your six digit barcode range and dedicate it to the particular media type. It's sad that Netbackup doesn't support proper regexps in the barcode rules so that the 'L2', 'L3' (presumably) 'L4' last two digits of the barcode can be used to select the media type. We've had a feature request in for years for this and it's gone nowhere (unless 6.x does it and our rep
Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-2 LTO-3 mix [NC]
Bobby, but from what I understand: But if the bar code rule changes, how does NetBackup know that it is not a new tape? By checking the media catalogs. If you have 25 tapes sitting in offsite storage that NB read as ABC001-025 you pull them back for a restore, NetBackup will not know anything about them, assign them to scratch and you sit there wondering why the tapes don't load. If you put them back in the robot for the restore, you have to make sure NBU knows about them. If it does not - then you'd have to import them. Also, NBU has rules on which tapes it can and which tapes it cannot overwrite ( ALLOW_MEDIA_OVERWRITE ) Another scenario is that Quantum comes in and has to update the firmware on a library and in the process has to remove all of the tapes to perform the library calibration/verification (I have been through several of these). All the tapes are put back into the robot (we know not all in the same place). And it does not matter for NBU which slot has which tape - that's libraries business. How will NetBackup determine what is old, what is new, what is borrowed, which admin is blue. Catalogs. I have worked on this for over 6 months and have had a case opened/closed with Veritas. They concur with my dooms day scenario. They are there to solve the immediate issues mostly. Scenarios are not welcome :-) I have already had a similar thing happen on the install of a new library on the same master that read 8 characters instead of 6 on the bar code label. I caught it before tapes got overwritten. I have no problems having 3 different media types in the 618 slots L700. All is peachy. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:veritas-bu- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McCammont, Anderson (IT) Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor); Spearman, David; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-2 LTO-3 mix No - changing the media id generation rule (MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS in vm.conf) affects the media id. Changing the barcode rules (potentially) changes the media type and volume pool. Existing tapes won't be reallocated to a new pool on a barcode change - if they did then every inventory of the library would break netbackup. vmupdate(1M) only assigns attributes to new media. If we could put regexps into vmrule e.g. (made up vmrule -listall -b) barcode mediavolume max mounts/ tag type pool cleanings description -- *CU$ HC2_CLN None50 LTO Cleaning Tapes CLN DLT2_CLN None20 DLT Cleaning Tapes *L4$ HCART4 Scratch 0 LTO4 media *L3$ HCART3 Scratch 0 LTO3 media *L2$ HCART2 Scratch 0 LTO2 media NONE DEFAULT None 0 DEFAULTDEFAULT Scratch 0 -- then the world would be a better place. A trivial code change I'd bet and a feature request that's been outstanding for several years. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:veritas-bu- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Williams Sent: 25 April 2007 18:21 To: McCammont, Anderson (IT); 'Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)'; 'Spearman, David'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-2 LTO-3 mix You can't change the bar code rules like that in mid stream. It would change the media id of every tape already in the library and put every existing tape in scratch. You are going to either have to partition the drives in separate partitions (Yuk), or just pick your default tape type and add all of the other types manually (not a big deal). Existing tapes don't use the bar code rules anyway, they are already known. It is only NEW to the robot tapes that need to have a bar code rule. I have 2 i2K's with both LTO-3 and LTO-2. No big deal. I have them in the same partition. I use the LTO-3's mostly for tape to tape duplication for offsite (LTO-2 duplicated to LTO-3 works great). Most of the clients can't push data fast enough to feed the LTO-3 tapes. (Yes, I do multiplex some mid range x3 to feed tapes data). I use Staging disks to catch the really slow ones and do disk to tape staging to the LTO-3 tapes. If you put the LTO-3's in their own partition, you could not use any tape duplication between partitions. Another major headache that I have at a site with 2 separate libraries (both ADIC 1k's) is when one runs out of media, everything fails with 96 errors and then moves to the other physical library. Not a big issue until failure stats are looked at. Bobby Williams 2205 Peterson Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Catalog Checker
I am trying to determine the current level of NBCC and how to download it. There was a document 285909 at one time, but it appears to have been removed. The current 6.0 upgrade manual still lists the use of this program as a requirement. Any help would be appreciated. Allan Barstow Spirit AeroSystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Catalog Checker [NC]
From my past experience it is better to open a call and works with Symantec on this. I've done it already few times in he past. Last time, back in Spetembet, it took me 1 month ( ! ) to clean catalogs. In the NBCC output there may be many discrepancies listed and those guys have a trained eye and ( i think ) a parser to seed trhought it. I am at 5.1 yet, so can't help you with the version. IN any case, the document for 5.1 is http://support.veritas.com/docs/267965 I am sure you are aware of the search on the support site - http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/support/search.jsp? It sucks big time and almost impossible to find anything on it, but ... as a last resort Barstow, Allan \(SN\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/2007 09:36 AM To veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Catalog Checker I am trying to determine the current level of NBCC and how to download it. There was a document 285909 at one time, but it appears to have been removed. The current 6.0 upgrade manual still lists the use of this program as a requirement. Any help would be appreciated. Allan Barstow Spirit AeroSystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu * This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. * ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0
Hi, We have some Celerra NAS devices on the network (and SAN) and would like to use NDMP to back up those devices. We have a tape library with six tape drives in the SAN. Is it possible to configure the Celerra NAS devices to mount the tape drives from the SAN with NetBackup SSO option? Or we have to mount the tape drive on one of the NetBackup media servers and do three-way or remote NDMP backup? I read through the NetBackup for NDMP SA's guide but still not clear on how SSO works with NDMP. Can somebody kindly explain to me how SSO works with NDMP? Thanks much, Rongsheng ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Exchange 2003 Cluster - Backup Area Network
Hi - I am trying to backup my exchange 2003 cluster through my backup area network. I had created a ip address resource with a Backup Area Address for the cluster. The backup area network card has been configured as well. I have configured the Netbackup agent to reflect the changes and i am able to ping from the master/media servers. Am I missing something else? My backups are failing with a status 69. -- DLew97 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0 [NC]
Rongsheng, I can't give yo much details on NDMP SSO configuration option as this is new in 6.0 and I am still on 5.1 I do not think there is much difference though - when doing tpconfig to create a device on media server, you'd just add -share yes option. For what it's worth, here are some generic NDMP ramblings I can share with you. You'll need the NetBackup for NDMP option installed with the license and mostlikely the same on EMC sides. If drives already zoned and Celera can see them - you practically all set jsut few configuration commands to run :-) Celera see the drive and start dumping to it when it's told to. Media and master servers get the devices ( tpconfig ) and STU configured ( bpstu[list|add|rep|del] ) with drives connected to NDMP host ( ndmphost:nrst#a in my NetApp case ). Master, media , robot control ( could be all on the same machine ) servers will do the scheduling and the media management ( pick, mount, unmount, etc. ) NBU will give a goahead to Celera to do the SCSI Reserve/Release and to start dumping to the specified NDMP drive[s]. Would be nice if you could post the summary if you'll decide to go with this. Regards Rongsheng Fang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/2007 10:41 AM To veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0 Hi, We have some Celerra NAS devices on the network (and SAN) and would like to use NDMP to back up those devices. We have a tape library with six tape drives in the SAN. Is it possible to configure the Celerra NAS devices to mount the tape drives from the SAN with NetBackup SSO option? Or we have to mount the tape drive on one of the NetBackup media servers and do three-way or remote NDMP backup? I read through the NetBackup for NDMP SA's guide but still not clear on how SSO works with NDMP. Can somebody kindly explain to me how SSO works with NDMP? Thanks much, Rongsheng ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu * This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. * ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0
Rongsheng, We use nbu6mp4/sso/ndmp to back up celerra cifs servers. It is easier than with 5.1 but works fine with one word of caution down below. You need to zone the fibre so the celerra sees the drives. Setting up the library is specific to that box. Once all the fibre stuff is done you will need an sso licemse and a ndmp license. Once loaded you will go to media and device mgt/devices/ndmp hosts (this is the gui of course, (sorry all you died in the wool cmd line junkies) and add the name of the CIFS server you want to back up. After that use the Configure storage devices wizard to discover the paths via the ndmp option. This is way simplistic. It is well detailed in the 6.0 admin guides and those should be used. I followed them step by step and had no problems. CAUTION: I have mentioned this about the Celerra before but will do so again. If you are running the 5.5 code on the Celerra when you do an interogation of the unit whether by gui or command line the process can get hung up. The Celerra instead of timing out will fail the datamover. If you don't pick up on the fact that the DM has failed and you run another interogation you might fail the 2nd datamover which makes for a lot of unhappy users. So when you do this have nasadmin up and stop what your doing if you get the first failure. EMC knows about this, we actually had their people on site, who promptly blew away our celerra database. They have not been back. David Spearman County of Henrico -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rongsheng Fang Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:42 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0 Hi, We have some Celerra NAS devices on the network (and SAN) and would like to use NDMP to back up those devices. We have a tape library with six tape drives in the SAN. Is it possible to configure the Celerra NAS devices to mount the tape drives from the SAN with NetBackup SSO option? Or we have to mount the tape drive on one of the NetBackup media servers and do three-way or remote NDMP backup? I read through the NetBackup for NDMP SA's guide but still not clear on how SSO works with NDMP. Can somebody kindly explain to me how SSO works with NDMP? Thanks much, Rongsheng ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0
Rongsheng, NDPM and SSO works very similar to normal SSO with NetBackup. What I would do is configure the Windows and UNIX hosts to share the drives first, then configure access to the NDMP Host (Celerra NAS), then finally modify the drives to include the NDMP path to the drives. You can then set up an NDMP storage Unit, and start backing up. However I feel the need to advise you that not all versions of all filers are compatible with SSO, this is mainly due the way reserve and release are handled in some versions of some manufacturers Filer OS. Please check the support.veritas.com web site, compatibility list for NDMP to verify that your Filers OS is compatible. Thank you, Mike Heck ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Exchange 2003 Cluster - Backup Area Network
Per Symantec's website: http://support.veritas.com/docs/276349 Status 69 or Status 71: * Confirm the directives are correct for the version of Exchange. For Exchange 5.5, the directives are Microsoft Exchange Server:\Information Store and Microsoft Exchange Server:\Directory. For Exchange 2000/2003 server is Microsoft Information Store:\* or Microsoft Information Store:\storage_group_name. Please note that for the files list Microsoft Information Store:\* to work correctly, Allow multiple data streams must be enabled. * Confirm that the servers list correctly lists the Exchange server name. Do not use a NetBackup name, the name of a backup interface, or a fully qualified domain name. If the server is listed in the Exchange administrative console as Exchange_server_1, confirm that is how it is listed in the policy. If the policy shows Exchange_server_1_backup or Exchange_server_1.domain.com, the backups will fail. * If the backup makes use of the directive NEW_STREAM, be sure the Allow multiple data streams option is selected. Tom --- DLew97 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi - I am trying to backup my exchange 2003 cluster through my backup area network. I had created a ip address resource with a Backup Area Address for the cluster. The backup area network card has been configured as well. I have configured the Netbackup agent to reflect the changes and i am able to ping from the master/media servers. Am I missing something else? My backups are failing with a status 69. -- DLew97 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0
If I understand you correctly, you want to share all 4 drives between the Media servers and the NAS device. Allowing the NAS device to do local backup and not use the network. If that is correct I am afraid it is not possible with the Sun NAS device. See the support.veritas.com web site for the current Veritas NetBackup(tm)Network Data Management Protocol (NDMP) Compatibility List (updated January 29, 2007) document number 251713. The Sun NAS device is only supported for Direct attached, remote, and 3-way NDMP, not SSO. So with the Sun NAS device the only possible solution to use direct attached tape drive would be to zone the SAN to have at least one tape drive dedicated to the Sun NAS device. This would however limit you to 3 or less drives for the 2 media servers to use for non-NDMP backups. Otherwise you could use remote NDMP, but that would require pulling all the data over the network. To clarify the reason that some vendors are not supported, there are two different ways of doing scsi reserve and release. If the vendor does not support the hard reserve / release that NetBackup uses we cannot assure the integrity of the data and thus cannot support SSO on that platform. So far Only these vendors have been certified to support SSO: EMC Celera in most of the 5.1 and higher DART OS Revisions ONStore in EverON 1.2.3 and higher IBM running Data ONTap 7.1.1 and higher DinoStor running OS 3.6.5 NetApp running 7.1.1 or higher Thank you, Mike Heck CFT -Original Message- From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:08 PM To: Mike Heck; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0 Ok... Just a point of clarification here... I was under the assumption that if I had 4 fiber drives in library shared with 2 media servers via SSO that I could also share one of those drives with an NDMP NAS, namely a Sun StorEdge 5320. Is this not the case? Just to clarify, when it comes NDMP backup time I want the Sun StorEdge to allocate one of the SSO drives and write its data to it while sending metadata to one of the media servers. Is that not gonna happen? -Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Heck Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:56 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0 Rongsheng, NDPM and SSO works very similar to normal SSO with NetBackup. What I would do is configure the Windows and UNIX hosts to share the drives first, then configure access to the NDMP Host (Celerra NAS), then finally modify the drives to include the NDMP path to the drives. You can then set up an NDMP storage Unit, and start backing up. However I feel the need to advise you that not all versions of all filers are compatible with SSO, this is mainly due the way reserve and release are handled in some versions of some manufacturers Filer OS. Please check the support.veritas.com web site, compatibility list for NDMP to verify that your Filers OS is compatible. Thank you, Mike Heck ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0 [NC]
Why not ? STK loves NT ... I'm sure it is a Dell box with Enginio controllers ... If you want to use shared ( SSO ) drives - confirm with STK/SUN if the NDMP version it runs supports SCSI Reserve/Release and of course as was mentioned yearlier today, NetBackup have to be version 6. Regards. -- Misha Pavlov Société Générale desk: (212) 278-6096 cell: (646) 346-9341 This message uses only 100% recycled electrons. Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/2007 03:07 PM To Mike Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED], veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0 Ok... Just a point of clarification here... I was under the assumption that if I had 4 fiber drives in library shared with 2 media servers via SSO that I could also share one of those drives with an NDMP NAS, namely a Sun StorEdge 5320. Is this not the case? Just to clarify, when it comes NDMP backup time I want the Sun StorEdge to allocate one of the SSO drives and write its data to it while sending metadata to one of the media servers. Is that not gonna happen? -Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Heck Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:56 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and SSO in NetBackup 6.0 Rongsheng, NDPM and SSO works very similar to normal SSO with NetBackup. What I would do is configure the Windows and UNIX hosts to share the drives first, then configure access to the NDMP Host (Celerra NAS), then finally modify the drives to include the NDMP path to the drives. You can then set up an NDMP storage Unit, and start backing up. However I feel the need to advise you that not all versions of all filers are compatible with SSO, this is mainly due the way reserve and release are handled in some versions of some manufacturers Filer OS. Please check the support.veritas.com web site, compatibility list for NDMP to verify that your Filers OS is compatible. Thank you, Mike Heck ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu * This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. * ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] changing hostname of master server on 6.0
I know on the support site it says not to do this without Symantec Support, but has anyone ever done it. If so, what are the steps involved, any documentation? Thanks, Jerry ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
