[Veritas-bu] need NetBackup experts. Michigan
We're in search of NBU experts and Sr level Administrators to join our growing NetBackup consulting team. You must be able to design and deploy complex NetBackup solutions. If you have stellar skills with high end storage and tape solutions (IBM/EMC/Hitachi) or Symatec EVault that would be beneficial. The offered positions will be very technically rewarding for the right candidate. You must be able to work in the US, Canadian citizens are fine. There is a minimal amount of local travel (25%). We are not a body shop, we are not staffing to fill temporary hourly contracts. this is a direct hire, salaried position Susan Damron Horan Senior Technical Recruiter email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Compsat Technology Inc. 25330 Telegraph Road, Suite 200 Southfield, MI 48034 Fax: (248) 223-1026 - Attn: S. Horan ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/278938.htm And no, "nbpemreq -suspend_scheduling" does not carry over across daemon bounces or reboots. If you want to not have jobs trigger immediately after those actions, you'll need to either disable your NB startup script or be really quick with another suspend command. - John Nardello From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Holowinski, Scott Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 2:26 PM To: Len Boyle; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Cc: Kevin Whittaker Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Len, That doesn't appear to be a documented command line switch. So how do you turn scheduling back on after using it? Thanks, Scott From: Len Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:32 AM To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Kevin, Try the command nbpemreq -suspend_scheduling len From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:59 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Ok, when I was on 5.1 I could change the behavior file to # of tries 0 and rereadconfig to allow NB to be running but no new jobs to kick off. But I could still submit jobs manually. When I went to 6.5, VERITAS told me to just stop the bprd daemon. Well, with that not running I can not submit jobs manually. Sometimes, I am working on the master server and bring up netbackup and don't want any jobs to run. Anybody have any ideas on how to do this? Kevin Whittaker Syniverse Technologies Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin Work: (813) 637-5502 Cell: (813) 810-6456 Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 03:25:55PM -0700, Holowinski, Scott wrote: >> nbpemreq -suspend_scheduling > That doesn't appear to be a documented command line switch. So how do > you turn scheduling back on after using it? It does appear in a technote. http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/278938.htm -- Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. > ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Getting a list of files from a failed backup
Yeah, as you mentioned with 5.5 million inodes, there is probably a significant amount of time before the client can start sending data to the media server, causing the default timeout value to get overran causing what looks to be a network connection timeout. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] 1 TB limit ?
turn on verbose logging, and check the client side log (i.e. bpbkar). See if it is hanging on a particular directory or file. If it is, you may have corruption or some other problem in the client filesystem. As of v6.5, I don't know of any 1TB limit in most traditional filesystem backups in Netbackup. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3
Ok, I figured it out. Since we use Qlogic branded adapters and QLA driver instead of the QLC driver there was a setting we needed to change in /kernel/drv/qla2300.conf. It is the equipment of the pci-max-read-request variable in qlc.conf. # PCI-X Maximum Memory Read Byte Count. #Range: 0, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048 or 4096 bytes #Default: 0 = system default hba0-pci-x-max-memory-read-byte-count=2048; Anyway, that plus setting maxphys=0x80 in /etc/system seems to have removed all bottlenecks from the T2000 and we are able to get linespeed data transfer speeds through the QLE2462. We are now able to vault jobs at around 160MB/sec from VTL to LTO3. I've only tried two concurrent vaults for x2 performance. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs
Len, That doesn't appear to be a documented command line switch. So how do you turn scheduling back on after using it? Thanks, Scott From: Len Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:32 AM To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Kevin, Try the command nbpemreq -suspend_scheduling len From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:59 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Ok, when I was on 5.1 I could change the behavior file to # of tries 0 and rereadconfig to allow NB to be running but no new jobs to kick off. But I could still submit jobs manually. When I went to 6.5, VERITAS told me to just stop the bprd daemon. Well, with that not running I can not submit jobs manually. Sometimes, I am working on the master server and bring up netbackup and don't want any jobs to run. Anybody have any ideas on how to do this? Kevin Whittaker Syniverse Technologies Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin Work: (813) 637-5502 Cell: (813) 810-6456 Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] 10Gbps network for backup LAN
how about configuring bondo on linux and ipmp on solaris side. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] 1 TB limit ?
1 tb limit is already resolved in netbackup 5 with mp4. We have been backing the database of more than 2 tb. But better you divide backup in multiple streams as some time it fails depending on the number of files you have in backup. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Some info on my experiences with 10GbE
I don't think it's the T2000's that are so special, I think it may have more to do with Sun's cards... I recently did some 10G testing with a Sun X4100 w/ 2 Opteron 2216's (dual core, 2.4Ghz) running RHEL 4, and found that it drastically outperformed the 4-core 1Ghz T2000's. I just swapped one of the cards from a T2000 into the X4100, and I tested sending data from the X4100->T2000, and then from the T2000->X4100. When sending data from the X4100->T2000, the throughput was the same as T2000->T2000, but when sending data from T2000->X4100, the maximum throughput achieved was 9.8Gb/s with 16 threads. An interesting observation is that all 4 cores on the X4100 were 50% idle when running at this rate. Also, worth mentioning is that I did some tests between a couple 8-core 1.2Ghz T2000's, and I got them to 9.3Gb/s with 16 threads, so the 8-core 1.2Ghz T2000's definitly outperform the 4-core 1Ghz ones. Big supprise. :) Similar to the previous poster, iperf seemed to perform the best with a 512k buffer and 512k tcp window size, and I also saw some large fluctuations in total throughput results. I'm guessing this is due to where the Solaris scheduler is running threads, since with mpstat I'd occasionally see 1-2 cores (8 cpu's in mpstat) at 99-100% sys, and then the other 2 cores would be 100% idle. If the scheduler would spread the load across the cores more evenly then perhaps more throughput could be achieved. To help smooth the results, all the numbers I've reported on the list are the average of 3 separate 5-minute long iperf runs. Btw, I'm also finding that the single threaded performance is crap with these cards on the 1Ghz T2000's - though with the 1.2Ghz T2000's or X4100, single threaded performance was slightly better (interestingly, the 8-core T2000's consitently stumbled w/ 3 threads): No. Threads Mbit/sec X4100->T2000T2000->X4100 T2000->T2000(8core/1.2Ghz) 1 944 2143 1686 2 18673988 1937 3 25584772 1897 4 31465096 3704 6 43688071 5934 8 54688282 6908 16 64729842 9311 32 65139893 9283 -devon Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:33:08 -0500 From: "Curtis Preston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Some info on my experiences with 10GbE To: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" This is another pro-T2000 report. What makes them special? --- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pancamo Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 11:43 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Some info on my experiences with 10GbE I just started testing 2 T2000's with dual 10Gbps SUN Nics directly connected to each other... I'm somewhat pissed that I'm only able to get about 658Mbps from one thread on the 10Gbps nic while I'm able to get 938Mbps using the onboard 1Gbs nic with when using the iperf default values. Which means in some cases the 10Gbit nic is actually slower than the onboard 1Gbit nic However, I was able to get 7.2 Gbps using 10 threads. Here are some of my max results with different thread (-P) values ./iperf -c 192.168.1.2 -f m -w 512K -l 512 -P x TCP Win Buffer Threads Gbps 512 512 1 1.4 512 512 2 2.5 512 512 4 4.3 512 512 6 6.4 512 512 8 6.1 512 512 10 7.2 512 512 15 4.6 512 512 18 3.6 512 512 20 3 512 512 30 2.5 512 512 60 2.3 Another annoying deal was that the results from iperf were not the same each time I ran the test. The results were as much as 3Gbps different from run to run. The results should be the same for each run. my /etc/system settings settings that I added as suggested by SUN set ddi_msix_alloc_limit=8 set ip:ip_soft_rings_cnt=8 set ip:ip_squeue_fanout=1 set ip:tcp_squeue_wput=1 set ip:ip_squeue_bind=0 set ipge:ipge_tx_syncq=1 set ipge:ipge_bcopy_thresh = 512 set ipge:ipge_dvma_thresh = 1 set consistent_coloring=2 set pcie:pcie_aer_ce_mask=0x1 Here are the NDD settings that I found here: http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/tnb/parameters.jsp#2 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_conn_req_max_q 16384 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_conn_req_max_q0 16384 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_max_buf 10485760 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_cwnd_max 10485760 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_xmit_hiwat 131072 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_recv_hiwat 131072 ndd -set /dev/nxge0 accept_jumbo 1 I also found information
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs
Hello Kevin If memory serves me, it is no longer suspended. You can also use the command nbpemreq -resume_scheduling To restore operations. In the long term it would be good if netbackup could have a more general interface to the scheduling functions. So one could suspend client schedules, or overhead job, like dups and db backups. Also I do not believe that this command will stop user backups such has rman. It would be nice if one could do that also. len From: Kevin Whittaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:16 PM To: Len Boyle; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Len, That worked great, but if I stop and start netbackup will it still be suspended? Kevin From: Len Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:32 AM To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Kevin, Try the command nbpemreq -suspend_scheduling len From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:59 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Ok, when I was on 5.1 I could change the behavior file to # of tries 0 and rereadconfig to allow NB to be running but no new jobs to kick off. But I could still submit jobs manually. When I went to 6.5, VERITAS told me to just stop the bprd daemon. Well, with that not running I can not submit jobs manually. Sometimes, I am working on the master server and bring up netbackup and don't want any jobs to run. Anybody have any ideas on how to do this? Kevin Whittaker Syniverse Technologies Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin Work: (813) 637-5502 Cell: (813) 810-6456 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs
Len, That worked great, but if I stop and start netbackup will it still be suspended? Kevin From: Len Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:32 AM To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Kevin, Try the command nbpemreq -suspend_scheduling len From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:59 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Ok, when I was on 5.1 I could change the behavior file to # of tries 0 and rereadconfig to allow NB to be running but no new jobs to kick off. But I could still submit jobs manually. When I went to 6.5, VERITAS told me to just stop the bprd daemon. Well, with that not running I can not submit jobs manually. Sometimes, I am working on the master server and bring up netbackup and don't want any jobs to run. Anybody have any ideas on how to do this? Kevin Whittaker Syniverse Technologies Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin Work: (813) 637-5502 Cell: (813) 810-6456 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup documentation written in French
A person posted in the Symantec forums requesting where he may get documentation for NetBackup written in French? Here is a link to that posted thread. If you can help him then please post a response at that link. https://forums.symantec.com/syment/board/message?board.id=21&message.id= 39945 Here is the text of his request: Bonjour je cherche de la documentation ou un support de cour en francais sur NETBackup qq un peut m'aider merci ham __ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs
Kevin, Try the command nbpemreq -suspend_scheduling len From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:59 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs Ok, when I was on 5.1 I could change the behavior file to # of tries 0 and rereadconfig to allow NB to be running but no new jobs to kick off. But I could still submit jobs manually. When I went to 6.5, VERITAS told me to just stop the bprd daemon. Well, with that not running I can not submit jobs manually. Sometimes, I am working on the master server and bring up netbackup and don't want any jobs to run. Anybody have any ideas on how to do this? Kevin Whittaker Syniverse Technologies Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin Work: (813) 637-5502 Cell: (813) 810-6456 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and holding Jobs
Ok, when I was on 5.1 I could change the behavior file to # of tries 0 and rereadconfig to allow NB to be running but no new jobs to kick off. But I could still submit jobs manually. When I went to 6.5, VERITAS told me to just stop the bprd daemon. Well, with that not running I can not submit jobs manually. Sometimes, I am working on the master server and bring up netbackup and don't want any jobs to run. Anybody have any ideas on how to do this? Kevin Whittaker Syniverse Technologies Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin Work: (813) 637-5502 Cell: (813) 810-6456 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Disk storage unit old lock files can they be deleted
HI Guys the site im working at has been having issues with its diskstorage unit.running out of space even though there is seemingly penty of disk available, I believe that this may be because the images on disk are not getting moved to tape in time. I have re jigged the schedule so that the migration to tape happens earlier (there was previously a multi hour delay between the two jobs). However during my investigation i have noticed what seems to be old lock files. does anyone know what is the purpose of these, why do they not get cleaned up and can they be deleted safely if not Were running nbu 6.0 mp 4 on solaris 10 cutdown listing below thanks 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1179493284_C1_F1.1179493284.lock -- 1 root root 0 May 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1179753436_C1_F1.1179753436.lock -- 1 root root 0 May 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1179754385_C1_F1.1179754385.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 4 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1180964051_C1_F1.1180964051.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 5 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1180966971_C1_F1.1180966971.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 6 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181136894_C1_F1.1181136894.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 7 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181223199_C1_F1.1181223199.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 7 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181223207_C1_F1.1181223207.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 7 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181224177_C1_F1.1181224177.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 13 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181742660_C1_F1.1181742660.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 14 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181743632_C1_F1.1181743632.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 14 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181828145_C1_F1.1181828145.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 14 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181828183_C1_F1.1181828183.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 14 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181829140_C1_F1.1181829140.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 16 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1181920574_C1_F1.1181920574.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 18 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182172766_C1_F1.1182172766.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182175724_C1_F1.1182175724.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182258133_C1_F1.1182258133.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182258136_C1_F1.1182258136.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182259071_C1_F1.1182259071.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182259135_C1_F1.1182259135.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182260077_C1_F1.1182260077.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182260091_C1_F1.1182260091.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182260104_C1_F1.1182260104.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 19 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182261020_C1_F1.1182261020.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 20 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182262036_C1_F1.1182262036.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 20 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182347461_C1_F1.1182347461.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182348448_C1_F1.1182348448.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182348460_C1_F1.1182348460.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182430933_C1_F1.1182430933.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182430942_C1_F1.1182430942.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182430945_C1_F1.1182430945.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182431878_C1_F1.1182431878.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182431914_C1_F1.1182431914.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182431922_C1_F1.1182431922.lock -- 1 root root 0 Jun 21 2007 lab-ex2k3-v1_1182432844_C1_F1.1182432844.lock +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
