Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)

[bob944]

> I am trying to setup a single exclusion list in Master/Media
> server.  So no need to do anything on the client side.
> 
> [...] 
> Please advise if I am doing wrong

You're not reading the manual.  That isn't how exclude/include lists
work.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)

[Harpreet SINGH]

Dear All,

Thanks for the quick feedback...

With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  :   (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   :(O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.




   
 "Donaldson, Mark" 
 To 
   "Harpreet SINGH"
 05/27/2009 06:18  ,  
 AM 
   ,   
   
cc 
   
   Subject 
   RE: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in
   Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)
   
   
   
   
   
   




Exclusion files are client-side only.  If you put one on the master
server, it doesn't function for the clients.

Certainly it's something we, the user community, have been requesting
for a very long time.

-M

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Harpreet
SINGH
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:56 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)


Dear All,

I am heaving a setup of 6 clients and one Master/Media server running on
Linux.

I am trying to setup a single exclusion list in Master/Media server.  So
no
need to do anything on the client side.

I have created the file /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list. In this file
/ncla/harp/harp1 I want to do backup of /ncla/harp all the files and
exclude harp1 folder.

Please advise if I am doing wrong. Here it is doing backup of /ncla/harp
and /ncla/harp/harp1

04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /
04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/1.dbf
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/2.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/3.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/4.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/5.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/
04:34:37.626 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5564_663896577.arc
04:34:38.185 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5565_663896577.arc
04:34:40.207 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5566_663896577.arc
04:34:41.237 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5567_663896577.arc
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa1

With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  :   (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   :(O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


ForwardSourceID:NT000E2CE2

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mai

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem

[Donaldson, Mark]

standard for my 6.5.3 install now are:
 
libacl.i386
libstdc++.i386
xinetd
 
(The last seems obvious but for some reason it's missing on half our
servers).



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jon
Bousselot
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:07 PM
To: Conner, Neil; Veritas List
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem


Try 'yum install libacl.i386'

Then it worked for me.




From: "Conner, Neil" 
To: Veritas List 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:23:08 PM
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem

Netbackup 6.5.3 on Solaris.  I'm well aware that Fedora is not a
supported client platform, but I'm trying to install the 6.5.3 binaries
anyway because this is what I was handed.

Client platform:
Linux client.mbari.org 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 11 01:16:59 EDT
2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I'm told this is a Fedora Core 5 64-bit install.  The client currently
has the 6.0 MP5 binaries installed and backups are successful.  Here is
the error I get when I run update_clients:

> /tmp/bp_inst.2143/tar: error while loading shared libraries:  
> libacl.so.1:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

The libacl.so.1 file does exist in the /lib64 directory but it is a link
to libacl.so.1.1.0.

Has anyone had any success in dealing with this?

Thanks,
Neil

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)

[Donaldson, Mark]

Exclusion files are client-side only.  If you put one on the master
server, it doesn't function for the clients.

Certainly it's something we, the user community, have been requesting
for a very long time.

-M 

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Harpreet
SINGH
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:56 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)


Dear All,

I am heaving a setup of 6 clients and one Master/Media server running on
Linux.

I am trying to setup a single exclusion list in Master/Media server.  So
no
need to do anything on the client side.

I have created the file /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list. In this file
/ncla/harp/harp1 I want to do backup of /ncla/harp all the files and
exclude harp1 folder.

Please advise if I am doing wrong. Here it is doing backup of /ncla/harp
and /ncla/harp/harp1

04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /
04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/1.dbf
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/2.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/3.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/4.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/5.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/
04:34:37.626 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5564_663896577.arc
04:34:38.185 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5565_663896577.arc
04:34:40.207 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5566_663896577.arc
04:34:41.237 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5567_663896577.arc
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa1

With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  :   (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   :(O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)

[Girish Jorapurkar]

Yes, the exclude file is specific to the machine where it is present. But you 
can "push" exclude file from master to various clients using bpsetconfig -e 
 command in 6.5.3. I am not sure if the command option is there in 
6.5.2.

/Girish

- Original Message 
From: "judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com" 
To: harpreet_si...@ctl.creative.com; VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU; 
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)

Can you explain how you are setting up a single exclusion list?

I was not aware that you can set up 1 exclusion list that applies to all
clients.  I thought each client has their own exclusion list.  And if
you set one up on the media server it is only for the backup of the
media server.

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Harpreet
SINGH
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:56 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)


Dear All,

I am heaving a setup of 6 clients and one Master/Media server running on
Linux.

I am trying to setup a single exclusion list in Master/Media server.  So
no
need to do anything on the client side.

I have created the file /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list. In this file
/ncla/harp/harp1 I want to do backup of /ncla/harp all the files and
exclude harp1 folder.

Please advise if I am doing wrong. Here it is doing backup of /ncla/harp
and /ncla/harp/harp1

04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /
04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/1.dbf
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/2.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/3.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/4.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/5.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/
04:34:37.626 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5564_663896577.arc
04:34:38.185 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5565_663896577.arc
04:34:40.207 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5566_663896577.arc
04:34:41.237 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5567_663896577.arc
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa1

With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  :   (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   :(O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



  
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] create log file on Backup exec client???

[men duffy]

our Backup Administrator recently change backup software from Veritas Net 
backup to Backup EXEC.  On netbackup, we can setup "bp.conf" file on agent and 
get backup log file on client (Redhat LINUX) under 
/usr/openv/netbackup/log/bpbkar.  In this way we know which files been backup 
and check backup successful or not.

After change to Backup Exec, we don't know how to setup it.  Does anyone know 
how to setup backup log on LINUX client?

Thanks.

_
Hotmail® goes with you. 
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Mobile1_052009___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)

[judy_hinchcliffe]

Can you explain how you are setting up a single exclusion list?

I was not aware that you can set up 1 exclusion list that applies to all
clients.  I thought each client has their own exclusion list.  And if
you set one up on the media server it is only for the backup of the
media server.

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Harpreet
SINGH
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:56 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)


Dear All,

I am heaving a setup of 6 clients and one Master/Media server running on
Linux.

I am trying to setup a single exclusion list in Master/Media server.  So
no
need to do anything on the client side.

I have created the file /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list. In this file
/ncla/harp/harp1 I want to do backup of /ncla/harp all the files and
exclude harp1 folder.

Please advise if I am doing wrong. Here it is doing backup of /ncla/harp
and /ncla/harp/harp1

04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /
04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/1.dbf
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/2.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/3.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/4.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/5.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/
04:34:37.626 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5564_663896577.arc
04:34:38.185 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5565_663896577.arc
04:34:40.207 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5566_663896577.arc
04:34:41.237 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5567_663896577.arc
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa1

With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  :   (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   :(O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem

[Jon Bousselot]

Try 'yum install libacl.i386'

Then it worked for me.





From: "Conner, Neil" 
To: Veritas List 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:23:08 PM
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem

Fedora client install problem Netbackup 6.5.3 on Solaris.  I’m well aware that 
Fedora is not a supported client platform, but I’m trying to install the 6.5.3 
binaries anyway because this is what I was handed.

Client platform:
Linux client.mbari.org 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 11 01:16:59 EDT 2006 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I’m told this is a Fedora Core 5 64-bit install.  The client currently has the 
6.0 MP5 binaries installed and backups are successful.  Here is the error I get 
when I run update_clients:

> /tmp/bp_inst.2143/tar: error while loading shared libraries:  
> libacl.so.1:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

The libacl.so.1 file does exist in the /lib64 directory but it is a link to 
libacl.so.1.1.0.

Has anyone had any success in dealing with this?

Thanks,
Neil___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem

[Conner, Neil]

Nope, just want to stay current.  Less to hassle with when 6.5.4 comes out
:-)


On 5/26/09 1:25 PM, "Nardello, John"  wrote:

> I have to ask - given that it's unsupported anyway, why upgrade if it's
> already working ?  Looking for a new feature ?
> - John Nardello
> 
> 
> From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Conner, Neil
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:23 PM
> To: Veritas List
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem
> 
> Netbackup 6.5.3 on Solaris.  I¹m well aware that Fedora is not a supported
> client platform, but I¹m trying to install the 6.5.3 binaries anyway because
> this is what I was handed.
> 
> Client platform:
> Linux client.mbari.org 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 11 01:16:59 EDT 2006
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> I¹m told this is a Fedora Core 5 64-bit install.  The client currently has the
> 6.0 MP5 binaries installed and backups are successful.  Here is the error I
> get when I run update_clients:
> 
>> > /tmp/bp_inst.2143/tar: error while loading shared libraries:
>> > libacl.so.1:
>> > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> 
> The libacl.so.1 file does exist in the /lib64 directory but it is a link to
> libacl.so.1.1.0.
> 
> Has anyone had any success in dealing with this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Neil
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)

[Harpreet SINGH]

Dear All,

I am heaving a setup of 6 clients and one Master/Media server running on
Linux.

I am trying to setup a single exclusion list in Master/Media server.  So no
need to do anything on the client side.

I have created the file /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list. In this file
/ncla/harp/harp1 I want to do backup of /ncla/harp all the files and
exclude harp1 folder.

Please advise if I am doing wrong. Here it is doing backup of /ncla/harp
and /ncla/harp/harp1

04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /
04:33:22.088 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/1.dbf
04:33:22.089 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/2.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/3.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/4.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/5.dbf
04:33:22.090 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/
04:34:37.626 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5564_663896577.arc
04:34:38.185 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5565_663896577.arc
04:34:40.207 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5566_663896577.arc
04:34:41.237 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile:
/ncla/harp/harp1/NCLA_1_5567_663896577.arc
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa
04:34:41.238 [21849] <4> bpbkar PrintFile: /ncla/harp/harp1/aa1

With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana

Phone  :   (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax   :(O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient,  any disclosure,  copying or distribution of the message,  or
any action taken by you in reliance on it,  is prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,  please delete it
and contact the sender immediately.  Thank you.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem

[Nardello, John]

I have to ask - given that it's unsupported anyway, why upgrade if it's
already working ?  Looking for a new feature ? 

- John Nardello




From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Conner,
Neil
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:23 PM
To: Veritas List
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem


Netbackup 6.5.3 on Solaris.  I'm well aware that Fedora is not a
supported client platform, but I'm trying to install the 6.5.3 binaries
anyway because this is what I was handed.

Client platform:
Linux client.mbari.org 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 11 01:16:59 EDT
2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I'm told this is a Fedora Core 5 64-bit install.  The client currently
has the 6.0 MP5 binaries installed and backups are successful.  Here is
the error I get when I run update_clients:

> /tmp/bp_inst.2143/tar: error while loading shared libraries:  
> libacl.so.1:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

The libacl.so.1 file does exist in the /lib64 directory but it is a link
to libacl.so.1.1.0.

Has anyone had any success in dealing with this?

Thanks,
Neil

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem

[Conner, Neil]

Netbackup 6.5.3 on Solaris.  I¹m well aware that Fedora is not a supported
client platform, but I¹m trying to install the 6.5.3 binaries anyway because
this is what I was handed.

Client platform:
Linux client.mbari.org 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 11 01:16:59 EDT 2006
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I¹m told this is a Fedora Core 5 64-bit install.  The client currently has
the 6.0 MP5 binaries installed and backups are successful.  Here is the
error I get when I run update_clients:

> /tmp/bp_inst.2143/tar: error while loading shared libraries:
> libacl.so.1:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

The libacl.so.1 file does exist in the /lib64 directory but it is a link to
libacl.so.1.1.0.

Has anyone had any success in dealing with this?

Thanks,
Neil

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers

[Wacko_Jacko]

Just add the Master Server to the Hosts file on the NOM server.

You may need to have the Authentication Agent installed on the Master server 
also. Check that this is installed.

W_J


Will Tucker wrote:
> My master server is Windows Server 2003 NBU 6.5 and I have setup NOM on
> a totally different server with the same OS and NBU 6.5 that can ping
> the master server, but I cannot add the master server to it.  Any ideas?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Will Tucker | Storage Administrator
> Enterprise Technology Services
> Manhattan Associates, Inc.
> 
> Direct +1 678.597.6644
> Mobile +1 770.590.5404
> wtucker < at > manh.com
> http://www.manh.com/
> _
> MOMENTUM 2009
> Evolve>Extend>COMPETE
> Optimizing Supply Chains in a Variable World.
> May 19-22, 2009 Las Vegas, NV
> Visit www.manh-momentum.com today and register early for best rates.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
> Wacko_Jacko
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:29 PM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> 
> I had the same issues. When you created the policy, did you use the
> policy creation wizard. If so I believe that is why the error 49
> occurred.
> 
> Try upgrading to 6.5.3 via liveupdate and creating a new policy without
> the wizard this time and setup the policy manually.
> 
> This worked for me!!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Wacko_Jacko
> 
> 
> judy_hinchcliffe wrote:
> 
> > Just and FYI
> > 
> > Had all servers working on 6.5.2a
> > 
> > When I went to 6.5.3 NONE of my 2008 servers would work, all failed
> > 
> with
> 
> > a 49.  Had to take them all back to 6.5.2a.
> > 
> > I Never been able to figure out why.
> > Then last Friday while I was working on it at 4 pm I failed with a 49,
> > at 4:30 pm backups worked.
> > I upgrade 5 more of my 2008 servers and they are all working on 6.5.3
> > now.
> > 
> > No idea why they failed, cannot find anybody who says they changed
> > anything that suddenly made them work.
> > 
> > 2008 just seems to be a little weird with 6.5.3
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> > [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
> > 
> Sweeney,
> 
> > Patrick
> > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:15 PM
> > To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> > 
> > I did.  On my 1 2008 server the backup ran for 4 days.  On the 5th day
> > bpbrm seemed to never hand off to bpcd and the parent job just hung
> > 
> out
> 
> > there, never spawning child jobs, and not allowing me to cancel it.
> > 
> > I reverted it back to 6.5.2a.  Lots of things it could have been, but
> > not any I have time enough to toy with.
> > 
> > Patrick Sweeney
> > (978) 787-4553
> > patrick.sweeney < at > axcelis.com
> > I.T. Systems/Networks
> > 
> > For issues requiring immediate attention please contact the Solution
> > Center
> > IT Solution Center
> > (978) 787-
> > Beverly.Helpdesk < at > axcelis.com
> > Axcelis Technologies
> > 
> > Have you searched here and here?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> > [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
> > 
> RyanV
> 
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:56 AM
> > To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> > Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> > 
> > 
> > Did you ever try the NBU 6.5.3.1 client?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> +--
> 
> > |This was sent by rvela < at > ercot.com via Backup Central.
> > |Forward SPAM to abuse < at > backupcentral.com.
> > 
> > 
> +--
> 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> > 
> > ___
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> > 
> 
> 
> +--
> |This was sent by trevor.jackson < at > cgi.com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse < at > backupcentral.com.
> +--
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/verit

Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM Issues

[judy_hinchcliffe]

Did you add the name of the nom sever to the 'other severs' list on the
master server?

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Will
Tucker
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:11 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NOM Issues

My master server is Windows Server 2003 NBU 6.5 and I have setup NOM on
a totally different server with the same OS and NBU 6.5 that can ping
the master server, but I cannot add the master server to it.  Any ideas?




Will Tucker | Storage Administrator
Enterprise Technology Services
Manhattan Associates, Inc.

Direct +1 678.597.6644
Mobile +1 770.590.5404
wtuc...@manh.com
http://www.manh.com/
_
MOMENTUM 2009
Evolve>Extend>COMPETE
Optimizing Supply Chains in a Variable World.
May 19-22, 2009 Las Vegas, NV
Visit www.manh-momentum.com today and register early for best rates.


-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Wacko_Jacko
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:29 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers


I had the same issues. When you created the policy, did you use the
policy creation wizard. If so I believe that is why the error 49
occurred.

Try upgrading to 6.5.3 via liveupdate and creating a new policy without
the wizard this time and setup the policy manually.

This worked for me!!

Thanks

Wacko_Jacko


judy_hinchcliffe wrote:
> Just and FYI
> 
> Had all servers working on 6.5.2a
> 
> When I went to 6.5.3 NONE of my 2008 servers would work, all failed
with
> a 49.  Had to take them all back to 6.5.2a.
> 
> I Never been able to figure out why.
> Then last Friday while I was working on it at 4 pm I failed with a 49,
> at 4:30 pm backups worked.
> I upgrade 5 more of my 2008 servers and they are all working on 6.5.3
> now.
> 
> No idea why they failed, cannot find anybody who says they changed
> anything that suddenly made them work.
> 
> 2008 just seems to be a little weird with 6.5.3
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Sweeney,
> Patrick
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:15 PM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> I did.  On my 1 2008 server the backup ran for 4 days.  On the 5th day
> bpbrm seemed to never hand off to bpcd and the parent job just hung
out
> there, never spawning child jobs, and not allowing me to cancel it.
> 
> I reverted it back to 6.5.2a.  Lots of things it could have been, but
> not any I have time enough to toy with.
> 
> Patrick Sweeney
> (978) 787-4553
> patrick.sweeney < at > axcelis.com
> I.T. Systems/Networks
> 
> For issues requiring immediate attention please contact the Solution
> Center
> IT Solution Center
> (978) 787-
> Beverly.Helpdesk < at > axcelis.com
> Axcelis Technologies
> 
> Have you searched here and here?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
RyanV
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:56 AM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> 
> Did you ever try the NBU 6.5.3.1 client?
> 
>
+--
> |This was sent by rvela < at > ercot.com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse < at > backupcentral.com.
>
+--
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


+--
|This was sent by trevor.jack...@cgi.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veri

Re: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers

[judy_hinchcliffe]

I have been fighting this issue for months.

Some of my 2008's work fine on 6.5.3.1 and some only work on 6.5.2a.

We have not been able to find out why.

I have a call open now and we are doing some detail investigation to
find out what is different between the servers that work and the ones
that don't.


-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Wacko_Jacko
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:29 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers


I had the same issues. When you created the policy, did you use the
policy creation wizard. If so I believe that is why the error 49
occurred.

Try upgrading to 6.5.3 via liveupdate and creating a new policy without
the wizard this time and setup the policy manually.

This worked for me!!

Thanks

Wacko_Jacko


judy_hinchcliffe wrote:
> Just and FYI
> 
> Had all servers working on 6.5.2a
> 
> When I went to 6.5.3 NONE of my 2008 servers would work, all failed
with
> a 49.  Had to take them all back to 6.5.2a.
> 
> I Never been able to figure out why.
> Then last Friday while I was working on it at 4 pm I failed with a 49,
> at 4:30 pm backups worked.
> I upgrade 5 more of my 2008 servers and they are all working on 6.5.3
> now.
> 
> No idea why they failed, cannot find anybody who says they changed
> anything that suddenly made them work.
> 
> 2008 just seems to be a little weird with 6.5.3
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Sweeney,
> Patrick
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:15 PM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> I did.  On my 1 2008 server the backup ran for 4 days.  On the 5th day
> bpbrm seemed to never hand off to bpcd and the parent job just hung
out
> there, never spawning child jobs, and not allowing me to cancel it.
> 
> I reverted it back to 6.5.2a.  Lots of things it could have been, but
> not any I have time enough to toy with.
> 
> Patrick Sweeney
> (978) 787-4553
> patrick.sweeney < at > axcelis.com
> I.T. Systems/Networks
> 
> For issues requiring immediate attention please contact the Solution
> Center
> IT Solution Center
> (978) 787-
> Beverly.Helpdesk < at > axcelis.com
> Axcelis Technologies
> 
> Have you searched here and here?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
RyanV
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:56 AM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> 
> Did you ever try the NBU 6.5.3.1 client?
> 
>
+--
> |This was sent by rvela < at > ercot.com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse < at > backupcentral.com.
>
+--
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


+--
|This was sent by trevor.jack...@cgi.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] NOM Issues

[Will Tucker]

My master server is Windows Server 2003 NBU 6.5 and I have setup NOM on
a totally different server with the same OS and NBU 6.5 that can ping
the master server, but I cannot add the master server to it.  Any ideas?




Will Tucker | Storage Administrator
Enterprise Technology Services
Manhattan Associates, Inc.

Direct +1 678.597.6644
Mobile +1 770.590.5404
wtuc...@manh.com
http://www.manh.com/
_
MOMENTUM 2009
Evolve>Extend>COMPETE
Optimizing Supply Chains in a Variable World.
May 19-22, 2009 Las Vegas, NV
Visit www.manh-momentum.com today and register early for best rates.


-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Wacko_Jacko
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:29 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers


I had the same issues. When you created the policy, did you use the
policy creation wizard. If so I believe that is why the error 49
occurred.

Try upgrading to 6.5.3 via liveupdate and creating a new policy without
the wizard this time and setup the policy manually.

This worked for me!!

Thanks

Wacko_Jacko


judy_hinchcliffe wrote:
> Just and FYI
> 
> Had all servers working on 6.5.2a
> 
> When I went to 6.5.3 NONE of my 2008 servers would work, all failed
with
> a 49.  Had to take them all back to 6.5.2a.
> 
> I Never been able to figure out why.
> Then last Friday while I was working on it at 4 pm I failed with a 49,
> at 4:30 pm backups worked.
> I upgrade 5 more of my 2008 servers and they are all working on 6.5.3
> now.
> 
> No idea why they failed, cannot find anybody who says they changed
> anything that suddenly made them work.
> 
> 2008 just seems to be a little weird with 6.5.3
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Sweeney,
> Patrick
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:15 PM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> I did.  On my 1 2008 server the backup ran for 4 days.  On the 5th day
> bpbrm seemed to never hand off to bpcd and the parent job just hung
out
> there, never spawning child jobs, and not allowing me to cancel it.
> 
> I reverted it back to 6.5.2a.  Lots of things it could have been, but
> not any I have time enough to toy with.
> 
> Patrick Sweeney
> (978) 787-4553
> patrick.sweeney < at > axcelis.com
> I.T. Systems/Networks
> 
> For issues requiring immediate attention please contact the Solution
> Center
> IT Solution Center
> (978) 787-
> Beverly.Helpdesk < at > axcelis.com
> Axcelis Technologies
> 
> Have you searched here and here?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
RyanV
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:56 AM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> 
> Did you ever try the NBU 6.5.3.1 client?
> 
>
+--
> |This was sent by rvela < at > ercot.com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse < at > backupcentral.com.
>
+--
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


+--
|This was sent by trevor.jack...@cgi.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers

[Wacko_Jacko]

I had the same issues. When you created the policy, did you use the policy 
creation wizard. If so I believe that is why the error 49 occurred.

Try upgrading to 6.5.3 via liveupdate and creating a new policy without the 
wizard this time and setup the policy manually.

This worked for me!!

Thanks

Wacko_Jacko


judy_hinchcliffe wrote:
> Just and FYI
> 
> Had all servers working on 6.5.2a
> 
> When I went to 6.5.3 NONE of my 2008 servers would work, all failed with
> a 49.  Had to take them all back to 6.5.2a.
> 
> I Never been able to figure out why.
> Then last Friday while I was working on it at 4 pm I failed with a 49,
> at 4:30 pm backups worked.
> I upgrade 5 more of my 2008 servers and they are all working on 6.5.3
> now.
> 
> No idea why they failed, cannot find anybody who says they changed
> anything that suddenly made them work.
> 
> 2008 just seems to be a little weird with 6.5.3
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of 
> Sweeney,
> Patrick
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:15 PM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> I did.  On my 1 2008 server the backup ran for 4 days.  On the 5th day
> bpbrm seemed to never hand off to bpcd and the parent job just hung out
> there, never spawning child jobs, and not allowing me to cancel it.
> 
> I reverted it back to 6.5.2a.  Lots of things it could have been, but
> not any I have time enough to toy with.
> 
> Patrick Sweeney
> (978) 787-4553
> patrick.sweeney < at > axcelis.com
> I.T. Systems/Networks
> 
> For issues requiring immediate attention please contact the Solution
> Center
> IT Solution Center
> (978) 787-
> Beverly.Helpdesk < at > axcelis.com
> Axcelis Technologies
> 
> Have you searched here and here?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of RyanV
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:56 AM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] issue with 6.5.3 and win 2008 servers
> 
> 
> Did you ever try the NBU 6.5.3.1 client?
> 
> +--
> |This was sent by rvela < at > ercot.com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse < at > backupcentral.com.
> +--
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


+--
|This was sent by trevor.jack...@cgi.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] sybase agent question

[Christopher Romano]

Hi...

 

I am trying to use the Netbackup Sybase Agent to backup a Sybase
dataserver, and have a few questions:

 

 

1)  In the sample script  they have:

#***


# Replace /usr/sybase12/scripts below with your actual path of the
Sybase files

#***


SYB_FILES_DIR=/usr/sybase12/scripts

/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bpbackup -c $SYB_FILES_POLICY $SYB_FILES_DIR

 

What is $SYB_FILES_DIR supposed to be set to...do I need to specify all
directories I want to backup?  Isn't passing a database name enough?

The example has this set to /usr/sybase12/scripts. Perhaps this is the
path to this script itself?

 

 

 

 

2)  Also in the sample script, they have $DATABASE_NAME= ...do I
really need to have 1 script per database?! The BA tells me there are
100+ databases on this one dataserver.

 

 

 

Thanks,

Chris Romano

IFS 

 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Sharepoint Status 1

[Martin, Jonathan]

 
Is SP02_SPS02 your Shared Service provider?  The Shared Services
Provider has a separate administrator group that is not the Farm
Administrators Group.  You might try adding your service account to that
SharePoint group.
 
-Jonathan



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Marianne
Van Den Berg
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:41 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Sharepoint Status 1



Hi All

 

Trying to config our 1st Sharepoint agent. Netbackup 6.5.3 on Master,
6.5.2a on client. 

Sharepoint 2003, Windows 2003.  No document level backup.

 

According to Sharepoint Admin, permissions have been granted as per
TechNote: http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/283976.htm

 

 

Backups fail with status 1. Details: 

26/05/2009 14:24:04 PM - started process bpbrm (5148)

26/05/2009 14:24:14 PM - Warning bpbrm(pid=4348) from client SP02: WRN -
can't open object: Microsoft SharePoint Resources:\Configuration DB
(SP02/SP02_SPS02_Config_db)\SP02_SPS02_Config_db (BEDS 0xE000FEA9: The
Backup Exec data store encountered a problem during the operation. See
the job log for details.)

...

26/05/2009 14:24:25 PM - Warning bpbrm(pid=4348) from client SP02: WRN -
can't open object: Microsoft SharePoint
Resources:\http://technologyct\Team DB 1
(SP02/STS_SP02_1709297175)\STS_SP02_1709297175 (BEDS 0xE000FEA9: The
Backup Exec data store encountered a problem during the operation. See
the job log for details.)

26/05/2009 14:24:34 PM - mounted; mount time: 00:00:23

26/05/2009 14:24:34 PM - positioning MP1014 to file 1

26/05/2009 14:24:42 PM - positioned MP1014; position time: 00:00:08

26/05/2009 14:24:42 PM - begin writing

26/05/2009 14:24:53 PM - end writing; write time: 00:00:11

the requested operation was partially successful(1)

 

 

 

Same error in logs. We are pretty confident that it's a permissions
problem, but have no idea how to proof this...

Also don't understand the Backup Exec errors - no BE on Sharepoint
server, only NBU.

 

Any ideas?

 

 

Kind Regards

 

Marianne 



This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and automatically
archived by Mimecast SA (Pty) Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service
(SaaS) for business. Mimecast Unified Email Management (tm) (UEM) offers
email continuity, security, archiving and compliance with all current
legislation. To find out more, contact StorTech
 . stormcid 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Successful Backup Report

[Donaldson, Mark]

Here's what I use.  I gives output that looks like below, totals by
client, then broken down by policy.  

Run it without options for a 24-hour report or specify a number of hours
on the command line to see greater depth.  Change the
"y...@yourdomain.com" at the top of the script for your mail address.  I
run it daily via cron.

=
## Report Start: Mon May 25 08:00:01 MDT 2009 for past 168 hours.

## General Statistics
Total Backup Jobs: 7249
Total Volume: 28.63 TB

## Backup totals by client

righthand = 1.2 GB
:   Unix_FS_DevTest_11.2 GB (2 jobs)
:Unix_FS_logs   18.4 MB (2 jobs)

dns1 = 298.4 MB
:  Unix_FS_Firewalled  216.4 MB (3 jobs)
:Unix_FS_logs   82.0 MB (2 jobs)

dns2 = 384.3 MB
:  Unix_FS_Firewalled  265.8 MB (3 jobs)
:Unix_FS_logs  118.5 MB (2 jobs)

server-tm-07 = 78.9 GB
:   NT_CO_Whs   78.9 GB (1 jobs) 

## Backup totals by policy

   Unix_FS_DevTest_1:  4.7 GB
   Unix_FS_DevTest_2: 10.6 GB
   Unix_FS_DevTest_3: 21.3 GB
  Unix_FS_Firewalled: 98.6 GB
Unix_FS_Firewalled_Tier1: 13.2 GB
  Unix_FS_Firewalled_Web:  1.9 GB
  Unix_FS_Prod_1:163.9 GB
  Unix_FS_Prod_2:145.6 GB





-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of NBU
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:49 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Successful Backup Report


Hi Forum,

I need a script that will give me successful backup figure during a
period of time for uniq clients.

Can anyone share the script or the procedure to do so pls.

+--
|This was sent by qureshiu...@rediffmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



rpt_client_totals
Description: rpt_client_totals
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

[Jimenez, Daniel]

If anyone has any other ideas on how I can resolve this issue, please shoot 
them out, right or wrong, thanks.

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team

From: Nardello, John [mailto:john.narde...@wamu.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:24 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

Make sure you remove any entry that looks like :

* ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL

=)

- John Nardello



From: Jimenez, Daniel [mailto:daniel.jime...@imb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:11 AM
To: Nardello, John; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues
John

I attempted a few variations on the information you sent below and just as my 
previous testing it doesn't seem to matter what is in the auth.conf file, it 
allows me full access. So there may be something larger causing the problem but 
unfortunately, not sure what it is.

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
From: Nardello, John [mailto:john.narde...@wamu.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:46 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

auth.conf syntax is :

domain\login 

For example :

MYDOMAIN\user1 ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL
MYDOMAIN\user2 ADMIN=AM+BPM+DM JBP=
Be aware that as of 6.5.2 I think it was, the domain has become case sensitive 
in the login screen. So if you have it capitalized in the auth.conf file, the 
users need to enter "MYDOMAIN\user1" as their user name.

- John Nardello



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jimenez, Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:40 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues
Hey guys

Has anyone been able to get the Java auth.conf file configured to work in an AD 
environment? I have made several modifications to the file, even going as far 
as removing all rights to my user but I can still access the Netbackup Java 
console without issue. I do have Administrator rights on the server but I was 
under the impression that the auth.conf would be able to bypass these 
permissions since it is specific to Netbackup? Any assistance would be 
appreciated, thanks.

Netbackup 6.5.3.1
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

[Jimenez, Daniel]

John

I removed that entry and then just kept my user in the file with "domain\user 
ADMIN=AM JBP=" so that I only have access to Activity Monitor but that still 
did not stop me from accessing every other part of the Java Console.

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team

From: Nardello, John [mailto:john.narde...@wamu.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:24 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

Make sure you remove any entry that looks like :

* ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL

=)

- John Nardello



From: Jimenez, Daniel [mailto:daniel.jime...@imb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:11 AM
To: Nardello, John; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues
John

I attempted a few variations on the information you sent below and just as my 
previous testing it doesn't seem to matter what is in the auth.conf file, it 
allows me full access. So there may be something larger causing the problem but 
unfortunately, not sure what it is.

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
From: Nardello, John [mailto:john.narde...@wamu.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:46 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

auth.conf syntax is :

domain\login 

For example :

MYDOMAIN\user1 ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL
MYDOMAIN\user2 ADMIN=AM+BPM+DM JBP=
Be aware that as of 6.5.2 I think it was, the domain has become case sensitive 
in the login screen. So if you have it capitalized in the auth.conf file, the 
users need to enter "MYDOMAIN\user1" as their user name.

- John Nardello



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jimenez, Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:40 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues
Hey guys

Has anyone been able to get the Java auth.conf file configured to work in an AD 
environment? I have made several modifications to the file, even going as far 
as removing all rights to my user but I can still access the Netbackup Java 
console without issue. I do have Administrator rights on the server but I was 
under the impression that the auth.conf would be able to bypass these 
permissions since it is specific to Netbackup? Any assistance would be 
appreciated, thanks.

Netbackup 6.5.3.1
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Sharepoint Status 1

[Marianne Van Den Berg]

Hi All

 

Trying to config our 1st Sharepoint agent. Netbackup 6.5.3 on Master,
6.5.2a on client. 

Sharepoint 2003, Windows 2003.  No document level backup.

 

According to Sharepoint Admin, permissions have been granted as per
TechNote: http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/283976.htm

 

 

Backups fail with status 1. Details: 

26/05/2009 14:24:04 PM - started process bpbrm (5148)

26/05/2009 14:24:14 PM - Warning bpbrm(pid=4348) from client SP02: WRN -
can't open object: Microsoft SharePoint Resources:\Configuration DB
(SP02/SP02_SPS02_Config_db)\SP02_SPS02_Config_db (BEDS 0xE000FEA9: The
Backup Exec data store encountered a problem during the operation. See
the job log for details.)

...

26/05/2009 14:24:25 PM - Warning bpbrm(pid=4348) from client SP02: WRN -
can't open object: Microsoft SharePoint
Resources:\http://technologyct\Team DB 1
(SP02/STS_SP02_1709297175)\STS_SP02_1709297175 (BEDS 0xE000FEA9: The
Backup Exec data store encountered a problem during the operation. See
the job log for details.)

26/05/2009 14:24:34 PM - mounted; mount time: 00:00:23

26/05/2009 14:24:34 PM - positioning MP1014 to file 1

26/05/2009 14:24:42 PM - positioned MP1014; position time: 00:00:08

26/05/2009 14:24:42 PM - begin writing

26/05/2009 14:24:53 PM - end writing; write time: 00:00:11

the requested operation was partially successful(1)

 

 

 

Same error in logs. We are pretty confident that it's a permissions
problem, but have no idea how to proof this...

Also don't understand the Backup Exec errors - no BE on Sharepoint
server, only NBU.

 

Any ideas?

 

 

Kind Regards

 

Marianne ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

[Nardello, John]

Make sure you remove any entry that looks like :
 
* ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL
 
=) 

- John Nardello

 



From: Jimenez, Daniel [mailto:daniel.jime...@imb.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:11 AM
To: Nardello, John; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues



John

 

I attempted a few variations on the information you sent below and just
as my previous testing it doesn't seem to matter what is in the
auth.conf file, it allows me full access. So there may be something
larger causing the problem but unfortunately, not sure what it is. 

 

Daniel Jimenez

Data Protection Team

From: Nardello, John [mailto:john.narde...@wamu.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:46 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

 

auth.conf syntax is :

 

domain\login 

 

For example : 

 

MYDOMAIN\user1 ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL
MYDOMAIN\user2 ADMIN=AM+BPM+DM JBP= 

Be aware that as of 6.5.2 I think it was, the domain has become case
sensitive in the login screen. So if you have it capitalized in the
auth.conf file, the users need to enter "MYDOMAIN\user1" as their user
name. 

 

- John Nardello

 

 



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jimenez,
Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:40 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

Hey guys

 

Has anyone been able to get the Java auth.conf file configured to work
in an AD environment? I have made several modifications to the file,
even going as far as removing all rights to my user but I can still
access the Netbackup Java console without issue. I do have Administrator
rights on the server but I was under the impression that the auth.conf
would be able to bypass these permissions since it is specific to
Netbackup? Any assistance would be appreciated, thanks. 

 

Netbackup 6.5.3.1

Windows 2003 Server Enterprise

 

Daniel Jimenez

Data Protection Team

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Successful Backup Report

[judy_hinchcliffe]

Here is my daily backup summary report script

I test for date, because on Monday morning I want to go back to 5 pm
last Friday and see the backups for all weekend.
The rest of the week I just go from 5 pm the night before.
This is run at 9 am each morning via cron.  
Adjust your time to include the hours you want reported.

This breaks them down according to Status Code.
So all that finished ok are in the Zero section, each client name only
showing once even if they have multi jobs.

I always do a scroll to the bottom to see the ones with errors.


rptdate=`cat /opt/openv/scripts/temp/date4dlyrpt`
mydate=`date +%w`
if [ $mydate == 1 ]
then
h=64
else
h=16
fi
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bperror -U -backstat -hoursago $h
-by_statcode> /opt/openv/scripts/temp/bksum.txt
mail -s "YourLocation Daily Backup Summary for $rptdate"
someonewhoca...@yourcompany.com  < /opt/openv/scripts/temp/bksum.txt
date '+%a %b %d %Y' > /opt/openv/scripts/temp/date4dlyrpt

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of NBU
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 1:18 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Successful Backup Report


if streaming is used then i will be getting duplicate clients enteries
in the report for single backup.

Hope u get my point.

+--
|This was sent by qureshiu...@rediffmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

[Jimenez, Daniel]

John

I attempted a few variations on the information you sent below and just as my 
previous testing it doesn't seem to matter what is in the auth.conf file, it 
allows me full access. So there may be something larger causing the problem but 
unfortunately, not sure what it is.

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
From: Nardello, John [mailto:john.narde...@wamu.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:46 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

auth.conf syntax is :

domain\login 

For example :

MYDOMAIN\user1 ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL
MYDOMAIN\user2 ADMIN=AM+BPM+DM JBP=
Be aware that as of 6.5.2 I think it was, the domain has become case sensitive 
in the login screen. So if you have it capitalized in the auth.conf file, the 
users need to enter "MYDOMAIN\user1" as their user name.

- John Nardello



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jimenez, Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:40 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues
Hey guys

Has anyone been able to get the Java auth.conf file configured to work in an AD 
environment? I have made several modifications to the file, even going as far 
as removing all rights to my user but I can still access the Netbackup Java 
console without issue. I do have Administrator rights on the server but I was 
under the impression that the auth.conf would be able to bypass these 
permissions since it is specific to Netbackup? Any assistance would be 
appreciated, thanks.

Netbackup 6.5.3.1
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

[Nardello, John]

auth.conf syntax is :
 
domain\login 
 
For example : 
 
MYDOMAIN\user1 ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL
MYDOMAIN\user2 ADMIN=AM+BPM+DM JBP= 

Be aware that as of 6.5.2 I think it was, the domain has become case
sensitive in the login screen. So if you have it capitalized in the
auth.conf file, the users need to enter "MYDOMAIN\user1" as their user
name. 
 
- John Nardello
 



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jimenez,
Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:40 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues



Hey guys

 

Has anyone been able to get the Java auth.conf file configured to work
in an AD environment? I have made several modifications to the file,
even going as far as removing all rights to my user but I can still
access the Netbackup Java console without issue. I do have Administrator
rights on the server but I was under the impression that the auth.conf
would be able to bypass these permissions since it is specific to
Netbackup? Any assistance would be appreciated, thanks. 

 

Netbackup 6.5.3.1

Windows 2003 Server Enterprise

 

Daniel Jimenez

Data Protection Team

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Java Console Issues

[Jimenez, Daniel]

Hey guys

Has anyone been able to get the Java auth.conf file configured to work in an AD 
environment? I have made several modifications to the file, even going as far 
as removing all rights to my user but I can still access the Netbackup Java 
console without issue. I do have Administrator rights on the server but I was 
under the impression that the auth.conf would be able to bypass these 
permissions since it is specific to Netbackup? Any assistance would be 
appreciated, thanks.

Netbackup 6.5.3.1
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise

Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fwd: Netbackup BMR Thoughts

[Bluejay]

>- It doesn't support restore to dissimilar hardware for Linux. 

We use a lot of RedHat and RedHat-clone distributions, and dissimilar 
hardware is no issue.

For DR we use a live CD with a NetBackup client on it and a script that 
handles all the grunt work. The worst we might have to do is build a new 
initrd file with drivers for the boot disk.

  - 
Bluejay Adametz
 
Resisting temptation is easier when you think you'll probably get another 
chance later on. 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu