Re: [Veritas-bu] drive is not ready or inoperable (277)

2009-12-17 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
Well I was using tpconfig -delete - drive x  where X was drive number on
Server.
Seems odd really. Must be a Windows feature :)



From: smpt [mailto:sm...@peppas.gr] 
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 6:51 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] drive is not ready or inoperable (277)



Another solution to this, If you cannot restart your master server is to
run the command  nbemmcmd -deletalldevices -mediaserver  . Then you
can run the wizard to auto discover the drives.

 

stefanos

 

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 7:54 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] drive is not ready or inoperable (277)

 

seems a restart of the master services sorted it. 
Not nice to do when you have critical backups running :-( 

TFN :) 

_ 
From:   WEAVER, Simon (external)  
Sent:   Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:29 PM 
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
Subject:drive is not ready or inoperable (277) 

hi all 
No idea why, but one San Media Servernow reports the above on 1 drive. 
Cannot bring it up ! 

re-run device config wizard, it can see all drives, completes the
wizard, but drive wont come up ! 
Any other suggestions? 

Windows device manager can see everything 
Thanks 

Regards 

Simon 

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential
and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any
attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its
content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments
from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this
email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
-o-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office:
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England

 


This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential
and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any
attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its
content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments
from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this
email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
-o-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office:
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP to basic disk

2009-12-17 Thread Spearman, David
I was finally able to get back to this problem. Apparently the job actually is 
running. On the NBU gui it appears that nothing is happening, no byte count, 
etc. However when I looked at the target drive itself the img files were there 
and growing, but extremely slow for an ndmp job.

The situation is this. We have a netapp on which we recently implemented the 
snapshot for exchange feature for our exchange2007 system. Since we require 3 
months of snapshots but don't have nearly enough space to leave them all there 
we want to back the snaps up to disk. So the snaps are on fibre attached netapp 
volumes and the ndmp job grabs the snap and is writing it to a basic disk. The 
basic disk is actually a 6TB GPT volume that is made up of  fibre attached 
netapp SATA space.

I also tried redirecting to another disk SATA space that is on a clarriion. 
Once again, extremely slow throughput. Directing the job to tape gives me more 
expected results.

David Spearman
County of Henrico, Va.

From: Nathan Kippen [mailto:nate.kip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:34 AM
To: Spearman, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP to basic disk

We are writing NDMP backups to disk.  We are doing 3-way backups ... NDMP sends 
data to media server, which then writes to disk.  We are running NB 6.5.4.  
That is odd you aren't getting any error messages .. Have you checked the VxUL 
logs?




On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Spearman, David 
sp...@co.henrico.va.usmailto:sp...@co.henrico.va.us wrote:
It was my understanding (and it was also noted in a Veritas white paper) that 
one could do an NDMP backup to basic disk starting with 6.5.2. We are running 
6.5.3 and will probably jump to 6.5.5 soon. Unfortunately when I try nothing 
happens. No error messages, no failures. Everything looks fine, the log says 
the job is writing, unfortunately not a single byte is ever written. The job 
just sits there forever until manually killed. Any thoughts?

David Spearman
County of henrico
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  
Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edumailto:Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Oracle Database Restore Problem

2009-12-17 Thread Adrian Soetanto
Dear all,

I have a problem when restoring the Oracle Database on AIX  Linux
clients.
The problem is related to privilege issue.

I used NetBackup client (Backup, Archive, and Restore), by running this
command on AIX (using Xmanager)  Linux: 
/usr/openv/netbackup/jbpSA 

I used the 'Oracle' restore type and the database to be restored has
been shown at the 'Directory Structure' of jbpSA, but I was unable to
drill-down/expand the database's tree.
When it asked for username (SYSDBA privilege), password  Net service
name (TNS Alias), I've tried to use the correct 'sys' userID  password
and TNS alias (I've double checked those entries with my system
administrator), but it's failed with this error message:
Oracle Connection:
ERR - Unable to connect to elodev. Error code = 12560

I've tried to run the jbpSA using root  oracle users, both resulted the
same error.
Since I got those error when I expanded the database tree, I can't run
the restore as well.

I've tried to test the 'sys' user within sqlplus command (logged on as a
root user), and it's failed with this error message:
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges

But, when I tried to logon using the oracle user, it was successful but
it's still failed when I run the restore using jbpSA.

Could you please help me solve this problem?
Since I'm a novice in Oracle DB, is there any guidance which I can refer
to?
If possible, please give me the step by step information about restoring
an Oracle Database to AIX  Linux platform.

FYI, both the NetBackup master  client (agent) use the same NetBackup
version, which is 6.5.4.

Thank you in advance.


--
Best Regards, 
  Adrian Soetanto
  PT. Bentoel Prima - Infrastructure Staff 
  Jl. Raya Karanglo - Singosari, Malang 
  Tel. (+62-341) 298 774 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Poor NBU Performance After setting Concurrent I/O mode on AIX

2009-12-17 Thread Simón Alejandro Franquiz
Hi Guys,

   We have an AIX SAN Media Server backing up a 8TB SAP-Oracle DB, normally
it takes 10 hours to go through but after we change the filesystems to a
Concurrent I/O mode (due to a SAP suggestion) the same backup takes about 22
hours.

   We have a case open with Symantec support. We have change the buffers
size and that sort of thing but it is not very helpful.

   We would like to know if changing the filesystems to a CIO mode is
impacting the backups and why?

   Thanks so much for take some time for us.

Regards,
-- 
SAF
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] FA for NetBackup 7

2009-12-17 Thread Robin Small
I saw this at the NetBackup site yesterday:

http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/336166.htm


Looks interesting.

Integrated dedupe and vStorage api support for VMware (there were more features 
listed, those two stood out for me).


~ Robin
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] SUMMARY: bprestore ignores -R rename_file

2009-12-17 Thread Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy
Many thanks to everyone who responded and especially to Stefanos.

Removing extra spaces around to in rename file resolved the problem.



=== original post ==
Dear List,
Happy Holidays to everyone.

Could you please point what I am doing wrong? Thank you.

NB 6.5.0 on RedHat 5.2

[r...@nbmaster5 ~]# bprestore -C usoracleprod001 -D usoracleqa001 -p
USORACLEPROD001 -s 11/07/2009 00:30 -e 11/07/2009 23:59 -L
/root/20091216_restore.log -R /root/20091216_rename_file
/rman_backup/current/usoracleprd/misc/sizing/db_size.txt
[r...@nbmaster5 ~]#
[r...@nbmaster5 ~]# cat /root/20091216_rename_file
change /rman_backup/current/usoracleprd/misc/sizing/db_size.txt  to
/restore/20091216/rman_backup/current/usoracleprd/misc/sizing/db_size.txt
[r...@nbmaster5 ~]#


Restore complets SUCC but goes to the original location ignoring -R option.

[r...@usoracleqa001 ~]# find /rman_backup/ -ls
3604498 drwxr-xr-x   3 oracle   oinstall 4096 Dec 17 00:14 /rman_backup/
3604508 drwxr-xr-x   3 oracle   oinstall 4096 Dec 17 00:14
/rman_backup/current
3604518 drwxr-xr-x   3 oracle   oinstall 4096 Dec 17 00:14
/rman_backup/current/usoracleprd
3604528 drwxr-xr-x   3 oracle   oinstall 4096 Dec 17 00:14
/rman_backup/current/usoracleprd/misc
3604538 drwxr-xr-x   2 oracle   oinstall 4096 Dec 17 00:14
/rman_backup/current/usoracleprd/misc/sizing
3604548 -rw-r--r--   1 oracle   oinstall  206 Nov  7 05:53
/rman_backup/current/usoracleprd/misc/sizing/db_size.txt
[r...@usoracleqa001 ~]#


Thank you,
Aleksandr
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Data Protection Advisor

2009-12-17 Thread Allen, Jimmy
Is anyone using Data Protection Advisor for Netbackup reporting?
**
 
This message may contain confidential or proprietary information intended only 
for the use of the 
addressee(s) named above or may contain information that is legally privileged. 
If you are 
not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the 
intended addressee, 
you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or copying 
this message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately 
notify us by  
replying to the message and delete the original message and any copies 
immediately thereafter. 

Thank you. 
**
 
FACLD

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] FA for NetBackup 7

2009-12-17 Thread smpt
Dedupe works really good. But be careful, it is not the solution for all
systems .

 

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Robin Small
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:44 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] FA for NetBackup 7

 

I saw this at the NetBackup site yesterday:

 

http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/336166.htm

 

 

Looks interesting.

 

Integrated dedupe and vStorage api support for VMware (there were more
features listed, those two stood out for me).

 

 

~ Robin

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] FA for NetBackup 7

2009-12-17 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:18 PM, smpt sm...@peppas.gr wrote:

  Dedupe works really good. But be careful, it is not the solution for all
 systems .


It's also not free.  You will pay for each terabyte of pre-duped data.

   .../Ed

Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas Netbackup Report Status by each mount point.

2009-12-17 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I don't have a script that'll do this - it's possible, I think but it'll
be a major pain to create.

You'll have to use bpimagelist to get the majority of the information,
it'll have the start  elapsed times (you can calculate end time) for
each image.  It'll also have the backupid for that image.

You could then use bpflist and that backupid to get a view of the backup
which occurred.  From that, if you sort to the shortest path (by subdir
count) you could then infer which filesystem was backed up by that
backupid.

Just quickly... here's the IMAGE record from a backup of mine:

IMAGE lp91 0 0 8 lp91_1261022563 Smaug_FS 0 *NULL* NetBackup Incr 1 3
1261022563 2742 1263700963 0 0 44557223 6643 1 29 0
Smaug_FS_1261022563_INCR.f *NULL* *NULL* 0 1 0 0 0 *NULL* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
*NULL* 0 0 0 *NULL* 586876 0 0 709075 0 0 *NULL* *NULL* 0 0

Buried in here are field for start time, elapsed time, etc.

Then you could cross-reference through bpflist:

bpflist -client lp91 -backupid lp91_1261022563 \
-policy Smaug_FS -d 12/15/2009 -rl 9 -option ONLY_DIRS \
| awk '{print $10}' |sort -r | tail

...and it returns...

/smaug/vol/documentum03/ap04_data_dcm/index/data/fulltext/
/smaug/vol/documentum03/ap04_data_dcm/index/data/
/smaug/vol/documentum03/ap04_data_dcm/index/

That last line is the top level of the files that were backed up.

It probably could be sorted better - use a field-count based on / as a
field separator.  Shortest field-count wins.

Something like this will print the smallest field-count based on a /
separator (replace the sort|tail with this):

awk -F'/' '{if(NR==1){f=NF;save=$0}
   else{if(NFf){f=NF;save=$0}}}
   END{print save}'


It's a starting point anyway.

-Mark


-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
harpreet_singh
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 6:24 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Veritas Netbackup Report Status by each mount
point.


Dear All,

Many thanks for contributing your scripts for various reports. I am ver.
6.5.4 on Red hat. Sorry to say could not find the report where I can
extract the backup details by each mount point.

My Majority backups are being done by multiple data Streams and
Multiplexing.

Not sure if possible I can get the report as

Job ID # Policy Name # Client Name # Mount Point # Start Time # End Time
# Elapsed Time# #MB backup # Backup Status etc... we want to charge to
other departments by the total size of backup. Not you if you want to
add some more.?

Example
Client   Type  Status  MediaSvr   Start_Time   End_Time
Elapsed  KilobytesFiles

aceaix1s Diff   0  ebsmaster  10/04/2004 00:11:07  10/04/2004
01:03:53   00:52:46651929  589
aceaix2s Diff   0  ebsmaster  10/04/2004 00:11:07  10/04/2004
00:59:42   00:48:35 27478   93
ams1an01pDiff   1  ebsmaster  10/04/2004 01:10:15  10/04/2004
01:26:16   00:16:01   3604735 3606
ams2an01pDiff   0  ebsmaster  10/04/2004 01:10:15  10/04/2004
01:21:32   00:11:17486168 2752
amsaix1d Diff   1  ebsmaster  10/04/2004 00:11:07  10/04/2004
01:03:18   00:52:11497548  166
amsaix1s Diff   0  ebsmaster  10/04/2004 00:11:07  10/04/2004
01:43:35   01:32:28   1795347 1473

As I am heaving a server with about 200 mount points. So I want to know
the status of each mount point.

Regards,

Harpreet

+--
|This was sent by harpreetra...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Netbackup

2009-12-17 Thread Koping Wang
Hi,
I am upgrading netbackup form 6.0.4 to 6.5.4. Everything goes smooth except one 
media server. Almost at the end of the upgrade I got this
---
Starting the NetBackup Remote Monitoring Management System.Starting the 
NetBackup Service Layer.Starting the NetBackup Service Monitor.
Could not obtain storage units : cannot connect on socket
ERROR upgrading disk staging storage 
units./usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/nb_updatedssu mayneed to be run 
separately to resolve the 
issue.
There is no staging storage unit on this media server or disk storage unit.
Now when I start netbackup on this media server, I only see ltid and vmd in MM 
Processes.

MM Processesroot  1193 1 16 15:48:55 ?5:49 
/usr/openv/volmgr/bin/ltidroot  1217 1  0 15:48:59 ?2:08 vmd
When I open up netbackup GUI, in Devices - media server, it shows the media 
server is offline.

Can any give me some hint?

Thanks
Koping



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Media server offline after upgrade to NBU6.5

2009-12-17 Thread Koping Wang
Sorry, I should put a better subject line. And  my OS is Solaris.


I am upgrading netbackup form 6.0.4 to 6.5.4. Everything goes smooth except one 
media server.

Almost at the end of the upgrade I got this
---
Starting the NetBackup Remote Monitoring Management System.
Starting the NetBackup Service Layer.
Starting the NetBackup Service Monitor.

Could not obtain storage units : cannot connect on socket
ERROR upgrading disk staging storage units.
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/nb_updatedssu mayneed to be run separately to 
resolve the issue.

There is no staging storage unit on this media server or disk storage unit.
Now when I start netbackup on this media server, I only see ltid and vmd in MM 
Processes.

MM Processes
root  1193 1 16 15:48:55 ?5:49 /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/ltid
root  1217 1  0 15:48:59 ?2:08  vmd

When I open up netbackup GUI, in Devices - media server, it shows the media 
server is offline.

Can any give me some hint?

Thanks
Koping




___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas Netbackup Report Status by each mount point.

2009-12-17 Thread A Darren Dunham
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 05:00:29PM -0700, Donaldson, Mark wrote:
 You'll have to use bpimagelist to get the majority of the information,
 it'll have the start  elapsed times (you can calculate end time) for
 each image.  It'll also have the backupid for that image.

I use this method for a backup checker that polls the catalog to see
what's been backed up.  Yeah a lot of work to create, but can be
powerful.

I'll fill in a couple of bits on my use of bpflist.

 You could then use bpflist and that backupid to get a view of the backup
 which occurred.  From that, if you sort to the shortest path (by subdir
 count) you could then infer which filesystem was backed up by that
 backupid.
 
 Just quickly... here's the IMAGE record from a backup of mine:
 
 IMAGE lp91 0 0 8 lp91_1261022563 Smaug_FS 0 *NULL* NetBackup Incr 1 3
 1261022563 2742 1263700963 0 0 44557223 6643 1 29 0
 Smaug_FS_1261022563_INCR.f *NULL* *NULL* 0 1 0 0 0 *NULL* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
 *NULL* 0 0 0 *NULL* 586876 0 0 709075 0 0 *NULL* *NULL* 0 0
 
 Buried in here are field for start time, elapsed time, etc.
 
 Then you could cross-reference through bpflist:
 
 bpflist -client lp91 -backupid lp91_1261022563 \
 -policy Smaug_FS -d 12/15/2009 -rl 9 -option ONLY_DIRS \
 | awk '{print $10}' |sort -r | tail

One thing about bpflist.  Once you have the backupid, you don't need the
dates (or the policy).  It makes you give a date argument, but you could
just toss in a random date in the past.

Also, I guess I'm just lucky, but when I look at my images via bpflist,
the top of the tree for all my devices is always the first entry.  So I
just read the first entry and toss the rest.  So far so good on NBU
standard clients and on Netapp NDMP jobs.

Only thing it doesn't work on in my environment is an Isilon filesystem.
That one doesn't necessarily record a file for the top of the tree on an
incr.  The file list only shows changed files which may be a couple of
levels below the requested point.

 /smaug/vol/documentum03/ap04_data_dcm/index/data/fulltext/
 /smaug/vol/documentum03/ap04_data_dcm/index/data/
 /smaug/vol/documentum03/ap04_data_dcm/index/
 
 That last line is the top level of the files that were backed up.
 
 It probably could be sorted better - use a field-count based on / as a
 field separator.  Shortest field-count wins.

Note that you've asked for all those files with the -rl 9 on your
command.  You could also run the command with -rl 1, -rl 2, ... until
something pops out.  I'm not sure that's any easier than postprocessing
the output, though.

If these are all standard backups, the -option FILESYSTEM_ONLY should
help isolate them.  But that option doesn't seem to help me with my NDMP
backups.  I still see all the files/dirs.

-- 
Darren
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] MS-Windows Synthetic problem with MSCS

2009-12-17 Thread David Stanaway
Okay,

so I have a problem with backing up MSCS clusters with ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES
backup selections.

The cluster nodes not holding the volume attempt to backup the volumes
and fail. This was easy enough to fix with policy specific client
exclusions, and these exclusions for the clustered volumes get skipped
correctly when backing up with Full, or Differential-Incremental
schedules, and images for those volumes don't get created.

The Synthetic Full schedule however errors out with the cluster volumes
with an exist status 671.

Is there something I am missing? The client exclusions are set up right
as they work for the other schedule types. Do the synthetics ignore the
exclusion lists since they are not touching the client system?

In Legato, the ALL backup selection skips volumes that are associated
with an MSCS cluster. Is there a policy specific way I can do the same
thing?

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] FA for NetBackup 7

2009-12-17 Thread Scott Jacobson


Ed,

Are you saying what seems to be "included" aswith thisupcoming release; animbedded feature and it will still cost?

Hmm, what else in v7.x will we look forward too with our wallet in hand.

Also, on this thread, de-dupe, works good, but not the solution for all systems - elaboration?
Thanks,
Scott
 Ed Wilts ewi...@ewilts.org 12/17/2009 1:45 PM 
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:18 PM, smpt sm...@peppas.gr wrote:



Dedupe works really good. But be careful, it is not the solution for all systems .
It's also not free. You will pay for each terabyte of pre-duped data/Ed

Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewi...@ewilts.org
Contact Me Linkedin ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu