Re: [Veritas-bu] Media Servers Per Tape Drive Ratio

2011-01-26 Thread William Brown
Now I would be asking the opposite question, how many tape drives per media 
server, based on the guidance I’ve seen somewhere about how many MHz of CPU are 
required to drive a tape, and how many MHz are required to handle each Ethernet 
port over which the data arrives.  There is a lot of wet finger as there is 
always a bottleneck somewhere, it is just very time consuming to chase them 
down.

Our older sites use SSO a lot and it is a bad thing as it was overused – 
servers wait many many hours for drives to come free, and can even wait 
mid-backup when they change tapes; NetBackup not unreasonably tries not to use 
the drive that is unloading for the next tape, but that means that a server 
changing tapes just joins the queue at the back.

Newer site there is no SSO; we have Sun T5220 media servers each with 4 x LTO4, 
2 on each of 2 x 4Gb/s fibres.  That is a theoretical bottleneck because if 
both drives are doing 2:1 compression we are over what a 4Gb/s fibre can do.  
We use disk staging to prevent the slow clients hogging drives, so all tape 
access is SLP duplications which run at at least 100MB/s.  The media servers 
are also FT media, so what would have been SAN Media Servers (big RAC systems) 
are SAN clients.  Much easier to manage, seems to run OK.  Hopefully no 
shoe-shining.

Doesn’t answer your question at all!  If you really do want to use SSO then it 
comes down to seeing how many hours each media server needs a drive, seeing if 
you can create backup windows that are as wide as possible, and fitting the 
hours you need a drive into the hours in the backup window.  Go above that and 
Status 196 will hurt you.

William D L Brown


This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] How Much Data Can Be Backed Up

2011-01-26 Thread William Brown
I’d agree with Ben, all you can really do is measure the ‘tape hours free’ and 
say what % busy your overall environment is.  You can I guess also see the 
total data moved in that backup window or 24 hour period, multiply the ‘% free’ 
by that and get an approximation at how much more data can be backed up with 
what you have.

Now of course it only really works if your environment is totally homogenous, 
for example there is only one storage unit/storage unit group or SLP for all 
backups, and underlying it is one media server or a pool of media servers.  All 
backups must be over the same speed of LAN….not many backup shops are like that.

Otherwise you will calculate you have free capacity, but actually it is all on 
one SAN media server that does not 100% use its tape drives, and the users 
(curse them!) will add the extra data somewhere quite else.

If you can move your architecture towards being able to load balance 
‘everything’ it will make your life easier.  Reporting tools like EMC DPA, 
OpsCenter Analytics etc can help you figure out where the capacity is and where 
the slowdowns are that can be addressed to sweat the assets more.

William D L Brown


This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Size buffers / Performance Tune on Ex2k3 with LTO4

2011-01-26 Thread bob944
 Just a quick question, but I used some default NetBackup settings to
 tune Exchange backups and restores.
 
 If I move to a different library with LTO4 (rather than LTO3), do I
 need to reconfigure the settings?
 Windows 2003 SAN Media Exchange, with Master Win2k3 SP2

Need?  No, unless there were tape driver (not NetBackup) settings
changes--which I haven't seen in years.  For NBU, since the maximum
transfer rate of the drive is now faster (and LTO4s vary transport
speed to make up for slower transfer rates rather than stop/back
up/resume when the host can't keep up), you may want to revisit the
bptm logs to see if buffer tuning is indicated.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Media Servers Per Tape Drive Ratio

2011-01-26 Thread bob944
 How do you determine how many media servers per tape drive in your
 environments?  I have 10 LTO3 tape drives and have been using 2
 media servers per tape drive.  Thank you.

I read this question differently than others who responded.  In case
the question related to SSO, recent NetBackup versions (6.5 and higher
IIRC) reduced the traffic among media servers sharing a drive, making
it practical to have more media servers sharing more drives reliably.
A dozen media servers sharing four LTO4s certainly works; I don't know
what the practical maximum would be.

Note:  the more of your media servers that are Windows, the more
problems you will have (RSM, HBA drivers, network comms for SSO, ...).


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Screencast Demonstration Video Series

2011-01-26 Thread Ken Schonberg
Introducing the NetBackup Screencast Demonstration Video Series

The NetBackup Screencast Demonstration Videos are a group of short videos 
designed to demonstrate specific functions and procedures within NetBackup. 
They have been produced by Symantec NetBackup Product Support to help you get 
the most out of your NetBackup environment.

The initial focus of the NetBackup Screencast Demo Video series is the 
NetBackup Agent for Microsoft Exchange.  Thirty-four videos have been produced 
detailing a variety of topics including:

 *   How to configure various backup scenarios for Exchange within NetBackup 
(such as DAG backups, CCR backups, etc.)
 *   How to perform various restore scenarios for Exchange within NetBackup (to 
RSGs, Alternate clients, etc.)
 *   Special topics such as Exclude list usage
 *   Troubleshooting NetBackup Exchange backup and restore issues

To see the entire list of videos, please check out this TechNote:

VIDEO: NetBackup Support Screencast Demo - list of available videos
 http://symantec.com/docs/HOWTO41825

We would appreciate any feedback you have on these videos - to do so submit 
article ratings using the Rate this Article feedback box included in the 
rightmost column of every article in our knowledge base.



Thanks,



Symantec NetBackup Support
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] tool for backup-windows

2011-01-26 Thread Peter Wuckel

hello,looking for a tool to see the backup-windows of all policies/schedules in one "picture" / "excel-sheet" ...any ideas?thx in advancepete
Neu: WEB.DE De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!  Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: https://produkte.web.de/go/demail02

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] tool for backup-windows

2011-01-26 Thread Nate Sanders
Hah yeah, me too. Blows my mind there still isn't a way to do this in
the program.


On 01/26/2011 02:13 PM, Peter Wuckel wrote:
  hello,

 looking for a tool to see the backup-windows of all policies/schedules
 in one picture / excel-sheet ...

 any ideas?

 thx in advance
 pete
   

 Neu: WEB.DE De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
 Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: *https://produkte.web.de/go/demail02*


-- 
Nate SandersDigital Motorworks
System Administrator  (512) 692 - 1038




This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

2011-01-26 Thread James Yaple
We are considering a new OS platform for our Netbackup media servers at
$WORK.

 

The current platform is Solaris on SPARC, the consideration is going to
Solaris on x86.

 

Is this a good idea?  Is the conversion from Solaris SPARC to x86 more or
less effort than a completely separate platform, say Redhat Linux?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

James

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Question about media server OS - Solaris on x86?

2011-01-26 Thread William Brown
We 'engineered' - as in wrote the required internal docs - for Solaris x86 a 
few years back. We found no internal users wanting it.  If their s/w was ported 
to x86 it was to Windows or Linux, not Solaris.  We dropped support.

BUT I read on this group of people who converted their RHEL media servers to 
Solaris x86 just to use ZFS and got a big performance boost compared to staging 
to EXT3.

So it does depend on what you need.  What I would say since Ora¢le took over is 
to check carefully the ¢ost.  It is emphatically not the same as Sun according 
to others on the Sun Managers group.  Another aspect  is your in-house 
knowledge; we have a number of staff with many years Solaris knowledge and a 
few staff with a few years RHEL knowledge; that delta has a cost.

You have to weigh these up.   I  would also be interested to see what others on 
this forum who are Sun SPARC users think about the future.

William D L Brown


This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Question re iSCSI tape library serverless iSCSI staging

2011-01-26 Thread taurusgeo
Hello folks, I wonder if anybody has experience with iSCSI tape library in a 
similar setup as per below:
The backup setup configured is D-2D-2T and the first 2D - backup Disk Storage 
Unit located on iSCSI SAN connected to backup server via iSCSI. By adding iSCSI 
enabled tape library, is it possible to configure NetBackup to do a 
serverless  disk staging to tape via iSCSI? i.e. scheduled disk staging 
process from ISCSI SAN (disk STU) will move data directly to ISCSI Tape library 
WITHOUT sending data flow input/output through iSCSI network card on backup 
server, only metadata goes to backup server? If this configuration is possible, 
what type of license/feature may be required? Thanks all
George

+--
|This was sent by glav...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu