[Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain

2011-02-16 Thread mitch808
PureDisk is def cheaper up front.  However, dedupe rates and ingest performance 
are no where near what a DD box can do.
Factor in also, if you did you "Older," servers, what is the 3,4, and 5 yr 
maintenance costs on that, for those servers?  Not to mention the storage.

IMO, while a higher up front cost with DD, the long term TCO would be lower.
Sometimes cheaper and "good enough," are not enough.

+--
|This was sent by mnab...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain

2011-02-16 Thread Lightner, Jeff
And some just go to third party support companies and don't spend
capital on backup solutions until they absolutely have to do so.   For
many organizations backups are deemed "unimportant" by the powers that
be until the day they need to restore something.

 

Having worked for various organizations I can say that some are very
proactive in this area and others won't contemplate buying new backup
technology until the old stuff dies completely or at least appears ready
for imminent collapse.   I doubt you know who "most" firms do it
personally.

 



From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sesar,
Steven L.
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:13 PM
To: Marelas, Peter; Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain

 

Most firms I'm aware of re-capitalize gear every 3-5 years, in order to
avoid paying out-of-warrantee maintenance.

 

 

===

   Steven L. Sesar
   Data Storage Architect
   UNIX Application Services R101
   The MITRE Corporation
   202 Burlington Road - MS K101
   Bedford, MA 01730
   tel: (781) 271-7702
   fax: (781) 271-2600
   mobile: (617) 519-8933
   email: sse...@mitre.org 

===

 

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Marelas,
Peter
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 5:40 PM
To: Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain

 

I don't buy that rational. How often do you think you are going to turn
over an appliance? It is more likely you will add to the pool of
appliances. I know we have never turned over a VTL and only now we are
replacing them with DD's. 

 

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 3:46 AM
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain

 

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Fred M <77fre...@gmail.com> wrote:

My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk and DataDomain for
de-duplication. 

 

One of the selling advantages of the PureDisk appliances is that you
only buy the de-dupe licenses once.  All hardware eventually gets old.
When that happens, you can buy another PureDisk appliance and re-use
your existing de-dupe licenses.  You could build your own appliance with
off-the-shelf hardware and re-use the licenses.  With a DD, when you
upgrade the hardware, you're re-buying the software again since the
prices are not separate.

 

When you're doing the cost comparisons, factor in not only the initial
purchase but also subsequent purchases.

 

I despise per-TB licenses too (as somebody else pointed out),  If I had
a choice, I wouldn't buy them and would tend to avoid the PureDisk
licensing model specifically for this reason.

 

   .../Ed
 
Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Celerra backups

2011-02-16 Thread X_S
we have about 8 data movers with about 100TB of data.  we're presently using 
netbackup and ndmp to back these up over fibre to LTO4 tape drives.  i would 
like to back this up to a data domain box (10Gb nics) but am looking for ideas 
for the fastest and/or best way to get this data to data domain.  i would 
appreciate any help.  thanks.

+--
|This was sent by xsp...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain

2011-02-16 Thread Sesar, Steven L.
Most firms I'm aware of re-capitalize gear every 3-5 years, in order to
avoid paying out-of-warrantee maintenance.

 

 

===

   Steven L. Sesar
   Data Storage Architect
   UNIX Application Services R101
   The MITRE Corporation
   202 Burlington Road - MS K101
   Bedford, MA 01730
   tel: (781) 271-7702
   fax: (781) 271-2600
   mobile: (617) 519-8933
   email: sse...@mitre.org 

===

 

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Marelas,
Peter
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 5:40 PM
To: Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain

 

I don't buy that rational. How often do you think you are going to turn over
an appliance? It is more likely you will add to the pool of appliances. I
know we have never turned over a VTL and only now we are replacing them with
DD's. 

 

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 3:46 AM
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain

 

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Fred M <77fre...@gmail.com> wrote:

My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk and DataDomain for
de-duplication. 

 

One of the selling advantages of the PureDisk appliances is that you only
buy the de-dupe licenses once.  All hardware eventually gets old.  When that
happens, you can buy another PureDisk appliance and re-use your existing
de-dupe licenses.  You could build your own appliance with off-the-shelf
hardware and re-use the licenses.  With a DD, when you upgrade the hardware,
you're re-buying the software again since the prices are not separate.

 

When you're doing the cost comparisons, factor in not only the initial
purchase but also subsequent purchases.

 

I despise per-TB licenses too (as somebody else pointed out),  If I had a
choice, I wouldn't buy them and would tend to avoid the PureDisk licensing
model specifically for this reason.

 

   .../Ed

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Client install download of 5.1 MP6 or 7

2011-02-16 Thread Marianne Van Den Berg

MP6 patch can be downloaded here: http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH49986

Base NBU Client software must be downloaded from FileConnect: 
https://fileconnect.symantec.com/

If you have a Unix master, you should be able to install the patch on the 
master (provided you have loaded the Linux client software) and then push to 
the client.

Regards

M.

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of fredsharky
Sent: 15 February 2011 09:50 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Client install download of 5.1 MP6 or 7

I need to find a place to download a copy of Netbackup Client 5.1MP6 or 7

We are in need of one ASAP. 

We having o load on a RH 5 box.

Any help would greatly be appreciated and keep the snickering to a minimum 
please  :D

+--
|This was sent by fwa...@acxiom.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu