Re: [Veritas-bu] exclude_list - exclude core file but not core directory

2011-08-28 Thread Anurag Sharma

Dave,
 
To exclude all files with a given name, regardless of their directory path, 
just enter the name without a preceding slash. For example: "example" rather 
than "/example" 
 
Here is an example *exclude_list* 
 
 
---
 
 
 
# this is a comment line
/tmp/example/dir/all
/tmp/example/dir2only/
/usr/home/*/all_tmp
/*/all_temp
core
 
--
 
Anurag 
 

> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:31:28 -0500
> From: da...@graniteweb.com
> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] exclude_list - exclude core file but not core directory
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm dealing with exclude_list for the umteenth time, and stumbled into a
> classic problem.
> 
> The examples in the docs have always shown excluding "core", which
> excludes all core files AND core directories. Because of how you define
> things, it is possible to exclude just directories by appending / (e.g.,
> core/), but there is no corresponding way that I can find to exclude
> ONLY files named core.
> 
> I can more or less accomplish what I need to by using an include_list
> that contains "core/", but this will obviously add processing overhead
> because it's going to build the initial list, drop excluded stuff, then
> go back through all the excluded directories and look for all
> directories named "core". I especially don't want the include list to
> go back and re-add any core directories under other directories that I
> have also excluded.
> 
> For example:
> exclude_list:
> core
> /dev
> /sys
> /mnt/auto
> /var/mqm/
> /u[0-9]*/
> 
> If I have an include_list that looks like this:
> core/
> 
> It will pick up any directories named core under:
> /dev
> /sys
> /mnt/auto
> /var/mqm/
> /u[0-9]*/
> 
> Which I do NOT want it to do.
> 
> 
> Does anyone know if it's possible to define JUST files named core in the
> exclude_list, so that an include_list is not necessary? If an
> include_list is the only way to do it, is it possible to avoid the
> re-adding under the directories I _do_ want to exclude?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> David Rock
> dave...@graniteweb.com
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
  ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] exclude_list - exclude core file but not core directory

2011-08-28 Thread David Rock
Hello,

I'm dealing with exclude_list for the umteenth time, and stumbled into a
classic problem.

The examples in the docs have always shown excluding "core", which
excludes all core files AND core directories.  Because of how you define
things, it is possible to exclude just directories by appending / (e.g.,
core/), but there is no corresponding way that I can find to exclude
ONLY files named core.

I can more or less accomplish what I need to by using an include_list
that contains "core/", but this will obviously add processing overhead
because it's going to build the initial list, drop excluded stuff, then
go back through all the excluded directories and look for all
directories named "core".  I especially don't want the include list to
go back and re-add any core directories under other directories that I
have also excluded.

For example:
exclude_list:
core
/dev
/sys
/mnt/auto
/var/mqm/
/u[0-9]*/

If I have an include_list that looks like this:
core/

It will pick up any directories named core under:
/dev
/sys
/mnt/auto
/var/mqm/
/u[0-9]*/

Which I do NOT want it to do.


Does anyone know if it's possible to define JUST files named core in the
exclude_list, so that an include_list is not necessary?  If an
include_list is the only way to do it, is it possible to avoid the
re-adding under the directories I _do_ want to exclude?

Thanks.

-- 
David Rock
dave...@graniteweb.com
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Warning Beta 7.5 OpsCenter

2011-08-28 Thread Dave
Symantec has never, ever supported upgrading anything to beta. Beta is a
chance to preview the new software on a new system. Upgrades are not
supported. I thought this was pointed out in the Beta Primer but I could be
wrong. 

Never, ever install beta software in production (obviously). 

dave

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WALLEBROEK
Bart
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:38 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Warning Beta 7.5 OpsCenter

Just a small warning when you try to upgrade OpsCenter to 7.5 (beta 1).

The upgrade wiped out our existing db and also crashed after the
installation (a clean install works).

I know this is only a beta 1 version but still.  An installation, even an
upgrade, should work before making it (beta) available.

A case has been opened with Symantec support.

Best Regards,
Bart WALLEBROEK
Backup Admin & Systems & Applications Management & Support Specialist
Enterprise Applications Delivery - Infrastructure Management S.W.I.F.T. SCRL
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu