Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7.1.0.3
If you are in a CPU dense, memory lean environment, the vSphere Enterprise for >6 core CPUs is a good reason. Similar for SRM. I'm awaiting 7.1.0.3 to get fully baked to test/deploy myself. On 12/20/2011 11:16 AM, . . wrote: Anyone else being pressured to upgrade to 7.1.0.3 to support vSphere5 or Exchange 2010 SP2? I tried looking through the release notes, but I can't find exactly what 7.1.0.3 won't support. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere it was clustered datastores and the new filesystem. Is there a restriction with hardware level 8? I'm not sure why our VMware folks are itching to upgrade, since the only new filesystem advantage I see is datastores > that 2 TB? I would be nice if we can have a list of what works and what doesn't with regards to vSphere 5 and the 7.1.0.3 release. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7.1.0.3
Only speaking for myself here, but we're looking at vSphere 5 for VMs with > 8 vCPUS (cores.) I believe someone from Symantec posted here a few weeks ago that vSphere 5 was supported with the same functionality as vSphere 4 but that new functionality required 7.1.0.3. Do you know what this new functionality is (if any?) I could be mistaken. -J From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of . . Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:16 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7.1.0.3 Anyone else being pressured to upgrade to 7.1.0.3 to support vSphere5 or Exchange 2010 SP2? I tried looking through the release notes, but I can't find exactly what 7.1.0.3 won't support. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere it was clustered datastores and the new filesystem. Is there a restriction with hardware level 8? I'm not sure why our VMware folks are itching to upgrade, since the only new filesystem advantage I see is datastores > that 2 TB? I would be nice if we can have a list of what works and what doesn't with regards to vSphere 5 and the 7.1.0.3 release. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 7.1.0.3
Anyone else being pressured to upgrade to 7.1.0.3 to support vSphere5 or Exchange 2010 SP2? I tried looking through the release notes, but I can't find exactly what 7.1.0.3 won't support. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere it was clustered datastores and the new filesystem. Is there a restriction with hardware level 8? I'm not sure why our VMware folks are itching to upgrade, since the only new filesystem advantage I see is datastores > that 2 TB? I would be nice if we can have a list of what works and what doesn't with regards to vSphere 5 and the 7.1.0.3 release. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBAC Setupclient 17-open pipe failed
C:\Program Files\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin>bpnbaz -SetupClient ..zzz Gathering configuration information. looking for ..zzz Specify password for pre 7.0 hosts: Setting up NBAC on target host: ..zzz bpcd on the target host '..zzz' failed to generate credential s. bprd failed while attempting to configure NBAC on target host 'dk01sne001.scsupp ort.int', error code: 17-pipe open failed. The file: SetupClient.nbac has been updated in the current directory with result s of this operation The configuration of some target hosts did not complete. Please check your log f or more details. As the ..zzz client is in another subnet than the main part of our clients I suspect it might something blocked in the firewall Has somebody experienced this error before ? Regards Michael ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
