Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

2014-01-31 Thread Anurag Sharma
Sunit

DDBOOST on FC not possible. 

Do FC if you want VTL deployments.

DDBOOST works at high speed on 10g network.

So it depends what you have if you can have 10g connectivity between media 
servers and DD then go for DDBOOST

else go fibre with VTL implementation

Also you can not use one DD device as VTL and DDBOOST at the same time.

Anurag

Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:58:33 +1100
From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com
To: sunilgulati1...@gmail.com
CC: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,

Hi Sunil,
I believe you can use DD Boost over FC between media server and DD. With 
NetWorker you can use ClientDirect with FC, too if memory serves me well.

However, DDs can't replicate over FC atm, you have to use 1 or 10 gig links to 
replicate data. 
Of course you need DD OS 5.4+, DD Boost plug-in 2.6+ and NBU 7.6. Don't forget 
to check your FC infrastructure with EMC for DD Boost over FC compatibility. 
EMC pre-sales should pass your configuration through a qualification process, 
in theory.

Best regards, Mikhail


On 27/01/2014 8:46 pm, "Sunil Gulati"  wrote:

Hello, Can we use DDboost feature over FC ? Like I have production and a DR 
site in my environment. I have data domain & netbackup media servers at both 
location. I have kept tape library at my primary site for tape outs.

 I want to use SLP which will run 4 backup jobs  (Backup, Replication, Import & 
duplication) means I'll be replicating my backup images from production site to 
DR site using DDboost. 

I want to know if I can use the same over FC ?  Thanks Sunil  

___

Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu




___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu   
  ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Splitting NetBackup Domain to Two

2014-01-31 Thread Anurag Sharma
Mike,

Thank you for detailed response.

At the time of running nbdecomission on mediaB I will move the references to 
mediaA for future restores in order to determine the tape labels for the 
restores.

For the existing tapes in the library at mediaB I will move all of them to to 
DONOTOVERWRITE custom pool or simply ship them to iron mountain where most of 
our tapes are as of now.

I am not so sure about AIR as of now coz we are using falconstor for dedupe 
don't know if that supports that I heard as of now its supported on NBU 
appliance and PDDO only . How air you doing AIR in your setup ?


Anurag 



From: michael.f.lave...@abbott.com
To: sharma.anu...@hotmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; 
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
CC: michael.f.lave...@abbott.com
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Splitting NetBackup Domain to Two
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:17:02 +









If you are going to do this, and size the media server at site B appropriately, 
then…
 
Set up each as Auto Image Replication sites for each other.  You have VTL at 
both sites, so you should be able to replicate.
Don’t be afraid to fund an additional media server for domain B.
 
Hopefully, the OS for existing & prospective master are the same.  The server 
hardware base should be similar, but not on the identical refresh schedule (you
 don’t want to have to refresh both in the same year).
 
I’m assuming you have WAN stability problems and are fed up with it.  We have 
five NetBackup domains within 40 miles on the map around the San Francisco Bay
 area.  We’ve gone thru fission and fusion.  From the Central Time Zone, it 
makes so much sense to consolidate to one domain with media servers and storage 
units in each data center.  From an operational stability standpoint, 5 nights 
of failed backups a month
 because of the WAN is not tolerable.
Try to manage both domains as if they were the same domain.  Use the same 
naming conventions for policies, storage units, etc…
 
The biggest operational challenge is turning domain B on.  Media handling is 
the biggest issue.  Give the media owned by media/master B to media for A so you
 can track it.  Physical tape is easy.  VTL “tapes” are less so.  You are going 
to be able to import the tapes into domain B once you get the B master created. 
 It’s starting from scratch.  The media known in domain A is essentially for a 
working list retained
 so you can use it to complete and verify your imports into domain B.
 
Good luck.
 


From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]
On Behalf Of Anurag Sharma

Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 3:07 PM

To: veritas-bu; veritas-bu2

Subject: [Veritas-bu] Splitting NetBackup Domain to Two


 

Experts,








This is the current setup 
 
1 Master server at SITE A
 
2 Media servers  out of which 1 at SITE A 1 at SITE B
 
I would like to separate SITE A and SITE B so that I do not have dependency on 
only one Master server which is a single point of failure , so basically I am 
looking at upgrading SITE B media server as Master server.
 
 
 
We have separate VTL and Tape Library at each site.
 
VTL Zoning and Tape Library Zoning already done on SITE B media server.
 
In my mind it is just upgrading the binaries re adding the devices and pointing 
the clients to new master server for new backups and still doing restores from 
the old master servers for older data. Is there anything
 I am missing.?
 
If anyone has done it please share.
 
 
Anurag 

  ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Splitting NetBackup Domain to Two

2014-01-31 Thread Lavelle, Michael F
If you are going to do this, and size the media server at site B appropriately, 
then...

Set up each as Auto Image Replication sites for each other.  You have VTL at 
both sites, so you should be able to replicate.
Don't be afraid to fund an additional media server for domain B.

Hopefully, the OS for existing & prospective master are the same.  The server 
hardware base should be similar, but not on the identical refresh schedule (you 
don't want to have to refresh both in the same year).

I'm assuming you have WAN stability problems and are fed up with it.  We have 
five NetBackup domains within 40 miles on the map around the San Francisco Bay 
area.  We've gone thru fission and fusion.  From the Central Time Zone, it 
makes so much sense to consolidate to one domain with media servers and storage 
units in each data center.  From an operational stability standpoint, 5 nights 
of failed backups a month because of the WAN is not tolerable.
Try to manage both domains as if they were the same domain.  Use the same 
naming conventions for policies, storage units, etc...

The biggest operational challenge is turning domain B on.  Media handling is 
the biggest issue.  Give the media owned by media/master B to media for A so 
you can track it.  Physical tape is easy.  VTL "tapes" are less so.  You are 
going to be able to import the tapes into domain B once you get the B master 
created.  It's starting from scratch.  The media known in domain A is 
essentially for a working list retained so you can use it to complete and 
verify your imports into domain B.

Good luck.

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Anurag Sharma
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 3:07 PM
To: veritas-bu; veritas-bu2
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Splitting NetBackup Domain to Two

Experts,



This is the current setup

1 Master server at SITE A

2 Media servers  out of which 1 at SITE A 1 at SITE B

I would like to separate SITE A and SITE B so that I do not have dependency on 
only one Master server which is a single point of failure , so basically I am 
looking at upgrading SITE B media server as Master server.



We have separate VTL and Tape Library at each site.

VTL Zoning and Tape Library Zoning already done on SITE B media server.

In my mind it is just upgrading the binaries re adding the devices and pointing 
the clients to new master server for new backups and still doing restores from 
the old master servers for older data. Is there anything I am missing.?

If anyone has done it please share.


Anurag
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu