Re: [Veritas-bu] T2000 vaulting performance with VTL/LTO3

2007-11-16 Thread Andre Smith
Depending on how many streams and write drives are running  
concurrently, check your shared memory settings in /etc/system.

On Nov 16, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Chris_Millet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:


 I'm starting to experiment with the use of T2000 for media servers.   
 The backup server is a T2000 8 core, 18GB system.  There is a Qlogic  
 QLE2462 PCI-E dual port 4Gb adapter in the system that plugs into a  
 Qlogic 5602 switch.  From there, one port is zoned to a EMC CDL 4400  
 (VTL) and a few HP LTO3 tape drives.  The connectivity is 4Gb from  
 host to switch, and from switch to the VTL.  The tape drive is 2Gb.

 So when using Netbackup Vault to copy a backup done to the VTL to a  
 real tape drive, the backup performance tops out at about 90MB/sec.   
 If I spin up two jobs to two tape drives, they both go about 45MB/ 
 sec.   It seems I've hit a 90MB/sec bottleneck somehow.  I have  
 v240s performing better!

 Write performance to the VTL from incoming client backups over the  
 WAN exceeds the vault performance.

 My next step is to zone the tape drives on one of the HBA ports, and  
 the VTL zoned on the other port.

 I'm using:
 SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS = 262144
 NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS = 64

 Any other suggestions?

 +-- 
 
 |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
 |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +-- 
 


 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Backup and Vault Performance

2007-10-30 Thread Andre Smith
Does a whitepaper exist that explains the relationship between using  
multiple write drives/multiple streams and the effect it has on i/o  
performance?
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu