Re: [Veritas-bu] Media server offline after upgrade to NBU6.5
Thanks Justin, I found the problem. The media server can not resolve the fully qualified host name of the master server (EMM server). Thanks Koping From: Justin Piszcz [jpis...@lucidpixels.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 1:08 AM To: Koping Wang Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Media server offline after upgrade to NBU6.5 On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Koping Wang wrote: Sorry, I should put a better subject line. And my OS is Solaris. I am upgrading netbackup form 6.0.4 to 6.5.4. Everything goes smooth except one media server. Almost at the end of the upgrade I got this --- Starting the NetBackup Remote Monitoring Management System. Starting the NetBackup Service Layer. Starting the NetBackup Service Monitor. Could not obtain storage units : cannot connect on socket ERROR upgrading disk staging storage units. /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/nb_updatedssu mayneed to be run separately to resolve the issue. There is no staging storage unit on this media server or disk storage unit. Now when I start netbackup on this media server, I only see ltid and vmd in MM Processes. MM Processes root 1193 1 16 15:48:55 ?5:49 /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/ltid root 1217 1 0 15:48:59 ?2:08 vmd When I open up netbackup GUI, in Devices - media server, it shows the media server is offline. Can any give me some hint? Thanks Koping Is there an EMMSERVER entry (for the (usually, the master server)) in the media server bp.conf? Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup
Hi, I am upgrading netbackup form 6.0.4 to 6.5.4. Everything goes smooth except one media server. Almost at the end of the upgrade I got this --- Starting the NetBackup Remote Monitoring Management System.Starting the NetBackup Service Layer.Starting the NetBackup Service Monitor. Could not obtain storage units : cannot connect on socket ERROR upgrading disk staging storage units./usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/nb_updatedssu mayneed to be run separately to resolve the issue. There is no staging storage unit on this media server or disk storage unit. Now when I start netbackup on this media server, I only see ltid and vmd in MM Processes. MM Processesroot 1193 1 16 15:48:55 ?5:49 /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/ltidroot 1217 1 0 15:48:59 ?2:08 vmd When I open up netbackup GUI, in Devices - media server, it shows the media server is offline. Can any give me some hint? Thanks Koping ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Media server offline after upgrade to NBU6.5
Sorry, I should put a better subject line. And my OS is Solaris. I am upgrading netbackup form 6.0.4 to 6.5.4. Everything goes smooth except one media server. Almost at the end of the upgrade I got this --- Starting the NetBackup Remote Monitoring Management System. Starting the NetBackup Service Layer. Starting the NetBackup Service Monitor. Could not obtain storage units : cannot connect on socket ERROR upgrading disk staging storage units. /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/nb_updatedssu mayneed to be run separately to resolve the issue. There is no staging storage unit on this media server or disk storage unit. Now when I start netbackup on this media server, I only see ltid and vmd in MM Processes. MM Processes root 1193 1 16 15:48:55 ?5:49 /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/ltid root 1217 1 0 15:48:59 ?2:08 vmd When I open up netbackup GUI, in Devices - media server, it shows the media server is offline. Can any give me some hint? Thanks Koping ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Exec 12.5 License Installation
Daniel, Open BackupExec 12.5 console. Tool - Install Options and License Keys on this Media server ... you can enter your key there. There is a Backup Exec Forum in http://www.backupcentral.com/. You can get much more resources there. Thanks Koping Wang | System Adminsitrator | Unix, Linux, Backup --- Message: 5 Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:00:49 -0700 From: Jimenez, Daniel daniel.jime...@imb.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] Backup Exec 12.5 License Installation To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: 906db7576c45f54089758115958d7b7102ca805...@prrmsgmbx002a.cmc.indymac.biz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hey guys I don't normally work with Backup Exec so I am not sure how to enter a recently purchased serial number into an evaluation copy of Backup Exec 12.x to make it a licensed copy without removing any of the existing settings? It attempts to re-install and not sure if this is going to overwrite the settings. Any assistance would be appreciated, thanks. Daniel Jimenez Data Protection Team ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 32, Issue 36
It does not look like this tape has expired. The expiration date is 3/10/2009. Check the retention from your policies (backup classes in 3.4). It looks like 4 month retention to me. The expiration date is from the last image put on the tape. You can run bpexpdate to command to force expire the tape, even though I don't recommend you do it. # bpexpdate -ev mediaid -force -d 0 -host media server Koping Wang | System/Backupk Administrator | -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:14:18 -0500 From: naymyotun netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] Backup media FULL message To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: 1230257658.m2f.294...@www.backupcentral.com Hi, I am running the netbackup 3.4 server for long time. A few days ago, I noticed i was getting error message 96 when running backup. Then i checked most of the media are status FULL message. id rl images allocatedlast updated density kbytes restores vimagesexpiration last read --- STATUS --- BKP09 55 10/28/2008 23:28 12/07/2008 09:44hcart 961478144 0 14 03/10/2009 09:44N/A FULL In fact , the rentention period has already over, but never ovewritten and show error message status 96 whenever run the backup. Pls. advise. +-- |This was sent by naymyo...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 32, Issue 36 ** ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Command line to replace GUI
Try bpimagelist: /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bpimagelist -client client_name -d startdate -e enddate Go to Netbackup Command Doc for more detail. Koping Wang ESRI System/Backup Administrator -Original Message- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:43:13 -0400 From: Baumann, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Veritas-bu] Command line to replace GUI To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii All, When I use the GUI for client backups from Jan 1st until now, I get a complete list. Is there a command to get that same information from the command line? thx. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] bpdbm acting wacky -- NB 6.0 MP5
Does anybody has and bad experience with 6.0 MP6? I heard too may bad things of MP5. I am on MP4 and thinking about upgrade to MP6. Sun E450, Solaris 9, NBU6.0 MP4 Thanks Koping Message: 1 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:42:15 -0500 From: Nick Majeran [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 24, Issue 61 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We just experienced a rash of these on MP5 -- basically, there were some bugs in MP5 which caused intermittent image corruption. bpdbm will hang during cleanup or database backups, and database backups failed with status 41. Fun times, let me assure you! We ran through about 5 corrupted images in a week (on images that were expired), and then upgraded to MP6. We we had to do was run an lsof, see exactly which files bpdbm is hung up on, kill those bpdbm pids, and delete the files in question. Everything was clean after that. hth, Solaris 10, Netbackup 6.0 MP5 Master server. My bpdbm process is acting wacky (I think...I've never noticed this behavior before). I've actually got 14 bpdbm processes running, but also 38 active jobs currently. The logs for my in netbackup/logs/bpdbm are very large...around 2 gigs per day's log file. I'm seeing such inforation in there as: image_by_file: processing file /usr/openv/netbackup/db/images/hostname/115700/hostname-Oracle -B ackup_1157475027_UBAK expdate: no match for /usr/openv/netbackup/db/images/hostname/1203000/hoststname-Ora cl e-Backup_1203468053_INCR by bp.conf file has: VERBOSE = 1 ENABLE_ROBUST_LOGGING = NO But the thing is, I've noticed some information in my bpdbm logs talking about Informix backups that we haven't done in almost 2 years since we've moved to Oracle. The backups are long since expired...so why is Netbackup processing those files? On my master server, I'm running Solaris 10 on a v440 w/ 16 gigs of RAM, 4 CPU's running @ 1593 Mhz. I do have a large netbackup domain...60 Media SAN Media servers, ~30 clients...but my Master server sees constant 100% cpu utilization. The Server slows down, and locks up. Could this be related to bpdbm checking all the files in the catalog, and spawning so many bpdbm processes? -- Mike Sponsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 24, Issue 62 ** ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Successful NDMP Backups Missing Data
Martin, 1. I don't have experience with NDMP backup, but I know NBU6.0 MP5 is not a good service pack. Last time NBU could not open compressed catalog after I patched to MP5, I end up unpatched and move back to MP4. 2. If you want backup through NFS, make sure the NFS connection is on a separate NIC from your backup NIC, otherwise your backup will be very very slow. Thanks Koping -- Message: 4 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:11:33 -0400 From: Martin, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Successful NDMP Backups Missing Data To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks everyone for the comments. Here's some more information: Client: Sun StorageTek 5370 (nbnfs) Master/Media Server: Windows 2003 STD SP2 running Netbackup Enterprise 6.0 MP5 (nbbk01) nbnfs 12/14/2007 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 46865896 772513720 Full-Weekly Full 21:49:02 No nbnfs 12/21/2007 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 47584824 796582733 Full-Weekly Full 21:55:57 No nbnfs 12/28/2007 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 47683917 805472963 Full-Monthly Full 22:59:43 No nbnfs 1/8/2008 9:06:28 AM PR_NDMP 33581624 536189959 Full-Weekly Full 13:56:53 No nbnfs 1/11/2008 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 48033174 810362561 Full-Weekly Full 22:28:07 No nbnfs 1/18/2008 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 37250565 611787136 Full-Weekly Full 17:26:27 No nbnfs 1/25/2008 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 48885260 833748549 Full-Monthly Full 23:03:54 No nbnfs 2/1/2008 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 49524885 838532189 Full-Weekly Full 23:47:23 No nbnfs 2/8/2008 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 49908417 848834139 Full-Weekly Full 23:07:55 No nbnfs 2/15/2008 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 50243186 855850214 Full-Weekly Full 1 00:01:05 No nbnfs 2/22/2008 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 50511980 863140542 Full-Weekly Full 1 00:46:31 No nbnfs 3/3/2008 12:10:12 PM PR_NDMP 19450344 316300098 Full-Monthly Full 07:01:54 No nbnfs 3/7/2008 8:00:00 PM PR_NDMP 47423669 775305192 Full-Weekly Full 20:16:58 No If you notice, all of the red entries are less than they should be. The full backup qty gets incrementally bigger each week with the exception of the red failures. The 316GB backup was a failed robotic controller so I expected that but the other three backups were status 0 in Netbackup. I've got three sites all simmilarly configured and two sites (this one and another) are showing this same issue. One intresting point about this particular host is that the same directories are missing from all three successful failed backups. We've got a ticket open with Sun, as Netbackup seems to think its a filer issue. (We agree.) We've had issues in the past with super long directory paths on this NAS device, maybe this is simmilar. Personally, I'm appauled that there seems to be no better communication between the filer and Netbackup about the backup status and that NBU just assumes everything's 100% hunky dory. We use the activty monitor and BPDBJOBS in a NUMBER of scripts to monitor completion. I think its unreasonable to assume the storage guys need to check their filer logs every week to make sure their backups are complete. This may be an excuse for me to write the script I've been planning that measures job success on how much data was backed up (compared to the trend.) For this weekend we're going to backup the data via NFS mount on another server. Stoopid NAS. I love this job... /sigh -Jonathan PS: Should have bought a NetApp =P From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 5:10 PM To: Martin, Jonathan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Successful NDMP Backups Missing Data You might want to verify your policy selections included everything and also that you don't have an exclude list specification on the client that would have made it skip certain things. It would be very bad indeed if NBU gave a status 0 for backups that didn't backup exactly what they were told to backup. My first suspicion would be that this didn't occur - that either its not in the selections for the policy or it was excluded due an exclude list. Of course there are other things that could cause this - e.g. do not cross mount points, don't backup NFS etc... that might have been set on the policy by default. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:11 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Successful NDMP Backups Missing Data I'm looking at an Full NDMP backup from this past weekend. According to the activity monitor it was Status - 0 Successful. However, when drilling down into the data via Backup and Recover I notice that certain key folders are missing. Upon further inspection, I notice the past 4 weeks backups look something like this - 833GB, 833.2GB, 833.7GB, 780GB. Although Netbackup gives me the 0 I'm obviously missing data. I
Re: [Veritas-bu] Backing up Leopard clients - OS X 10.5
Hi, This was from a month ago, I am not sure anybody figure this yet. I finally got sometime to work on the backup os x 10.5. Here is my fix. 1. On the os x 10.5 system, install netbackup client as usual, you will get error messages, ignore them. 2, Create a launchd.plist file under /System/Library/LaunchDaemons. The file name is nbu.bpcd.plist 3, The file content as following. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC -//Apple Computer//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd; plist version=1.0 dict keyDisabled/key false/ keyLabel/key stringcom.nbu.bpcd/string keyProgramArguments/key array string/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bpcd/string /array keyinetdCompatibility/key dict keyWait/key false/ /dict keySockets/key dict keyListeners/key dict keySockServiceName/key stringbpcd/string /dict /dict keySessionCreate/key true/ /dict /plist -- 4. run this command: # launchctl load /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/nbu.bpcd.plist Thanks Koping Koping Wang ESRI System/Backup Administrator -Original Message- Message: 5 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:25:00 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backing up Leopard clients To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Don, With the release of OS X 10.5, Apple removed all functionality of inetd (and others) and replaced it with its launchd process. Below is a link to read more information about launchd. With the removal of inetd, the bpcd and vnetd process no longer listen on their respective ports based on a 10.4 config. http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.21/21.06/launchd/index.html At last check, Symantec currently doesn't provide support for 10.5. They will have to create plist entries for the NBU client processes to replace the /etc/inetd.conf definitions. http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise _Server/278064.pdf Mike McLain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Klebba Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 6:11 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Backing up Leopard clients I recently upgraded one of my Mac clients from Mac OS 10.4.11 to 10.5.1 (Leopard). I'm running netbackup 6.5.1 on both the master server and the Mac client. The Mac client was able to backup before going to 10.5.1., now I'm getting 54 errors, unable to connect to client. I'm no longer able to telnet to port 13782 on the Mac. Does anyone have any ideas on how I can resolve this? -- Don Klebba Quicken Loans Storage Management Team ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Solaris 10 Kernel Parameters
Recently I am studying of turning kernel parameter for Solaris 10 ( They change name to Share Resource Management Parameters). I come out with following for Netbackup 6.0. In the file /etc/project system:0 user.root:1project.max-msg-ids=(privileged,256,deny);project.max-sem -ids=(privileged,1024,deny);project.max-shm-ids=(privileged ,512,deny) noproject:2 default:3 group.staff:10 This is base on http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2724 http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/281842.htm Any comment? Koping Wang ESRI System/Backup Administrator ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Reconfig Storage Units
Abhishek, # bpschedreq -rereadconfig bpschedreq: unrecognized option -rereadconfig bpschedreq: -terminate -jobid jobid -suspend -jobid jobid [-M master_server,...,master_server] -tables -read_stunits -read_stu_config -predict datetime [-L] -verbose level format for datetime is mm/dd/ HH:MM:SS I meant I like to change the properties of a storage unit. How can I make the change take effect without restart Netbackup entirely. Thanks Koping From: Abhishek Dhingra1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:43 PM To: Koping Wang Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Reconfig Storage Units You need to run #bpschedreq -rereadconfig Abhishek Dhingra IBM Global Services, Delhi, Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile : +91-9818675370 Koping Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/05/2008 01:25 AM To veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] Reconfig Storage Units Hi, I need to change configuration of one of my storage units. Which daemon should I restart? I can not restart Netbackup entirely. Netbackup 5.1 mp4 on Solaris Koping Wang ESRI System/Backup Administrator ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Reconfig Storage Units
Hi, I need to change configuration of one of my storage units. Which daemon should I restart? I can not restart Netbackup entirely. Netbackup 5.1 mp4 on Solaris Koping Wang ESRI System/Backup Administrator ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0 MP5 unable to read old catalog. Solairs 9
Hi, I just upgrade the NBU from 5.1 to 6.0 MP5 around 2 weeks ago. I found the 6.0 does not read my catalog order than 30 days. I have set 'Compress catalog interval after 30 days' in my Global Attribute. My catalog was text. Did any body see this issue before? The OS is Solaris 9 Thanks Koping ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Upgrade Netbackup 5.1MP4 to 6.0 - Solaris
Hi, I am upgrading Netbackup 5.1 MP4 to 6.0. I got a problem: My Netbackup is running Solaris 9 When I remove the old VRTSnetbp, 'pkgrm VRTSnetbp'. At the end, I got Removal of VRTSnetbp partially failed. So when I install Netbackup 6.0, I got the following messages: --- The following old package is currently installed on your system and should be removed prior to an upgrade: VRTSnetbp *** It is highly recommended that older packages be removed before doing an upgrade. *** Do you want to exit this script so you can remove packages now? [y,n] (y) -- Should I just answer no:, and continue? Thanks Koping ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade Netbackup 5.1MP4 to 6.0 - Solaris
All right, After I send the last email, I found this article, it fix my problem. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/289055.htm Thanks Koping _ From: Koping Wang Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 12:47 PM To: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu' Subject: Upgrade Netbackup 5.1MP4 to 6.0 - Solaris Hi, I am upgrading Netbackup 5.1 MP4 to 6.0. I got a problem: My Netbackup is running Solaris 9 When I remove the old VRTSnetbp, 'pkgrm VRTSnetbp'. At the end, I got Removal of VRTSnetbp partially failed. So when I install Netbackup 6.0, I got the following messages: -- - The following old package is currently installed on your system and should be removed prior to an upgrade: VRTSnetbp ** * It is highly recommended that older packages be removed before doing an upgrade. ** * Do you want to exit this script so you can remove packages now? [y,n] (y) -- Should I just answer no:, and continue? Thanks Koping ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Force cleaning catalog files?
Hi, Netbackup does not compact/clean catalog files until all backup jobs has down. Does anyone know how to manually start the process? Thanks Koping Koping Wang ESRI System/Backup Administrator ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1 and Solaris 10 ZFS
I heard Netbackup does not support ZFS until Netbackup 6.5 Koping --- Message: 4 Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:47:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1 and Solaris 10 ZFS To: Juan Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Tue, 8 May 2007, Juan Rojas wrote: Greetings, I am running NBU 5.1 Mp6 on a Solaris 10 11/06 system. I created a ZFS pool with two file systems in it. When I backup the file systems the only thing that gets backed up are the directory entries and not the files underneath them. I googled, read the Veritas documentation, contacted support and still can not get an answer. Is anybody backing up ZFS files and can point me to gotchas? Thanks. Juan Rojas IMPORTANT WARNING: The information in this message (and the documents attached to it, if any) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please delete all electronic copies of this message (and the documents attached to it, if any), destroy any hard copies you may have created and notify me immediately by replying to this email. Thank you. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu My guess is backing up ZFS is not supported yet? Justin. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
RE:[Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent..
Hi, We are also looking in D2D solution which work with netbackup. We are going to make decision between DataDomain and Dilligent. This is my thought about these two products. Dillignet: Pro: VTL - low impact on configuration. faster - it use fiber channel. more add on functions - there are some good add-on functions you can buy from diligent. Con: costly - Software: Netbackup VTL license, Diligent license, Redhat RHEL 64-bit license. Hardware: 64 bit AMD server, disk storage. If you don't have san, you might need a fiber switch. Datadomain: Pro:Simple, no software license needed. Con: Not expendable, if you run out of space, you screw up. Netbackup PureDisk: PureDisk is like a separate software from Netbackup. You can have a lot of choice if you want to look into different D2D products. PureDisk only support windows client. Koping Wang ESRI Backup/Systems Administrator 380 New York St Redlands CA, 92373 Message: 2 From: Hampus Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 19:24:02 +0200 Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup PureDisk vs datadomain / Diligent.. This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0008_01C67AB0.9F36F690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =20 I am looking datadomain and diligent products and have noticed that Netbackup are doing something similar with its PurDisk function. Have = anyone looked at Netbackup PureDisk? =20 Best regards, =20 Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66 E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Disk backup products for NBU - DataDomain, Diligent
Title: Disk backup products for NBU - DataDomain, Diligent Does anybody use Diligent Protectire or DataDomain DD400 series. How it goes? I am not seeking comparison of these two products. I would like to know from your experience. Do they meet your expectations? Any problem? How is their support and service? Koping Wang ESRI Backup/Systems Administrator 380 New York St Redlands CA, 92373
