Re: [Veritas-bu] Master Server Hostname Change

2006-08-04 Thread Stefanos Monovasios
If you have the services down during the copy and move the voldb, pooldb
from the master and mediadb from all media servers (and the master) there is
no problem with the tapes.

It will be good to logically move the tapes out of the robot before move the
voldb

smpt 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:42 PM
To: smpt; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Master Server Hostname Change

 That's great info , much appreciated

Quick Q ,how did you over come the tapes being overwritten in the new
system, or as you have moved all db's the new system recognises the
media as if it where its own?

Cheers

Dave

-Original Message-
From: smpt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 04 August 2006 10:36
To: Clooney, David; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Master Server Hostname Change

Hi, I've done this many times.
You are correct. 
You must run the bpimage command before you move the database.
Then you can move the image dir to the new server.
Also you must move the files: mediadb, voldb,  pooldb, ruledb. The
vmglob is not needed. Check the vm.conf and bp.conf.
Move the class, client and config dirs (if byou need the policies, and
the configuration setings of the Previous   server).
If you use DSSU move the shed dir
If you use vault move the vault dir
 
All copies must be done with the services down.


As I told you I've done many times, most of them with success. But with
some installations Although the backup and restore  is working,u  I
can't restore from old server's backups with error 202. I don't know why
and I can't call Veritas as this is unsupported. It is strange.
smpt


  ---Original Message---
  From: Clooney, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Master Server Hostname Change
  Sent: 04 Aug '06 10:29
  
  All
  
  you wont believe it but I'm still investigating the master server 
 hostname  change and need some advice as to where else something could

 go wrong.Now i  know this is possible and everyone mentions that 
 Symantec PS should be  pulled in to complete otherwise unsupported and

 this I realise. What I'm  trying to do is validate the expense in 
 order to get the PS work approved  so here goes, the new master is 
 identical to the current with nothing  active at all. I know this is 
 not as simple as it seems however am trying  to get an outline.
  
  The problem we have is if we go the importing route this would take 
 us 9  months.
  
  Scenario is the domain the master was bulit in is going to be 
 discontinued  and we can't stop it ( and host file options are ruled 
 out too) ,  additionally the master was bulit with a fqdm which I tend

 to disagree  with.
  
  the db's to worry about are
  
  Image db:As this is a flat file directory structure this can be
copied
  and then manipulated for the images to reflect the new server
  
  bpimage: -newserver name [-oldserver name] [-id  id]
  
  PoolDB:  can be copied as flat file
  
  PolicyDB:   once again flat file structure, straight copy
  
  MediaDB:the media db can too be manipulated to reflect the new
server
  and this I have tested, so now no  FORCE_RESTORE_MEDIA_SERVER is  
 required on the old server.
  
  bpimage: -newserver name [-oldserver name] [-id  id]  Question 
 , once this is done and the mediaDB is copied  over , would Netbackup 
 then know of the images resident on media ??
  
  
  VolDB:This is the problem child in my opinion, one because
its
  distibuted and two because there is no real way of manipulating it ,

 suggestions would be most welcome
  
  Sure it can be copied over, but no doubt would need some  changing.
  Once volume is added , assignbyid with allocation time  which can be 
 retrieved from bpmedialist -L
  
  Globdb:   this can be recreated quite easily
  
  
  If anyone knows of anything I'm missing please let me know.
  
  Much appreciated
  
  David Clooney
  
  
  
  
  
  Notice to recipient:
  The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is  
 confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the  
 addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the 
 sender  immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended 
 recipient, any  disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
 or omitted to be  taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful.
  
  When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained 
 in  this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions 
 expressed in  any applicable governing terms of business or client 
 engagement letter  issued by the pertinent Bank of America group
entity.
  
  If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of 
 America,  N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited 
 are authorised  and regulated by the Financial Services 

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.0 Licensing

2006-07-21 Thread Stefanos Monovasios
Title: RE: NetBackup 6.0 Licensing








You dont need new licenses
to work with NetBackup 6 if you dont want the new features of NetBackup.
Im using a 3.4 key and it is working perfectly.

But if you want to enable
some of the new features you have to get a new license. (this wasnt needed
for any upgrade till now) 

That means that if you dont
have support and you find the media you can go to next version or any version. (But
you will not have support)



As I know sun customers are
not Veritas customers (They dont have a license certificate) and Veritas
doesnt upgrade or support them. The only support they have is from sun.

If there is a sun
customer in the mailing list, please enlighten us 



stefanos











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gabi Goldstein
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 6:17
PM
To: Gabi Goldstein; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu]
NetBackup 6.0 Licensing





A
customer with NetBackup 5.x licenses purchased from Sun and a support agreement
also purchased by Sun has received the following reply from Sun Licensing:

If the customer is running 5.1 it should be no problem. 5.x licenses will
enable the 6.0 Netbackup media. In other words,the customer does not need 6.0
keys. It has to work fine.

Is this correct? The customers with support agreements from Symantec are getting
new license keys for 6.0, so they may be necessary.

Thanks!






___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 available

2006-07-05 Thread Stefanos Monovasios








I will load it immediately
to all my customers that running NetBackup 6. I have stopped upgrading my
customers from NetBackup 5 when I understand that Symantec make a mistake and realize
a virus with the name NetBackup 6



stefanos









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dhotre, Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 3:47
PM
To: Johnny Oestergaard; Ian;
veritas-mail-list
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available





I will load it
directly into my production system as soon as I have downloaded it.



We call it RGE
:-) (resume generating event) 









From:
Johnny Oestergaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 7:19
PM
To: Dhotre, Shekhar; 'Ian';
'veritas-mail-list'
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available

I will load it directly
into my production system as soon as I have downloaded it.

But in my case it is
because I have had serious problema with loops in nbjm for the last 4 months and
no help from Veritas on that issue, except sending them the same documentation
over and over again.

So in my current
situation nothing can be worse then running MP2 and I had to upgrade to that
because of business moving Windows X64 systems into production.



/johnny











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dhotre, Shekhar
Sent: 3. juli 2006 21:03
To: Ian; veritas-mail-list
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available





I would try it on the
test system first ,and see what it breaks if any .







Shekhar Dhotre

Sr.Unix-Storage
Engineer/Architect.

ICTStorage
Engineering.

v
404.846.7483 | f 404.848.1077 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
48 Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA 30346

No one achieves a goal alone


#

IBM certified RS/6000AIX specialist.

Veritas Certified Specialist.(Netbackup)

Sun Certified admin for
Solaris.

Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer. 

#















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:02
AM
To: veritas-mail-list
Subject: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available

FYI, looks like 6.0 MP3 is available for download from
support.veritas.com.
http://support.veritas.com/menu_ddProduct_NBUESVR_view_DOWNLOAD.htm

Mmmm, should I? Shouldn't I? :-)










This email (including any
attachments) is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient you must
not copy, use, disclose,
distribute or rely on the information
contained in it. If you have
received this email in error, please
notify the sender immediately
by reply email and delete the email
from your system.
Confidentiality and legal privilege
attached to this communication
are not waived or lost by reason of
mistaken delivery to you. Lend
Lease does not guarantee that this
email or the attachment(s) are
unaffected by computer virus,
corruption or other defects. Lend
Lease may monitor incoming and outgoing
emails for compliance with
its Email Policy. Please note that our
servers may not be located
in your country.






___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 available

2006-07-05 Thread Stefanos Monovasios








ALSO Imagine that the 6.0
MP2 was 62MB and 6.0MP3 is 170MB 

stefanos











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefanos Monovasios
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000
11:44 PM
To: 'Dhotre, Shekhar'; 'Johnny
Oestergaard'; 'Ian'; 'veritas-mail-list'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available





I will load it
immediately to all my customers that running NetBackup 6. I have stopped
upgrading my customers from NetBackup 5 when I understand that Symantec make a
mistake and realize a virus with the name NetBackup 6



stefanos









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dhotre, Shekhar
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 3:47
PM
To: Johnny Oestergaard; Ian;
veritas-mail-list
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available





I will load it
directly into my production system as soon as I have downloaded it.



We call it RGE
:-) (resume generating event) 









From:
Johnny Oestergaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 7:19
PM
To: Dhotre, Shekhar; 'Ian';
'veritas-mail-list'
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available

I will load it directly
into my production system as soon as I have downloaded it.

But in my case it is
because I have had serious problema with loops in nbjm for the last 4 months
and no help from Veritas on that issue, except sending them the same
documentation over and over again.

So in my current
situation nothing can be worse then running MP2 and I had to upgrade to that
because of business moving Windows X64 systems into production.



/johnny











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dhotre, Shekhar
Sent: 3. juli 2006 21:03
To: Ian; veritas-mail-list
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available





I would try it on the
test system first ,and see what it breaks if any .







Shekhar Dhotre

Sr.Unix-Storage
Engineer/Architect.

ICTStorage
Engineering.

v
404.846.7483 | f 404.848.1077 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
48 Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA 30346

No one achieves a goal alone


#

IBM certified RS/6000AIX specialist.

Veritas Certified Specialist.(Netbackup)

Sun Certified admin for
Solaris.

Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer. 

#















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:02
AM
To: veritas-mail-list
Subject: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3
available

FYI, looks like 6.0 MP3 is available for download from
support.veritas.com.
http://support.veritas.com/menu_ddProduct_NBUESVR_view_DOWNLOAD.htm

Mmmm, should I? Shouldn't I? :-)










This email (including any
attachments) is confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient you must
not copy, use, disclose,
distribute or rely on the information
contained in it. If you have
received this email in error, please
notify the sender immediately
by reply email and delete the email
from your system.
Confidentiality and legal privilege
attached to this communication
are not waived or lost by reason of
mistaken delivery to you. Lend
Lease does not guarantee that this
email or the attachment(s) are
unaffected by computer virus,
corruption or other defects. Lend
Lease may monitor incoming and outgoing
emails for compliance with
its Email Policy. Please note that our
servers may not be located
in your country.






___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU6 and Sharepoint accounts

2006-06-02 Thread Stefanos Monovasios









You must use an account
with share point admin privileges and not system account.



stefanos









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilkinson, Tim
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:45
AM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU6 and
Sharepoint accounts







Hi,











We're looking to back up Sharepoint Portal 2003 and I've
noticed a strange bit in the VERITAS Sharepoint 2003 admin guide. Step 4 seems
to suggest if local account is not used then it's all finished and shouldn't be
configured:











Configuring the NetBackup Client Service Log On Account
To backup the SharePoint Index databases or Document Libraries, the NetBackup
Client Service must be authorized to run as the SharePoint administrator. In
Windows Services, configure the NetBackup Client Service properties for the
host(s) where the Index database(s) or Document Libraries reside.
▼ To verify or modify the Log On account for the NetBackup Client service
1.Open the Windows Services application.
2.Double-click on the NetBackup Client Service entry.
3.Click on the Log On tab.
4.If the local system account is not selected as the Log on as account, proceed
with step 7.
5.Provide the name of the account authorized to run as the SharePoint
administrator.
Note To change this account, you must have administrator group privileges.
6.Stop and start the NetBackup Client Service.
7.Close the Services control panel application.









Is this a typo? Surely any account could beset for NBU
Client Service logonso it seems strange that any account other than local
system is OK given step 5. Step 4 would make more sense to me without the word
'not'.

I suppose what I'm asking in a roundabout way is 'is the
local system account OK to have as the NetBackup Client service account?'









Cheers,



-

Tim
Wilkinson 
I.T.
Support Officer 
Science
Corporate Information Systems 
Defence
Science  Technology Organisation 
Department
of Defence 

Tel: (02) 96921484 
Fax:
(02) 96921562 
Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 














___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] BMR Web Cast recording

2006-05-26 Thread Stefanos Monovasios








Is there a way to learn
about upcoming web casts? 

I know that there is a
mailing list for this, but I cant find it



stefanos











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 5:57
PM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] BMR Web Cast
recording





The BMR 6.0 Webcast was recorded on April 26th. It includes the demo of the new Fast Windows restore capability that will be available in 6.0 MP3.View RecordingRecording DetailsSubject: NetBackup Bare Metal Restore v6.0: Tech Overview/DemoRecording URL: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/symantec/viewRecording ID: E-M9DMXBAttendee Key: wXj4_n

This Office Live Meeting invitation is a personal
invitation meant only for you. 

It should not be forwarded. If you received
this email by mistake or 

require Live Meeting Assistance, please refer to
the Live Meeting Assistance
 Center at 

http://r.office.microsoft.com/r/rlidLiveMeeting?p1=7p2=en_USp3=LMInfop4=support

If you have any technical problems or questions,
please contact Live Meeting Customer Support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: 
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
- www.microsoft.com/office/livemeeting 
- 1.866.493.2825 (toll free in the U.S.
and Canada)
or 650.526.6950 (international direct dial) or 00.800.9522.3000 (toll free in
EMEA) 

For other assistance, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

























Ray
Schafer





Senior Principal
Systems Engineer





Field Technology Group





Symantec Corporation





www.symantec.com





-





Office:+1
512.433.3300 x 3345





Interoffice:6
[512] 3345





Mobile:+1
512.426.3188





Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
















___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] NBU5 share point 2003

2006-05-02 Thread Stefanos Monovasios
Hi, 
We are running NBU 5.0 and now we are installing Microsoft share point 2003.
I can find a NBU 5 manual for share point 2001 but not for 2003. And as I
can see NBU6 has both manuals (one for 2001 and one for 2003). 
Does any one know if I have to buy the share point agent for 2001 and use it
with my 2003 server or I have to use something else? 

Upgrading to NBU 6 is not an option for now

Thanks


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] NBU5 share point 2003

2006-05-02 Thread Stefanos Monovasios
Hi, 
We are running NBU 5.0 and now we are installing Microsoft share point 2003.
I can find a NBU 5 manual for share point 2001 but not for 2003. And as I
can see NBU6 has both manuals (one for 2001 and one for 2003). 
Does any one know if I have to buy the share point agent for 2001 and use it
with my 2003 server or I have to use something else? 

Upgrading to NBU 6 is not an option for now

Thanks


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] can SAN media server restore clients?

2006-04-28 Thread Stefanos Monovasios








I havent tried it,
but as I know the license goes to the backup. The restore is a deferent think. For
example you dont have to create a storage unit to do a restore.

So a network restore from
a SAN media server mast be ok



stefanos











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Major, Rusty
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006
10:46 PM
To: Bob Stump;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] can SAN
media server restore clients?





In 4.5, I know
it's possible. I do not know about 5.x and up. I would say that if the
licensing model would let it backup other clients, which again in 4.5 is
possible, though not legal, it should work.



-Rusty









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Stump
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006
2:20 PM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] can SAN
media server restore clients?

can a licensed SAN
media server be used to restore data to a client other than itself? 








RE: [Veritas-bu] VxSS - Veritas Security Service

2006-03-13 Thread Stefanos Monovasios








VxSS is not needed. And
if you decide to install it the performance of the activity monitor will be degraded.



stefanos









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Ljungblad
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:12
PM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jim McDowell; Michael Morgan
Subject: [Veritas-bu] VxSS -
Veritas Security Service











Veritas Security Service











SYSTEM: 





5.1 (mp2) Datacenter 6+
soon:2003New
Windows Server System: SingleMastermedia server -





 Command
Central
:
Symantech Staffon site training users this week -





2 Robotsone2006
Overland Neo:Ultrium 3 -
Capacity -8 drives - Media = 100 + -





1. Robot 2001 one SUN
L1800:4
DLT7000 -4 Drives - 96 Tape capacity
-





1 Network to
backup:
35 New 2003 Servers, sql, clusters, mail, XP Pc's, SAN etc...





*5
New HP/UX kick ass clients, Payroll, lawson, oracle etc...





WAN:
NOT BACKED UP:
35 Networks,
largest spanning up to 2500Miles from local Frame relay -





SECURITY: CISCO's (ACL's):



















QUESTION:VxSSIs
it neccessary to use VxSS on this Backup System?






Is thereany issue's that we should be concerned with?






Is there a risk of failed restores?





Is
this security system a hog?






Are there advantages within a local LAN?






Are there disadvantages within a local LANor in general?






Are there any solutions to existing issue's that may have been Corrected?












Any other suggestions for performance,
tunning, updates or full Spectrum of our setup is Greatly Appreciated -

















Thanks,





have a nice day -











[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Copley Information Services





La Jolla, CA






92037





(858) 729 - 8010
















RE: [Veritas-bu] Barcode Scanning

2006-03-13 Thread Stefanos Monovasios








Hi,

You can use storage pools
from netbackup to track your tapes. Netbackup knows if a tape is inside the
library and you can use a script to inform netbackup were are the tapes that
are out of the library (with vmchange command)

stefanos









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Durrant
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:52
PM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Barcode
Scanning







Hi Everyone











I've been tasked with trying to find a solution to our tape
mountain here.





Our tapes are in one of four places and all have unique bar
codes.











Ideally, we want to have a handheld barcode scanner that can
record when our tapes go off site and come back from the off-site datasafe. We
also want to be able to record when the tapes are in the library etc.











I know that our NetBackup solution can read the tapes but
wondered if anyone has done something like this before and could recommend any
products.





The best product will feature a database which we could
tailor to indicate which tapes are where.











Thanks





Justin








-- 

To report this message as spam, click hereThis message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by DFK Systems Limited, and is believed to be clean.



RE: [Veritas-bu] exclude, include query

2006-03-13 Thread Stefanos Monovasios
Put ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES at the policy file list.
Put all your drives at the exclude list (c:\ d:\ e:\ m:\ n:\ system_state)
Put m:\*.trk n:\*.trk m:\*.bak and n:\*.bak

I suggest not starting any exclude and including lists with *

stefanos

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:40 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] exclude, include query

Guys im mailing on behalf of a colleague who works on the windows side
of the fence. He asked me this question about netbackup but i wasnt too
sure on how it would behave.

He basically wants to backup *.trk and *.bak ( i think cant remember )
on a couple few drives.
Now he cant put m:\*.trk and m:\*.bak because that will just backup
those files in the root of m:\  right?

He has ought about doing this :-  put in the policy file list *.trk and
*.bak hoping this will backup all instances no matter what directory or
mount point. Then in the exclude_list put ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES and in the
include_list put m:\ n:\

Hes hoping this will backup *.trk anywhere under m:\ and n:\

Has anyone any idea if this will work or if the include_list overrides
the policy file lists and everything under m:\ will be backed up?

Cheers
Dave
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Bpmedia -movedb problem

2006-02-14 Thread Stefanos Monovasios
The bpmedia -movedb moves a part of netbackup database. You can't change a
master server with this. 
If you use 4.5 or 5.x just copy the /volmgr/database/ directory and
/netbackup/db/media/mediadb  Then reconfigure the library and the tape drive
and your tapes are now moved to the new server. 
You have to move the db/image dir and other files to complete the move of
the master server

stefanos



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 4:01 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Bpmedia -movedb problem

Hello All

I'm moving a master/media server to a new machine. I'm trying to use the 
procedure in this technote: http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/266720.htm

But I keep getting:
2bpmedia: INITIATING: version NetBackup 5.1 created: 0
2bpmedia: client/server handshaking failed
client/server handshaking failed
2bpmedia: EXIT status = 26

Any ideas/suggestions will be appreciated

Regards
Michael


--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Need some clarification on moving a Master to a more powerful system..

2006-02-09 Thread Stefanos Monovasios








Yes you can do it

The name of the server is
critical for licensing (the var folder) and at the images. If you change the
name and replace the var folder with the old one netbackup will play. 



stefanos









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Despres
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006
4:42 PM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Need some
clarification on moving a Master to a more powerful system..






Hey All.. 

I
need some clarification on moving Netbackup 4.5 fp9 from a 220r to a 440r.


Note:
Hostname and IP will stay the same 

Can
I configure Netbackup on the new system with a temp hostname/IP. Then
when the time comes 
rename
the new system with the current hostname/IP. And perform a bprecover to
recover the catalog info. 

Do
I need to install Netbackup after the new box has been changed hostname/ip wise
to the current info? 

Thanks



Joe
Despres...

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.