[Veritas-bu] Mount Points and Jobs

2008-08-15 Thread sauderd

When backing up Unix servers, allowing multiple data streams will cause 
Netbackup's stream discovery to create one job for each mounted filesystem.  
However on Windows, it creates one job for each drive letter, regardless of the 
number of mounted filesystems beneath each drive letter.

We are creating separate filesystems and mount points on Windows precisely 
because it breaks backups into smaller, more managable jobs.  Does anyone know 
a way to get Netbackup's stream discovery to create one job for each mounted 
filesystem on Windows? (i.e. more granular than one job per drive letter)

If that's not possible, I'm considering ways to do my own stream discovery via 
scripts and kick off one job per filesystem myself (and turning off the Cross 
Mount Points option).  Anyone have experience with that approach? (I'm already 
aware of mountvol.)

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Mount Points and Jobs

2008-08-15 Thread sauderd

We mount our volumes in a single location, so I found that adding a spec like 
L:\volumes\vol* into the selection list had the desired effect: one job for 
each mounted volume.

Thanks!

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-06-13 Thread sauderd

Our numbers vary greatly according to the clients.  We have very old Solaris 
machines that backup at 50+ MB/sec.  We have very new Windows machines where 
throughput varies greatly between different volumes on the same machine (e.g. a 
volume with 5 million tiny files backs up at 30 MB/sec via FlashBackup, while 
another volume on the same machine gets about 7 MB/sec backing up small files 
via FlashBackup).

It's difficult to get good numbers because we use multi-streaming and 
multiplexing like crazy.  So the actual throughput to the drive is the sum of 
the jobs using the drive at that moment.  Individual jobs vary between 5 MB/sec 
and about 65 MB/sec.  But the total throughput to the tape heads is unknown.

Anyone know an easy way to calculate that?

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-05-09 Thread sauderd

I spoke with our Network guys and got the following:
1. the IOS version is 12.2, revision 18, sfx 7 native
2. there is no minimum hardware version
3. we are running on a Catalyst WS-X6748-GE-TX
4. they configured LCP ports in active mode

Being a Unix guy and knowing virtually nothing about Cisco gear, I haven't the 
foggiest idea what any of that means.  But that's the best I can relate their 
info.



Paul Keating wrote:
 Is anything particular required on the Switch?
 Minimum IOS version?
 Minimum hardware version?
 
 Paul
 
 -- 
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
  Of sauderd
  Sent: May 8, 2007 11:27 AM
  To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
  Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server
  
  
  
  It was driver code to get the dladm command to work properly 
  with the Cisco switch.
  
 
 
 La version française suit le texte anglais.
 
 
 
 This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the 
 Bank of
 Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying 
 of this
 email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is
 unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it 
 immediately from
 your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. 
 
 
 
 Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
 confidentielle.
 La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute 
 diffusion,
 utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par 
 une
 personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous 
 recevez
 ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans 
 délai à
 l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé 
 de votre
 ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.
 
 ___
 Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu






___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-05-09 Thread sauderd

I spoke with the network guys in our shop and I got the following:
1. the IOS version is: 12.2, rev. 18 sfx 7 native
2. there is no minumum HW version
3. the hardware we're using is a Catalyst WS-X6748-GE-TX
4. they configured the ports as LCP in active mode

Being a Unix guys, I haven't the foggiest idea what that means.  But that's the 
best I can relate their info.





___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-05-08 Thread sauderd

Oh, I almost forgot to mention something.  We got a specially created fix from 
Sun to get the Solaris 10 part to work. A publicly available patch will 
forthcoming soon.





___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-05-08 Thread sauderd

It was driver code to get the dladm command to work properly with the Cisco 
switch.





___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-05-07 Thread sauderd

The four onboard NICs as well as an extra 2-port NIC we installed are all GLDv3 
devices.  So, they take advantage of the new dladm command to do link 
aggregation.  We had the networking guys configure the 6 ports on the Cisco 
switch (LACP protocol) and then we did the aggregation as follows:

dladm create-aggr -P L2 -l active -d e1000g0 -d e1000g1 -d e1000g2 -d e1000g3 
-d e1000g4 -d e1000g5 18
ifconfig aggr18 plumb nvsun14 up

One would only use Sun trunking if the NICs or software could not take 
advantage of the new GLDv3 stack.  In particular, we found that the ce (Cassini 
NIC) devices will never take advantage to of the dladm aggregation.  Their 
performance is also much poorer because they bury the CPU.  So stay away from 
them.

But dladm rocks!





___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-05-05 Thread sauderd

Before we put our T2000's into service as Netbackup master servers, I 
benchmarked their network throughput using ttcp and it was amazing.  We pushed 
5 simultaneous ttcp streams into the T2000 for a cumulative throughput of 495 
MB/sec (that's megabytes).  All of this was without it breaking a sweat on the 
CPU--quite low utilization.  Take careful note that we were using the 6/06 
version of Solaris 10; it takes advantage of the GLDv3 rewrite of the Solaris 
10 networking stack, including network link aggregation.

We put it into service as a Netbackup master server and we aggregated 6 
incoming GigE links.  Like the post above, I used 256K as the buffer size 
(recommended by the the LTO3 drive manufacturer, HP).  I used empirical methods 
to find the miniumal number of buffers that still provided benefit.  I doubled 
the number of buffers, tested, doubled, tested, etc.  I found that 128 buffer 
provide a slight increase in speed vs. 64 buffers.  But beyond 128 there was no 
gain.





___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu