Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Customers

2009-11-20 Thread smpt
Hi, 
I've install two 6.6 puredisk servers and I have to say that the GUi is one
of the biggest flows puredisk has.
I agree that you need power at the client site to do the calculations.  
Why don't you use the snapshot capabilities of netbackup to backup the
client?

I think that it is a good idea to download the puredisk appliance (VM) and
test it.  
And netbacku 7 will have the puredisk engine inside, and as I can see it is
working fine. You will not have to mess up with the puredisk GUI.



-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Burrell
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 5:17 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Customers


We're using it to backup about 35 remote servers, some of which have the
"millions of small files" issue in spades.

Short answer: it may not solve your backup window problem- or it might.

Things to keep in mind: you are limited in terms of the number of PO's per
job.  Each file/folder is a PO, so you'll probably need some hefty
include/exclude lists to make sure you are below the limit (varies by
version- check the manual for your version).

A lot of your performance with PD is based on the client. I have a 1.25 TB
client that does 6 million + files per night. Takes 8-10 hours over a 1 GB
LAN link to a local PD sever, even with only 8GB of changes.  This is an
older server with a 3ghz Xeon processor and 4 GB RAM.  Disk controller is an
HP SA6400 with 192 Mb set to 50/50 R/W.  A more powerful client would
definitely improve your performance.

If you want to play around with it, you can download a pre-packaged VM with
a built-in trial key to see if it works for you.  I highly recommend a long
chat with Symantec techincal types too- I haven't used the VM or version
6.6, but at least on the older versions the installs are not for the faint
of heart.

Tom
--- On Fri, 11/20/09, Klebba, Don  wrote:

> From: Klebba, Don 
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Customers
> To: "veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu"

> Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 7:47 AM
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> I was wondering if anyone is using
> Pure Disk and in what
> capacity. We have some systems that have millions of small
> files, and 
> 
> Thought that maybe backing these
> servers up using Pure Disk
> what help solve some of our time window issues. 
> 
>    
> 
> Thanks 
> 
>    
> 
> Don
> Klebba
> 
> Quicken Loans
> 
> Storage Management Team
> 
> donkle...@quickenloans.com
> 
> 
> phone:
> (734)805-7791 
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -Inline Attachment Follows-
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 


  
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Customers

2009-11-20 Thread Tom Burrell

We're using it to backup about 35 remote servers, some of which have the 
"millions of small files" issue in spades.

Short answer: it may not solve your backup window problem- or it might.

Things to keep in mind: you are limited in terms of the number of PO's per job. 
 Each file/folder is a PO, so you'll probably need some hefty include/exclude 
lists to make sure you are below the limit (varies by version- check the manual 
for your version).

A lot of your performance with PD is based on the client. I have a 1.25 TB 
client that does 6 million + files per night. Takes 8-10 hours over a 1 GB LAN 
link to a local PD sever, even with only 8GB of changes.  This is an older 
server with a 3ghz Xeon processor and 4 GB RAM.  Disk controller is an HP 
SA6400 with 192 Mb set to 50/50 R/W.  A more powerful client would definitely 
improve your performance.

If you want to play around with it, you can download a pre-packaged VM with a 
built-in trial key to see if it works for you.  I highly recommend a long chat 
with Symantec techincal types too- I haven't used the VM or version 6.6, but at 
least on the older versions the installs are not for the faint of heart.

Tom
--- On Fri, 11/20/09, Klebba, Don  wrote:

> From: Klebba, Don 
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk Customers
> To: "veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu" 
> Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 7:47 AM
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> I was wondering if anyone is using
> Pure Disk and in what
> capacity. We have some systems that have millions of small
> files, and 
> 
> Thought that maybe backing these
> servers up using Pure Disk
> what help solve some of our time window issues. 
> 
>    
> 
> Thanks 
> 
>    
> 
> Don
> Klebba
> 
> Quicken Loans
> 
> Storage Management Team
> 
> donkle...@quickenloans.com
> 
> 
> phone:
> (734)805-7791 
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -Inline Attachment Follows-
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 


  
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] PureDisk Customers

2009-11-20 Thread Klebba, Don
I was wondering if anyone is using Pure Disk and in what capacity. We have some 
systems that have millions of small files, and
Thought that maybe backing these servers up using Pure Disk what help solve 
some of our time window issues.

Thanks

Don Klebba
Quicken Loans
Storage Management Team
donkle...@quickenloans.com
phone: (734)805-7791

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu