Dear all,
It is noticed when I am doing backup via NFS I am getting below messages.
Where it hangs the backups for a short while.
Any Idea how to fix this.
log file from /bpbkar
05:40:25.146 [23204] 4 bpbkar
PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTL-EPO/CTL-EPO-2010-12-02--1/CTLEPO1-flat.vmdk
05:40:25.230 [23204] 4 bpbkar
PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTL-EPO/CTL-EPO-2010-12-02--1/CTLEPO1.vmdk
05:40:25.237 [23204] 4 bpbkar
PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTL-EPO/CTL-EPO-2010-12-02--1/CTLEPO1.vmx
05:40:25.237 [23204] 4 bpbkar PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTLCVS1/
05:40:25.263 [23204] 4 bpbkar
PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTLCVS1/CTLCVS1-2010-12-02--1/
05:40:25.263 [23204] 2 bpbkar process_file: INF
- /vcb_bkup/CTLCVS1/CTLCVS1-2010-12-02--1/CTLCVS1-flat.vmdk is sparse:
stat.st_size = 10758666240, stat.st_blocks * 512 = 10731413504
05:51:17.039 [23204] 2 bpbkar process_file: INF
- /vcb_bkup/CTLCVS1/CTLCVS1-2010-12-02--1/CTLCVS1-flat.vmdk is now size
9914671872
06:04:41.236 [23204] 4 bpbkar
PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTLCVS1/CTLCVS1-2010-12-02--1/CTLCVS1-flat.vmdk
06:04:41.329 [23204] 4 bpbkar
PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTLCVS1/CTLCVS1-2010-12-02--1/CTLCVS1.vmdk
06:04:41.330 [23204] 4 bpbkar
PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTLCVS1/CTLCVS1-2010-12-02--1/CTLCVS1.vmx
06:04:41.330 [23204] 4 bpbkar PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTLDB2/
06:04:41.369 [23204] 4 bpbkar
PrintFile: /vcb_bkup/CTLDB2/CTLDB2-2010-12-02--1/
06:04:41.371 [23204] 2 bpbkar process_file: INF
- /vcb_bkup/CTLDB2/CTLDB2-2010-12-02--1/CTLDB2-flat.vmdk is sparse:
stat.st_size = 10751490048, stat.st_blocks * 512 = 10743996416
06:12:42.464 [23204] 2 bpbkar process_file: INF
- /vcb_bkup/CTLDB2/CTLDB2-2010-12-02--1/CTLDB2-flat.vmdk is now size
10565035520
With Warm Regards
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harpreet Singh Chana
Phone : (O) 6895 - 4326
Fax : (O) 6895 - 4991
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
Notice
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution of the message, or
any action taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please delete it
and contact the sender immediately. Thank you.
WEAVER, Simon
(external)
simon.wea...@ast To
rium.eads.netEd Wilts ewi...@ewilts.org,
Sent by: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
veritas-bu-bounce cc
s...@mailman.eng.aub
urn.edu Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] New netbackup
master server spec
11/30/2010 02:24
PM
with Ed here - G7 are super machines, and strongly and highly recommended
for Windows !
Simon
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [
mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 3:59 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] New netbackup master server spec
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:37 AM, xgtdec netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com
wrote:
64 Gig, would you think thats a minimum, if you could afford more would
nbu 7.0 use it? Any other general Spec considerations you would take?
There are a lot of it depends here.
It depends on how many jobs you're scheduling and how frequently. It
depends on whether you're a media server as well as a master server. It
depends on whether you're doing de-dupe. It depends on how many restores
you're doing and how big those restores are.
Since you have a pair of master servers now, you're in good shape to know
what your expected load should look like. Take the requirements for both
servers, add them up, figure out how much you're currently behind the
curve, and add your expected growth.
You can pick up a nice DL580 G7 - the performance model comes
pre-configured with 4 8-core processors and 64GB of RAM. We're getting one
with Linux to replace our aging Solaris-based server but there's no
