Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-07 Thread Paul Keating


-- 

> -Original Message-> From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 
> December 6, 2006 7:24 PM> To: Paul Keating> Cc: 
> Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in 
> solaris...> > So how many master and media licenses do you need?  Double > 
> the expected > number or does NetBackup get it right?  
1 per server.If you have three instances running on 3 physical servers, you 
needthree licenses.All you're really messing with is the networking routing.No 
different than giving a media server multiple connections on severalVLANs

> Do the tapes get assigned to > media-A-bge0 and media-A-bge1 or just media-A?
Just to media-ANetbackup doesn't really know much about the interfaces at 
theapplication/DB level, except when it's doing the compare for theservernames 
listed in the b.pconf
> > Do you have Aptare StorageConsole?  How many licenses does it need in > 
> > this configuration?
Yep. One per media server, same as if you have only one IP/NIC per mediaserver.
Paul
La version française suit le texte anglais.

This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank 
ofCanada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying 
of thisemail or the information it contains by other than the intended 
recipient isunauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it 
immediately fromyour system and notify the sender promptly by email that you 
have done so. 

Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
confidentielle.La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y 
rapportent. Toute diffusion,utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par unepersonne autre que le ou les destinataires 
désignés est interdite. Si vous recevezce courriel par erreur, veuillez le 
supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai àl'expéditeur un message 
électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votreordinateur toute copie 
du courriel reçu.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-06 Thread Ed Wilts
On 12/5/2006 3:19 PM, Paul Keating wrote:

[major snipping of the config setup]

> SERVER= master-ce0
> SERVER= master-ce1
> SERVER= media-A-bge0
> SERVER= media-A-bge1
> SERVER= media-B-bge0
> SERVER= media-B-bge1
> SERVER= media-C-bge0
> SERVER= media-C-bge1
>  
> The bp.conf needs the actual interface names of the servers listed, not 
> the "netbackup" names..
> for each server, there is a DNS alias for the netbackup hostname, ie, 
> master, media-A, media-B, etc, that points to the ce0 or bge0 interface 
> for the respective server.

So how many master and media licenses do you need?  Double the expected 
number or does NetBackup get it right?  Do the tapes get assigned to 
media-A-bge0 and media-A-bge1 or just media-A?

Do you have Aptare StorageConsole?  How many licenses does it need in 
this configuration?

Thanks,
.../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-05 Thread Paul Keating
I'm backing up dozens of clients over 2 GigE interfaces per media server.
I've got a V880, with 2x GigaSwift GigE cards, and several V240s with the built 
in bge quad cards.
 
On my V880 Master, I have the following:
 
hostname: master
Netbackup is installed with "master" specified for the hostname.
/etc/nodename = master
 
interface ce0 = 192.168.1.1 = master-ce0
interface ce1 = 192.168.1.3 = master-ce1
 
/etc/hostname.ce0
192.168.1.1 netmask + broadcast + group multiIP up addif 192.168.1.2 deprecated 
-failover netmask + broadcast + up
/etc/hostname.ce1
192.168.1.3 netmask + broadcast + group multiIP up addif 192.168.1.4 deprecated 
-failover netmask + broadcast + up
 
On my V240s, I have the following:
 
hostname: media-A
Netbackup is installed with "media-A" specified for the hostname.
/etc/nodename = media_A
 
interface bge0 = 192.168.1.5 = media-A-bge0
interface bge1 = 192.168.1.7 = media-A-bge1
 
/etc/hostname.bge0
192.168.1.5 netmask + broadcast + group multiIP up addif 192.168.1.6 deprecated 
-failover netmask + broadcast + up
/etc/hostname.bge1
192.168.1.7 netmask + broadcast + group multiIP up addif 192.168.1.8 deprecated 
-failover netmask + broadcast + up
 
and so on, with media-B using the next 4 IPs, etc.
 
the bp.conf of each client has the following:
 
SERVER= master-ce0
SERVER= master-ce1
SERVER= media-A-bge0
SERVER= media-A-bge1
SERVER= media-B-bge0
SERVER= media-B-bge1
SERVER= media-C-bge0
SERVER= media-C-bge1
 
The bp.conf needs the actual interface names of the servers listed, not the 
"netbackup" names..
for each server, there is a DNS alias for the netbackup hostname, ie, master, 
media-A, media-B, etc, that points to the ce0 or bge0 interface for the 
respective server.
 
I'm thinking about giving both public IPs the same "name" in a DNS hunt pool to 
see if that works...when time allows.
 
each server can backup multiple clients and they will loadbalance almost 50:50 
over the interfaces, and in the case of a link failure, the failed link will 
"failover"as a virtual interface on the remaining working interface...so you 
can move a server to a different network switch, or anything at all with no 
outage, by moving the physical connections one at a time...if you notice 
above, there are IPs ending in even and odd numbers..for two interfaces, 
you will need 4 IPs as you need the virtual IPs (in BLUE above) internal to the 
system to monitor the link states.these IPs will never be seen from outside 
of the respective boxes.we just use this even digit "public" and odd digit 
"internal/virtual" paradigm as it's easy to keep trackthe "internal" IPs do 
not need to be in DNS or host files or anything at all, however, IIRC, they 
must be in the same subnet as the public interfacesI THINK.I never had 
any reason to try it any other way, so I've left it as is.
 
 
if I can help anymore, let me know.
 
Paul
 
 
-- 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: December 5, 2006 3:56 PM
To: Paul Keating
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...



Paul, 

It sounds like you are backing up multiple clients (each has one 
interface) to a single server with two nics. 

Can you give a bit more detail on bp.conf config on the client and the 
server? 

I'm thinking i can do this with my fibre card and the bge interface on 
my v240. 

Karl 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/05/2006 12:23:33 PM:

> Sorta true, Darren.
> 
> However, since in an NBU env, the master initiates the backup, and 
> theclient replies to the interface from which the backup was 
> initiated, youget very good load balancing.
> Ie, the master server starts the backup via interface-A, the client 
> seesthe backup request from interface-A, and then starts 
> transmitting backupdata backup to interface-A.
> I'm getting almost exactly 50:50 loadbalancing of incoming data on 
> apair of GigE NICs.
> You will need to have the "interface name" of both NICs in the 
> clients'bp.conf files.
> However, I'm troubleshooting an issue with hot DB backups that I 
> thinkmight be related to ambiguity between the interface names and 
> thehostname.although I think I may be able to resolve it with a 
> DNShunt pool.If that doesn't work, then I'll probably have to go 
> withEtherChannel/Suntrunking for the master, though I'll probably 
> leave themedia servers as they are.
> Paul
   

Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-05 Thread Karl . Rossing
Paul,

It sounds like you are backing up multiple clients (each has one 
interface) to a single server with two nics.

Can you give a bit more detail on bp.conf config on the client and the 
server?

I'm thinking i can do this with my fibre card and the bge interface on my 
v240.

Karl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/05/2006 12:23:33 PM:

> Sorta true, Darren.
> 
> However, since in an NBU env, the master initiates the backup, and 
> theclient replies to the interface from which the backup was 
> initiated, youget very good load balancing.
> Ie, the master server starts the backup via interface-A, the client 
> seesthe backup request from interface-A, and then starts 
> transmitting backupdata backup to interface-A.
> I'm getting almost exactly 50:50 loadbalancing of incoming data on 
> apair of GigE NICs.
> You will need to have the "interface name" of both NICs in the 
> clients'bp.conf files.
> However, I'm troubleshooting an issue with hot DB backups that I 
> thinkmight be related to ambiguity between the interface names and 
> thehostname.although I think I may be able to resolve it with a 
> DNShunt pool.If that doesn't work, then I'll probably have to go 
> withEtherChannel/Suntrunking for the master, though I'll probably 
> leave themedia servers as they are.
> Paul
> -- 
> 
> > -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> auburn.edu > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf > Of Darren Dunham> Sent: December 1, 2006 11:02 AM> To: 
> Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 
> Trunking in solaris...> > All versions of Solaris support IPMP in 
> software.  This > allows for a bit> of outbound load sharing, but 
> isn't really appropriate for load> balancing incoming data (as you 
> might want on a netbackup server).  It> does provide you with 
> failover though, and you can balance > the incoming> traffic 
> manually.  If all you need is failover, then it may be> sufficient.>
> > > IP Mulitpathing (IPMP) and Link Aggregation configuration 
> > details should> be in the administrators guide for the version of 
> Solaris you have (if> supported). > 
> 

> La version française suit le texte anglais.
> 

> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, 
> and the Bank ofCanada does not waive any related rights. Any 
> distribution, use, or copying of thisemail or the information it 
> contains by other than the intended recipient isunauthorized. If you
> received this email in error please delete it immediately fromyour 
> system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. 
> 

> Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
> confidentielle.La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y
> rapportent. Toute diffusion,utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou 
> des renseignements qu'il contient par unepersonne autre que le ou 
> les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevezce courriel
> par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans 
> délai àl'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous 
> avez éliminé de votreordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-05 Thread Darren Dunham
> Ie, the master server starts the backup via interface-A, the client sees
> the backup request from interface-A, and then starts transmitting backup
> data backup to interface-A.
> 
> I'm getting almost exactly 50:50 loadbalancing of incoming data on a
> pair of GigE NICs.

Fantastic.  I'm letting through some of my greater familiarity with
networker, where I would oftentimes have to explicitly provide the
server interface in the configuration.  So there is no ability to
autobalance in that situation.

-- 
Darren Dunham   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay area
 < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-05 Thread Paul Keating
Sorta true, Darren.

However, since in an NBU env, the master initiates the backup, and theclient 
replies to the interface from which the backup was initiated, youget very good 
load balancing.
Ie, the master server starts the backup via interface-A, the client seesthe 
backup request from interface-A, and then starts transmitting backupdata backup 
to interface-A.
I'm getting almost exactly 50:50 loadbalancing of incoming data on apair of 
GigE NICs.
You will need to have the "interface name" of both NICs in the clients'bp.conf 
files.
However, I'm troubleshooting an issue with hot DB backups that I thinkmight be 
related to ambiguity between the interface names and thehostname.although I 
think I may be able to resolve it with a DNShunt pool.If that doesn't work, 
then I'll probably have to go withEtherChannel/Suntrunking for the master, 
though I'll probably leave themedia servers as they are.
Paul
-- 

> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Darren Dunham> Sent: December 1, 2006 11:02 AM> To: 
> Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in 
> solaris...> > All versions of Solaris support IPMP in software.  This > 
> allows for a bit> of outbound load sharing, but isn't really appropriate for 
> load> balancing incoming data (as you might want on a netbackup server).  It> 
> does provide you with failover though, and you can balance > the incoming> 
> traffic manually.  If all you need is failover, then it may be> sufficient.> 
> > > IP Mulitpathing (IPMP) and Link Aggregation configuration > details 
> should> be in the administrators guide for the version of Solaris you have 
> (if> supported). > 
> 
La version française suit le texte anglais.

This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank 
ofCanada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying 
of thisemail or the information it contains by other than the intended 
recipient isunauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it 
immediately fromyour system and notify the sender promptly by email that you 
have done so. 

Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
confidentielle.La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y 
rapportent. Toute diffusion,utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des 
renseignements qu'il contient par unepersonne autre que le ou les destinataires 
désignés est interdite. Si vous recevezce courriel par erreur, veuillez le 
supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai àl'expéditeur un message 
électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votreordinateur toute copie 
du courriel reçu.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-04 Thread Edson Noboru Yamada

By the way, we've tried to test SunTrunk using a 4-processors V480 with 8GB
RAM,
but without success. The CPU consumption easily reached to 100%
but with the network bandwidth lower than 1, 1.2 Gbps.

SUN support was simply patetic (and worse, very expensive).

So, the bottom line: it's not any hardware configuration that actually
supports
trunking.

HTH



On 12/1/06, Hampus Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


 Hi all,



I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it's possible to
trunk/team several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it?



Thanks and regards,



Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-04 Thread Darren Dunham
> whoops... I guess i got confused with my v240's bge's that aren't=20
> supported.

Yeah, the bges are an odd beast that is not supported by Sun Trunking,
and VLAN support depends on the OS (not on 8, okay on 9 and up, I
think).  However it is a GLDv3 driver, so you should be able to use
link_aggregation directly under Solaris 10.

http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-4554/6maoq01nk?a=view 

-- 
Darren Dunham   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay area
 < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-04 Thread Karl . Rossing
whoops... I guess i got confused with my v240's bge's that aren't 
supported.

thanks for the clarification.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/04/2006 11:32:46 AM:

> that is not true, I think you can trunk ce interfaces too... I did 
> it on E4500 
> that had two ce0 and ce1 interfaces and they were 1000MBit
> 
> Chris
> 
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Last i checked, you can only trunk 10/100 ports together.
> >
> > GB ports are not supported. That makes sense since the server's I/O 
would
> > be severally bogged down.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/01/2006 11:57:00 
AM:
> >
> >> Thanks all...
> >>
> >> Hampus Lind
> >> Rikspolisstyrelsen
> >> National Police Board
> >> Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
> >> Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
> >> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> >> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Darren Dunham
> >> Skickat: den 1 december 2006 17:02
> >> Till: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> >> Ämne: Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...
> >>
> >>> I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it's possible to =
> >>> trunk/team
> >>> several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it?=20
> >>
> >> All versions of Solaris support IPMP in software.  This allows for a 
bit
> >> of outbound load sharing, but isn't really appropriate for load
> >> balancing incoming data (as you might want on a netbackup server). It
> >> does provide you with failover though, and you can balance the 
incoming
> >> traffic manually.  If all you need is failover, then it may be
> >> sufficient.
> >>
> >> SunTrunking is an extra application that you can run on Solaris.  It
> >> only supports certain hardware in certain combinations.  It's a cost
> >> purchase for versions prior to Solaris 10.
> >>
> >> Solaris 10 can use SunTrunking as well, but also allows for link
> >> aggregation of any networking hardware that uses gld3 drivers.  This 
is
> >> built into Solaris and doesn't require extra software.
> >>
> >> IP Mulitpathing (IPMP) and Link Aggregation configuration details 
should
> >> be in the administrators guide for the version of Solaris you have 
(if
> >> supported).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/
> >> Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay 
area
> >>  < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
> >> ___
> >> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> >> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> >> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > !DSPAM:122,4574524a253872050917973!
> >___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-04 Thread Krzys
that is not true, I think you can trunk ce interfaces too... I did it on E4500 
that had two ce0 and ce1 interfaces and they were 1000MBit


Chris

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Last i checked, you can only trunk 10/100 ports together.

GB ports are not supported. That makes sense since the server's I/O would
be severally bogged down.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/01/2006 11:57:00 AM:


Thanks all...

Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Fr?n: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] F?r Darren Dunham
Skickat: den 1 december 2006 17:02
Till: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
?mne: Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...


I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it's possible to =
trunk/team
several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it?=20


All versions of Solaris support IPMP in software.  This allows for a bit
of outbound load sharing, but isn't really appropriate for load
balancing incoming data (as you might want on a netbackup server).  It
does provide you with failover though, and you can balance the incoming
traffic manually.  If all you need is failover, then it may be
sufficient.

SunTrunking is an extra application that you can run on Solaris.  It
only supports certain hardware in certain combinations.  It's a cost
purchase for versions prior to Solaris 10.

Solaris 10 can use SunTrunking as well, but also allows for link
aggregation of any networking hardware that uses gld3 drivers.  This is
built into Solaris and doesn't require extra software.

IP Mulitpathing (IPMP) and Link Aggregation configuration details should
be in the administrators guide for the version of Solaris you have (if
supported).

--
Darren Dunham   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay area
 < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu





!DSPAM:122,4574524a253872050917973!
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-04 Thread Steven L. Sesar

GiGE trunking is absolutely supported with Solaris. The OP can start here:

http://www.sun.com/products/networking/ethernet/gigaswift/index.xml

--Steve

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Last i checked, you can only trunk 10/100 ports together.

GB ports are not supported. That makes sense since the server's I/O 
would be severally bogged down.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/01/2006 11:57:00 AM:

> Thanks all...
>
> Hampus Lind
> Rikspolisstyrelsen
> National Police Board
> Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
> Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Darren Dunham
> Skickat: den 1 december 2006 17:02
> Till: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Ämne: Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...
>
> > I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it's possible to =
> > trunk/team
> > several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it?=20
>
> All versions of Solaris support IPMP in software.  This allows for a bit
> of outbound load sharing, but isn't really appropriate for load
> balancing incoming data (as you might want on a netbackup server).  It
> does provide you with failover though, and you can balance the incoming
> traffic manually.  If all you need is failover, then it may be
> sufficient.
>
> SunTrunking is an extra application that you can run on Solaris.  It
> only supports certain hardware in certain combinations.  It's a cost
> purchase for versions prior to Solaris 10.
>
> Solaris 10 can use SunTrunking as well, but also allows for link
> aggregation of any networking hardware that uses gld3 drivers.  This is
> built into Solaris and doesn't require extra software.
>
> IP Mulitpathing (IPMP) and Link Aggregation configuration details should
> be in the administrators guide for the version of Solaris you have (if
> supported).
>
> --
> Darren Dunham   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
> Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay area
>  < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
>


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
  



--
===

  Steven L. Sesar
  Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst
  UNIX Application Services R101
  The MITRE Corporation
  202 Burlington Road - MS K101
  Bedford, MA 01730
  tel: (781) 271-7702
  fax: (781) 271-2600
  mobile: (617) 519-8933
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

=== 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-04 Thread Karl . Rossing
Last i checked, you can only trunk 10/100 ports together.

GB ports are not supported. That makes sense since the server's I/O would 
be severally bogged down.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/01/2006 11:57:00 AM:

> Thanks all...
> 
> Hampus Lind
> Rikspolisstyrelsen
> National Police Board
> Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
> Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Darren Dunham
> Skickat: den 1 december 2006 17:02
> Till: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Ämne: Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...
> 
> > I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it's possible to =
> > trunk/team
> > several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it?=20
> 
> All versions of Solaris support IPMP in software.  This allows for a bit
> of outbound load sharing, but isn't really appropriate for load
> balancing incoming data (as you might want on a netbackup server).  It
> does provide you with failover though, and you can balance the incoming
> traffic manually.  If all you need is failover, then it may be
> sufficient.
> 
> SunTrunking is an extra application that you can run on Solaris.  It
> only supports certain hardware in certain combinations.  It's a cost
> purchase for versions prior to Solaris 10.
> 
> Solaris 10 can use SunTrunking as well, but also allows for link
> aggregation of any networking hardware that uses gld3 drivers.  This is
> built into Solaris and doesn't require extra software.
> 
> IP Mulitpathing (IPMP) and Link Aggregation configuration details should
> be in the administrators guide for the version of Solaris you have (if
> supported). 
> 
> -- 
> Darren Dunham   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
> Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay area
>  < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 
> 
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-01 Thread Hampus Lind
Thanks all...

Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Darren Dunham
Skickat: den 1 december 2006 17:02
Till: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Ämne: Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

> I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it's possible to =
> trunk/team
> several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it?=20

All versions of Solaris support IPMP in software.  This allows for a bit
of outbound load sharing, but isn't really appropriate for load
balancing incoming data (as you might want on a netbackup server).  It
does provide you with failover though, and you can balance the incoming
traffic manually.  If all you need is failover, then it may be
sufficient.

SunTrunking is an extra application that you can run on Solaris.  It
only supports certain hardware in certain combinations.  It's a cost
purchase for versions prior to Solaris 10.

Solaris 10 can use SunTrunking as well, but also allows for link
aggregation of any networking hardware that uses gld3 drivers.  This is
built into Solaris and doesn't require extra software.

IP Mulitpathing (IPMP) and Link Aggregation configuration details should
be in the administrators guide for the version of Solaris you have (if
supported). 

-- 
Darren Dunham   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay area
 < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-01 Thread Darren Dunham
> I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it's possible to =
> trunk/team
> several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it?=20

All versions of Solaris support IPMP in software.  This allows for a bit
of outbound load sharing, but isn't really appropriate for load
balancing incoming data (as you might want on a netbackup server).  It
does provide you with failover though, and you can balance the incoming
traffic manually.  If all you need is failover, then it may be
sufficient.

SunTrunking is an extra application that you can run on Solaris.  It
only supports certain hardware in certain combinations.  It's a cost
purchase for versions prior to Solaris 10.

Solaris 10 can use SunTrunking as well, but also allows for link
aggregation of any networking hardware that uses gld3 drivers.  This is
built into Solaris and doesn't require extra software.

IP Mulitpathing (IPMP) and Link Aggregation configuration details should
be in the administrators guide for the version of Solaris you have (if
supported). 

-- 
Darren Dunham   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOShttp://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?   San Francisco, CA bay area
 < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-01 Thread Mike L. Varney
Sun has a software package to do this.  It's "Sun Trunking 1.3", and you 
can see it at http://www.sun.com/products/networking/ethernet/suntrunking 
...

It is free for Solaris 10 (SPARC & x86), and costs $995 for Solaris 8 & 9.

-- Mike Varney / HRI




"Hampus Lind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/01/2006 05:18 AM

To

cc

Subject
[Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...






Hi all,
 
I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it’s possible to 
trunk/team several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it? 
 
Thanks and regards,
 
Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

2006-12-01 Thread Hampus Lind
Hi all,

 

I`am new to solaris and wonder if anyone know if it's possible to trunk/team
several network cards under solaris? If so, how do you do it? 

 

Thanks and regards,

 

Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu